Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Six Points for Speeding and Mobile Phone Use

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,310 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,310 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Informative thanks.

    Needs to be data driven approach and clearly there are not enough resources.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 Damienmac


    Looks like common sense has prevailed.

    Micheal Martin sees that 4 speeding fines in 3 years = ban is already pretty harsh.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41409482.html



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,862 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    that's a bit of a slapdown for the RSA.

    they were probably well aware that the suggestion would be kiboshed, so they can now say 'don't blame us, our ideas were shot down'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭dontmindme


    There's a correlation between speed/force of impact and severity of damages in a collision. Is there any relationship between speed and frequency of collisions?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,862 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    logically, there should be. collisions are easier to avoid if average speeds are lower.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭dontmindme


    Then that would imply motorways being the worst offenders for collisions. Is there any evidence that bears this out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,310 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Central dividers on motorways and similar mitigate the effect of speed. Other than that exception higher speed roads generally have more severe accidents. Especially rural roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭Uncle Pierre


    It certainly had all the hallmarks of kite-flying.

    In fairness, six points for any speeding offence would be too much, particularly when you consider that before too long, the offence could be driving at as little as 36 km/h on a deserted street in a provincial town in the middle of the night.

    There'd be some merit to having a graduated series of how penalty points would apply - e.g. four points for going more than 15km/h above the limit, five points for going more than maybe 25km/h above it, etc.

    Would also be in favour of more severe penalties for mobile phone use, because really, there's no excuse for it. But six points for every single speeding offence, no matter how minor, would be just disproportionate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,310 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Roads that have more frequent accidents tend to be fast high volume roads without central dividers. Can be compounded by other factors.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,303 ✭✭✭JVince


    only an average of 80,000km a year and to date have clocked up in excess of 3million KM. A few years ago I'd think nothing of doing Dublin - Waterford - Cork - Killarney - Limerick and back to Dublin on a day.

    They are slower drivers - which some people tend to think means bad drivers. And sometimes they can be ultra slow.

    But they do not contribute to road deaths and that is borne out by actual real evidence.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This proposal is driven by the road victims association, its an emotive proposal which holds no logical grounding, but that hasn't stopped the authorities making irrational decisions in the past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,154 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    There'd be some merit to having a graduated series of how penalty points would apply - e.g. four points for going more than 15km/h above the limit, five points for going more than maybe 25km/h above it, etc.

    I was thinking that last night but more the higher the speed the higher the points.

    So If you are doing 36kph in a 30kph zone then two points, 59 in a 50 zone would be 3 points, 90 in a 80kph zone would be 4 points, 110 in a 100kph zone would be 5 points and 140 in a 120 zone would be 6 points any faster than than 141 and in a 120 zone would be an automatic driving ban, something like that and of course of you were doing 120 in a 50 zone then that would be 6 points, 90kph in that zone would be 4 points etc.

    That woud put maners on people quick.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,364 ✭✭✭kdevitt


    So 20% over the limit would be 3 points, and 10% over the limit would be 5 points? Totally sane.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,303 ✭✭✭JVince


    Can you elaborate or show even a scant bit of evidence of this? - Or like other posters is it something you've made up and have convinced yourself its true?

    You do know that drivers from a huge number of countries can simply swap their "home" license for an Irish license. - All EU member states + EEA states + UK + South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, Japan, most of Canada & Switzerland.

    Ukrainians may drive here as "license holders" with their Ukrainian license.

    as for Ukrainian insurance - again, you can chose to believe Far right scumbags who target anything to spread misinformation for people to believe without question, or you can sit back and think - you've a 40k car and you are going to risk leaving it uninsured in a foreign country that has far too many nutters who spout hatred against any foreign person and amazingly you have managed to get through several countries without showing insurance as well.

    Ukraine was and still is a tech hub. They have many well off people who work in tech and the HQ is in Ireland. Many also will drive here and visit relatives now living here - but far right scum will try and tell you otherwise, yet funny, they can NEVER provide any proof.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,250 ✭✭✭Keith186


    Glad to see a negative reaction to this proposal from the Tánaiste.

    If this is the best the RSA can come up with they need a new leader.

    Oh wait, how about more ads with spectacular crashes...



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,862 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    there is a lot more going on there than your simple parameter of speed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,154 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Or how about more adds like that terrible scooter add. It's so bad.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭Uncle Pierre


    Was about to point that out myself….but maybe not in as blunt or sarcastic a manner!

    In fairness, am sure those suggestions were just off the top of the other poster's head, same as I just typed up mine as examples of how it could operate.

    On the suggestion of six points for 120km/h in a 50km/h zone - there'd probably be grounds there for a charge of dangerous driving or similar anyway, and the associated higher penalties that already brings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    It is ironic in the extreme that you're asking this poster for evidence to back up his anecdote, which was in reply to a different poster making a claim that was submitted without evidence also, yet you haven't asked the same of the original poster. Then, to top it all off, you sign off with your own anecdotal evidence.

    So you think foreign drivers are worse than Irish ones, obviously? Have you any evidence of this?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    for mobile phone use…?crush the phone and the car,no excuse for it,every car for certainly the last 15 years has bluetooth and any car can have a hands-free kit installed…its an epidemic and must be the cause of alot of crashes

    yo! donnie vonredactedpants,vlad putin,benji netanyahu,vic orban..you sirs are the skidmarks on the jocks of humanity!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,303 ✭✭✭kirving


    Sitting in traffic, you find your phone in your pocket annoying, so you take it out to put it in the door pocket.
    Boom, car crushed… Sound proportionate?

    As I posted recently, the RSA have no data to differentiate between breaking the speed limit, and crashing. It'd be funny if it wasn't so serious.

    Here's the FOI Request I recently sent them.

    image.png

    Now of course I know that speeding above the limit has killed people, no doubt about that, but how many? Where? When? What were the other factors?

    The fact that the RSA cannot share the most basic of information proves that that they haven't a clue where to even start, and are too busy inventing new punishments, to even think about actually addressing the root causes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,893 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Have you actually looked at the information they have published?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,303 ✭✭✭kirving


    I have, and its woefully lacking, hence why I submitted the FOI request.

    Nowhere will you find information about whether a fatal crash was due to "inappropriate speed" or "breaking the speed limit", but they want to give 6 points for the latter, and not address the former (via their driver training).

    Why is that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    So you think foreign drivers are worse than Irish ones, obviously? Have you any evidence of this?

    Have you any evidence they're not?

    I can't tell you the amount of times I've happened upon some shitbox of a car doing some crazy manoeuvre and every time it was some crazy African.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,893 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    But I never claimed they're better than Irish drivers, why would I need evidence to back up a claim I never made? I asked you if you had evidence for the claim you made.

    Your claim, so burden of proof lies squarely on your shoulders. You either back it up, or accept that people will disregard your claim as bulls1t. Your anecdotal nonsense about crazy Africans does not count as proof either. Anything asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

    Your contradiction and bias in demanding evidence from one party, while accepting the word of another party on face value, just goes to show how meaningless your calls for evidence really are. You don't give a flying fcuk about evidence, really, you're just trying to stifle debate and deflect from your racist, xenophobic, contradictory jibber-jabber.

    So, I'll ask again, have you any evidence to back up your claims that foreign drivers are worse than native ones? And what is your reasoning behind challenging one side of the debate for evidence while accepting any old twaddle from the other side?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,658 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    https://www.rsa.ie/docs/default-source/services/s2-licensed-drivers/rsa-penalty-points-offences-2022.pdf?sfvrsn=7ef1d693_9

    image.png image.png image.png

    It's a pity they don't put a bit more energy into reviewing everything that's on the current list of penalty points instead of a couple of headline grabbers. Driving the wrong way on a motorway - 2 points; Driving on a footpath or on a cycle track - 1 point; going the wrong way around a roundabout - 1 point.

    Really comes across of a case of the RSA wanting to be seen to do "something" - whilst knowing it isn't a runner - instead of actually trying to make a difference.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    Again, just enforce the existing rules rather than more hot air about new legislation.

    🙈🙉🙊



Advertisement