What’s your most controversial opinion? **Read OP** **Mod Note in Post #3372**

give the staff bonus points for doing things like getting your order wrong, or adding a hidden 60 cent charge to your meal when buying a breakfast with a fizzy drink. bonus points if you keep them waiting long enough or give a random salt pack with breakfasts which make no sense.

i seriously wanna know who even eats salt with pancakes, or sausage, or oaths.

in my opinion its not that "only the aweful people only have what it takes to clean up the mess", but rather they don't care what anyone else thinks of them for cleaning up the mess. And also that they're not held back by morals or ethics, or with saving face.

i admit i could be wrong though

Not forgetting Professor Kerstin May, President of the University of Limerick who recently sent a one line note to the Chairman of the PAC explaining that her dog had eaten her homework and her toe was sore so she wouldn't be able to attend the PAC meeting to discuss how she managed to overspend €5.2m of taxpayers' funds when buying 20 houses for student accommodation.

(UL paid more than €11 million for 20 homes at Rhebogue, 3km from the campus and Prof Mey has acknowledged that the university “paid significantly above market price” for reasons that remain unclear.)

in that situation, to "not get the baby" would be a selfish decision based on emotions and not wanting to feel bad emotionally for doing something so easy. its one of those cases where the ends actually do justify the means and not just a phrase thrown around as a justified excuse like it usually is.

think of it this way, you have a chance to save million of lives, by not allowing 1 life to remove many others. 1 vs millions. i think its fair to say that millions of lives should not be lost and would be unfair to be lost just because of how a person might feel emotionally after going back in time and stopping 1 life from ruining others

Interesting, I'd be of the opposite in that someone who isn't willing to do a bit of something bad for the greater good leans more towards being a bad person. Now this would depend on circumstance but at the end, if someone wouldn't take out 10 people to save all of humanity is a bad person to me. If they do, then they've just saved humanity and surely that's a pretty good reason to consider someone a good person?

Thats very true actually. it's blunt but its 100% true. alot of things people have done in history is often later sugar coated as to why they've done those things, but more often than not the excuses given were conjured up for puplic relations reasons or some other crap. They put words in other peoples mouths alot and give false explanations for reasons of things that never even came into said persons head. Happens alot.

interesting, thanks for letting me know. i'll keep an eye out for that book. Also the uk tv show "misfits" had an episode involving someone with the intention of going back in time to get him (hitler not stephen fry lol), not as a baby but somepoint before or near around the start of ww2. i wont spoil it for anyone reading, but all i'll say it could be portrayed by some as a mistake or a stupid thing but with good intentions.

For the day that's in it. Nirvana is an over-rated band. For every listenable song, you have to trawl through half a dozen tracks of unlistenable noise.

These are my automatic assumptions of various people.

People with head/facial tattoos: well they definitely don't work as a teacher or doctor anyway.

People with hair dyed green/blue/pink: precious, probably no work ethic in them at all.

Lads who wear matching tracksuit bottoms and tops: wannabe criminal (bonus points when they kit their toddler out in same).

Single women over the age of 35 with designer clothes and more than one dog (usually of the narky breed): unstable and incapable of intimate human connections.

Single men who regularly travel alone to SE Asia: nefarious **** going on.

Social media 'influencers': aren't going to have a status up early in the morning anyway.

Macra na Feirme members: old-fashioned simple folk.

Adults still REALLY into Harry Potter,comics etc: grow up ta feck.

UL did, but that was before Mey was appointed President. Her appointment came after a "worldwide search" (I assume that Google was used!) and her key role was clean up the shop! A role that she has completely failed to perform.

Given that she's only 60, I suspect that her current bout of (paid) sick leave may run for a number of years.

that the C.i,A were complicate in JFKs assassination . Don’t kill me , I know nothing