Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War

18889919394208

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,580 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    I don't know too much easier.

    But surely Ukraine with F16s > Ukraine without F16s.

    A lot has been made of the fact that Ukraine barely have an air force, but the Russians still struggle to get air superiority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,949 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    A big plus is the integration of various Western ordinance. Purpose designed versus Jerry-rigged to older Migs and Sukhois.

    As you point out, the Russians are having difficulty with the existing Ukrainian air force. A steady supply of F16s would cause them more headaches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,044 ✭✭✭jmreire


    There has been reports about Russians having finished their contract terms and looking to return home, being refused permission to leave, and those that did were being charged with deserting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,681 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭rogber


    According to latest survey from Ukrainian Razunkov Centre think-tank, 44 percent of Ukrainians in favour of negotiating with Russia to try and end the war, but 80 percent against Putin's current conditions. Hard to know what to read into that except a growing sense that it's time to at least start talking...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,552 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    I wouldn't read it that way at all. Start talking with whom?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,716 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Unless they survey the conditions Ukrainians would accept it's pointless.

    Do the majority want 1991 borders back and EU membership?

    Do they want NATO?

    Would they accept 1991 borders minus Crimea?

    It's pretty pointless without knowing which of Putin's conditions they don't agree with.

    In my mind I can't see a world where Ukrainians would accept losing cities like Mariupol, Melitopol, Berdyansk and especially Donetsk city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,087 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Latest analysis by Perun (long but always worth a watch)

    Both countries are having issues but Ukraine is "increasingly fighting a Soviet army" with Russia burning more and more into older reserve equipment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,949 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Reminds me of the old quip about the large and modern Russian army.

    Russia has a modern army but it isn't large. Russia also has a large army but it isn't modern.

    One of the suggestions was that the likes of T62s being seen were a temporary measure a while back. The fact that they are dragging out Stalin era T54s would dispel that notion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,179 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 579 ✭✭✭vswr


    this poll is going to be construed a number of ways… conditions for talking seriously have been set a good while back, until Russia decide it's time to lower the bar, it's not going to happen.

    Also from the Razumkov Centre today…66% of Ukranian's think Russia can be beaten on the battlefield.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,538 ✭✭✭zv2


    Ok the conspiracies are coming to the surface-

    James Jackson@jj110101101·Jul 14It's STAGED.
    He cut his ear with a razor.
    No way a bullet can do that without touching the temple.

    I won't even provide a link to this nonsense…

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,751 ✭✭✭saabsaab




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭rogber


    Yeah fair point one survey seems to contradict another, hard to draw any clear conclusions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Through carelessness in preparing food or standards falling in food production or more subsidisation of food products from third world countries and being imported in substandard containers or conditions. But there's been a lot of poisonings of people reported all across Russia this past month and more. Lots of reports of children in camps and such. This one in last few days in Crimea.

    Poisoning at a children's camp

    Children were poisoned en masse at the Kalamitsky Briz camp in Yevpatoriya. Rospotrebnadzor reported that 26 people were hospitalized. The children were diagnosed with acute intestinal infection.

    The department noted that the children are currently in satisfactory condition, and an epidemiological investigation is being conducted at the institution itself. The head of the Russian Investigative Committee, Alexander Bastrykin, ordered a report to him on the progress of the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Could also be another element in increased food poisonings.

    Maintenance teams are not there like they were to keep the sewage pumps going, the crap pumped out and general maintenance is reducing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭Roald Dahl


    The very first starting point for the negotiations would be the full and unconditional surrender of Russia and its delivery into the administration of allied Western forces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,472 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    @Overheal
    Continue the topic here, I doubt you will though…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,435 ✭✭✭✭Say my name




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,336 ✭✭✭wassie


    I didnt know armour plating had so many uses…….like for 'combat robots' and 'armoured blinds'.

    Bargain at 200 roubles.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,044 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yeah, quite as incredible though it may seem!!! More than shocking, in fact!!!😕



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,502 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    To be fair, you're talking in circles.

    trump would be immeasurably worse for Ukraine than Biden.

    He'd destabilise NATO, he's said he would reduce funding to Ukraine and with every putin interaction he's rolled over and exposed his belly.

    I'm unsure what point you'd make to counter that other than "he's a blowhard".

    After Crimea, Ukraine started moving their army and training to western standards, they didn't do this fast enough, but that wasn't a trump ploy (he tried blackmail and got impeached). Obama was never going to be able to roll US hardware in to defend Crimea. Pretending otherwise is disingenuous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,289 ✭✭✭amandstu


    , he's said he would reduce funding to Ukraine and with every putin interaction he's rolled over and exposed his belly

    You don't think he would just facilitate Putin's invasion using all the levers at his command?

    Would he just leave a small rump in the East (or none at all if Putin insisted on taking the whole country?

    If Europe tried to prevent this ,would he just see where the dice fell or would he strongarm it into accepting whatever agreement he came to with Putin

    (my hypotheses entirely. Just how I feel things could play out if he has a free hand)

    Edit :!s there a general sentiment in America that it owes Europe nothing and that any ties are just transactional?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,716 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    The Russians have crossed the river in Vovchansk. Hopefully they don't gain a foothold and are pushed back. The Russians are all in here it seems as they've reduced activity on the border with Sumy. Would love to see them fail to take it.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,031 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Even while he was castigating NATO countries which weren't spending much on defense, he was at the helm during a shift in US military posture more to the Eastern borders of NATO (Countries which do tend to spend on defence, as it happens), a move which wasn't massively appreciated by Germany at the time (loss of local revenue). His administration also undertook the largest exercises of Army and Navy movement across the Atlantic since the end of the Cold War. The snap test of the entire US military sealift fleet needed to get equipment to Europe (which it has to be said, failed miserably) has not been tried again since.

    Whilst certainly he may have destabilised NATO to the tune of "Sure, I'll let Putin invade countries which don't chip in", that may be a positive destabilisation: He has never, to my knowledge, ever said he would abandon those nations which have been chipping in the 2%+, so Baltics, Poland, etc seem safe, and it does seem to have helped push the more recalcitrant nations the correct direction.

    Whether he is good for Ukraine, as opposed to NATO, however, is an entirely separate issue. I really think he could be a wildcard who could go anywhere from complete abandonment to "I shall be the hero of Ukraine, send in the US Army, and have statues built of me in Kyiv!" And then he can get that military parade in DC he wanted, like there was in 1991.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭rogber


    That's the ideal scenario and then there'd be no need for negotiations. It's obviously not going to happen with Putin in charge. Time will tell...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,502 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Honestly manic, you've lost it here, trump's plans would be awful for NATO, his behavior with authoritarians has been to give them what they want, even with Iran, he managed to make it worse and give Iran more autonomy while trying to punish them.

    And the only defence is "he won't actually do what he's saying". Which isn't a good reason to support someone.

    It does feel like you've been reaching on this topic for the last while. putin will be counting down the days till a trump presidency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 206 ✭✭randomuser02125


    Attributing a level of intelligence to the man that just does not exist. What are his advisors thinking?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,376 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    You have said it before (to look at Trump's actions vs his words as regards NATO during his previous term + won't be as bad as people fear), but I don't believe that you can extrapolate from "Trump 1" to "Trump 2".

    Not sure if you are trying to reassure yourself here or what? I think Trump was feeling his way to an extent. All those former Generals and experts he was appointing to cabinet positions are gone now. I think a few of them have come out and said he was a disaster that needed to be guide-railed and talked around to avoid making awful decisions (from their pov).

    Now he thinks he knows what he is doing, and has built up a group of kooks around him that will be more to his liking, flatter him and indulge his ideas. His awful Vice President choice JD Vance is the new breed, a person who swallows a good bit of Russian propaganda whole and spews it out again.

    I think he will be whispering in Trump's ear that Ukraine needs to be cut off, agreeing with him that NATO involvement needs scaling back as many European states and the EU itself are conning the US by not paying protection money, and are just as much a US enemy as "Chy-na". More appointments like him to follow I expect if Trump wins.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭Lirange


    He has just nominated a VP with a consistent record of opposing aid to Ukraine at every turn. Senator Vance has been one of the most strident and committed politicians when it comes to blocking efforts to pass bills to that end. Trump is 78. Whatever influence you choose to believe Vance may or may not have within the administration or on US foreign policy doesn’t negate the fact he would be a heartbeat away.

    Trump does have a record as President. Trying to frame that time in a more favourable light is a hard sell. Consider how his former Defence Secretaries have characterised him. Esper & Mattis have expressed withering criticisms speaking of his incompetence, immaturity, & poor judgment. How many Secretaries of State & Defence will he fire in a second term? How many embassies around the world will he again leave understaffed & without ambassadors? We certainly already know he’s destabilising. We obviously don’t need to speculate on that score. I don’t think overall it was a desirable sort of destabilisation, however one might conceive of that notion. The last thing Ukraine or NATO need at this moment is this brand of “wildcard.”



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement