Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Random Running Questions

1329330332334335

Comments

  • Subscribers Posts: 710 ✭✭✭FlipperThePriest


    Don't know if anyone else makes their own? I've never bothered with the gels, I have used the following throughout marathon training and during the marathon itself. Other than this, only other thing I've ever used for fuel is jelly sweets, but they get messy in wet weather.

    • honey - 80gm (ish)
    • lemon juice (maybe a half squeezed)
    • salt (half a teaspoon)
    • few drops of dilute orange for flavour
    • water (about 150ml, suppose you could use less if you wanted gel like consistency)

    Mix and add to 250ml soft flask. Always does the trick. I've tried adding caffeine tablets to the above, but always felt a bit shook afterward, so stopped using them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,824 ✭✭✭Enduro




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭Bassfish


    Anyone have any idea what could cause you to slow down your running pace without meaning to? I'm a very basic slow jogger. Usually used to run 5 to 10k at 6:10 per km or thereabouts comfortably enough. I've been losing weight amd thought I would naturally speed up because I'm carrying less but the opposite is happening. Feels like the same level of effort and I'm down to 6:50 or 7;00 per km. Can't pin point any particular reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,517 ✭✭✭Sunny Dayz


    It could be possible that you are not fueling yourself enough?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,698 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    Losing concentration?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 701 ✭✭✭Escapees


    Heat perhaps, i.e. hot weather, dare I suggest it. I'm not into the over-focus on hydration these days, but certainly it can become an issue in hot weather if overweight or overdressed...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,341 ✭✭✭witnessmenow


    Are you calorie counting to lose weight? If so, how much of a deficit are you typically doing per day? Or do you have another approach?

    I've been calorie counting for about 3 months and have been losing weight, and at the start I was probably being too aggressive with it. Was finding runs a bit harder effort wise for sure.

    The most concrete example I have is one Saturday early on, I planned to run 14k at just over 6:30/km , and after 12k I had to take a walk break.

    The following Saturday I had a 10mile race. For the week I increased my calories a bit, especially on Friday, and fuelled more than I typically would on the run with gels. My average pace for the race was 6:08/km, which I know is not fast, but it's a pretty big improvement on not being able to run 12k at a slower speed only the week before.

    It's tough to get the balance right between eating enough to properly run and lose weight, but if you can get it right, losing weight definitely makes a huge difference.

    I raced another 10 mile about 6 or 7 weeks after the above and my average pace was 5:33/km. I had done 30-40km per week in between so I probably was fitter anyways, but I was 6kg lighter too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭Bassfish


    Thanks for that. Maybe it is a fuel issue. I usually eat about 1800-2000 kcal a day. I thought that not having enough fuel on board would effect the length of the run rather than the speed. I'm slower from the very first km.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,341 ✭✭✭witnessmenow


    Were you at your heavier weight when running the 6:10 pace runs? Or have you put on weight since then?

    1800-2000 seems pretty reasonable without knowing what type of food it is.

    When I was being too aggressive with the calories I could feel it even on 5k runs. That was 1500 calories max though

    What time of day do you normally run? If you normally run in the mornings, maybe try an evening run after you've had some food and see how you feel.

    One thing I felt helped for the first few weeks was just almost writing off running performance for a few weeks. Primary goal was weight, running was second. I'd commit to getting the runs done but if I had to slow down to do them, I would. (And I definitely did need to)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭Bassfish


    This is the thing, I was running 6:10s when I was 7 or 8kg heavier! It's usually late evening when I run so maybe I'm underestimating how tired I am after a long day. Thinking maybe I need to be doing some leg strength work between the runs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,698 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    Anyone here with experience of racing off heart rate? Thinking of doing the Craughwell 10 mile next week.

    Part of my issue is that I don’t really know what pace I can do it in or for that matter the marathon. So I was hoping to use HR to pace this race and then see where that leaves me for the marathon.

    Have been doing all my longer runs and recovery runs off HR so I figure its no harm to give it a go in a race that doesn’t mean too much to me.

    Was planning on 80% for 8k, 85 for the next 5k and then let it go for the last 3k.

    I do realise that without proper testing that I can’t really know my zones but I figure there are that many variables and unknows that being out by 5% on any one figure will statistically even itself out with something else being out. I’m not going to get too caught up on the zones being out by a few BPMs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,341 ✭✭✭witnessmenow


    I wouldn't say I raced by my heart rate, I'd try go more on feel in the situation your describing but I've definitely use it as a thing to keep an eye on. I've seen some comments online that it's a bad idea, but seems like a good marker of effort to me.

    I'm not a very experienced runner so hopefully other more experienced folks can share, but here are my two cents on it.

    My max HR is about 192, I do most of my training runs targeting 150. I know from experience that 170-180 or so is me pushing but probably manageable pace, above 180 is where I'm on borrowed time at that stage if I keep it up.

    For my last 10 miles run, I also didn't have a clue what pace to do so I was going by feel but I was happy enough to be averaging around the 170 -175 mark til the last 4 or 5K. If I was going more than that I would pull back. It was tough but was able to keep it up. That's a good bit higher than the 80% your suggesting (assuming 80% of max), it's closer to 90%. I was fairly cooked towards the end though, even if it was 1k more I wouldn't have been able to keep it up.

    Just to note I'm 37, so my HR is higher than the 220 - age formula. Im just putting my max HR as the max I've witnessed. Not sure what you'd be basing your max on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭marathon2022


    Racing a 10-miler based purely on heart rate is a bad strategy for a shed load of reasons -Anxiety or excitement before or during a race can elevate your HR leading to bad judgement of your effort level. Also temperature and humidity can affect your heart rate, making it difficult to maintain a consistent HR. You might even end up adjusting your pace too frequently, especially if your HR spikes or dips due to factors other than your running effort. This can lead to an inefficient race strategy making it difficult to maintain a steady pace.

    Running on uneven terrain, or in windy conditions will affect your HR. If you try to maintain a consistent HR you will slow down too much on hills or speed up too much on descents, which will disrupt your race performance. you to miss out on adjusting your strategy based on race conditions, pacing with other runners for example, responding to competitors, or taking advantage of favorable sections of the course.

    Racing is dynamic and I would think focusing on HR will only limit your ability to respond to changes during the race. You might miss opportunities to push harder when you feel good or fail to conserve energy when you need to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,698 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    Cheers for that. The reason I said 80% was based off a long run/tempo where I was 20 minutes on, 20 off X3, I was at about 167 for the hard runs and by the end of the third I was done. I’m taking max around 188, so that was 89%.

    Having said that it was after a long week, had done a 20k the night before and that was a 25k run, so everything was tired. Maybe in a race I’d be able to hold it at that or slightly lower, say 165.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,698 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    Genuine question but would you not combine the HR with a race strategy? Not stick rigidly to the HR but use it as a base to judge your effort, taking into account that it will spike when you hit a hill and you need to find a sweet spot that balances the HR and not burning yourself out on the hill either.

    If you wanted to trial racing by HR rate what race would you recommend?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭marathon2022


    I wouldn't combine HR with race strategy because I find it just complicates things(as per my reply). Previous races and the preceding training block usually provide enough to go on for pacing strategy.

    Thats me, maybe some of the more experienced chaps around here have different experiences with racing by HR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,213 ✭✭✭Trampas


    If you want to keep it a hr range then I’d be more give it a quick check after a couple of km to see what range I’m in on the assumption nothing out of the ordinary in conditions (weather or route) if it’s good then just keep the effort up if at the intended pace. Gives it a chance to settle down after the initial spike at the start



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,698 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭marathon2022


    I am, but of course you should try it. Why not, if the 10 mile is not your target race then its a free hit bu if you're looking for a guide on Marathon pace, maybe go all out at the 10 mile, ignore your HR.

    Best of luck either way, even though I like the 10 mile distance, never raced it 😎



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭FinnC


    I'd go further and say don't train off HR, but each to their own.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,213 ✭✭✭Trampas


    What do you mean by that. Ignore hr completely or just hr training and figure out what’s easy, threshold and hard.

    Apart from the vast majority of people running easy to hard I’d even go more would do it without some sort of hr monitoring but unless they’re using a chest or arm strap then it’s pot luck on the figures so kind of pointless then



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,482 ✭✭✭Lazare


    For me it's HR for 80% of my running, and that's just simply watching that it stays <130.

    Sessions and racing are guided by pace.

    I was (and still somewhat am) intrigued by the idea of testing my LTHR a week or two out from a mara and racing based on that though.

    May well test it some time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,004 ✭✭✭Unknownability


    Unbelievably, I am after getting an entry into Tokyo through the general ballot.

    Has anyone done it before, grateful for any tips.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,692 ✭✭✭DeepBlue


    Congrats, I had the impression that it was easier to win the Euromillions than get an entry through that ballot 😱



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,213 ✭✭✭Trampas


    Get the test done but I wouldn’t be doing it before a marathon that close. You should treat the test like a race as you’ll be working during it. Especially if they do a v02 as part of it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,004 ✭✭✭Unknownability


    Thanks, looking through emails it seems it was also my first time entering the ballot.

    I know have Tokyo, Paris and London in two months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,482 ✭✭✭Lazare


    Cheers, yeah, I've done one before. I would say it's more like a mini session.

    Fine to do during taper imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭MY BAD


    A question for marathon runners here! If you were to suggest a marathon plan to follow for my first marathon next autumn what would it be? I'm running around 15 years but I haven't raced in almost 5 years. Which I hope to change next spring. I'd like to push towards sub 3. My last half was 83:56 back in 2016 and in 2019/20 I was sub 17 minutes 5k sub 36 minutes 10k which seems like ages ago now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭SuspectZero


    Maybe some background on your mileage might help? Like ballpark starting mileage and ending mileage that you find sustainable? And where you find(if you do) to breakdown from niggles or injuries?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,134 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    Anyone done two in a week before, I am doing Amsterdam in Sunday and then Dublin following Sunday, I am a middle of the road 4 hour runner, I did Berlin 3 weeks ago so have a good bit of mileage in the legs, how painful is it actually going be.



Advertisement