Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2024 F1 General Discussion Thread

18990929495111

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 34,939 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,888 ✭✭✭✭mickdw




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,502 ✭✭✭PsychoPete


    So there isn't any breaking f1 news I've missed...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,636 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    William will be adding yellow to their cars for the next two races.

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,174 ✭✭✭thefa


    Not sure about the yellow. Not the prettiest car in the first place.


    What’s the latest opinions on the pending Hamilton/Sainz/Antonelli moves? The narratives have changed a few times over the course of the season along with driver and car form.

    As a Ferrari fan, looking forward to seeing Hamilton in red but conscious his form has been quite choppy albeit in an inconsistent car. If Ferrari deliver a good car, I see him doing well but hard to see LeClerc not having the edge.

    At the same time, losing the quality of Sainz isn’t ideal. Regularly challenges LeClerc but they keep it clean. Does Hamilton help Ferrari achieve a constructors more than Sainz?

    I guess from a Mercedes perspective, getting Antonelli in a year early only hurts them significantly if they would’ve been in a title fight and the learning curve costs a lot of points.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,309 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    And I don't think Sainz and Leclerc have ever hit each other? I can definitely see if the Ferrari is good next year that Hamilton and Leclerc end up tangling at least once…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    The hearing is at 2130 Irish time. Not sure that anything will come of it in terms of the actual penalty. However, I can see the FIA amending the rules moving forward as a lot of the paddock have spoken out about how Verstappen used the current interpretation to his advantage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Do you think he used it to make the pass or did he use it to get Norris +5s??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,888 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    He came off the brakes to keep himself ahead to skew the rules in his favour but couldn't make the corner himself. I think in a case when both leave the track, positions should stay as per run up to corner. Would be simpler than the nonsense they are trying to apply with inside driver getting penalty some of the time and outside driver the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,103 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    yeah I'm the same. Plus I feel that going for something like qualifying would be great, the race, you'd actually miss most of it but see one corner and that's it. It's odd, see the cars go by, wait 70-120 seconds and see the cars again.

    I think I'd be bringing some sort of app to listen to and or watch the coverage while I was there, which would defeat the purpose. I have little to no interest in attending a race, but I'd be really interested to see an exhibition of the cars etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    I dont understand how you skew the rules in that fashion though, was he not just defending the corner because Norris was never ahead though? Difficult to judge a moment when a driver should back off. He didn't even know Norris got a penalty for that so he couldn't have had it in his head as a premeditated outcome.

    What would happen if norris got ahead before the apex because verstappen backed off to stay on track, norris goes outside track limits but verstappen was behind at the corner?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    I think that is the point about the fallout of this. Verstappen hit the brakes late, went slightly off track but was ahead at the apex. He was ahead because of his late braking which made him go off track. Norris gained an advantage off track and was given a penalty.

    If this is not clarified/more guidance given by the FIA then this type of defence will become acceptable and will make overtaking on a corner an issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,536 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    Norris should have known not to overtake off track. Verstappen could have been the one getting the penalty otherwise. I think most drivers know Verstappen tactics by now and Norris was a bit naive to do what he did.

    Hamilton used to get away with the same trick of going off track to stay ahead. The stewards get wise to that crack if you do it more than once or twice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,502 ✭✭✭PsychoPete


    You have to use the rules to your advantage. Mclaren are getting off pretty lightly in the criticism, they should have told Norris to give the place back straight away. Their in race decisions are very questionable at times



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,495 ✭✭✭bren2001


    i think the application of the rule is silly but Max just used it to his advantage. They should have either given the place back or done it when there was enough time to get 5+s ahead. It was a bizarre decision from McClaren.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,309 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I assume it's Christian Horner and not Helmut Marko that has been keeping Checo with red bull as long as they have? I wonder will questions be asked about his leadership? Not taking decisive action when it became absolutely obvious that Checo has lost whatever confidence he previously had with the car has cost Red Bull the constructors championship, and they're now going to finish 3rd.

    When they were dominant last year they could afford to have 1 driver, but this year they can't. Currently Perez is 212 points behind Max. Both McLaren drivers, both Ferrari drivers and both Mercedes drivers are ahead of him.

    Perez has been crap, there's no denying that. But he's not the only person in red bull with questions to answer...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,556 ✭✭✭niallm77


    Sponsorship money is huge and I'd wonder if there is contractual obligations around Mexico GP (or Americas) about that which outweighs the drop in prize money

    Add in the additional wind tunnel time etc they will now get and I'd wonder if having additional time next year with new regs on the horizon suits them a little.

    Win the drivers title with Max, finish 3rd constructors but gain development time for the next few years.

    Also Merc must be struggling cost cap wise (in terms of upgrades) given the number of crashes lately and having to revert to Miami Spec parts etc. Russell damaged his wing yesterday too which won't help.

    It's a long shot but Lawson to RB and Colapinto to VCARB is possible. Vowels said they wanted Colapinto to have a seat next year somewhere.

    Can't see Checo being Max's team mate next year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,309 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I had a thought last night. If I'm red bull I put Lawson in now. Give him the last 4 races to prove himself. If it works, aces. If it doesn't, spend an ungodly amount of money in buying out Sainz's new contract - Williams can then run Colopinto next year.

    Red bull need to go back to being the ruthless team of old when it comes to promoting and trying out their junior drivers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,176 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Sainz driving for Williams next year and Perez driving for red bull is a modern day tragedy, though I am interested to see how Sainz gets on in a midfield car. Also interesting to see how Hamilton gets on with a competitive car again.
    Barring a DNF it’s curtains for Landos championship tilt this season, next year could, on paper, be an absolute belter in terms of multiple teams & drivers fighting for wins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,174 ✭✭✭thefa


    There’s definitely something behind the idea that the Red Bull becomes more geared towards Verstappen’s style as it develops. Would be very interested to see how Lawson would do in it as it’s a seat which has given some solid drivers a serious setback.

    Lawson couldn’t do any worse that Perez on current form but it won’t be much good for 2025 if he would only be good enough to battle for the lowest points finishes. Sainz is a proven race winner who’s competed with the best in multiple manufacturers would surey be more adaptable.

    Now whether any of that could happen commercially or practically, I don’t know. Seems like a long shot but would be exciting.


    The handling of the Perez contract earlier this season was quite odd. Obviously must be a huge sway with the finances.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,002 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Perez - Verstappen must be the biggest quality gap between teammates since Hamilton - Kovalainen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,556 ✭✭✭niallm77




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,037 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Am seeing they have now also given Verstappen 2 penalty points for forcing another driver off the track.

    He now has 6 points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,723 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Yes that woukd be brilliant. Its like Red Bul have gone from being ruthless to just taking it easy now do. Maybe this us thr kick Red Bull need to get them back to their old ways. As Riker would say " I liked the old me, What hsppened to him? "

    Something like that. This is basically Red Bull now. It's like they got complacent and thought this run of form from last year would last forever but they have got a good kick up ithe ass this year.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,723 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    He is going to have to stop being nasty and be a good so.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,024 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah I think Daniel Ricciardo would agree they're gone soft.

    Perez brings a ball of money. Firing him isn't as simple. That's all there is to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,309 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    But do red bull realistically need the money? Versus the reputational damage of their team performing so poorly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,176 ✭✭✭✭klose


    It will be interesting to see what they do about it, the GP this weekend will go down as one of the most embarrassing by a top teams driver in recent memory, Perez was literally a laughing stock this weekend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,024 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    That's the discussion Red Bull is presumably having right now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,309 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I also noticed how chummy ferrari and McLaren currently are, even though they are fighting for the constructors. I assume if they end up fighting for the driver's next year that friendliness will go away...



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement