Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all, we have some important news to share. Please follow the link here to find out more!

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058419143/important-news/p1?new=1

General Irish politics discussion thread

1141142144146147264

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,972 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    My only issue with him being finance minister is that he has never been a senior minister and he has relatively little time to prepare for the budget that will be the (presumably) last major action of this government before the election.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,457 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, he will have Pascal not far away, plus Simon looking over his shoulder, checking his sums.

    He will do OK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    The problem is the body responsible for determining if this unethical behaviour aren't allowed properly investigate that. I don't see how that's an acceptable situation. It gives cabinet members carte blanche carry out unethical behaviour and get away unpunished.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭pureza


    But they have determined that they aren't to investigate it,not anyone else

    Probably even less inclined to do so now ,from zero to less than zero inclination,given the DPP's determination,any chance you could move on?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    They are the body responsible for investigating unethical behaviour. Who else else aretthey expecting to investigate it? The DPP aren't responsible for prosecuting unethical behaviour either, they are responsible for prosecuting criminal behaviour.

    I don't feel comfortable that cabinet members are allowed carry out unethical behaviour whenever they desire and there's no repercussions for that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    But in other government incompetence news, how come no one told Harris that the government wwre responsible for defence forces regulations before he went off on a nonsensical rant blaming the defense forces?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,183 ✭✭✭Living Off The Splash


    Listening to McGrath's filibustering style of interview, on Morning Ireland this morning reminded me of the typical FF boys of old….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,972 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I caught the very end of it - seemed a tetchy interview?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,562 ✭✭✭antimatterx




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,326 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Standard behaviour to be honest. The responsible minister for RTE was never accountable for what was going on in an institution under her remit too.

    The arrogance of power again, circle the wagons and take no responsibility.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,138 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Harris is turning out to be a remarkable politician, a touch of the Berties about him. He seems to have convinced people that he is an outsider trying to fix the problems of government. It carried Fine Gael through the locals with their vote increasing since the last general election. It will be interesting to see if he can carry the momentum into the next general election. Fresh faces like Jennifer Carroll-O'Neill and the new slate of candidates replacing old tired politicians will add to the impression of Fine Gael bringing something new, even "change".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    He's certainly hitting all of the populist low hanging fruit. That'll probably keep him going until the election. There's only so much of that you can get away with though before the usual knotty complex problems arise that can't be solved with a simple edict.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,138 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    He benefits from being appointed so close to the election.

    Something to watch for if he is challenged is to see him try to claim that he didn't have responsibility because Leo something and he will be different. Interesting to see if he can pull it off.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,944 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Wonder does he still think it's worth it?

    Bomb threat at his family home this evening.

    Thankfully a hoax, but utterly unacceptable and upsetting for his family.

    That's 3 security incidents at his home since he took Office.

    He lives in fairly typical semi-d in a small housing estate, that might have to change if this kind of crap keeps happening.

    Protesting is one thing, but this kind of stuff needs to be stamped out, hard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,712 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I'm no fan of Harris and will happily criticise FG, but that is repulsive. Young kids in the house and all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,326 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It's hard to know what they are waiting for legislation wise. Any gathering outside a politician's home should be an immediate red card and an offence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,138 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    O'Gorman lives near Blanchardstown village and I have seen the idiots hanging out there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    If these things are left unchecked then it's only a matter of time before we have our own Jo Cox/David Amess murder in this country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    He increased their vote from those two elections by 1.1%. I think the comparisons to Bertie, who secured above 39% at three elections, might not he the most accurate. Time will tell though. As you say, it will be interesting where that 1.1% momentum will take then in a general election. The big question is where will the votes of an 10% of the voting electorate go, in a general election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    In news that surprised no one, Harris has needed to make a climb down on trying to blame everything on the defence forces. The line about enough about the whataboutery is comedy gold. That's pretty much all he has done as Taoiseach so far.

    "I also think there's serious consideration together we need to give, and I accept this may require change on our end too, in relation to if there are serious allegations made against somebody, what happens to them in the period of time before that allegation goes to court?"

    "So enough of the whataboutery, enough of the anonymous briefing. It's a serious issue here, and as Taoiseach I remain concerned this afternoon and we're going to get to the bottom of this and we're going to get it right."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,989 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    That's some spin you're putting on it tbh.

    A Garda in a similar situation would be suspended until the end of the legal process, no matter how long it takes. Allowing a member of the DF to continue serving as if nothing had happened while serious charges are waiting to be heard is not on.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    The government are responsible for the Defence Forces and their regulations. FG have been in government for 15 odds years. Why have FG never shown any interest in members of the Defence Forces with convictions before?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,989 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Because it hasn't caused a media storm before?

    This is understandable, a government has a heck of a lot of other things to be getting on with. The body with the greatest understanding of the DF regulations is the DF itself. So why didn't the DF ever call for change? Are they happy to have members accused of very serious offences in the civilian courts continue to serve as if nothing has happened, and if so why?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,326 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Throughout the institutions of the state there is a lack of scrutiny and accountability because it is the same in government. Top down problems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    So basically unless it causes a media storm FG and the current government don't care? That doesnt say much for them at all. Too busy getting on with what? Managing and over seeing RTE?

    You should ask those questions to the DF or the current government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭pureza


    Latest Red C

    IMG-20240629-WA0013(1).jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,326 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I'm surprised SF haven't shipped a few more points and dropped below FF, given the negativity since the LE EU's. Harris's bounce isn't amounting to a lot really. Will be fascinating to see how it plays out in an election campaign



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭pureza


    FF up 4 points is the interesting bit here

    Given their shy vote that might put them in the low 20's in reality and given a strong 50 to 60% transfer as per the Euros and co co's,we could see an FF and FG government with like minded independents have an 8 or 9 seat majority?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,989 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The present government, the past government, and any future government the same. It's the nature of politics.

    Too busy getting on with the 'trivial' task of running the country and all that entails.

    Nobody is going to put in a manifesto pledge about the minutiae of Defence Forces regulations, now are they? People want to know what will happen to their taxes or the health service or that motorway bypass that was planned 30 years ago.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,972 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I saw today that a few papers today gave endorsed Labour in the UK election. Other papers are well known for their support of the tories.

    Just wondering, so we have the same here? I know there's a historical perception that the indo was pro-fine gael. But do the papers here come out with an editorial line to say vote for party X?



Advertisement