Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Rugby Discussion 3

1136137139141142211

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    All Blacks blew it I felt - just stopped playing with around 20-25 mins to go.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    No definitive proof? He incredibly clearly loses possession of that ball. There is clear daylight between his hand and the ball. Do you not hear the sound the South African commentator makes!?

    Their bench was quite weak which showed in the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, agreed. South Africa’s ability to ratchet up the pressure in the last 20 was excellent too.

    Grant Williams and Kwagga’s try seemed to be scored too easily IMO; thought NZs goalline defence would be better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    one of the comms suggested that there was no knock on when he lost control, the ball was pushed back by the tackler then he regained control to score. Fair enough result in the end, SA weren’t great but NZ only played for 30/35 minutes, the rest was mistakes and no ideas. This wasn’t much better than the first test against Argentina.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    I’m always amazed at Irish fans ability to big up their own team and diminish others. From memory Ireland was two fantastic DGs away from going down 0-2 in SA.

    I won’t be surprised if NZ do lose by more than a score at the aviva. It’s a very tough end of year tour with no easy games and Ireland are an excellent side. But I wouldn’t be surprised either if nz won. Fine enough margins at the top



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    As opposed to…every other set of fans in the world? Come on.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Possibly, but you basically never see it called that way. I am fairly convinced that if that had gone to review it would have been overturned. Just a bad look for the TMO I think but he'll be as aware of that as anyone (though given it was Carley maybe not).



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Basically all the tries for both sides looked too easy. NZ were poor at defending near the ruck and SA were poor at defending in midfield.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,477 ✭✭✭kuang1


    So what I get from that is... You agree with me?

    Yeah. We were 2 fantastic DGs away from a 2-0 loss in SA.

    But we got them.

    We were also a Scott Barrett thigh away from a world cup semi final less than a year ago.

    And we didn't get there.

    Like you said fine margins.

    Am I really bigging up my team and diminishing yours disproportionately? Based on current form and evidence?

    I really don't think so swiwi.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Or a disallowed try away from drawing the first game…which would have won Ireland the series!

    NZL can win but any less than their best and they'll lose.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    yeah, you’d never see it called and we won’t see it again, but then often knock ons are called that have clearly gone backwards which penalises losing control. Afaik that’s not against the law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    TMO was Brian McNeice. Carley was an AR on Saturday.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Which is really more the spirit of the game?

    A long pass that goes a few cm forward to the receiver or a complete hames of regathering that falls straight down?

    An attempt to intercept a pass that is barely missed or a blatant slapdown that goes backwards?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Amazing ability of SA to consistently squeeze out wins in tight games with the kind of mental resilience long associated with NZ.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/home-summaries/?post=2346450

    So NZRU and SARU have come to an agreement for "full" tours in 2026 and 2030. Seems like the first NZ tour of SA in 2026 will be 8 matches, 3 tests and 5 provincial games. This is going to impact the Rugby Championship massively, either reducing it to 3 rounds or cancelling it altogether. Seems like a real slap in the face for Aus and Arg, and I'm surprised whatever participation agreement for TRC allows it. I get why they feel the need to do it, but things remain not fully ok down in the SH. (sorry for the awful website link)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,074 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Perhaps a desperate effort by NZ to keep SA from looking to join the 6Ns? Australian rugby really in the dumpster, going to be a difficult task to stay financially competitive if they lose the Rugby Championship and the Bledisloe



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I don't think NZRU need to worry about that, SARU would jump to join the 6N still, but they aren't going to be allowed so it's not really that relevant.

    International rugby really doesn't seem in a great place off the field, despite being more competitive than I can ever remember on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,074 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Feel like the game desperately needs a financial reset, and perhaps a deeper level of profit sharing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,410 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I think it’s probably a question of time before they join the 6N unfortunately. At the end of the day, money talks-who would ever have thought that Twickenham would have ever sold their naming rights?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    He loses control but the ball doesn't go forward because Barrett pushes it back into him. Barrett doesn't apply downward pressure while the SA player does when he regains control. Is there a law against losing control if the ball doesn't go forward? I don't think so. I am amazed that this try was given because generally losing control of the ball is penalised but by the letter of the law that ball didn't go forward. I agee that it was short though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    If Barrett is in front of Mbonambi (even if Barrett is himself moving backwards) when Mbonambi loses control and the ball touches Barret then by definition a Knock on has occurred. If Barrett is positioned anywhere else (but in front) and the ball touches him, then a Knock on has not (necessarily) occurred. I think Barrett's actions caused Mbonambi's right hand to move off the ball, but Mbonambi is still holding the ball under his arm. The grounding is on the goal line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Again, I see your point but technically Barrett pushes the back away from himself back into the carrier. For me there's no argument about it going forward, it doesn't. But the controversy is because people have been trained to expect a knock on ruling with any loss of control.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,045 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    I think if a knock was given no-one would have protested. People usually think if you loose the ball, it's by default a knock on unless it is really really clear you pushed the ball backwards. If it's anyway close to 50 - 50, it's usually a knock on call and no-one minds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    True.

    This is perhaps more appropriate to the Rules thread so won't pursue it further. Always a good idea to refresh one's knowledge of the Laws & Definitions when attempting to judge how the game is officiated.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 12,872 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    The “solution”, for what it’s worth, is apparently to keep Bledisloe going by means of a one-off test on Anzac Day (in April, right in the middle of the Super Rugby season). You can’t help feel that all this won’t help the already dire straits Australian rugby is in, though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Teams for SA vs NZ:

    Teams:

    South Africa

    15 Willie le Roux, 14 Canan Moodie, 13 Jesse Kriel, 12 Damian de Allende, 11 Cheslin Kolbe, 10 Handre Pollard, 9 Grant Williams, 8 Jasper Wiese, 7 Pieter-Steph du Toit, 6 Siya Kolisi (captain), 5 Ruan Nortje, 4 Eben Etzebeth, 3 Frans Malherbe, 2 Bongi Mbonambi, 1 Ox Nche

    Substitutes: 16 Malcolm Marx, 17 Gerhard Steenekamp, 18 Vincent Koch, 19 Kwagga Smith, 20 Elrigh Louw, 21 Jaden Hendrikse, 22 Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu, 23 Lukhanyo Am

    New Zealand

    15 Will Jordan, 14 Sevu Reece, 13 Rieko Ioane, 12 Jordie Barrett, 11 Mark Tele’a, 10 Damian McKenzie, 9 Cortez Ratima, 8 Ardie Savea, 7 Sam Cane, 6 Wallace Sititi, 5 Tupou Vaa'i, 4 Scott Barrett (captain), 3 Tyrel Lomax, 2 Codie Taylor, 1 Tamaiti Williams

    16 Asafo Aumua, 17 Ofa Tu’ungafasi, 18 Fletcher Newell, 19 Sam Darry, 20 Luke Jacobson, 21 TJ Perenara, 22 Anton Lienert-Brown, 23 Beauden Barrett  



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Plenty of changes on both sides.

    Think the All Blacks have said Blackadder and Caleb Clarke's absences are injury related.

    I think it's a bit regressive for the Boks to bring Pollard back in for Sacha (who I felt was really good last week for the most part), but understand bringing Willie le Roux back in as I think the Bok backline looks much more dangerous with him linking play. Ruan Nortje has had a couple of good performances, and looks a really good lineout operator. Jasper Wiese had an excellent game last week and brings a real edge to the Boks pack IMO.

    On the ABs side it'll be interesting to see if they can get Will Jordan more involved from the 15 shirt. I think Rieko Ioane's form has been poor and he's lucky to be still in the shirt IMO. Pack went pretty well last week, but Blackadder (despite conceding a lot of penalties) will be a loss. Sititi is quite a different player.

    Looking forward to it again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    I dont have a problem with Pollard starting. Cant just start Sacha every game now, have to manage and rotate. And if not Pollard then who, Libbok? Against NZ? Im not too sure that would be a good idea.

    Back line have a lot of options, even if theres no wing or full back on the bench, have enough utility players who can move around if needs be.

    My concern is Kolisi playing. State of him after last week's match, then speculating about a broken cheek bone, now confirmed he will be playing with a broken nose. That cant be good for him or the team.

    Gonna be a tougher game than last week I think, for SA especially, with maybe half the stadium supporting NZ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    No, I don't really rate Libbok, unless someone else is going to take over goalkicking for him.

    I just think there would have been no harm in persisting with Sacha and giving him a longer run in the jersey to continue to build confidence. To me, the ceiling for how good the Boks can be is higher with him at 10 over Pollard (which is saying a lot when you consider they're back to back RWC champions). Especially as he's been largely kicking well and showed good composure over the past few games.

    On Kolisi - it's another one of these bizarre scenarios where it seemed he'd incurred a relatively serious injury, and they made a lot of noise about it (similar to Marx' injury post the Ireland second test), and then the player is back almost immediately. A concern I'd have on Kolisi is the way the Boks are using him now under Tony Brown's system (just in the context of this injury) - they seem to have him popping up as a carrier on a way more frequent basis. It's working well, and he's well suited to it, but he's shipping a lot of hits from it too.

    Agreed the Boks have lots of versatility in the backs - le Roux, Moodie, Kriel, Sacha, Grant Williams and Cheslin can all realistically cover multiple positions to a high level.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭Jacovs




Advertisement
Advertisement