Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Farm Payments 2024

13468919

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,089 ✭✭✭kk.man


    I'm not begrudging anyone, I'm simply saying my payments that I earned are gone to less productive land. That's unfair in anyone's book. If the eu decided to treble the payments to the less well off areas i be delighted for those farmers. It would generate wealth for all persons connected with farming in their area. But when they took from us that's the issue.

    At no stage did I say those people don't work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 175 ✭✭V6400


    so the people in the east worked and borrowed to stock high, what did other lads do wrong?

    What if things had been done the other way around and less intensive lads on bad land got the good payments 20 years ago and they changed now to distribute payments more evenly, would you say it was unfair and hand back the money? Maybe if it had been done that way then lads could have afforded to work, reclaim, drain and what ever else was needed to be done to make their land more productive and they wouldn’t need to be looking at more or less destocking their land to go organic to try and make some sort of money.

    You had over 20 years of what more than triple the average entitlement value on good productive land? Do you not think it’s time that another lad, maybe a young lad or girl starting out, had the opportunity to have a middling payment so they might be able to make something of their land?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 175 ✭✭V6400


    if you google biss criss webinar you’ll find the department videos from when they introduced the new schemes last year, I’d say that would be the easiest way to take it all in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,214 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    TBH kk, there was serious winners and loser after the 2002 removal of the link between production and payments. A lot of farmers stacked payments so they didn't have to rent land.

    The losers were the suckler farmer West of the Shannon who found there bull weanling dropped 2-300 euro in value after the link disappeared in 2005. These lads sold there bull weanlings with no punches taken. I know of a calf rearer who used to buy and rear a couple hundred bull calves in North Kerry. He was after buying a farm around 2000 and had not the cash flow to punch cattle and replace them so he sold all his bulls as yearlings with all punches and extensivation payments intact.

    Lads that bought land during 2003/4 where sellers loaded the payments onto there own. Lads with high payments had 20 years of it. It was always going to end. The EU was reducing the CAP budget by about 1% a year over that time scale, and redirected payments towards greening. Problem was the farm organisations did not acknowledge this to the farmers with the higher payments.

    Another thing that happened to lads along the west coast was the way the removing of so call ineligible areas such as rivers, rock and scrub. Thebm land had not changed since 2002 but the often these farmers lost 10%+ of there payment and now have to buy back entitlements to activate these lands as they are included again. They got virtually nothing for there entitlements often as they were low value.

    A significant number of lads around the rings in marts would only be there because they had an average industrial wage in payments for the first 10+ years. They could then act the bollax and prevent part time lads from buying and force them to buy there replacements from them. LSL finally f@@ked that game although lads still manage to pick up a few here and there.

    When I bought the farm in 2002 I ended up with about 10.5k in payments. In 2009 ( I think) I bought about 1.5k in low value entitlements for there face value and stacked them onto my own payment. It's has dropped to below 8k now and stabilised there. In During 2003/4 I drew on average about 20k/ year in punches, if I had one reference year I have been made but that was the way the cookie crumbled. I got f@@ked over in 2010 because REPS closed and had no environmental scheme for 6 years. There was many lads caught similar to me when during 2007/8 the department started to make REPS available and attractive to extremely intensive farmers.

    There was f@@k all fair about what happens when SFP was first set up it just happened that some were lucky to fall off the right side of the stool. If you did you had 20 years of it if lads left there business stand still and got addicted to the high payment tit it unfortunate, blame the farm organisations for not highlighting what was going to happen instead of them harping on about "upward only convergence" when they knew full well what was going to happen

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,638 ✭✭✭Packrat


    They're some entitled 'big man' points of view out of some posters alright.

    On the best of land apparently, profitable to the point where they don't bother with schemes, but still bitching about payments to people on tough ground.

    We in this generation of hill farmers had three choices:

    1. Continue as our fathers did with high stocking rates (yes that's possible on bad land but requires constant backbreaking work) for low or negative margins and raise our families in poverty relatively worse than anything we experienced, - if any woman would even have us.

    2. Get an off farm job, try to have a life ourselves and try to give our wives and children a reasonable standard of living comparable to other occupations. This required lowering stocking rates and maximizing the schemes.

    3. Sell up, plant it all and end our generational family farms.

    It's galling to hear these prime land heroes bitching and moaning about "their" money moving west.

    For generations they paid us next to nothing for our store animals and then reaped the reward based on geology, geography and often history, whilst looking down their very long noses at us, - peasants in the west.

    Ive no sympathy for them today, packed up to the last gairdín with cows their fat lazy sons and daughters won't milk, - only watching to see if they could get the land zoned for the nearest big town.

    Some attitudes never change, - we're still irrelevant peasants to them, no better than rats pinching away at their grain store.

    The wheel turns.

    “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command”



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 252 ✭✭In the wind




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭massey 265


    A very good take on the origins of the bps-sfp-biss or whatever name the entitlements payments were called over the last 20 odd years i.m.o.I would also add that farmers that had heifers in the reference years lost out big time as heifers were not included in the entitlement calculations at that time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,214 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Ya lads with heifers lost out as there was only the slaughter premiumon them. At least with cull cows you could have two twists a year at the slaughter premium.

    Heard of a lad that was slaughtering 900 a year of them mostly on rented land. He dropped all the rented land and instead of having 400 euro entitlements they were around 2k in value. He was in his late 50's and it provided him some retirement income as he had no successor.

    I can understand some lads who had high entitlements being upset/annoyed however they should have realised it was going to change. I do not buy the productive/ non productive arguments. It was just the way things fell at the time.

    Many lads forget for 5 years before 2002 the national envelope was capped so lads producing more would have reduced the payment on individual animal premia. As I said it depended on where your farming business was at the time

    If you signed a contract for land on the 31 December 2002 you get the DED average if you signed on the 1 January you got 50% of the DED average.

    Maybe some lads on lower value entitlements could have made more of an effort to up the value of there's however it was all relative with a lot of lad left naked or virtually naked of entitlements

    I

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,089 ✭✭✭kk.man


    Those who had heifers bought cheaper cattle in the mart so they made decent money between buying and selling. The bullock finisher in most those years was operating at a loss. Mind boggling prices paid to build up payments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,214 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Not correct, the money was made in punching cattle. The difference between the value of the punch on an animal with and without it was about 60% of the value of the punch and you had the extensivation on them as well.

    I bought animal in 2003/4 with about 450 in punchs, extensivation and slaughter premia on them for about 250 more than punched out animals, you just had to wait for the punches and extensivation. Slaughter premium was paid out in regular tranches throughout the year. Premia was paid at the end of the year on a calender year basis. Any animal punched before December 31st was paid early the following year. Extensivation was tricky one it was on a selected date basis, 5 of them throughout the year on dates that the minister selected. It was paid around May the following year great thing about it, was it was in the one walloper of a cheque

    If farmer were trading at a loss they were making mistakes. Your factory payment was only a small portion of the overall pot.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭red bull


    Are many awaiting the ECO payment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Well said, the attitudes shown here sometimes are ridiculous. I'm delighted "their money" is being distributed more fairly and evenly.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,842 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    MOD NOTE;

    no matter what way the CAP cookie crumbles there's going to be winners and losers. Keep it on topic and cut out the personal attacks, thanks.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 140 ✭✭Farm365


    Yeah I haven’t received any Eco payment yet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,221 ✭✭✭tabby aspreme


    If you picked extensive grazing as one of the ECO options, your stocking rate for the year may not be finalised and can cause delays, give the dept a call



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭joe35


    Stocking rate goes on what you put on your census. I didn't get eco last year until end of January 2024



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,283 ✭✭✭Dozer1


    received a 2023 liming payment today, not much but welcome, I guess its what was held back from the initial announcement



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭Conversations 3


    I haven't received anything yet.

    Is this strange or am I just at the back of the que?

    Should I be calling Portlaoise?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,675 ✭✭✭✭whelan2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭dominatinMC




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Tileman


    the sheep welfare scheme paid today in full sell. Not just 80%. This is the €8 per ewe scheme funded by national funds.

    You’d never know there was a general election on would you



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,609 ✭✭✭✭Reggie.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭woody84


    Received no payments here yet, had an inconclusive on the ams findings so I'm guessing that's why they're delayed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,638 ✭✭✭Packrat


    Sheep welfare in but not full payment- about the same as last year.

    “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 727 ✭✭✭eire23


    When the sheep improvement scheme payment made then? I presumed it would be this month as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭joe35


    I got full payment in SWS.

    Had an inspection last week on SIS so hopefully it'll be through soon enough.

    She didn't say when payment would be made, but found her very helpful with the inspection.

    Re.. tags in ear. Some of my sheep had only one tag (only a few) she never mentioned it during inspection.

    Father had an inspection before and I remember one of the actions was to re-tag sheep with only 1 tag, then send in a photo of register showing this action done



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 394 ✭✭StoutPost


    Always keep some extra tags on hand. If you have some missing and you get the call you can take out the single tag, re tag with a new set and match them in the flock register.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭Sami23


    All depends how awkward the inspector is it seems



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Tileman


    no this is the sheep welfare scheme. €8 per sheep. This is the first year of it.
    U are thinking of sheep improvement scheme.Sis. That is paid 12€ initial. Usually paid 80% in nov and balance in spring.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,638 ✭✭✭Packrat


    Correct. Spotted this today. This is the €8 new money.

    “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command”



Advertisement