Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland's Refugee Policy cont. Please read OP before posting

13637394142142

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    He should pass that info onto Aontu or some of the other right of centre politicians. The place is a joke now. They're getting far too much and we're only encouraging them to come in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    So now people fleeing an actual country at war shouldn't be allowed in?

    Why not just go all in and push for a ban all foreigners? After all, they are taking up housing, housing and health resources.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,706 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Hundreds of unknown people, in.fact thousands of unknown people enter our country every day, why is.it only an issue with respect to.asylum seekers?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,706 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    But why detain them to do that? As it is They are (mostly) in IPAs centres, we know where they are. You cannot detain people indefinitely without trial. It is not allowed, and the minute it happens a Habeas Corpus case would be taken and the detainees released immediately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,061 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Can it be all that hard to put a joined up system in place to address the issue of spoofers that arrive without passports and illegals with a deportation order against them?

    You have the Thornton Hall site, which was intended for a new prison, make it one, put in the infrastructure necessary and it doesn't need to be fancy, just portacabins by the hundreds and run a sturdy, barb wire topped fence around the site.


    If you arrive in this country without documents, you have broken the law, to a cabin in Thornton hall you go for detention until trial, appoint a judge to travel to a courthouse on site (also in a portacabin if necessary) to hear cases daily. When convicted of illegally entering the state you can remain there to serve your sentence, I'd recommend a law change to make illegal entry and failure to leave the state a mandatory 6 month sentence.
    If you wish to apply for asylum while serving your time you can, but we really need to get processing of asylum applicationa down to under 6 months. I’d suggest putting the necessary resources in place to do so. The law needs to be changed to limit the number of appeals that can be taken, that would do a lot to cut down waiting times. none of this leave to remain bollix, that needs to be banned, you either get accepted or you leave, no third options.

    Do that and watch the numbers arriving with no passport plummet to exactly zero.

    Are you subject to a deportation order? When that order is issued immigration officers with powers of arrest should be dispatched to take you into custody and off to the Thornton Hall detention centre you go as soon as the order is issued where you will be held until your deportation. If it has been judged that you are illegally in the state, then you should absolutely have zero right to roam free about it. Certiantly any entitlements to housing, social welfare etc should be cancelled upon refusal, you're not a citizen, you're not an asylum seeker, you are entitled to nothing.

    If you agree to go quietly when deportation is ordered, the deportee will be escorted by immigration staff to their plane, for those that try to frustrate that process or act up, buy a couple of ‘con air’ planes to conduct forceful deportations of those that refuse to co-operate.

    Do that and watch asylum figures drop from the thousands to the hundreds, and those hundreds will be arriving with their passports in hand.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    You seem to be basing your plans on the assumption that people will simply leave.

    Before their boat push back policy Australia tried something similar. Approx 4,000 people were detained. Less than 1,000 either left voluntary or could be deported.

    Many stayed in detention centers for years before being allowed remain in Australia or resettled, at great expense, in third countries.

    The total cost was around 12 billion.

    https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/operation-sovereign-borders-offshore-detention-statistics/7/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    (5) whether or not the Albanian Govt co-operate, put the 150 people off the aircraft

    It's admittedly a pretty small sample size, but I think the amount of thanks for this post gives a decent indication of how in touch with reality our anti-immigration friends are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I find it funny that when the anti-immigration brigade want to scaremonger about Islam they'll tell us how we need to protect our Christian, democratic values.

    When they're scaremongering about IPAs they want to lock people up, deport them without trial, take away medical care, leave them homeless, etc etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,117 ✭✭✭Gen.Zhukov


    It's clear that none of those people claimed asylum, if they did they would have entered the country.

    Why is it 'clear' these people didn't claim asylum? Nothing in the article makes that clear at all - Were you there? What were they doing here? Were they just mooching about having a look at out fields or what?

    Another very poor defence of FG there suvi and of an article aimed at kidding the people of Ireland that FG had control of the situation -

    Must try harder

    "Gardaí said….' this and 'Gardaí said…' that - Nobody in AGS prepared to put their name to the claims in the article cynically released on a Sunday, like the recent 'McEntee signs deportation orders' released on a holiday Monday

    Pure pre-election spin by the FG strat comms unit with lots more to come

    To reiterate: there is nothing in that article that makes it 'clear' that the 50 lads were not claiming asylum - in fact, it was purposely sketchy on details. We may well have to wait til we're a little bit closer to GE day before we get another similar report with unnamed Garda sources making wild claims that will also go unchallenged by other media outlets



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 611 ✭✭✭DaithiMa


    I find it amazing how you could extrapolate from my post that people fleeing a war shouldn't be allowed in, or even better that I want a ban on all foreigners. Some leap required there.

    My problem is with the complete and total lack of a plan, the huge wastage of money, the destruction of tourism while still enriching hoteliers in many areas around the country and the fact that O'Gorman has shown a willingness to totally disregard planning laws.

    Would you be happy for 1000 refugees to be housed in tents in a field in the middle of nowhere with no sewage, no wastewater treatment and no paths on the surrounding roads, as O'Gorman wanted to do in Thornton Hall? Or do you think building temporary homes that may or may not last 20 years at 440k a pop is a sustainable plan?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,706 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    If they claimed asylum, they would have been allowed to enter. That is the law. There is no ambiguity about it. Thousands are refused leave to enter/land in the country every year. A certain percentage of those will then claim asylum and must be allowed enter. It has been linked here plenty of times.

    Nobody in AGS 'puts their name to ' anything. Everything that is released is released through the press office. It is against the law for individual Gardai to leak information to the press(or anyone)

    It appears you are looking for conspiracies where none exist.

    & Just fyi, I couldn't care less about FG, wouldn't give them a vote if they were the only party standing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭halkar


    People fleeing war will usually go to neighbouring countries like millions of Syrian refugees in Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey. Many coming here are from countries where there is no war. Take a look at the list in maebee's post. Which of those countries in war? IMO they should be deported immediately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,090 ✭✭✭gw80


    Economic migrants will leave, if they are not getting what they want here,genuine refugees will not,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭TokTik


    1. Detain them and bring them to the airport. Give them a voucher for a flight out of Ireland.
    2. Deny them ANY access to housing, education, welfare, health, anything.
    3. Built large detention centres that are within human rights laws and place any illegals found to have not left the country here. Feed them the very basic calories, protein etc, no mobile phones, nothing above the very basics etc needed until they decide to move home.
    4. Cut all diplomatic ties with any country that will not accept their countrymen/women back. No aid, no trade, no tourist visas, no business visas, no working visas.

    Easily done if the will was there and would see numbers coming drop within months



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭TokTik


    So hold on, on one hand these people have to use fake ids because the despots in their origin countries don’t want them to leave.

    BUT, their countries won’t take back these people who they didn’t want to leave in the first place back when we try to repatriate them.

    Thats some circle to square



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    So what is your alternative solution then? You never posted one.

    There's no war in Ukraine? Think you might want to brush up on your current affairs knowledge tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭halkar


    Mod Edit: Warning issued for ignoring mod instruction - no anecdotes

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 611 ✭✭✭DaithiMa


    Pointing out that O'Gorman's department has spent 440k per modular unit is not the same as saying 'keep all foreigners out' as you insinuated (I'm not surprised you tried to paint me as a racist but I think most fair minded people can see my post had absolute zero racism in it).

    I've never claimed to have a solution. It's not my job. I'm just outlining the eye watering sums of money involved in going down Roderic's route and pointing out the blatant disregard he seems to have for planning laws and the environmental impact of his 'fill fields in the middle of nowhere with refugees' strategy, despite him being a member of the green party!

    I'm sure a competent person could come up with a much more cost effective and sustainable plan than the one he has pursued and continues to pursue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    Then why did you quote my post? Also, people fleeing war to go to countries closer to them. Hence the reason most refugees are in countries close to Ukraine.

    Accommodation is expensive in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭halkar


    I quoted your "So now people fleeing an actual country at war shouldn't be allowed in?"

    Yes people flee wars, there are many wars and conflicts around the world now. Did we open our doors unconditionally to Syrians, Palestinians, Libyans, Afghans, refugees of African and Asian conflicts etc. etc. ? Are they not human? What's so special about Ukrainian war? We get labeled racist, fascist, extreme right and what not but biggest bunch of racists are in government and European Parliament. I rather see injured Palestinian kids brought to country for treatment than see rich Ukrainians going around in expensive cars that I can't afford and running on the electricity or fuel that I am paying for. I rather see our homeless to get 400k houses. Government is not even giving them tents never mind houses.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,246 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    The government probably think they are getting value for money when 336 k was spent on a bike shed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,284 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Mod Edit: Warned for link dumping an article from 2003!!

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,706 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Interesting... So you're telling us that of that group of people who arrived by boat to Australia, more than 75% were 'genuine refugees'.

    I'm not aware of any wars in the region at that time, and I believe many would have travelled through, or past, several other 'safe' countries on their journey.

    If true it would certainly put paid to several of the oft repeated lies about IPAs we hear on the thread.

    Post edited by MegamanBoo on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Interesting article there from 2003 citing anonymous sources within Michael McDowell's department.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    I absolutely agree. We should absolutely be accepting refugees from other war torn countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 561 ✭✭✭harryharry25


    Leo talked about it. What the **** did he do about it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,654 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    There's nothing like an unsubstantiated anecdote to convince people on this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Not quite what she said in the podcast, that text appears to be from gript.ru.

    I don't think anybody is claiming that all IPAs meet the criteria. The problem seems to be those claiming the opposite, that all are 'bogus', and labelling all IPAs as such on that basis.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,284 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement