?????? v Trump (and one or two others) The US Presidential election 2024. Read OP before posting

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1910/S00036/the-america-of-trumps-father.htm

Trump's father Fred

and we know who his skinhead advisers are

Oh come on, you're smarter than this.

When someone mentions the "blood" of a nation, they are clearly talking about a racial makeup. It has nothing to do with it being a "nationalist" sentiment.

Trump knew damn well what he was saying and who he wanted to get on board with it. One doesn't even touch a sentence like that unless there are certain types you want to reach.

No, it is not a hoax. I clearly explained why it was not a hoax with reference to the specific quote and the pattern in Trump's similar comments about the Proud Boys, and now topped up with racist drivel about blood.
I think the images in Overheal's post convey a thousand words about the "fine people" at that event and who Trump was dog whistling to.

Noted for the fourth time you dodged a pertinent question to the debate. It is obvious to people it was a racist statement by Trump, about "poisoning blood", and the reason you refuse to answer is it would involve you breaking the see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil rule about Trump. So your claims here have zero credibility accordingly, when you continually dodge such a pertinent question on the very topic being discussed. Trump's racism. To do so would collapse the house of cards defence you have been maintaining of Trump's vile conduct.

And "not playing laundry list" or nonsense about a "Dem bubble" is not an answer.

”red wave November” take 4?

As ever, it could be that the polling is wrong, but a couple of things about that - one is that this cuts both ways and the numbers could be underplaying the lead Trump has. The other one is that to say the polling is wrong, but then have it turn out that it was accurate to a reasonable degree, i.e. within a couple of points, it will be seen as ridiculously hubristic after the election takes place.

Biden's campaign must make an effort that acts like the polling has them behind, even if this is not the case, in order to leave as little on the field as possible.

What do you think Trumpist bleating about electoral fraud has been all about? It was never really about reversing the result in 2020 as everyone outside the hardcore MAGA bubble knew that wasn't a goer. It's really been about raising support for the idea of tightening voting regulations that are really just designed to suppress the vote against Trump in areas where lawmakers are in a position to pass these kinds of reforms.

Now, the only question is how much progress have the Republican party under Trump made with regard to the above? It's a massive question no one here seems to be asking and I must say that I find it rather strange.

I keep posting this article excerpt from earlier in the year, and it seems to get no response even though the contents are rather alarming,

[Michael[ Whatley [RNC co-chair], who embraced the former president's baseless claims of widespread voter fraud, said that the RNC "will be focused like a laser on getting out the vote and protecting the ballot," saying that they "hired election integrity directors in battleground states." Those individuals, he said, are "already recruiting and training tens of thousands of volunteers to serve as poll judges workers and observers who will act as real-time monitors whenever votes are being cast and counted."

"And we will do more," he pledged. "If our voters don't have confidence that our elections are safe and secure, nothing else matters."

It just serves to point out that the Trump campaign is being very organised, here. Maybe more organised than you know, and sitting back and saying that the polls are probably underestimating the level of support for Biden, or overestimating it for Trump, is the kind of complacency that will lead to complete disaster in November.

Enoch Powel knew who he was trying to appeal to and so did Donald Trump.

you know there is a Trump quote during that hoax interview that Trump said he wasnt including racists in the "fine people" , are you going to say that didnt happen?

this is why watching US politics is such fun, people are watching different movies on the same screen, reality is kind of broken but in a funny way

It wouldn't surprise me if Trump genuinely had no idea he was copying Hitler's rhetoric or emulating him.

The more worrying thing would be that at no point would he consider that a cause for self-reflection or thinking about the effect of him thinking along the same lines as Hitler.

Whataboutery, ignoring the elephant in the room. Trump's actual racism.

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS POISONING THE BLOOD OF OUR NATION

its been done, are you prepared to take in "new" information and reassess views?

https://thehill.com/video/charlottesville-hoax-real-fact-checker-finds-trump-didnt-call-neo-nazis-fine-people/9810879/

"Charlottesville hoax real?! Fact-Checker finds Trump Didn't call neo-Nazis 'fine people'

Rising

Jessica Burbank and Robby Soave react to Snopes fact-check that shows Donald Trump didn't say neo-Nazis are "fine people" in the 2017 Charlottesville "Unite The Right Rally.""

Evidently you are not, or you wouldn't keep running away from Trump's racism and dog whistling.

He was dog whistling, using weasel words like 'fine people' to dog whistle to racist scum.

There weren't many fine people at the rally, it was a rally of racists.

It is all part of a pattern with Trump, culminating in him directly invoking the language of the 'fine people':

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS POISONING THE BLOOD OF OUR NATION