Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland's Refugee Policy cont. Please read OP before posting

11718202223142

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    This rhetoric is just stupid - there's plenty of scumbags in our own homeless you'd be weary of giving a piss soaked cardboard box to nevermind a free brand new house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,021 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    The problem there then is that the government are taking houses off people, usually young, looking to buy their first home and start a family.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,242 ✭✭✭aero2k


    Your fifth last paragraph begins with "Finally". You then go on to write four more paragraphs, three of which begin with, in order, "Additionally", "And one last thing", and "Moreover". Since then you have another long post where the last paragraph begins "Finally", so maybe the ADHD meds took a while to give you the claimed focus😀.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    think you missed the origin of that post



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I think it's worth posting this reminder again on some of the facts surrounding the refugee process as many of the same lies have reappeared.

    Lie: Asylum seekers don't work and become welfare dependent.

    Fact: The ESRI reports strong employment uptake by people from the IPA community.

    https://www.esri.ie/system/files/publications/RS160.pdf

    Lie: People coming through 'safe' countries are 'bogus' asylum seekers.

    Fact: IPA's do not have to stay in the first 'safe' country they reach. While many do, it's of course reasonable and legal to travel further, whether for family reasons, job opportunities or long term stability.

    https://fullfact.org/immigration/refugees-first-safe-country/

    Lie: 'Bogus' asylum seekers arrive from 'safe' countries.

    Fact: Countries which are designated safe by the Department of Integration are deemed to be so for the majority of people. People can still seek asylum from these country, as individuals or smaller minority groups might still be persecuted.

    https://www.thejournal.ie/what-are-designated-safe-countries-of-origin-in-ireland-what-countries-how-does-it-work-how-many-applicants-6285239-Jan2024/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,311 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Their are 500,000 adults living at home.

    Their are thousands leaving each year because they can't start a life here.

    Their are a few thousand Irish people who are homeless.

    Why should anyone who never contributed anything to here turn up and get housed before any of them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭tom23


    Exactly…. but but but the left will tell ya that we should be doing it for everyone. I know what I’d be doing with pissed soaked cardboard box.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Given that the recent political successes of the AFD have been cheered on (and over-exaggerated) here, I think it's worth sharing this article, which is useful in it's own right but also covers some of their methods and ideologies.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-41497022.html

    What really caught my attention here is the perspective it puts on common claims we hear on this thread, and from the far-right/anti-immigration brigade in general, about 'elites' pushing a pro-migration agenda.

    In the above article this AFD figure actually speaks about his own wishes to create an elite organization based on the SS of the nazi era, but using 'scientific' intelligence tests etc.

    After reciting recent polling victories, Ahrens turned to European higher education. “The universities used to be where society — where western European, where white society — used to produce elites capable of exerting power,” he said.

    “The organisation which I am working with is taking more concrete steps towards the establishment of such an elite,” he went on to claim. “We’re doing this partly through media outreach, partly through talking to people on the ground, and partly through networking, which is taking place more behind the scenes.”

    Far from being an egalitarian movement, (remember when they used to pretend to be concerned about the Irish homeless), I think it's pretty clear, from this and several other examples, that those behind a lot of the anti-immigration/far-right stuff clearly have their own elitist agenda. The question I have is why do those people who support them, and share their rhetoric and propaganda, believe they will benefit from these new structures?

    Just what gives people the confidence that they are anything more than 'useful fools' to those pushing the anti-immigration narratives, be that Trump, Putin, the AFD etc?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    How many of our own have never contributed a cent to the country? How many of those on the housing list have spent years sitting on their holes not trying to better their situation but with their hands out waiting for the "foreva home"? Im not arguing for floodgates open immigration but this idea that all of "our own" are saints is laughable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,802 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    All be it but with a rising number of asylum seekers coming here from around 3500 in 2018

    The projected figure for this year 25000 not something I would called grand nothing to worry about !



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 251 ✭✭noc1980


    So the far right received only 0.42% of the vote yet a recent poll showing 62% believe Ireland has taken in too many refugees. That should put an end to the narrative that only 'far right racists' are opposed to this immigration madness, shouldn't it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭tom23


    the figure we should throw back at the far left is how many failed applicants do we send home? I’m hoping the minister for justice might have that number soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,311 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Right and their is nothing we can do about that because they were born here.

    Now if you want to address the question I raised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,311 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    We are an island and the last stop and really should be receiving fewer then anywhere else.

    The numbers coming here make no sense for any genuine asylum seeker.

    You need to pass through multiple safe countries and an ocean to get here.

    The reason for the number is the word is out that we are soft and we offer the best benefits.

    While others get more strict then the numbers here will keep getting higher.

    We are a small country and cannot sustain what is happening.

    We dont have enough houses, prisons, nurses, guards, schools, teachers for the current population, in fact we are heavily stretched as it is.

    While the population gets bigger the government don't seem to be doing anything to increase the essential services needed to support it.

    We are going to be in some trouble if we get a recession or the multinationals pull out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 879 ✭✭✭creeper1


    You are advocating giving actual homes to folk rocking up claiming they need IP?

    The rest of us are getting into debt not far of a half million euros and becoming quasi slaves paying a huge mortgage and you are saying that they ought to get that Scot free?!

    Good grief.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    They're our problem, not another countrys. There in lies the difference



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin



    “Lie: Asylum Seekers don’t work and become welfare dependent”

    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/direct-provision-centre-inspection-finds-75pc-of-residents-not-able-to-move-out-due-to-lack-of-accommodation/a2098285064.html

    This article shows that the majority of them in Ireland are in fact welfare dependent. They are unable to leave Direct Provision because they cannot support themselves and so must rely on the state to provide their food and accommodation etc.

    That is quite literally the definition of welfare dependent and 75% is a huge proportion at that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,702 ✭✭✭✭Headshot




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,556 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    And here we go again…..

    The ESRI report does nothing of the sort, kindly stop with the "misinformation and lies".

    It is clear to everyone here that you are unwilling/unable to accept reality of what is actually happening. You repeatedly tell us that we have "hard border policies" (something you, unsurprisingly can never elaborate on when asked) when in reality we have the softest border in the EU.

    You are so biased to whatever your agenda is that you are unwilling to accept that people seek "asylum" here because there is virtually zero chance of being removed regardless of having a legitimate claim or not. You have championed the fact that its "hard and costly" to deport people from the very start. Its the same reason so many are turning up to Dublin airport without identification. The system is abused because it can. Something else you refuse to even acknowledge.

    You repeatedly have mentioned that those who can not get work visas to come here will just seek asylum instead as they want a better life for themselves. Would love to see how you equate this statement to your "facts" above. What you have suggested is economic migration, but you always have some excuse to deflect with. Family/Job opportunities are not grounds for seeking asylum.

    You are quite happy for people travel here from all over the world but then are also crying about the fact they face dangers, traveling half way around the world. You brilliantly suggested that rather than staying where they are safe we should in fact ferry/fly them here.

    So for the fifth time?

    1. Explain to everyone these "hard border polices" you repeatedly insist we have. Go on post a link.
    2. You seem to be happy for our asylum system to be openly abused, kindly outline the benefits you see for the country from this approach.
    3. At what point does an asylum seeker become an economic migrant in your eyes? Saying the latter does not exist would be misinformation and we know how you feel about that.

    Weak men, hard times.

    PS.

    Perhaps I should take a moment to summarise your position from the previous thread in case any new comers mistake you for the voice of reason:

    1. Ireland is a nasty little country with "hard border policies", but you are unwilling to tell us what these policies are.
    2. Everyone in and no one out at all costs, we can never have too many people regardless of having inadequate services. You never see a point where the cons of this outweigh the pros.
    3. Removing anyone is a waste of time and money. The "far right" is costing the state far too much money but it is ok to spend billions housing everyone who comes in and an unknown monetary sum "fixing the global south".
    4. You want laws brought in immediately to tackle the "far right" and everything else you do not agree with. But its ok to ignore our current laws if they do not suit your view point.
    5. Seemingly world geography is Irelands fault and we should facilitate a mass movement of people to Ireland from the 3rd world by ferry/plane - international law and borders be dammed.
    6. We should turn our visa system on its head to prioritise people from the global south regardless of needing them of not because everyone just wants a better life, we owe it to them after all and if we don't they will just claim asylum here anyway. But its impossible for anyone seeking asylum to be "bogus"
    7. People who argue against the rationality of all of this are mentally ill, far right, easily influenced, knuckle dragging, hate filled, misinformation spreading racists

    Sound about right?

    Post edited by twinytwo on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,528 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    Sure evidence from everywhere shows this. They are a nett loss to the country that takes them in overall. Or worse, like in the case of Sweden, the start of even bigger problems. Yet the usual reality deniers will tell us it's racist propaganda. Also nobody is even trying to pretend that the vast majority are doing anything other than scamming the system anymore, even the government themselves have admitted the majority arriving aren't legitimate asylum seekers, but they are doing nothing to stop it and are deporting none.

    But hey, 1000 men in tents in a field in North County Dublin. With nothing to do, no jobs, no transport, no shops, nothing - that's the start of something amazing for everybody!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭BobMc


    If they cant move out of direct provision and they have permits to work and are working should they then pay rent ? or do they remain in director provision accommodation while working on same terms?? they may not be able to afford market rent but should it be a free ride forever?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,078 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Staying there in the same terms because all this government care about is “optics” and PR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭BobMc


    So earning and living free, thats creating a big gap with irish, hard working couples struggling to pay rent and save for home etc etc. this is where I see friction is starting to come from



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 234 ✭✭Will0483


    You deserve an award for wading through all those posts. A brilliant summary of hisincoherent and contradictory posts.

    I would sum up that poster's output in one sentence though.

    To hell with logic or facts, the Irish Taxpayer just needs to bend over and take one for the team!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I don't see much in the line of logic and facts from the anti-immigration brigade around here. I see mostly the same lies and misinformation as spread by the likes of Trump, Putin, Orban, the AFD etc…

    Funny how some people will so readily accept this stuff, and even regurgitate it repeatedly, while being unable to accept something as simple and straightforward as the legality of claiming asylum in a non-neighboring country.

    https://fullfact.org/immigration/refugees-first-safe-country/

    I guess the Irish taxpayer just has to bend over and take the cost, harm and risk done by these hate-mongers too? What do you think it does to the cost of asylum accommodation when places are burned down or require round the clock security?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Quite a lot of people would meet your definition of being 'welfare dependent' so given the housing crisis.

    How many low-paid Irish workers require rental or income supplements?

    Is there something wrong with these people too?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Undoubtedly population increases over the last decade have put a strain on housing and services, which should have been handled far better.

    Yet only a small fraction, including this years projected numbers, of those came to seek asylum.

    Why are people so obsessed with this relatively small group?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,021 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Hang on second, I am sure that in this thread that it was said that immigration was not putting a strain on housing and services and that anybody that pointed this out was as usual labelled far-right or racist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 751 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    Our policy towards Asylum Seekers is a zero sum game where the AS win and Paddy Taxpayer loses, big.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Life in a scabies infested tent is your idea of winning now?

    Does it matter at all to you lot how far from reality what you write is, once the pro-Putin hateful rhetoric can be spread?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement