Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1164165167169170723

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,646 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    More than that, head of the Small Business Association during CFTrump's tenure. You can just imagine how much shenanigans she got up to.

    https://therevolvingdoorproject.org/we-need-to-talk-about-linda-mcmahon/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Maybe if you are stoned and watched and listened to the Joe Rogan Experience with Trump it might actually make some coherent sense otherwise there is nothing normal at all listening to that podcast.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    TRUMP: That election was so crooked, it was the most crooked election.

    ROGAN: Ok, but give me some examples of how.

    TRUMP: Well, let’s start, let’s start at the top and the easy ones. They were supposed to get legislative approval to do the things they did, and they didn’t get it in many cases, They didn’t get it.

    ROGAN: What things?

    TRUMP: Anything.

    ROGAN: Legislative approval of?

    TRUMP: Like for extensions of the voting, for voting earlier. All this different things By law, they had to get legislative approvals. You don’t have to go any further than that. If you take a look at Wisconsin, they virtually admitted that the election was rigged, robbed, and stolen. They wouldn’t give access in certain areas to the ballots because the ballots weren’t signed. They weren’t originals. They were– we could go into this stuff. We could go into the ballots, or we could go into the overall. I’ll give you another way.

    ROGAN: Are you gonna present this ever?

    TRUMP: Uh.

    ROGAN: Do you think, like–

    And then he just went on and on about hunter biden's laptop and joe biden's brain surgery. He's still trapped in 2020 and thinks he's still racing against Joe Biden. This is the stuff he abandoned his rallygoers for to prattle on for hours about. Many of them gave up on him.

    He was set to speak at 7:30 PM. Then said he wouldn't touch down until "around" 10:00 PM.

    I don't think he wins Michigan anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Previously on this forum, I asked how Trump gets away with things Nixon wouldn't have gotten away with? In reply, I was told Trump's behaviour has become normalised - but how did US society change so much from what it was in the 1970s to let that normalisation take place?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    US society has changed because US people have changed. Most obviously, in 1970 nine out of ten Americans were European. Now its less than 6 in 10, and within a few more years they'll be a minority. They already are a minority for younger generations so its just waiting for the older generations to die off. Obviously when there is a massive change in people, the society will change too.

    That aside, the US is a victim of attack on the very concept of standards, authority or elites. About 20 years ago, a younger Fareed Zakaria wrote a book called "The Future of Freedom" where he talked about his fears about the direction of freedom in the US. Its a very long time since I read it but I do recall he described multiple examples of authorities in the US being torn down. Even extremely mundane things like the Book of the Month club, which was a US institution which had 5 high brow judges (academics, paper editors etc) who selected works of great literature which it then sent out to its subscribers to read. The judges were recognised as being an elite, with the authority to maintain a high standard. Part of the draw of the club was to raise standards for ordinary people. To challenge them to read what the elite told them to read to access a higher form of culture. That got washed away in the 1960s/1970s as it became increasingly under attack to be seen as elite, or to have standards that held great literature as better than what ordinary people wanted to read. I don't endorse it entirely, but its interesting - its clear that standards are far lower across the board today than in the past on even the most basic things, like even how people dress.

    Copy and paste across pretty much all of US society and you get what you get. And its not just a Trump thing. Or even a US thing really given the same cultural changes have spread across the western world. Lying is endemic to modern US culture, not because their more prone to it but because its impossible to hold anyone to a standard when standards by themselves are seen as oppressive by the society. Christ, some of the worst liars in US politics are the fact checkers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,975 ✭✭✭thomil


    @political analyst

    I have a feeling that diving into that topic in detail would provide enough material not only for multiple scientific papers but full blown PhD theses, but I’ll try my best to give you my take on this. Please note that I’m not an expert on that subject, so feel free to also take other posters into account.

    From my perspective, there are multiple strands that are coming together. For starters, the generally bipartisan nature of US politics has always lent itself to a more acrimonious political climate than we’d be used to over here in Europe. One just needs to look at the anger and hatred that confronted the civil rights movement or later the anti-Vietnam protests. More importantly though, the traditional heartland of the US went into an economic decline starting in the mid 1970s. That’s when what is now known as the Rust Belt began to form as US heavy industry began to suffer from cheaper imports from abroad, the US motor industry started to fall behind, and so on. This downward trend wasn’t limited to the industrial epicenters of the country though, but also hit the agricultural sector, with many small-town industries either closing completely or being consolidated into fewer larger plants.

    At the same time, the US was at an all-time low in the post-war era. Its international standing had taken a beating as a result of the Vietnam war, and the post-WW2 beliefs of many Americans, namely that they were the greatest democracy on Earth had been eroded away by the seemingly interminable political turmoil in the 1960s, from JFK to the Civil Rights movement, to RFK, MLK, Kent State and numerous similar events. Speaking of the civil rights movements, whilst first JFK and then later primarily Lyndon Johnson had pushed through the removal of Jim Crow laws and the desegregation of public life, many in the southern states only grudgingly accepted this, but were not happy with it at all, leading to a simmering feeling of resentment in many areas of the South. This was only exacerbated by the effects of the economic decline from the 1970s onwards.

    It was this resentment that conservative religious leaders and, after the election of Jimmy Carter, also the Republican leadership tapped into and started to feed, something which culminated in the election of Reagan. Conservative leaders also began to deliberately undermine their political opponents, beyond what had previously been seen as normal, the Iran hostage crisis being a good example of that. And while Reagan did manage to turn the US economy around, his trickle-down economics and deregulation did little to alleviate the situation in the Rust Belt or out on the Great Plains, so that resentment was still there. It was against this backdrop that what I consider to be one of the most disastrous moves of the Reagan administration took place: The abolition of the fairness doctrine. This piece of legislation had obliged broadcasters in the US to ensure that differing view points on any issue should be given fair and equal coverage. Whilst the conservative revival in the rural US would have gone on even without that decision, it was this move that would allow the at the time up and coming cable news stations to throw fairness to the wind and fully cater to their viewers bias. Whilst I don’t think that this was an issue at first, over times this would pave the way for the likes of Fox News or Newsmax today.

    Finally, this brings us to today. As with so many things, Donald Trump did not breed the type of supporter that he has today and that enables his, in my opinion truly vile and deplorable, actions and statements. Moreover, he is taken advantage of a generation of people who grew up in a highly divided country in the mid to late 1960s, had their world views shattered when they left school in the early to mid 1970s, were faced with significant economic struggles in the 1980s, and from the late 1980s and early 1990s onwards began to be fed an increasingly polarised stream of broadcast news, something only reinforced when satellite radio services such as Sirius or XM Radio came onto the market. At the same time, because they had been brought up on the message that the US was the best there is, an because they were often the children of what has been called “The Greatest Generation”, that is the one that fought WW2, they grew up not lacking in ego, so now that they’re retired, the feel, and act, like the world owes it to them to satisfy their every whim because of what they supposedly went through.

    This isn’t helped by the fact that education budges have been continuously slashed for decades, whilst conservative evangelical leaders have consistently tried to, and in many cases succeeded in removing or castrating many of the subjects that are essential for kids in a modern democracy from public school curricula: Civics, Science, Sex Ed, etc., to the point where some States have removed Evolution from their science textbooks in favour of Creationist teachings, school books especially in Republican dominated states have seen the likes of the Trail of Tears or the Civil War either removed or watered down by revisionist viewpoints, etc.. All of this creates the witches brew that has caused the likes of Donald Trump, Greg Abbott or Ron DeSantis to float to the top.

    I know that I’ve written a lot, but all of this is only scratching the very surface of all the different elements at play here. Also, I am not an unbiased source, so feel free to research any of the points I mentioned on your own to get a better understanding of the subject at hand.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,594 ✭✭✭valoren


    ...point made alluded to already and articulated better.

    Post edited by valoren on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,825 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    How many layers of makeup is Trump plastering on these days? He makes David Dickinson look like an albino…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    The whole point of Roger Ailes founding Fox News was 'so that what happened to Nixon can never happen to another Republican again.'

    Ailes was a Nixon's media strategist…

    At the beginning of Nixon’s second term in 1973, he told his chief of staff H.R. Haldeman that they needed to create “a new establishment.” This would first involve creating “our own news,” which would engage in “a brutal, vicious attack on the opposition.” The Nixon administration asked outside supporters to “buy a television network.” TV was perfect, according to an earlier White House memo titled “A Plan for Putting the GOP on TV News.” Why? Because “People are lazy. With television you just sit — watch — listen. The thinking is done for you.” Roger Ailes, then an outside adviser to the Nixon administration, responded that this concept was an “excellent idea” that “should be expanded.”

    Then there was the judiciary. Shortly before Nixon nominated corporate lawyer Lewis Powell to the Supreme Court in 1971, Powell promulgated a detailed manifesto explaining that “the judiciary may be the most important instrument for social, economic and political change” — one that for the corporate right was “a vast area of opportunity.” John Ehrlichman, another Nixon aide, later wrote in 1982 that the president had wanted to fill the court with “young justices who would sit and rule in [his] own image.”

    Over the next several decades, Nixon’s dream became a reality, led by Ailes and Simon. Ailes’s story is well known.

    Post-Nixon, Ailes soon became news director of “Television News Incorporated” with funding from ultra-conservative beer magnate Joseph Coors. He later worked for Reagan, and then founded Fox News with Rupert Murdoch.

    https://theintercept.com/2019/09/28/impeachment-republicans-nixon-watergate/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 571 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    How does he walk away from the defamation case v Carroll it has gone to appeal and thrown out, Judge said he was just repeating himself…..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭Kalyke


    His stock is down 22% today!! Tanking has begun??

    https://www.google.com/search?q=djt&rlz=1C1ONGR_enIE1085IE1085&oq=djt&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqEQgAEEUYJxg7GJ0CGIAEGIoFMhEIABBFGCcYOxidAhiABBiKBTIGCAEQRRg7Mg4IAhBFGCcYOxiABBiKBTINCAMQABiDARixAxiABDINCAQQABiDARixAxiABDINCAUQABiDARixAxiABDIHCAYQABiABDIHCAcQABiABDIHCAgQABiABDIHCAkQABiABNIBCDE4NjJqMGo0qAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,027 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    No, just a small dip today as it's gone from about $15 to $53 in the previous week



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭Sigma101


    Janey Godley passed away this morning. RIP Janey.

    It's an appropriate moment to reflect on her most accurate and succinct contribution to political discourse.

    1730546812818550862836444515968.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,042 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,825 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Are we allowed post in images what woud be unacceptable in words? I was never sure…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,865 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭I.R.Y.E.D


    Yep, she received rape and death threats over it and a rally she held before the 2016 election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,595 ✭✭✭francois


    Roll on Tuesday, I think there may be a surprise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,705 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    wrong thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭greenfield21


    That selzer poll out is really bad news for Trump, actually one of the few reputable polls, if its that close in Iowa he ain't got a chance in Penn Wisconsin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    it’s not a flawless poll, it has a good track record of being accurate to the outcome though, that said one race one year it had democrats up +2 points and Republicans won it by +3. So, cautious optimism.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    No one poll can ever guarantee accuracy of course, just by its nature, but it would need to be wrong by over twice that amount to even match Trump's (losing) 2020 performance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo


    how do you mean? Trump still slight favourites in bookies…… Harris slight favourite in Polls.

    Are you thinking blow out either way?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,589 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    You'd think this would be enough for people to think "Maybe he's not suited to be President…"

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Suckler


    And the last one standing…Nikki Haley, a truly repugnant individual to say the least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    she’d be squarely against him right now too but she still deludes herself into thinking she has a shot in 2028 and can’t bear to be saddled with the RINO label



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,042 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    The New Yorker cover this week.....

    GbiXnxIbIAAq5oK.jpeg

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 12,662 Mod ✭✭✭✭2011


    How so?

    Neither Harris nor Trump winning would be a surprise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,234 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    That is very true. Everyone would be super super surprised if neither Harris nor Trump won

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 42,914 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Think the best bet for a "suprise" is if one side wins by a huge margin.

    I personally wouldn't be overly surprised if Harris ended up between 300-330 college votes

    Post edited by sydthebeat on


Advertisement