Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland's Refugee Policy cont. Please read OP before posting

11112141617142

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,618 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    No, I don't believe in different punishments based on the motivation of offenders. I believe everyone should be held equal and accountable before the law. When it comes to sentencing judges take all different things into account. That's enough. No need for different penalties based on motivation. IMO anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,804 ✭✭✭rgossip30




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,714 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    "The Dutch coalition government, headed by Geert Wilders’ far-right Freedom party (PVV), is considering sending Africans whose asylum requests are rejected to Uganda, in plans that opposition politicians have said are “totally unfeasible”.

    During a visit this week to the East African country, the Dutch minister for trade and development, Reinette Klever, said the cabinet was exploring the ideaand that Uganda was “not averse” to it, the Dutch public broadcaster Nos reported on Wednesday."

    Italy has done it and all the power houses of Europe will have their own solution soon enough. These countries know they cannot carry on like this, something has to be done but they need to stop these illegals getting into Europe full stop.

    I'm also a firm believer we need to do something with Africa to stop this influx. The West is not so innocent in all of this with Global warming etc but the corruption in this countries is staggering. I really wish we could stop this blight happening and stop the Sudan war, it's heart breaking we in the West are doing nothing and this is causing these people come to Europe.

    Stop the issues in these countries would decrease the number wanting to come



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,618 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Why don't they send those with rejected claims back to their own country?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,714 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    EU leaders push for harder stance on asylum

    Summit of European leaders hears call for firmer deportation policies as migration dominates agenda

    Finally it's good to see immigration is front and center of EU talks. I just don't have the confidence that EU will get it sorted, they have an awful track record.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,242 ✭✭✭aero2k


    I agree with every word of that post. It does seem to me that the attempt to create just such a hierarchy is an inevitable result of the wider nonsense going on regarding oppressors vs oppressed, where these characteristics are assumed because of membership of a particular group, rather than the behaviour of the person. Which is the epitome of racism (for example).

    The common tactics of shutting down any debate on these difficult but important topics doesn’t help either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,242 ✭✭✭aero2k


    I'm struggling to decide whether that's better or worse than pasting unattributed chunks of twitter posts like the lad on the Harris thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭lmao10


    I completely agree with your points. The resentment seems to be fueled by misinformation and fear-mongering, mainly from a few far right accounts which was then parroted by their minions without actually thinking about what they are saying. Instead of focusing on the real issues, like the housing crisis or the lack of investment in education, they demonize people who are legally contributing to society. Indians, like many others, come through proper channels, work hard, and contribute to the economy. The far right's dislike of Indians in Ireland often stems from pure racism, as they only target immigrants who don't fit their narrow, exclusionary views. The anger should be directed at systemic problems, not at individuals who are just trying to build a better life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,117 ✭✭✭prunudo


    What nonsense, there is nothing far right or racist to question the contuined volumes of both legal and illegal migration into this country and the strain it is putting on housing, health care, education, transport and every other service in the country. The fact is, while they may be working, allowing an unlimited amount of people into the country is affecting a large portion of the native population.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    More utter nonsense - you just missed your usual rubbish about 0.42% ….

    "People wanting a better life" is fine; everyone is able to move to another country if they prefer, source improved employment, source a larger home to expand a family etc.

    What they are not allowed to do is to arrive in a random country like Ireland, demand support and housing whilst peddling a made up sob story.

    But I'm sure deep down you really do get this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭lmao10


    Indians who come to Ireland arrive through legal channels, whether on work or student visas, and they follow all the necessary procedures. They don’t just show up and demand housing or government support. In fact, many are highly educated professionals in fields like technology, healthcare, and finance, filling key roles in the workforce. By contributing their skills and paying taxes, they play an important part in the economy, often without receiving any of the state benefits that critics claim they do. The portrayal of them arriving with “sob stories” and seeking handouts is simply not true.

    This kind of narrative is being pushed by far-right groups that have a clear agenda rooted in racism and xenophobia. They intentionally spread misinformation to create fear and resentment towards immigrants, despite the fact that these individuals are following the legal process and integrating into society. Instead of addressing the real issues—like housing and the overall economy—they divert attention by blaming a group that is actively contributing to Ireland. It’s nothing more than a tactic to sow division and distract from systemic failures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,528 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    We should just take as many people as we can lob in fields and hotels from the entirety of the third world. We are so rich that clearly we can easily support a few million people, oddly mostly men, all living in tents in fields and in hotels where they will all got along happily ever after while paying our pensions form their welfare supports. The infrastructure, jobs, doctors and money to support this liberal idiot folly will magically create itself from good feelings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭lmao10


    This kind of exaggerated rhetoric only serves to distract from the actual conversation. No one is proposing that Ireland takes in millions of people without any planning or consideration. The discussion is about Indians, many of whom are legal immigrants and many of whom are skilled professionals contributing to the economy, paying taxes, and filling essential roles in sectors like healthcare, IT, and education. Painting a picture of mass chaos with people living in fields or hotels is a far cry from the reality of regulated immigration policies that bring in individuals who help drive economic growth.

    Instead of relying on sarcastic exaggerations, it would be more productive to focus on the facts. Immigrants who arrive legally are not a drain on resources, but an asset to society. They contribute their skills, pay into the tax system, and help strengthen the very infrastructure that some claim is being “overwhelmed.” Shifting the conversation to the actual benefits immigrants bring—rather than indulging in extreme hypotheticals—would lead to a more rational and informed discussion on how to manage immigration in a way that supports both the economy and social stability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,618 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    Don't! There are posters who think that way and might assume you're serious and a kindred spirit!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    This thread is about refugees - legal and productive immigrants are a benefit to the country.

    Those who arrive after paying smugglers to get them through half a dozen or more safe countries, only to expect us to feed, clothe and house them forever - are not.

    It's the pro-open borders crowd who try to conflate the two groups to muddy the waters and stifle debate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭lmao10


    It's worth pointing out that your initial response was directed at a post about Indians, who come to Ireland legally and contribute positively to society. This discussion wasn't about refugees or illegal migration.

    That being said, regarding your comments about migrants arriving after passing through several countries, it’s important to recognize that not everyone who seeks asylum does so out of convenience. Many are fleeing war, persecution, or dangerous situations, and international law permits them to seek asylum in a safe country, regardless of how many countries they pass through. The idea that they expect to be "fed, clothed, and housed forever" is misleading—most refugees want to work and contribute once they are able to settle. The narrative that pro-open borders advocates are trying to “muddy the waters” is a common tactic used to simplify a complex issue. You responded to a post about Indians and got corrected and then claimed I am trying to "muddy the waters" for example. It's essential to separate facts from fear-mongering and recognize that not all migrants are here to take advantage of the system; many are simply seeking safety and a chance to build a life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 315 ✭✭cr-07


    Regarding legal migration - there is actually a list of critical skilled jobs needed to obtain a work visa:
    https://enterprise.gov.ie/en/what-we-do/workplace-and-skills/employment-permits/employment-permit-eligibility/highly-skilled-eligible-occupations-list/

    These are skilled jobs that Ireland cannot fill with its current populous. The people filling these positions are definitely needed here and are paying large amounts of tax for the benefit of the country. These people are not coming here to take up low paying jobs. I think this is where a lot of resentment stems from.

    On the other hand, you have a large population of Ireland benefiting from welfare etc (relative to legal migrants), because a lot of them couldn't be arsed bettering themselves.

    Regarding illegal migration - if the proper processes & resources were in place to deal with these people then the situation wouldn't be as it is today.

    In summary, if the "large portion of the native population" actually worked to better themselves then the country would be a much better place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭lmao10


    First, it’s important to remember that this discussion started around legal immigration, particularly Indians and other immigrants who come to Ireland through proper channels, contribute to the economy, and pay taxes. There’s nothing wrong with questioning migration policies, but it's crucial to distinguish between legal, skilled immigration and the issues related to illegal migration. Legal immigrants, like many Indians, are often filling roles in sectors that desperately need skilled workers. They aren't placing strain on services but are instead contributing through taxes and boosting the workforce.

    Regarding the broader issue of strain on housing, healthcare, and other services, it's not just about immigration. The housing crisis, for example, stems from a lack of proper infrastructure and long-term planning. Blaming legal immigrants for systemic issues ignores the root causes. Most of these services are under pressure because of years of underinvestment and mismanagement. The narrative that "unlimited" immigration is the problem is often promoted by far-right groups to stoke fear and resentment, but legal migration is controlled and managed through strict visa processes. It’s vital to have an honest discussion about the real causes of these strains rather than scapegoating immigrants who are legally contributing to the country.

    When discussing migrants who arrive through irregular pathways, it’s important to understand the context behind their decisions. Many individuals who take these perilous journeys are fleeing dire circumstances, such as war, persecution, or extreme poverty. They often come from places where their safety and basic human rights are compromised, leading them to seek refuge in countries like Ireland. While irregular migration raises legitimate concerns about border security and resource allocation, it’s crucial to approach the issue with empathy and recognize the complexities involved.

    Many of these individuals ultimately wish to contribute to society and can do so if given the opportunity. Addressing the root causes of migration and creating safe, regulated avenues for entry can help mitigate some of the pressures on services while ensuring that we uphold our values of compassion and support for those in need.

    It's also essential to recognize that Ireland has a long history of immigration and emigration itself. Over the years, many Irish people have sought better opportunities abroad, often facing challenges similar to those faced by today's migrants. For instance, during the Great Famine in the mid-19th century, millions of Irish emigrants left for countries like the United States, often arriving without legal documentation. In fact, it’s estimated that around 50% of Irish immigrants to the U.S. during that period were undocumented.

    As of 2024, there are an estimated 10,000 to 15,000 undocumented Irish immigrants currently living in the United States. This figure reflects a significant number of Irish individuals who, over the years, have found themselves living and working in the U.S. without the necessary legal documentation​

    Pew Research Center

    USAFacts

    Historically, many Irish emigrants have faced similar challenges, with a notable percentage relying on social services in their host countries. For example, during the 1990s, it was estimated that around 30% of Irish immigrants in the U.K. were receiving some form of welfare support.

    As Ireland continues to evolve into a multicultural nation, it is crucial to recognize the diverse backgrounds and experiences of immigrants who contribute to the fabric of Irish society.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    …it’s important to remember… it's crucial to distinguish… It’s vital to have an honest discussion… it’s important to understand…  it’s crucial to approach… It's also essential to recognize…  it is crucial to recognize…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭lmao10


    I stand by the points I made. In any serious discussion—especially on topics like racism and immigration—precision and clarity in language are key to making sure the conversation is productive. Highlighting what’s important, crucial, or vital isn't about being repetitive or formulaic; it’s about emphasizing the parts of the conversation that really matter. If we’re going to address these issues honestly and effectively, we can’t shy away from underscoring the things that truly need attention and careful thought.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Mention the Irish emigrated, check

    Mention the famine, check

    Mention the Irish undocumented, check

    Confuse legal immigration with lads arriving claiming asylum when they are not fleeing war but want to be supported in Ireland, check

    Btw what documents did Irish people require going to America during the famine?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭lmao10


    It seems like there’s some misunderstanding of the points raised. The mention of Irish emigration and the famine isn't to check boxes, but to provide historical context—important when discussing modern immigration issues. Just as Irish people sought opportunities or fled hardship, many of today’s migrants, whether legal or seeking asylum, do so for similar reasons. The challenges faced by Irish emigrants, including being undocumented in countries like the U.S., echo the current experiences of migrants today.

    As for the question about documentation during the famine, you’re right that formal documentation wasn’t required in the same way we think of it now. However, that doesn’t change the fact that many Irish emigrants arrived with little more than hope, often depending on the goodwill of the countries that took them in. It’s worth noting that the systems and laws governing migration have evolved since then. Today, asylum seekers—whether fleeing war, persecution, or severe hardship—are within their rights to seek refuge, and it’s international law that allows them to apply for asylum regardless of how they arrive.

    The point isn’t to conflate legal immigration with asylum seekers but to address the complex nature of migration and ensure the conversation remains informed by history and humanity. It was the posters here who brought up Indians and started conflating legal immigration with asylum seekers in the first place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 895 ✭✭✭Juran


    The difference between Irish undocumented illegal in the US, Canada or Australia and the illegal IPA migrants coming to Ireland is that the Irish illegals abroad fund their life 100%, work (perhaps untaxed) to pay for their housing, food, medical care, any training they undertake, etc. They dont look or take any social handouts.

    I dont condone illegal immigration in any form, be that Irish or any other nationality, but people here need to understand that the two scenarios cannot be compared.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭lmao10


    First of all lhe term "illegal immigration" is often misused when referring to asylum seekers who arrive without passports or proper documentation. International law, particularly the 1951 Refugee Convention, explicitly recognizes the right of individuals to seek asylum from persecution, regardless of their means of entry. Labeling these individuals as "illegal" oversimplifies their complex situations, as many are fleeing life-threatening circumstances where obtaining valid travel documents was impossible. This terminology can dehumanize asylum seekers and obscure the legal protections they are entitled to, ultimately influencing public perception and policy in ways that may lead to harsher treatment of those in need of help. A more accurate and compassionate understanding of their status acknowledges their legitimate need for safety and protection.

    Second of all, not all Irish people abroad "fund their life 100%".

    In the UK, a significant number of Irish nationals rely on social welfare systems. According to a 2021 analysis of census data, around 8% of Irish-born residents in England and Wales receive benefits, highlighting that many do indeed access social support. This reliance is not unique to the Irish immigrant experience; it reflects broader patterns of community support among immigrants in various contexts. Historical instances, such as during the Great Famine (1845-1852), also demonstrate how Irish immigrants frequently depended on community resources and social aid upon arriving in new countries.

    For more details on the welfare statistics related to Irish nationals in the UK, you can visit these sites which provide comprehensive analysis based on census data.

    In terms of actual numbers, there were approximately 380,000 Irish-born residents in England and Wales at the time. Thus, around 30,400 Irish-born individuals would be receiving benefits, according to official statistics.

    Irish in Britain

    www.irishinbritain.org/what-we-do/policy-and-representation/the-census

    Many critics of immigration often point to the presence of immigrants as a strain on public services, yet they conveniently overlook the approximately 30,400 Irish individuals in the UK who are receiving benefits. According to far-right logic, one might ask, should these people be thrown out as well?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,618 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Asylum seekers are not illegal immigrants and constantly calling them such is an attempt to criminalise them.

    Claiming asylum is a legal process



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,247 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Would IPAs coming here with fake documents or no documents be classed as illegals?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭lmao10


    When individuals arrive in Ireland without proper documentation and subsequently apply for asylum, their status changes significantly under the International Protection Act 2015. This legislation governs the asylum process in Ireland and aligns with international obligations, such as the 1951 Refugee Convention. Once an asylum application is submitted, individuals are recognized as asylum seekers, granting them legal protections against deportation while their claims are assessed. They gain access to essential services, including accommodation and healthcare, and may apply for the right to work after a certain period. The Act ensures that those fleeing persecution or serious harm can seek protection and have their cases reviewed fairly, emphasizing the importance of humanitarian considerations in the immigration process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,618 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Fake documents doesn't make asylum seekers illegal. Even if someone is actually an illegal immigrant in this country, they can still legally apply for asylum, so they are no longer illegal immigrants. Asylum is a legal right.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,169 ✭✭✭Jizique


    That act needs to be repealed - anything from 1951 is inappropriate for a modern society



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement