Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all, we have some important news to share. Please follow the link here to find out more!

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058419143/important-news/p1?new=1

General Irish politics discussion thread

1144145147149150263

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,126 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Labour will have a huge mandate, but 60% of people do not want them in government.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 30,001 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Is there any evidence that the UK is more capable or making "actual, real change" than any continental democracies? I get where the view comes from on a surface level, but as others have said the need to keep wildly different factions in your own party on side negates a lot of the supposed benefits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,949 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Labour in the UK would be a broad spectrum of parties here. That's the issue with FPTP. So while they won't need to worry about an opposition for a few years, they will have a lot of internal battles between the left and centrists in the party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,809 ✭✭✭rock22


    @markodaly "real change very very hard to implement as all it takes then is one party to just veto the whole thing.

    The biggest manifestation of this weakness is the power our permanent government has. They actually run the country and many ministers will not go against their Sec Gen or tell them where to go. Just look at the Dept. of Justice and Helen McEntee. The immigration stuff at the moment is also going through the Dept. of An Taoiseach as Simon Harris wants to assert some control over it. FG government?

    On your criteria, Putin probably has the best form of government as he can rule by diktat. But thankfully, the measure of a government is not simply based on how easy it is to make and implement decisions.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    There is no way of knowing what 60% of the population want who do not vote for the winning party because the choice a voter has is one single vote for a candidate in a large array.

    Who knows what was taken into account with the one vote?

    1932 was the last time the largest party got over 50% of the popular vote.

    When was the last civil war in the UK over an unrepresentative parliament? [In Ireland's case it was 1916 - 1922 just in case you have forgotten!]



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    One of the major issues with FPTP is the way that it results in many uncompetitive electoral areas. This is really pronounced in the USA where the vast majority of House districts are not competitive in the general election (aided also by partisan gerrymandering). That is bad enough but this also has the knock-on affect where the primary elections have become the real elections in many districts. They in turn are often won by candidates who are more partisan.

    The upshot of all of this is that you have more and more extremists representing districts, who have no incentive to try and find consensus with the opposite party, since there is no electoral benefit for them in doing so.

    Thankfully people are starting to wake up to the corrosive nature of FPTP and some states (Maine & Alaska) have now moved away from it with more, hopefully, on the way after November (Nevada, Oregon and potentially Idaho)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭eire4


    It is also a system that lends itself to being to over run by extremist governments as we are seeing all too glaringly in the US where they are on the verge of becoming an authoritarian state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭eire4


    Totally agree. I think as we clearly see in the US that FPTP is a toxic system which greatly facilitates extremist types getting elected and it makes it very open to extremist parties gaining governing power and all the damage that entails as we have been witnessing for years in the UK and we are now likely seeing coming to a horrific conclusion in the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭eire4


    Personally I think the citizens assemblies are a very positive growth to our democracy. Getting experts and those directly involved in the respective fields involved in analysis/discussion of the field and offering solutions to problems is a great addition to our democratic process overall.

    Facts are Ireland is only independent 100 years now roughly and we are one of the most stable and democratic countries in the world which is a remarkable achievement and pat on the back to our political system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,744 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Every party does indeed have factions, and that applies to the parties in FPTP systems too. In fact, it applies to them in spades.

    In a PR system, the factions within government are largely represented by different parties, and the voters get to decide the relative strength of each party. Even for factions within parties, in the Irish system the voters get to express a judgement on that too; I get to choose which FF or FG or whatever candidate I will give my first preference to, and this determines which of the party's candidates get elected and which do not, and so voters decide the relative strenght of the factions within the party. Voters in an FPTP system have no similar right.

    The result is that factions matter far more, and have far more power that is not conferred on them by voters, in an FPTP system than in a more democratic system.

    The FPTP system does have the advantage, if you consider it an advantage, that a party that a majority of the voters has rejected gets a thumping majority to drive through the manifesto that failed to secure majority support among voters. But they also get a thumping majority not to drive through the manifesto, if they decide not not to, and to drive through things that weren't in the manifesto, if they decide to do that (which is mostly what they do; probably 90-95% of the legislation enacted at Westminster has not been put before the electorate in a manifesto). What they will actually use their majority to do is decided by a factional struggle within the party, and the voters have little to no say about it. Therefore the factions do not greatly care about the opinions of voters.

    It's theoretically possible that the dominant faction would decide to use its dominance to deliver good long-term policy making. But the system is not set up to incentivise that; it incentivises the dominant faction to use its dominant position to secure the continuation of its own dominance. So there's no real reason to think that countries which have FPTP systems are, in general, better than other countries at forming and delivering good long-term policy. And a look at the recent history of the UK does nothing to subvert this analysis.

    Post edited by Peregrinus on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,983 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Donegall is the most Northern county in the republic - in more ways than just geographically.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    On FPTP, everyone knows that it's not representative and that is by far its biggest disadvantage.
    But the advantages are.

    You know who is going to be PM and in government the morning after.
    Sunak has already resigned and left No.10 Downing Street, a mere 12 hours after the polls closed.

    The morning after a PR-STV election, often its up on the air as to who will actually govern.

    PR-STV will lend itself to coalitions. It took 4 months to elect a Taoiseach last time in Ireland.

    I think Holland had a year without a government because parties could not agree on a program for government. FPTP will not (usually) led to such outcomes.

    It's also a simple system to vote on and understand. The winner takes all.

    Explain the concept of PRSTV to random people on the street, they will look at you sideways. Sure we had people proclaiming SF 'won' the last election because Leo got elected on the 5th count.

    One other advantage, you can kick someone out of office.

    PR-STV tends to lend itself to coalitions, so while a party's support may decline, they could still end up in government. If the tide goes out for you in FPTP, you are turfed out with no way back.

    I am NOT saying that FPTP is better than PR STV before people have a go.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 30,001 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You know who is going to be PM and in government the morning after.

    This is not any real advantage, it is a mild convenience. Ultimately it matters not at all.

    It's also a simple system to vote on and understand. The winner takes all.

    The definition of winner however is perverse. If you explained to someone on the street that their MP was elected with 20% of the vote they'd probably be quite confused too.

    I'm not a huge fan of AV, but it at least is objectively better than FPTP and retains most of the advantages that you claim. However, it was rejected so what can you do, I don't expect that to change anytime soon.

    Thankfully we don't have to worry about overcoming historical inertia to remove a terrible voting system, cause we don't have it in the first place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    You can make the same argument the other way, that FPTP keeps out extremists.

    Corbyn was too extreme for the middle ground so was never going to be PM.

    If there was a PR-STV system in the UK, we would be waking up to a Tory/Reform coalition, not a Labour landslide.
    Its a bit of a paradox in a way, as one of the reasons why people are unhappy with the Tories (and Labour) is that they are or were too centrist. So these other parties are set up, and may get some support but ultimately the system works against them. Therefore the more centrist and established parties continue to win.

    The only way for extremists to come to power is to take over a party from within, like what Trump did in the GOP.
    I don't see Farage taking over the Tory party.

    Look at the French system. It's a kind of FPTP with a few guardrails. But the presidential election is really FPTP in round 2, which is designed to keep out an extremists i.e Le Pen



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 30,001 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    If there was a PR-STV system in the UK, we would be waking up to a Tory/Reform coalition, not a Labour landslide.

    With the proviso that we have no idea how people would have voted under a PR-STV system, you are wildly overstating their combined vote share.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    This is not any real advantage, it is a mild convenience. Ultimately it matters not at all.

    I beg to differ.

    People know who won and who lost.

    People know who has power and who lost it.

    Often here and in Europe, the election is a sideshow for months of negotiations between various parties to come up with an acceptable programme for government and what is contained in said programme can be anyone's guess.

    Take 2019.

    FF and FG both lost seats and votes, yet remained in government. Did the people really vote for that? Maybe, maybe not. Who knows.

    In Ireland we have escaped the worst excess of this because both FF and FG are quite pragmatic, but over time we will see more and more instability as FF and FG vote share will decline and more ideological parties take to the fore.

    And also, we compare ourselves to the UK for lots of things.

    PR-STV isnt a bad system per say, but it does have weaknesses to it.

    We will find out in due course when we have our own election in some months to come. We will be lucky to have a new government by Christmas unless FF and FG get a jump in support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Indeed. People did vote tactically but that would may mean even less seats for Labour looking at the data.

    Maybe a Labour/Lib Dem coalition vs a Tory/Reform coalition. We don't really know, but the question was about how to keep extremists out and FPTP does that well enough as small extreme parties never get enough votes to get people elected, unlike say in Europe, where the Far Right and Far Left always do have people elected.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 30,001 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Maybe a Labour/Lib Dem coalition vs a Tory/Reform coalition. We don't really know

    Lab/LD would be 46% vs 37% for Tory/Reform. It really wouldn't be that close.

    FPTP allowed the extremists to take over the Conservative Party, it didn't keep them out of government at all.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    PR-STV has the advantage that the voter can vote against a candidate by giving them the lowest preference, or no preference. Its weakness is when choices a low as 7 or 8 come into play, as no one can be that discerning.

    In FPTP, the voter can only show first preference, or vote tactically and vote for the most likely candidate that is not the one most hated. However, unless there is a wide campaign for this, it is a bit haphazard. Most seats are forgone results, even where the winner might only get 30% of the vote.

    FPTP is a terrible system.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    That was the first ever election that I watched with interest. I remember being so confused when they mentioned this guy. Of course back then there was no real internet to look something like that up so I had no notion what a TV Deflector candidate was.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,412 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Well this says lots...

    Quite how or why anyone would think the likes of Farage is going to benefit anyone except Farage is beyond me. Is there anything that he has done that we can see which has been beneficial to the average Brit?

    Post edited by Seth Brundle on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭eire4


    You are of course free to make an argument like that but the reality is FPTP is a horrible system which is most assuredly much easier for extremists to take control of power from as we have seen in both the UK and the US. Not the pure speculation you put forth as to what may or may not have happened if the UK election used a form of PR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,828 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    As we've seen, even the vote in England is seriously fragmenting between five different parties - making the FPTP system even more outdated and unfit for purpose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    The most extreme example of this was in Liz Truss's constituency. Hilarious and all that she lost her seat but the Labour candidate won it with just 26.7% of the vote!

    Nobody should be winning a single seat constituency with barely quarter of the vote.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,949 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Especially when you consider that James Bagge is essentially an independent tory.

    Stupid system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,991 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    https://x.com/AlanEnglish9/status/1809519491832844610

    Fascinating Sunday Independent/Ireland Thinks poll tomorrow…. I'd be tempted to call it a marmalade-dropper.

    this on top of all the great sport today, my dodgy ticker might give out…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I didn't realise that. So the right-wing vote got split in 3. Explains how she was able to lose a 24k majority (Well apart from…everything else)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Interesting. Given the recent political head-winds I'm going to guess that it's another fall for SF - they'll be under 20% for the first time since the 2020 election. Since he's referring to it as a marmalade dropper, well under - somewhere in the 15% region.

    If that happens then I'd guess that Independent Ireland are >10%.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,991 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Would marginal third place behind FF merit the 'marmalade dropper' label by itself? I guess if you were looking to hype up the story…



Advertisement