Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War

1190191193195196208

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭Detritus70


    Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭rogber


    Bild is gutter press journalism but once in a while they get something right. This sounds plausible enough (assuming it happened before Lavrov "died" recently, a rumour the same poster was pushing)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭rogber


    Chinese banks reducing their business with Russia, obviously not for ethical reasons, but if it adds financial pressure to the Kremlin criminals can still be welcomed:



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,567 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    The most obvious answer is usually the correct one and you don't have to go looking for hypotheticals. The total aid from NATO countries to Ukraine is not the entirity of NATO's strength, but it is not an insignificant amount either. Over $100bn a year is not chump change, so it is understandable, even if disappointing, that the NATO countries are reluctant to give more.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,272 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Some countries like Sweden are putting the likes of the US to shame.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Ah the smell of burning Mordor in the morning


    Stuff going boom 💥 all around Moscow this morning



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,390 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,209 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    How crap must Putins air defences be if they can hit Moscow that effectively with drones ffs. It's not as though they shouldn't have been expecting it either given that they're nearly 3 years into their 3 day war, have approaching 750,000 dead and injured, and Ukraine has already demonstrated its willingness and ability to strike deep into Russia with drones.

    Even the partisan Russians have been well and truly hung out to dry by Putin. Will they turn on him? I won't be holding my breath.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    What air defences are there are causing more damage than the drones by slamming into buildings

    Aside this poses a big issue for the “but but Russia has DA BOMB” crowd, if Russia ever uses a nuke then the same drones can render every major Russian city unlivable by delivering dirty nuke bombs, some of these are already converted civilian crop duster planes, a fine coat of plutonium or cobalt isotope dust would cause more radiation than an airburst nuke



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,327 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Ukraine should pick out government institutions/military sites and power plants in Moscow and concentrate on them for about a month. No where else just there, give them a taste of this everyday in their capital. Day and night a few drones slamming in. Would really unsettle them in their beds and day to day life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,733 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Although it can be tempting to think that continued drone attacks on Moscow will have an impact on the local population and the war, is there any evidence of this having happened during other bombing campaigns in history?

    Frequently, support for a regime, even if unpopular, increases when the citizens feel threatened.

    Militarily, I doubt if there’s anything of importance in Moscow. Drone attacks on Moscow can only be “poking the bear” in the hope that he makes some stupid decisions.

    Like Hitler did in 1940 when after the RAF bombings of Berlin, he switched the focus of Luftwaffe bombings from the airfields to London and started the Blitz.

    In so doing he gave the RAF, who were on the ropes at the time, enough breathing space to survive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,272 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Russia is just too big an area to defend even just western European Russia. Especially when they've lost a lot of AD to Ukraine attacks already and they've to push them up to defend ammo dumps and air fields closer to the front line. It leaves a lot of their refineries exposed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭rogber


    That's what I was advocating recently (and was attacked by some of the same posters celebrating this event), there should be more and more of it.

    Will it make the population turn against Putin? Of course not. If anything the opposite might happen. But it's still a bit of well earned revenge for what Ukraine has to endure. Keep it coming



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    So todays Apple ruling raises interesting questions

    EU member state (us here in Ireland) has to collect and hand over 13bn from Apple despite multiple referendum where we were told our taxes are our own affairs yada yada and smacks of laws/rules being applied retroactively

    While EU continues to refuse to transfer 300bn of seized Russian criminal state assets to Ukraine

    It’s a fine day for rule of law when criminals are treated better than those following the law at the time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    The point here is we weren't following the law, or at least the ECJ deemed we weren't following our own law. The money comes to Ireland, not the EU, though if it's classed as a windfall then it has to go pay down our debt.

    It's not really the same situation where the EU are to take money from another jurisdiction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    its about not taking anything for granted, if you straight-lined the US from now it would end in bankruptcy its up to them to renew themselves, 36Trillion in debt is not a good place to be, it makes holding US assets a little less desirable even if there is no other game in town presently

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The US has no issues servicing it's nat debt and US treasuries are top notch collateral

    Russia on the other hand has a GDP lower than Texas



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Most of US debt is owned by people and institutions in US or allied countries

    US debt is big because debt is money and US being the richest in the world has a lot of money

    Now Chinese debt on other hand is something else to behold all tied up in worlds largest property bubble in a population that’s about to lose 300mn people (as much as live in US) couple decades and are very anti immigrant

    But we going off topic on a tangent now

    @silverharp I would recommend this book (it’s free from libraries and internet archive)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭rogber


    Delivery of Iranian ballistic missiles to Russia for use against Ukraine has been confirmed. The West, as usual, responding with talk of new sanctions instead of what would actually make a difference: give Ukraine free use of weapons anywhere they want on Russian territory, and tell Iran that Israel gets a green light to destroy more Iranian weapons facilities.

    For someone with military knowledge: what exactly are the significance of these ballistic missiles compared to what Russia already has?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,209 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Without wanting to sound like I'm buying into any of Putin's derisory red line threats, what you're proposing could set in train devastating consequences for millions more people and cause massive global instability. Global instability that I'm pretty sure suits a lot of very wealthy people by the way… the likes of Musk etc. It'll be the plebs in the street who will suffer if the Middle East completely falls to s**t… Iran, Egypt, Israel, Lebanon, Turkey, Syria etc… with tin pot dictators elsewhere in South America and Africa given free reign while the rest of the world is distracted… and China eyeing up opportunities to flex its military muscles in the midst of wars in Europe and Middle East.

    I'd much prefer if the US slapped Netanyahu down to calm tensions in that region, and at the same time the West did the same to the autocrat in the Kremlin and gave Ukraine the military hardware it needs to decimate the Russian forces on its territory.

    All this pussy footing around doesn't seem to be doing anything to stabilise things either in the Middle East or in Eastern Europe. D**king around with policies on migration, environment etc which just creates a vacuum for right leaning populists to fill. But then again, the rich are absolutely coining it these days, so I wonder why the boat is being kept from being rocked…

    I don't know how Zelensky has kept so much calm over the past couple of years as the West prevaricates endlessly. He's without doubt one of the Statesmen of the 21st century so far, which is pretty remarkable when you consider his background and relative obscurity up to a few years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭zv2


    One way to do it would be to hit Kursk or Rostov-on-Don with a dirty nuke and then tell the Russians that everyone within 300km of the Ukrainian border must evacuate because there's more on the way. That would put the frighteners on them.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,365 ✭✭✭paul71


    Exactly, and they have no way out. Russia (even without this war and the sanctions) was already in a perilous state, it has 2 major issues, it has always been a developing nation, it never reached the economic footing of a developed nation, something Ireland arguably only achieved in the mid 90s, and it has a demographic deficit.

    One of those factors is a problem for any nation, Germany is developed but has a demographic deficit (offset slightly by immigration), India has no demographic deficit but is still developing. The USA is developed and has a growing population, the best of both worlds. Russia outside Moscow and St. Petersburg is undeveloped and has an ageing, poorly educated and unhealthy population.

    The US has no issue with borrowing or its economy, in fact if it did, it would be the rest of the world who would suffer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭bilbot79


    Hopefully we can spend it on ditching the USC...

    And then Ukr beats Russia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    They don’t need to resort to any overt threats

    Just imho it renders “but but DA BOMB” type posts silly

    Yes Ukrainians don’t have nuclear weapons (big mistake giving them up it turned out) but if Putin does the evil act of exploding a nuclear device or more Ukrainians clearly have the technology to render large parts of Russia uninhabitable with existing homegrown tech they have

    And that’a before we get to what NATO or Chinese would do in such a situation

    So this war will most likely remain conventional



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,326 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Would be great to see a US admin. have courage to tackle Netanyahu, he (and Israel's behaviour under his govt.) are a source of chaos in the ME just as much as Iran is IMO.

    Just another wannabe tyrant, constrained a bit [compared to Putin or Khamenei] by the pre existing systems of a democracy but able to do a lot of damage.

    Netanyahu has (or had until quite recently!) no problems with Putin, or the Russian conquest and genocide of Ukraine.

    Israel has not helped Ukraine much at all (not much aid, no military help, no economic sanctions on Russia post Feb 2022). It has also blocked others from supplying weapons on 2 occasions that I have read of:

    • Spike anti-tank missiles that Germany wanted to send to Ukraine (designed/coproduced with israel), and;
    • Hawk air defence missiles/systems (in stocks that the US supplied to Israel, and asked for back, to send on to Ukraine).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,327 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    I think sky news was saying its the quantity that was given as they can use these Iranian ballistic missiles more for short range attacks in eastern and central Ukraine as their range isnt huge and use the more advanced longer range Russian ballistic missiles on targets in western Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,390 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Hope this turns out to be true.

    New Iranian missiles dead on arrival

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭rogber


    Actually I agree with you to a large degree, Netenjahu is a vile and reprehensible individual and I would only ever propose supporting him if it has a big knock on benefit for Ukraine. In this case it might. The Iranians, much like the Russians, are very big on threats, but as we've seen they're basically afraid of Israel because they know they'd be hammered in a war and very rarely follow through on threats.

    But yes, the most effective strategy would be to give Ukraine more and better weapons, but 2.5 years in with Ukraine on the back foot and facing what Blinken himself calls a "critical moment", do any of us believe the West is going to deliver those weapons?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement