Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1106610671069107110721837

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,253 ✭✭✭eire4


    Fair points and as it happens I just watched one of those very same Sexton early games you mentioned today. Ireland v USA from the 2011 World Cup Finals. Ugly viewing to say the least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 470 ✭✭part time punk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,621 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,367 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    It'll be a sad day when Cian Healy retires. One of our all time great players. It's incredible to consider he almost retired 9 years ago due to nerve damage, but he still went on to achieve so much more. Coming back from that is a huge credit to him.


    Post edited by Clegg on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭mun1


    The one thing we learned from the 6N is that Crowley should have been brought on after 60 mins vs NZ in the WC.

    12 weeks later Crowley started v France and had a stormer of a game.

    Not a popular opinion around here but Sexton was allowed live out his final games on his terms , to the detriment of the Irish team, much like BOD before him.


    Andy Farrells biggest mistake .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,534 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    The Crowley who started against France had vastly more experience playing at out half alongside reps in the Irish jersey than the one who benched in the World Cup 6 months ago. You’re not comparing like with like.

    He has racked up a large amount of minutes (709mins) for Munster at 10 since November. Add the 400 mins he got in the 6 nations. I’d argue his game has improved since the start of the tournament (for example he tidied up the charged down kicks which occurred in the first 2 games)

    Last season for comparison, he played 505mins of his 1223 mins at 10 as he also played a large proportion at 12. I think he’s improved a lot as a 10 and will hopefully continue to do so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I don't think that's quite accurate? He had a decent number of additional minutes off the bench coming on at 10, and moving there during games too (tho some of those mins at 10 he moved to 12 too admittedly).

    It's fair to say he wasn't 1st choice 10 at Munster until later in the season, but in the context of how spent Sexton looked in the last 10-15 mins of the game, I definitely think there's an argument he should've been brought on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,033 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Sexton was allowed live out his final games on his terms ,to the detriment of the Irish team, much like BOD before him.

    I don't agree with your point on Sexton but what's your beef with BOD? He was still playing fantastic rugby even when he retired, which he did 18 months before the World Cup - and his ready-made replacement didn't even become eligible until the following November.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,534 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I’ve gone by starts and minutes on this page. I agree it won’t be completely accurate as he will have moved around in games both to and from 10 but it gives a good idea of how much he played primarily at 10. Happy for someone to go through the games and come back with more accurate numbers but I think the general point stands.

    Lots been made of Sexton looked in the final 10 mins but you could make that argument about the whole team. One instance of Beirne getting a pass and dropping to the ground immediately as he was out on his feet stands out to me. Subs struggling to keep up with the pace.

    Anyway, don’t think we need to go over that game again 😅 I was just trying to make the point that I believe Crowley is a superior player now to what he was 6 months ago (and even 2 months ago) mainly due to exposure at 10 and whilst there is an argument as to whether that he could have created something there’s also a possibility he would have had a kick blocked down like he had in a couple of games in this 6N or speculative kicks to nothing like in the opening game.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,367 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Biggest issue in the QF was Ireland getting pummelled at the breakdown. Go back to the tour of New Zealand and even the November International before that and you'll see Ireland dominating that aspect of the game.

    New Zealand went all out to disrupt Ireland's flow and really took a lot of our better forwards out of the game. POM especially struggled that day. It's too simplistic an analysis to say Sexton should have come off. Given our struggles in the lineout and at the breakdown there's probably two or three changes that were of a higher priority to make sooner, which we didn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof



    Lots been made of Sexton looked in the final 10 mins but you could make that argument about the whole team.

    There's an obvious difference here tho, in that we still had a replacement on the bench for Sexton. We didn't have one for Beirne or anyone else. All the other bench options were used.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,540 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Lots been made of Sexton looked in the final 10 mins but you could make that argument about the whole team. One instance of Beirne getting a pass and dropping to the ground immediately as he was out on his feet stands out to me. Subs struggling to keep up with the pace.

    Crowley was the only unused Sub, Beirne's potential replacement was already on the field. Sexton's was on the bench.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,826 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    People will be able to read whatever they want into that French performance to make the point about whether or not he should have come on against NZ. Crowley played very well, but equally he made a number of (completely understandable) errors that gave away possession a bit cheaply in a manner we simply could not have afforded in the world cup. I simply will never accept that there is a clear answer to the question.

    Ultimately, in both the final 20 mins of the world cup and in this 6N I think we have massively missed the extra playmaker ability of Hansen though.

    As to the longer term future at 10, Crowley is obviously in prime position. I would be flabbergasted if Prendergast is getting any serious international game time next season - he will be doing exceptionally well for himself if he got a bench spot against Fiji in the autumn and that is basically the only chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It's too simplistic an analysis to say Sexton should have come off.

    I don't think anybody's saying Sexton not coming off is the only thing that went wrong that day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,367 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    In hindsight we probably shouldn't have started Hansen either. It's clear he wasn't fit and JOB made a much better impression against the New Zealand defence. Broke multiple tackles iirc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,297 ✭✭✭TRC10


    That's the problem with the Ireland's selection policy. Once you're in, you're IN for good until you either get injured or retire. It's incredibly rare for an established international to ever get dropped or phased out.

    What we're seeing now with POM is a prime example of this. Any other nation at the beginning of a new WC cycle with players like Baird and Ahern, would have moved on from the 35 year old and be getting them exposure. But with us, it's completely in POMs control. Until he decides to retire, it's his jersey. I would not be at all surprised if he's still captaining us aged 38 in 2027.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The same POM who himself was previously dropped under Farrell?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Fully agree, i can't believe guys like Conor Murray, Jack Conan and James Ryan were still starting for us in the last 6 nations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭El Vino


    For the man himself I'm delighted POM got a chance to captain the team to a 6 nations, I'd much prefer we have moved on however with Baird starting and Thomas Ahern on the bench. Also at scrum half I'd prefer to see Murray dropped and Casey or an alternative on the bench. I think there are plenty examples to show that Andy is an very loyal & conservative selector whatever your provincial bias. Results have been on the whole very good, but it is very fair to ask what might have been had he subbed Sexton pure speculation I know but I think AF got it wrong or bottled the decision. I think Sexton's status, historic reaction to being subbed when not injured etc all contributed to that at least subconsciously.

    As for Prendergast, when he makes a Leinster squad for a Champions Cup game with both Byrne brothers fit then we can consider him for Ireland squads other than that, he is not ready for it, the people who see him every day who's jobs are on the line when they put a team out will know first.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,485 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I mean, Care and Cole were right there, playing against Ireland. You must have seen them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,843 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Jamie George too. Sure he's 33, there's no way he'll make it to the next World Cup!!!!

    Same with Antonio in France. Imagine talking a 34 year old prop out of international retirement instead of bringing in new talent. It's inconceivable!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,662 ✭✭✭✭cson


    James Ryan is 27...

    Murray for sure & Conan still has a lot to offer but maybe not enough for RWC 27.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,485 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I thought I saw Marler but I must have imagined it because he retired years ago.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,292 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    but but but, Wales got rid of all their auld lads and they got on just fine, didnt they??? eh... eh ??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    I still think he was right to keep the lads like POM in situ for this 6N. It could have been a disaster without sexton, we were missing a main playmaker in Mack, and he wanted to make one of our inexperienced locks part of the main team.

    If it hadn't worked out the way it did, our new captain could easily have been in charge of a 3rd/4th place finish, and suddenly questions are getting asked about who's at fault and are the new guys really up for it. If that happened with a couple of older players still there, then we have the easy fix of moving them on.

    I'd be confident that neither Murray or POM will be there by November (barring some daft injury crisis), and I could even see some of the changes happening by/during the SA tour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭El Vino


    Objectively ask the question were Ireland better or worse in this 6 Nations than the last one? I'd argue there has been a drop off in performance especially in the pack. Last season won a Grand Slam, beat a fully loaded (DuPont Jalibert etc) French team at their peak, this season we beat 14 men, admittedly away. A crap Wales team, a Scotland team that lost to Italy, lost to England and trounced Italy. I see this as a decline.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,297 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Genuinely think it's just as likely Wales make the semis in 2027 as we do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Could be the fallout from the world cup. But I do agree. We weren't very good, just good enough to get over the line.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,621 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Not sure what impact Crowley would have had to make McCarthy hit a clear out properly. The team went right down the pitch at the death to inside the NZ 22. Sexton was key in that, despite not making runs himself. The game was lost because of a defensive breakdown for Jordan's try and Kelleher butchering a walk over maul.

    This idea that Crowley could have come on and changed things up ignores what transpired. It's a supposition based on a fantasy.



Advertisement
Advertisement