Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Irish politics discussion thread

1189190192194195295

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    SF are pushing now online the number of FG TD's that have left and this is a terrible thing. One "influencer" shouting 18 multiple times in all their pods is funny now.

    Between that and the corrupt polls its getting a little desperate.

    The same people going on about the 18 TD's are also the same peopel who have spent 5 years abusing them online and wondering why they have retired, or trying to say they don't know how they retired

    FF and FG took some feedback from last electin and a regeneration was required. The online crew complaining you are voting the same old people back in, when they put new people in with new ideas they complain about that. The same idiots will be complaining their entire lives on the internet whiel the rest of us live our lives



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Again, looking at the facts, old tired politicians replaced with fresh energy, a real renewal.

    Quite a difference to seeing Dessie Ellis and Aengus O'Snodaigh up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There is a real air of desperation around the Sinn Fein online presence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The "new" Td's like Mairead Farrell went onto radio today and proved she is a 'good republican', lying to cover up for SF.

    She wil go far in SF



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    They have lied so many times about that young man. I hope he is ok in the face of that relentless stuff. Even MLMD today in the Dail just couldn't say "we got it wrong", she just went back to what was on his Ogra application.

    Is it really possible that Sinn Fein's child protection policy is so weak that they didn't even verify his age???!!???

    Does she realise where this goes. It will quieten down for a day or two, but it will come up again and again during the election.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Mairead was a f**king joke, trying to say that SF talked to him first before the Dail, then when the presentor rightly pointed out if they talked to him then how had they no idea about his age. Then they didn't talk to him. Then they did but mairead didn't know.

    Then went into some rehersed spin about all they care about is the boy involved in this.

    Funny way to show that by constantly lying about him and trying to victim blame him at every turn. SF knew his age, they lied as usual and hoped nobody would find out. Like the BS events they just didn't figure out the person in question would go to the press.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That they didn't is how they let NOD continue his campaigning on Twitter and said nothing. Whatever about being sympatethic to NOD for his mental health when resigning, where was their concern for the young lad when he saw SF letting him maintain a public presence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Left him in GAA etc with access to young kids is unbelieveable to most people but then you remember Gerry etc doign the same

    If this didn't come out Im sure NOD would be back into SF in a few months/years when they thought it had blown over



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,103 ✭✭✭Caquas


    I think the difference between us is that you seem to believe we can have a decent health service if only we spend enough. In reality, contrary to your earlier post, we are spending vastly more on health with little effect. We don't need an Einstein to tell us not to expect a different outcome from even more spending.

    The political tragedy is that not a single elected representative wants to see any limit on spending by the HSE. In fact, every party will campaign in this election on promises of even more health spending sorry, improved health services. It would be electoral suicidal to say otherwise. Many politicians will grouse about some health costs e.g. about the National Children's Hospital but they all have shopping lists of additional health services. The Dáil is the only national Parliament in the world which has members elected for the sole purpose of protecting local hospital services - we even had a Government Minister resign over the status of his local hospital.

    We all blame the developers and the banks for the last crash but there was another side to the story - the massive increase in public expenditure on the back of the taxes from the construction boom. Not a single politician objected to that - the 2007 election was a blizzard of spending promises. Fine Gael were very lucky on that occasion that the Irish people preferred to stick with Bertie - a year later the whole thing blew up in our faces and FG have got 13 unbroken years in government and three Taoisigh.

    Of course, the recent Budget had nothing to do with the election which was not, absolutely not, going to be held until next year. But then….well… something happened…and .. oh God, look at that Shinner messaging a 17 16 year old. We need an election now!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,686 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    One of the last acts of this government is to double the fine for the long term unemployed who don't engage with the services.

    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/taoiseach-says-90-fines-for-jobless-who-refuse-to-engage-with-employment-services-is-common-sense/a1411768942.html



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    What’s the thinking here, is the Occupied Territories Bill being allowed to die on thevine and effectively blocked?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,942 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Out of curiosity where are you getting that from? Google search right?

    I say that because I was under the impression that she was 61 as well because when you google her it pops up in the AI-generated box at the top

    image.png

    The thing is - I don't know where Google's AI is getting that from and I have heard that it's not always accurate.

    ….and that turns out to be the case here. It's incorrect.

    She says herself in this article that she's 64



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,942 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Hmmm. Not sure about blaming hypochondriacs for the extra strain on the health service.

    In reality, like most developed countries, we have a rapidly aging population and that naturally puts a strain on any health service. We have more over 70s now than we have ever had and that population is growing every year. As people live longer, they have more complex medical requirements and require more medical services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,464 ✭✭✭corkie


    Was still curious about that so I queried another AI, which provided sources.

    https://www.perplexity.ai/search/heather-humphreys-age-TiluR7FzRguSEspIjpl7xQ

    At 61 or 64 she can't be senile or alzheimer sufferer that she doesn't know her own age?

    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." ~ George Santayana
    "But that's balanced out by the fact that it's a mandate not to do very much." ~ Prof. Eoin O'Malley



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,593 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I saw that labour were looking to have the dail sit next week instead of taking a midterm to get the occupied territories bill through, but isn't happening. So looks like it'll fall and have to be reintroduced in the next dail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,942 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Does it though? What is the actual source of that 1963 birth date?

    image.png

    That points to her wiki page but as you have already shown that date is not on there.

    I think I know what happened. The AI tool trawled the web at some point in the past when her wiki page had this incorrect 1963 birthdate down for her.

    With those interviews she did when she announced her retirement people realised that that DOB was wrong on there and they amended it (you can see it in the edit history)

    image.png

    That's why they only have her year of birth on her wiki page now - because it's based on this answer but they don't know the exact date.

    That AI chat bot seems to have invented it's own reasoning for this discrepancy (as AI bots are wont to do from time to time)

    image.png

    That's why AI chat bots can't be trusted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,143 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Isn't Jobseekers Benefit the one for people who specifically aren't long term unemployed?

    To be honest, of all the benefits to hit, the one that goes to the people who are only recently out of work is f*cking repulsive.

    If I went through a brief period of unemployment, I'd be absolutely disgusted at the idea of having the absolutely scant few quid I was getting reduced because I wouldn't go to interview for a minimum wage job that wouldn't cover the absolute basic living expenses while some other fella is cruising along having not worked in twenty years getting the gaffe paid for him.

    If I'm misinterpreting, I'd really appreciate someone correcting me, but this looks like the absolute lowest of the low as far as trying to bully the easy targets who have busted their balls paying tax to increase the overall numbers instead of tackling the actually long term unemployed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The reason I said 64 at the start of this was my partner knows her quite well and was convinced she was 64. Seems she was correct.

    Going to be a fascinating election in these parts. Heather's next in line T.P O'Reilly got just over 5000 first preferences votes and hasn't got remotely the same profile across the constituency that Heather had, he didn't get many transfers. Would have to be a very very good day for FG to get the second seat they'd hoped for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    This is only for people who are not engaging with the people trying to get them a job again. If you are engaging with the services etc then you have no issue.

    If you are highly skilled then the services will be trying to get you into a job in that area. That is how it works. Not to put you into a job that doesn't reflect the skills you have. Have you anything to say they will put everyone into a minimum wage job that doesn't reflect the skills you have?

    This is to stop people playing the system.

    It doesn't affect those who can't work etc. This is the claim been made online by some of the usual faux outrage accounts across twitter/etc.

    Who is this other fella cruising along having not worked in twenty years getting the gaffe paid for him?

    https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/social-welfare/unemployed-people/jobseekers-allowance/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,225 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    If only there was a way that so many of our doctor and nurse graduates wouldn't have to go abroad to get a decent standard of living

    If only the HSE could compete with publicly provided healthcare in the UK and Australia



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,504 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    If there were more staff available, all medical best practice would be to put them in to UHL.

    There isn't any path where reopening Nenagh and Ennis makes sense; but that won't stop politicians pretending there is.

    There is also the well pointed out factor that SF's taxation plans will make it less attractive for consultants and senior NCHDs to work in Ireland, so could reduce the number of doctors staying or coming here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭MFPM


    Yeah, they were always going to do this, it's illustrative of the Government's approach to the whole issue in recent months, lots of words and no actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,225 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Medical best practice is not exactly a FFG policy so not sure who you're trying to appeal to there.

    Up until about 2009 Nenagh and Ennis had fully capable A&E departments but maybe you are right. Perhaps you could explain better though?

    So you are saying we should vote for the party that will drop taxes the most on the high earners so to save our hospital? What party would that be?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,504 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They were never fully capable; they were small and without the specialists required to deal with complex situations. People with serious problems die going to A&Es like that; and Ennis in particular is at most 15 minutes ambulance time closer to anywhere than UHL is to the same places.

    I'm saying that voting for SF is not going to bring doctors and nurses flooding in to the country; if anything it'll be worse. People need to be aware of the impact of their plans; and also how their times of running the Department of Health in NI don't show that they have any particular skills or ideas on how to turn around a failing health service.

    I don't recommend any particular party, just to pay attention to parties policies and actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,543 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    SF have signed up to continue to implement the exact same slaintecare plan that FF,FG and the Greens are using. So I never can understand these claims from SF and its supporters that they will radically fix the HSE which would mean breaking the slaintecare agreements which is exactly the reason our healthcare is in such disarray as every new government for decades kept coming in and scrapping the current plans and starting a new thing. Slaintecare was designed to stop the constant chopping and changing and have a consistent long term health strategy agreed upon by everyone,



  • Posts: 1,167 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Exact same issue with schools. Our governments have not even begun to keep up with population increases (and aging) by building and staffing new facilities.

    Staffing is now caught in a death spiral in that people are leaving because they are understaffed and can not attract new entrants because of that under-staffing. We need to bite the bullet, identify key areas of under-staffing, break them out of the pay deal, and increase their pay. We can't increase conditions until staffing increases so money is the only variable under our control.

    Yes we will be over-paying in an international sense but it's supply/demand (as everyone seems to love saying except when it comes to a critical public service)

    The public pay deal is an absolute god send to the Government in this scenario. They get to point to it as this sacrosanct text to prevent correcting pay in key areas.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Up until 2009 Nenagh and Ennis had seriously dysfunctional hospitals prone to scandal after scandal of neglect and incompetence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    That delay and this should be election issues, but probably will be sidelined by MSM for the duration of the campaign.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    This is spun out all the time, do you have any actual data to show that doctors and nurses who graduate go abroad and don't return?

    A lot will travel after intensive study for years but in my opinion they return

    As you claim they move away and stay away maybe you can provide those stats. Thanks



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,143 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I've never gone through any substantial period of unemployment, so I haven't any direct personal experience with these services, but I have dealt with them from the other side, hiring people who are trying to get back to work.....given what I saw, you'll excuse me if I seriously doubt they have the skills, connections or capacity to help someone find, for example an executive level position in a niche sector.

    If I went through a redundancy or the likes, any process I would go through before starting a new position would take a few months. If I had some civil servant without a notion breathing down my neck asking to see how many jobs I'd applied for that week, I'd be telling them to f*ck right off.

    I haven't mentioned anyone who can't work, if you want to argue with people complaining on Twitter etc about this, go and find them instead of strawmanning it into my completely unrelated criticism of the policy.

    My issue is with it attacking those on Jobseekers Benefit, which I believe is specifically for those who have sufficient PRSI contributions (so a working history) and only last for a few months (so it isn't long term).

    I'm not sure why you've linked to information on Jobseekers Allowance, my issue is that per the article, it is targeting the SHORT TERM unemployed (those on Jobseekers Benefit) rather than specifically trying to resolve the actual problematic group of long term unemployed (those on Jobseekers Allowance). It's low hanging fruit, hassling folk who clearly have the will to work (given their history) who have paid into the system via their PRSI contributions to entitle them to this benefit.

    They'll push a handful of people into roles that they wouldn't usually accept and claim it as a great success (even if that person taking an extra month or two in their search would've resulted in them paying enough additional tax to vastly outweigh the costs). The long term unemployed who know their way about the system will remain entirely unaffected I'm sure.

    From the news article (bolding mine)

    Unemployed people who refuse to engage with social welfare ­employment services will see their Jobseeker’s Benefit cut by €90 under a plan quietly signed off by the Government after the Budget.



Advertisement
Advertisement