Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1802803805807808910

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I think there has been plenty of evidence that most people using the HTB didn’t necessarily ‘need it’.
    It’s a refund of their own tax contributions to give them a relative edge in bidding against SSBs and investors and also a bit of a bone to builders to encourage more supply.

    The absolute numbers and proportion of new builds going to FTBs has been increasing year on year despite the value of the subsidy provided being eroded by inflation over time. The subsidy is pretty much redundant in Dublin now because of the price cap yet still you’ll find queues at most new build launches.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,675 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I agree that most who availed of HTB probably didn't need it. I was also thinking of the First Home Scheme - seems astonishing we're offering to buy up to 1/3 of the property for FTBers if they can well afford it themselves.

    I'd also lean to the right economically on this, and strongly believe we should be abolishing all these schemes even if FTB's cannot afford to buy at market prices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    There was a debate some weeks ago, about EA's deliberately underquoting the asking price of property to drive bidding wars.

    Some would have you believe that the EA do this because one cannot reasonably expect a professional Estate Agent to value a property with certainty (but will charge you a fee when the bank wants it in writing before issuing a mortgage)

    But most reasonable intelligent people know that the EA do this deliberately to drive up the price.

    Exhibit A:

    image.png

    EA's going against their code of practice, for a quick buck?

    Estate Agents would never do such a thing!! ;)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,165 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,306 ✭✭✭Blut2




  • Posts: 14,708 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think you will find they voted to leave the EU, not the continent, but carry on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,306 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The specific terms of Brexit have meant that the UK is no longer part of Europe for data collection purposes by Eurostat (the creator of that chart).

    This is entirely down to the UK's choice of Brexit specifics, full EU membership is not a requirement (see Norway, Switzerland etc being included) to be included in Eurostat data collection.

    The UK is effectively no longer part of Europe in quite far ranging aspects of data collection and presentation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Did you bother reading the article before linking it. Yes the CSO have drilled down and estimated about 73k informal tenancies. About 65% are rented at sub 30% below normal rent levels. Most are in rural Ireland

    Some are where employers provide accommodation to employees. Some are described as guardianship tenancies where a person is renting to person related to them.

    Basically nothing to see here

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,165 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    The main word you seem to have skipped over after the drilling down is "estimated". Their estimates may be way off.

    I personally know of several rental setups that are not registered with the RTB, that do not fall into any of the categories of their '"estimates" - i.e. fully professional rental setups in Dublin paying full market rate, where landlord pretends the tenants are not actually 'tenants'. This 'landlord' has multiple 'rental' properties. Surely he cannot be on his own - we are in the middle of a housing crisis.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,890 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Exactly the type of landlord I would be looking for, I'd prefer cheaper rent than a tax credit. I suspect most rentals in Limerick were 30% under new rental levels prior to the eviction ban. Since then the exodus of landlords has been like a tsunami and new rentals are like hens teeth

    Never ever under estimate the ability of FFG to fcuk things up. It astounds me that a State completely incapable of managing it's own rentals would tax those people that can to the tune of 50%+.

    Yet we continue to vote for these fools and I'm surrounded by blue shirts. Where is the problem here? The people or the gangsters we vote for



  • Posts: 14,708 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I suspect a considerable number of those LLs who left the market over the last 2 years, had SFs proposed complete ban on no fault evictions in mind, when it looked a strong possibility that they would form the next government. I don’t agree with RPZ legislation, it has made matters even worse, but it would be churlish not to acknowledge that there were strong calls for its introduction from people other than FFG, some (SF/PBP) who said it didn’t go far enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭DataDude


    The main opposition party manifesto is to increase marginal rates on income over €100k (i.e. what most landlords will pay) to almost 60% so maybe that’s why?

    How do you think landlord rental income being taxed at lower rate than a nurses overtime would play in this country?

    Giving out about the rate of tax in this country and using it as a reason to vote for opposition in the same post…

    SF, PBP, Labour, Social Democrats…lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    And the eviction ban was pushed by SF, PBP, Solidarity, SD and Labour party. The probably because of the pressure exerted by opposition the government caved in. However TBF they removed the eviction bas as fast as possible when they saw the issues with it.

    One of the reasons for significant rent increases in Linerick was that LL in area that were not in RPZ's significantly rose the rental prices as they feared the introducing of RPZ's which happened last year.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭DataDude


    RPZ legislation perfectly encapsulates where Irish policy has gone.

    Left wing opposition screaming for an outright ban on any increases in rent at all.

    Government realises this is lunacy but conscious of public perception of landlords, along with knowing there is no alternative ‘right wing’ party in Ireland move sharply to the left and deliver a slightly softer version where increases are capped at 2% but not banned

    Prices continue to rise. Left wing parties continue to scream for outright caps on rent increases. Government responds again with slightly tighter policy (capped at inflation or 2%, whichever is lower)

    I can almost guarantee nobody in FG believes in RPZs but they have tactically taken up that position as they know anybody who doesn’t agree with them has to vote for them anyway as all opposition parties want a more extreme version of what we already have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,890 ✭✭✭Villa05


    There is no requirement to increase income taxes in this country with plenty of scope reduce them were they spent a bit more wisely. A party that represents people who get up early should recognise that

    If it meant that the nurse was doing the overtime in Ireland and not Qatar, would that be progress?

    FFG should be representative of these people instead they are muppets to high finance with funds, land hoarders, and developers the benificaries of there policies, not the people or the economy.

    All these entities have former FFG politicians as there lobbyists and the country and it's people will again pay a very high price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I’m extremely pro-lowering taxes on all middle to high income earners. Therefore I will continue to vote for current government.

    As, scarily, despite having the most progressive tax system in the world, every single opposition party openly wants to increase income taxes on mid to high incomes further.

    There is no doubt FG in particular would love to reduce the 52% marginal income tax but they would get utterly annihilated for doing so. We get what we deserve as a voter base.

    The political spectrum is split between hard left (SF, PBP, SD, Labour), centre left (FF, FG) and anti immigration (i would say right wing but don’t think these people have any economic policies and if they did, I expect they would be left wing given their support base).

    Centre left (what we have) is the best of a very bad bunch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 980 ✭✭✭stevedublin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I am in no way in agreement with DataDude right leaning housing beliefs or majority of their beliefs to be honest as they come across as very elitist in my opinion. However they are correct that "At present, Ireland's top marginal rate of tax is 52 per cent for employees and 55 per cent for self-employed."

    https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2024-02-01/220/#:~:text=Minister%20for%20Finance,-Share&text=At%20present%2C%20Ireland's%20top%20marginal,the%20top%20marginal%20tax%20rates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭engineerws


    Yes nothing to see.

    People renting on an informal basis where likely to be paying 30pc less rent than those with a formal agreement in place.

    And these houses rental without a formal rental agreement being in place were more likely to be located in a rural area.

    Just massive and endemic tax fraud 👍



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Wrong.

    48% on income over €42,000 (single person€ and 52% on income over €70,044. Actually 55% for self employed over €100k

    You’re forgetting PRSI and USC



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    You can look at it that way but tge winner is the tenant who are getting discounted probably most of the tax due to the government. The LL is taking IMO taking a huge risk with little upside if he is caught.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭engineerws


    Why are they not caught? The CSO should just send in the data to revenue or send revenue around. Charge them €20k for every year of theft, problem solved 👌



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,272 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,890 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I’m extremely pro-lowering taxes on all middle to high income earners. Therefore I will continue to vote for current government

    Would you correlate high personal taxes with extremely poor housing policy. We've had multiple examples of where 2 to 3 housing units could be provided for what the state is paying for 1. Additionally housing was sold for half the price of what the state is paying in subsidies for new supply

    We are at our peak in terms of numbers at work and salaries for those people. Housing should be able wash it's own face and be a net contributer to the state in such circumstances. Instead the department of housing is going through 8 billion per year (circa 25% of 2023 paye receipts) .

    I'm not so sold as you on FG being centre left. The indigenous wealth of the country is in land and property and contributes little or no tax, with all policies pumping the value to unsustainable levels. There a top 5% party with housing policies akin to a wolf disguised as a sheep.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14


    and the leg up for FTBs is only after they have borrow the absolute max mortgage the bank will give them - the government is effectively propping up prices for builders and adding a second interest only mortgage onto buyers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,890 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Rpzs might have worked had they a corresponding tax break to compensate LL's for increased costs/inflation and a plan to balance supply/demand dynamics. FFG policies were abysmal in this aspect

    I'm only familiar with the city and surrounds. They've been Rpz for much longer and many landlords were caught with below market rents, given the recession effects were far more traumatic than the rest of the country



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭DataDude


    No not really. Housing spend was less than 6% of government spending in 2023. It’s less than the GROWTH in Health spending in the last 5 years alone.
    In terms of your comment on ‘washing its face’, the figure you’re quoting is purely the budget allocated to spending. You don’t have the numbers on what it’s generating on the other side as all of the income is allocated centrally. The €6bn is not a ‘net spend’ because the DoH don’t receive the stamp duty, income tax, VAT etc. that housing generates.

    I’m pretty right wing but even I accept there’s going to always need to be some spend on social and affordable housing. So if you could even optimistically halve that €6bn it really makes no difference to the overall finances of the country.

    On FG not being centre left. Of course there is a spectrum, and I agree property taxes are far far too low in this country (again, the biggest opposition party want to abolish this altogether) but they’ve been in government for 16 years which has seen us

    • have the most progressive income tax system in the world, which redistributes wealth inequality more than any other country
    • Introduce RPZ zones
    • Increases in HAP, Social Hosuing, Affordable purchase etc.
    • Eviction bans
    • Unprecedented growth in state spending on health and welfare

    There will definitely be some counter examples (e.g. upcoming inheritance tax nonsense) but on the big areas issues of taxation and welfare it’s very difficult to say Ireland is not being governed as a predominantly left wing country.

    Much of the things you have given out about in your posts, all opposition parties want to do, but in a more extreme way. You’re giving out about left wing policies and saying you’ll protest that by voting more left. I don’t see any logic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,621 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    In fairness, its completely valid to criticise current government for their actions even if opposition parties may be even more extreme.

    Opposition parties are not in government - despite the screeching they do not/should not influence actual policy.

    That FG/FF have been so anti landlord despite not relying on any SF/PBP/SocDem/LAB support to keep them in govt is quite astonishing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Agree you can complain but what are you actually going to do? Vote for one of the even more anti landlord/higher tax parties?

    Thats why it makes sense. You only need to be slightly less anti landlord than all the others to maximize your votes.

    Id have some hopes that with their new 5 year mandate under Harris that FG will go back to what they really think rather than pandering to pick up some centre left votes. Time will tell.



Advertisement