Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Rugby Discussion 3

1132133135137138211

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,597 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Im glad Italy are in and yes, they play a nice game which I hope they can built to consistently compete. But they're still a long way off that, even with a couple of pro teams competing at the highest level. Rugby has also moved on, the top teams are very very good and the prospect of Portugal or Germany or Georgia getting there without first building a strong domestic game are tiny.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think it is easy to forget just how bad Ireland were and for just how long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,075 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I think given that the funding model of rugby is driven by the international game, it's unfair and unrealistic to expect Tier 2 nations to build up strong domestic games that can allow them to compete with Tier 1 teams. Why ask them to do something that we didn't do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,597 ✭✭✭ersatz


    There should be a system where T2 teams get x home tests and x away against T1 teams every WC cycle. You could add competition against T1 A Teams annually or bi-annually. Bringing teams straight to 6N level would be counter prouductive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,075 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'd love to see a Euros comp, during the Lions years. Be great as a summer competition.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The problem is money.

    There isn't enough money to fund all of this.

    Most of the National unions are in debt and don't break even most years - Even the Tier 1 countries.

    So playing more games against Tier 2 while totally laudable is just more cost.

    Half-full stadia with cheap(er) ticket prices and no meaningful TV/Ad revenue doesn't make financial sense sadly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,597 ✭✭✭ersatz


    defo a challenge, but ABs saw 40k show up in Sam Diego a few weeks ago. How many would they/ireland/England/SA get once every few years in Lisbon or Munich? If that’s not viable then the notion of promoting these teams to a higher level seems even more remote.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Just out of curiosity, whats school rugby like in Ireland?

    This past saturday saw the end of season game between 2 of the top rugby schools in SA, Paul Roos Gymnasium in Stellenbosch and Grey College. Stadium sold out within minutes, not clear what the capacity is though. And they added additional 2500 seats which also sold out in minutes.

    You would see the same scenes when Paarl Gymnasium plays Paarl Boys High in their annual interschool derby. And many other schools derbies across the country annually. Games broadcast live on tv and all.

    Both teams were also without top players who were representing SA vs Ireland in Paarl in the u/18 competition the same weekend.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Exhibition matches between Tier 1 teams in other countries is one thing and can help with general awareness of the game etc.

    But Ireland for example travelling to play Spain or Portugal for example is a short term loss maker so the most part.

    Long term it would be good , but the costs need to be borne today and as I said , most of the countries are already financially under-water.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,724 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Plus is would be a second-string Ireland team. So the main reason for a neutral to watch it to buy a ticket wouldn't be there as the big-name Ireland players wouldn't play.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,724 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    No suggesting it should happen, I'd just like to watch it.

    For the 6N, let the top 2 Pacific island teams play each other over 2 legs. Winner plays in the 6N that year, based in Europe (Belgium was often suggested when they talked about Argentina joining the 6N).

    They'd be everyone's second team and the money would be a boost to the Pacific island teams.

    The Pacific teams must be the vest value for money teams in the world. Samoa has the population of Cork city and tiny resources and make a decent team. They'd be dangerous with half the resources of Ireland.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    There was a "world schools cup" a few months back - Think St Michaels were the Irish representatives , not sure who won overall but the scores I saw suggested that the teams were all fairly competitive . I wasn't seeing massive wins for SA or NZ teams for example and given the general performances in recent years of the SA and NZ under 20's at the world cups I don't think they are ahead of schools in Europe.

    They do seem to get big attendances though..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Schools rugby in Ireland is very very regional, and while extremely popular in certain small pockets, probably isn't as representative of wider rugby support in the country as it might be in SA.

    All four provinces will have a Schools cup competition, and most tend to be played in the provincial ground with a final around St Patrick's Day roughly in March, and will almost always pull in a pretty good crowd.

    The dominant schools in both Leinster & Munster tend to be private (fee-paying) schools. This isn't really the case in Connacht (don't think there are any/many private schools outside of grinds schools) and Ulster.

    The Leinster Schools Cup Final will be played in the RDS, and in recent years has pulled in crowds of 10k-15k for the game, depending on the schools involved. Don't think it's quite as large as that in the other provinces but others will be better informed and could comment more closely.

    It gets a good level of coverage in sporting media (probably disproportionate to the actual amount of people who care about it I'm in being honest), and amongst rugby anoraks (like the people on this forum for example) people would follow it quite closely because it is still an enormous pathway for players moving into professional rugby.

    Similar to the big South African schools - the best rugby schools in Ireland are extremely well funded and have excellent facilities. An awful lot of Irish rugby stars of the past 20 years have gone to a very small number of schools i.e. Blackrock College in Leinster (Brian O'Driscoll, Leo Cullen, Caelan Doris, Garry Ringrose, Hugo Keena etc), PBC in Cork (Ronan O'Gara, Peter O'Mahony, Peter Stringer, Simon Zebo), RBAI in Ulster, and a handful of others historically very prominent.

    I looked at this again very recently and think of the c. 234 professional rugby players across the four Irish provinces (and including their academies), 20% of those players attended either Blackrock College (which must be one of the biggest professional rugby player producing schools in the world) or St Michael's College, two schools that are about 3km away from each other in a relatively small pocket of South Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,711 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    "You have to expand the game"

    Why ?

    I understand the argument with something like Gaelic Football where you have counties where it's their number 1 sport and they are shte at it. But the Germans and Spanish are not sitting around bored waiting to be saved by finally having a sport to play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Because 'the game' is not just the professional clubs & international sides. Those who play / coach / work in the pro game originate the amateur clubs & schools. The pro game is paid for by the audience & that audience wants more entertainment, not less. Lose the audience interest & you lose the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,711 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    But in the context of adding more weak teams to the tournament how is that entertaining the audience ?

    And a fair portion of the "pro audience" don't give a shte about schools or amateur clubs and loads don't even have a pro club. If anything the constant lust for pro/TV fan expansion is the biggest danger to the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,597 ✭✭✭ersatz


    it’s hard to know without seeing it happen but how many punters do you need in Spain/Germany to make a match financially viable? On the A tournament thing I think that would work domestically for tier 2 countries, would Irish/English fans ravel for an A match, not sure but how many are needed to make it viable and how long to generate the tv audience to build it up? For me if WR are committed to building the game and the options are adding teams to the 6N or developing a serious T2 comp with the likes of Ireland France and England involved thru A teams, the latter seems more likely to succeed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,075 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    You identify the biggest issue with WR, short term mindsets. I don't think it would be catastrophic for the game if tournaments were opened up. Might there be less money for a bit? Quite possibly, but the potential for growth would be worth some pain. Top teams want to eat their cake and have it too. Ring fence their profits, but also expand their reach into new markets



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,923 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    The problem is that most national unions are so cash-strapped that the "less money for a bit" would send them to the wall.

    Playing the long-term game only works if you have the ability to survive the short-term.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Exactly.

    Wales couldn't afford to buy the team a second round of Sandwiches after training these days , let alone pay for a squad to go and play in Spain, Georgia etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,923 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    The IRFU is one of the better run unions, and even we usually operate at a breakeven or loss-making basis.

    https://www.irishrugby.ie/irfu/about/annual-report/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,075 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Whats the solution, continue to do the same things that have left the game in a precarious situation or look to do something different? There's an argument to be made that the game needs to step back, costs have outstripped profits in a way that's unsustainable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    The regular inclusion of Tier 2 & 3 nations in the RWC is not usually welcomed by regular long standing followers of Tier 1 sides. Games between Tier 1 & lower Tier nations rarely result in anything approaching an even contest and are considered a side show by some. But for rugby followers in Tier 2 & 3 nations these games are hugely important and a source of real pride. It's easy being a follower of a Tier 1 nation, but we don't grow the game.

    Ignoring what people want as entertainment sounds elitist and choosing not to engage with & encourage other nations and their followers to improve comes across as self-satisfied. Like it or not, the audience pays for the game.

    Expansion benefits the stronger sides more by providing a bigger audience. That audience is not going to be composed of those who already join / play / support the established Clubs / provinces / nations. It's going to be composed of people who never had any connection to rugby before their sides were included.

    Rugby is moving closer to imploding, and the solution is expansion (while avoiding the excesses of soccer & golf).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,711 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Expansion of the World Cup doesn't necessarily provide a bigger audience. Adding a team like Germany won't move that needle. Spain and Portugal are already in and the vast majority of those countries doesn't give a shte. They are about as popular as the Irish water polo team.

    Rugby is moving closer to imploding because of expansion.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,323 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    And rugby will implode if it doesn't expand and gets countries more opportunities and chances to develop. The sport can't stick with a closed off 6 nations and eugby championahip and those 10 sides playing a few others beyond those tournaments occasionally. The sport needs to expand to grow and atrengthn



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,711 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I agree about the 6 Nations and Rugby Championship I just think the world cup is the wrong place.

    Also plenty of sports survive with their small fanbase. Rugby's problem is delusions of grandeur. Stop chasing soccer and it will stop imploding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,080 ✭✭✭✭The Iron Giant


    Rugby will implode a lot quicker if it tries to expand without the correct foundations, which it doesn't have.

    You keep saying 'needs to grow' without really giving any reason why it needs to outside of it being 'good for the game' which is just a soundbite. There is nothing to suggest there is material money or footfall in smaller nations outside of sheer optimism. Italy have been in the 6N for twenty years and none of my Italian friends have a notion about the game in Italy.

    If we take the here and now - Wales and Scotland are currently on their arse whilst currently being well recompensed in a 6 Nations competition being topped up with additional games in Summer/Autumn against for lack of a better term, Top 10 opposition that generally draw high gate receipts (in rugby terms). In what world is it a smart business decision to start forgoing some of that income for less income because of some charitable 'grow the game' fallacy? Wales are not going to make anything near the money that they currently make placing Australia and South Africa and instead playing Germany and Belgium and if anything it will hurt the domestic game because fans won't turn out en-masse to see Wales put a cricket score on Belgium.

    If you're the Scottish Rugby Union, which has just lost £10m in the last financial year, you would be laughed out of the room in a strategic meeting if you thought that the road to turning it around was that Germany, Romania etc. are full of untapped riches that will turn the sport around. Unions don't have the luxury of time or resources that you seem to think they have to forgoe precious existing revenue streams.

    Instead of giving some long-term "its good for the game", how exactly do you suggest that a Scotland or Wales try to stay afloat in the short term with their national team? The only answer is to generate revenue, not in 5 years or 10 years, but now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,597 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Growing the game is a little meaningless. The game is becoming more popular in Portugal with greater participation and more players than before. It’s now the #2 sport. Japan has seen similar growth over the last decade. None of this has much to do w WR or the kindness of tier 1 teams. There are other examples, U.S.A. is another place where the game has grown significantly over ten years. WR’s function should be to support that by at least facilitating tests against better teams between world cups. The idea that Wales or Scotland can’t afford 1 test a year against a minnow is just blowing smoke, if that’s what kills then then off they go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,526 ✭✭✭Blut2


    I'm surprised the senior cup final is only pulling in circa 10k attendance these days. I remember going to finals in Lansdowne Road in the mid 2000s and the entire lower tier was usually pretty full, but that was back in the Celtic Tiger era I guess. Peak Ross O'Carroll Kelly fever for schools rugby in Dublin anyway.

    edit: a quick google is suggesting back then attendance used to be circa 25,000, but its now more recently in the 10k-15k range due to moving to the RDS and TV coverage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,711 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Are you sure about that Portugal stat ?

    I can find nothing to back up it even being top 5.

    Most of England can't tell you anything meaningful about rugby union never mind Portugal, USA or Japan.



Advertisement
Advertisement