Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1109010911093109510961802

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    True but similar could be said for Munster and they squandered it.

    Munster had most of the country supporting them for a period of time and were one of the biggest brands in world rugby. With the right facilities, talent identification, partnerships, and coaching they could have pretty easily built on their success.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,775 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Absolutely. Munster definitely screwed up in the 2010s and neglected their academy etc etc. I think this is pretty common knowledge at this point. There has definitely been a turnaround and we are starting to see really good prospects coming out of there. I can sit here and complain about Kidney all day long if people want, but it's in the past.

    But both provinces working to peak efficiency, Leinster still have a massive advantage from demographics, economics and everything else. The schools system is what it is, Leinster didn't design it but they profit handsomely from it.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,380 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Munsters initial strength in the Pro game in the early '00s came from the Club game - That whole squad were the product of several seasons of playing high quality Club Rugby.

    In the early to mid '10s I think there was a general loss of focus on the club game , not just in Munster but everywhere - The Academy lads were barely playing for their clubs and not getting a whole lot of game time etc.

    Leinster got away with it to an extent because they had a half dozen sub-sub Academies in the various Private schools which fed them a better prepared player than the other provinces were getting.

    In the last 5-6 years those Academy players are back playing regular club rugby and certainly in the case of Munster they are paying a lot more attention to the Club Youth rugby pathways with multiple Snr squad members coming from there rather than the schools, that's a good thing and needs to continue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Crowley etc

    The likes of Ahearn/Glesson would be expected to get plenty of caps based on potential so far



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Murray, POM, Earls came didn't come out of club game and are 100+ caps players,

    Zebo as well but should have way more caps



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭TheSunIsShining


    Would also agree that the original Munster success was purely born of the AIL. And it was to Munster's detriment that they bought into completely separating academy and development players from clubs - would have, and still would, serve them far better to have those lads playing in AIL games and being hardened from it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Leinster didn't 'get away with it', they made the right bet on how to retain and develop their young players, starting even before the '10s.

    At the same time, Munster made terrible bets like maintaining two training bases, splitting players, including academy, and coaches. Schools pathway should have also been huge in Munster, they again wasted their window for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Leinster.. made the right bet

    Minutes from the first Leinster meeting c. 1880 actually prove this.

    "In six score and ten years hence, an economic boom will plumpen the coffers of what shall then be known as the Irish Free State. Unprecedented resources will flood into Dublin private schools and their production of players will be a key asset for our pursuits. Let us mostly chill and underperform until such a day."

    Perspicuity or what?

    EDIT: Sorry @sydthebeat - 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,107 ✭✭✭Rugbyf565


    Yep, I think where this academy negligence from the 2010s is most hurting Munster right now is in the front row where they have a seriously worrying absence of elite props and hookers. They’ve managed to produce quality players in other positions though- Shay McCarthy, Ben O’Connor, Gleeson, Gibbons, Edogbo Jr., Coughlan, Ruadhan Quinn will all turn into seasoned professionals IMO. From the previous crop you have Edogbo snr., Campbell, Ahern, Crowley, Flannery, Ben Healy, Hodnett, Kendellen, Casey -who have all proven themselves at the highest level. But think they’re behind on front row development.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,380 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Leinster definitely leaned into the fact that they had a ready-made production line of Academy prospects already prepared for the structures of Academy/Pro sport coming from the Boarding schools where their schedule , food and training regimens were strictly controlled so for them moving to the Academy was a very simple transition.

    That softened the impact of keeping those players largely out of the AIL game , a luxury that the other provinces did not have.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,824 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    thank you Oracle, and can you provide the same level of insight for all provinces?

    except Leinster of course. they're perfect.

    Post warned.

    Post edited by Cookiemunster on


  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The idea that Leinster have had zero input to their own success in developing players and it's all down to the schools is pretty disingenuous. As someone who attended a pretty B tier rugby school I can tell you they are very involved. The resources input by the schools themselves has rather grown legs in exaggeration too.

    Fortunately Munster seem to have turned a corner in development too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,548 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Far more blame being pointed to the IRFU on this debate around funding, but my question is about accountability. Both Munster and Ulster have fired coaches and its delivered very modest result. Have the fired any executives? Not that I know of.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,775 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    This is ridiculous though. Leinster themselves prove it by their underperformance til 2009.

    You can have the greatest structure in the world, but decisions still have to be made to exploit it most effectively. Leinster made that pivot from around 08 onwards. They have scouts and development officers all over the province in private schools and public schools and clubs. No one can magic a St Michael's out of thin air, but it's about investment in that level of rugby and making the most out of what is there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭TheSunIsShining


    I'd agree with this. For Munster in particular you need a strong AIL. And a strong Limerick. And Limerick rugby is not in a good place. Maybe the hurling success is biting the rugby?

    Senior and Junior schools final this season was Pres-Christians. Senior Final last season was Pres-Christians. No Limerick schools even entered the Senior B competition, the Barry Cup, this season. Not good at all and not good for Munster in the long-term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,275 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    You're aware Ulster CEO Petrie was fired, yes? He seemed to be held pretty accountable.

    Anyway, you said that you'd never seen anyone post criticising the management att Ulster or Munster. Within half a minute I'd found exactly such a post. So who knows what else has been discussed on here that you've been completely unaware of?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I can confirm with semi-regular contact with Ulster fans and their use of four-letter words and the middle finger emoji, that Petrie was absolutely loathed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I understand it is far easier to cry that the world isn't fair than to open your eyes and accept that inept leadership in the province you support squandered the enormous lead they had over other provinces in nearly ever facet on and off the pitch.

    Absolutely no reason that Munster could not have built facilities and pathways to turn the huge support they had in the '00s and '10s into a pipeline of players. You had guys raised in D4 who were self proclaimed 'Lunsters'. Moan all you want about private schools, there is absolutely nothing that stopped Munster from investing in their own private schools, especially when a significant portion of the Leinster and Irish teams are powered by just 2 schools.

    Glad Munster didn't take the route you have, blaming everyone else, and finally got their act together in recent years, following some of the things that helped to make Leinster the success they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    You read it here first folks. It's apparently possible to harvest a smattering of fairweather rugby fans and yield international-calibre rugby players, if you have the right leadership. Leadership that practices sorcery, perhaps.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,370 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I'm sure we'll get his side in his upcoming tell-all memoir. I think it's called Petrie Dishes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,548 ✭✭✭ersatz


    fair enough but the point stands, fans find far more issue with the IRFU, central contracts, the media and Leinster demographic/schools advantage to wish away enduring underperformance than they do with how the provinces are run. Coaches get stick, suits rarely do. Both Ulster and Munster have had periods where they dominated Irish rugby consistently, the reasons they fell away are mostly homegrown. RBAI and Methodist were once as important to producing Ireland players as blackrock and Michaels are now. It’s not the IRFUs fault that the wheels came off. RBAI has produced more internationals and Lions than any other school on the island, 3 times+ as many as Blackrock. At a guess they’ve also produced more IRFU leaders too.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,271 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    MMunster Invest in which schools though? There's pres and Christians in Cork City, bandon Grammar, glenstal, midleton college and very few others. And of those schools 2 are mixed unlike many of the leinster schools. Another has very small pupil numbers compared to most of the rugby schools in leinster.

    Leinster players have only been coming from Michaels for just about a decade and we can't replicate what leinster are doing through the schools.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,249 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    This is just getting silly now. No other province will ever be able to replicate the Leinster private school system or even come close.

    Munster, back in the 00s, were heavily reliant on the club system rather than schools.

    But then the club game was neutered. 🤷‍♂️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,240 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I think everyone knows this but a few on here seem to think, or at least want us to think it's a simple solution, hey you, you have a school, why isn't that school producing players.

    IF it was a simple fix, every school would be turning out tons of players for different sports.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,548 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Michaels has around 600 kids, it's not a very big school. Gonzaga is even smaller and they've become a serious rugby outfit in the last few years only. Im not sure they've produced any pros but they've created a house style that's very successful. maybe they have way more resources than equivalent schools in Munster and Ulster to invest in rugby, Ive no idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Club game seems to be going strong at the moment, based on all reports the attendance rates seem to be on the right way and quality of rugby

    Why would another province want to replicate Leinster? they should look at the options they have available and maximise them. I don't think any province can claim they have maximised the academy system, Leinster included



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    Those RBAI numbers are a nonsense though - they're heavily skewed by the number of players they produced in the early 1900s. They boast of having 85 internationals and 13 Lions, but in the past 18 years they're not in the Top 10 nationally in terms of players produced, with 0 Lions.

    If you go back to the start of 1996, so that counts the last 232 players to be capped by Ireland, Blackrock is #1 with 21 players, followed by Pres in Cork with 15, and St Michael's College with 11. Next is both St Mary's College and Clongowes with 9 each (Mary's numbers skewed by late 90s / early 2000s - their last international is Jack McGrath), with Munchins (8 players), Newbridge (7), Ballymena Academy (6), Ardscoil Ris and Castleknock College rounding out the top 10.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,249 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Correct, I think any stats that include the amateur era are worthless, things were just so different back then.

    Even early pro era is of limited value, when provinces were only playing a handful of games a year and players played for clubs. It is very hard to compare to the current world.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    Was is interesting is on that sample (232 players back to 1996), the split of province/club is relatively balanced.

    Leinster lead the way with 77 (33%), but Munster (62 - 27%) and Ulster (51 - 22%) are well represented, with Connacht on 27 (12%). The remaining 15 players (6%) were with UK based clubs when first capped.

    That hasn't changed that dramatically if you roll it forward and look at the last 100 players capped, where there are no players in the list who don't play for the 4 provinces, but the split is as follows: Leinster 39, Munster 25, Ulster 20 and Connacht 16.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,380 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    And if you set those figures against population, Leinster are about on par, Munster and Connacht are significantly over represented and Ulster are well under.

    From I can see the overall population split is ~41% Leinster , ~31% Ulster , ~19.5% Munster and ~8.5% Connacht

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


Advertisement
Advertisement