Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

1109710981100110211031529

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, Iamstop, I'm fully aware of what has been going on there prior to Oct7, and I'm neither trying to excuse it or deny it. I fully understand the principles of cause and effect. The point that I'm trying to make is that Oct7 is a watershed moment, it has changed everything. Bit like Sept 11th. Everything since 2005 has been leading up to this, and now everything is changed, utterly changed. That's my point, not to argue who did what to who, so far there's 33511 comments covering that. And nothing will ever be the same again I believe, and the backlash has just begun. And I believe that this outcome was Hamas's plan. For me, that's the sheer mechanics of it, and not assigning blame, excuses or approval.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,134 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Will be interesting to see the Hamas reaction to this given how they shield themselves using innocent civilians. If they try to stop the people from leaving, that would truly be a genocide on their part. If they let the people leave, then they are trapped in an enclosed area and really at the mercy of indiscriminate bombing. The situation for them is truly bleak.

    The only rational decision for Hamas is to release the hostages and work out a surrender deal. Unfortunately we're not dealing with rational people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,968 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I don't think there is any doubt that hamas is interested in protecting its own people, they are thugs, or surrendering to the Israelis themselves or the hostages. I'm not sure why posters are pushing this narrative as a likely solution given what has happened so far.

    Interesting that you acknowledge that if Hamas don't let the people in Rafah leave that they may be a genocide. Usually Israeli supporters tend to shy away from that phrase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Ah yes. more IDF gaslighting. I find it amazing how many gullible people are so willing to gobble it up.

    Reminds me of the one a few months back when they helpfully suggested that a million or so refugees could move to something like a 1km x 1km stretch of wilderness waste ground ...... and then bombed it anyway.

    Battered wife syndrome. Just explain to them why it's actually their fault that you are beating and killing them. Or even better still, convince yourself why they deserve it.


    A more rational decision for Hamas via-a-vis the hostages would be to execute them. It would expose the lie that the Israelis are only committing their genocide to get them back. And if the Israelis were actually being truthful (if such a thing were hypothetically possible) then it removes their claimed motivation for the ongoing genocide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,134 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Civilians aren't supposed to be used as human shields, it's a war crime and forbidden according to the Geneva Convention. If Hamas attempt to prevent civilians from evacuating to a safe zone, then they are a party to genocide.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,134 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    A more rational decision for Hamas via-a-vis the hostages would be to execute them.

    The mask slips.

    "I don't support Hamas, but I am for them killing innocent hostages".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,968 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Party to a genocide perpetrated by the Israelis then? I think the West should work to prevent the deaths then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 691 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    You keep repeating this over and over and over, playing this as the poor Israel card as if what has happened over the course of its existence was not inevitable. So let me try again as you completely ignored my last post on this.

    It was the Zionists choice to try and set up a state in lands already occupied. They knew the consequences they would face, and just in case there was any doubt, the Crane-King commission of 1920 laid it out in plain writing, it was a bad idea that would lead to bloodshed and they would be better of looking for somewhere else to settle. The Zionists were always fully aware that the creation of any state would be soaked in bloodshed, but they were willing to pay that price. Foolishly the British backed them in their project, then realised belatedly it was going to be a disaster as predicted, passed the buck to the UN who solidified an already bad situation with their partition plan. It was inevitable that Israel would be attacked as the British and subsequently UN completely ignored the wishes ot the majority of the population. You make your bed and you lie in it, the Zionists always knew the risks so they can hardly play the poor little victim now.

    Post edited by Fr D Maugire on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,134 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    If Israel makes an attempt to move enemy non combatant's to a safe area where humanitarian aid is made available but it's Hamas who prevents that, then it's Hamas who are responsible for any war crimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,968 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    You said it would make hamas a party to genocide. That suggests there is another party ie. Israel. At least you admit it will be genocide I suppose. Hopefully you don't support it when it happens then.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,549 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Israel is committing war crimes since Oct 7th. They are no better than Hamas, make no mistake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,867 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    It's a war crime to bomb civilians that are being used as human shields. So there's two options here.

    If Hamas are using civilians as human shields then Israel is committing war crimes every-time they try to bomb Hamas.

    If Hamas aren't using civilians as human shields, then Israel is just bombing civilians which is a war crime.

    So, are Israel committing war crimes or are Israel committing war crimes?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,766 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    "A more rational decision for Hamas via-a-vis the hostages would be to execute them. It would expose the lie that the Israelis are only committing their genocide to get them back."

    Rational?

    What dictionary are you using for that definition? Would you advocate for them to do this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,766 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    True, Donald said it. Nice slipperiness though. I suggest you let him answer the question put to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,968 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Its not entirely clear what the pro israeli argument is regarding the hostages. If they are returned should Israel be forced to stop killing civilians in the tens of thousands, or is this still okay to continue? If in that scenario they are also waiting on Hamas to surrender then they may be supporting the killing of civilians for god knows when.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,535 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Are you seriously comparing Israel to Russia? Let's see how that stacks up. Russia has spent all of history attacking it's neighbours. Israel has spent all of its history being attacked by its neighbours. Israel comprises less than 1% of the MENA region. Russia consists of 1/3 of Europe and all of North Asia. Last I checked, neither Ukraine nor any of the other countries Russia attacked had ever had a policy of destroying Russia and killing all Russian people. And there are concessions Russia can make for guaranteed peace.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Surely Hamas got the reaction they wanted. They can get international sympathy for Palestine. While their own provocation to spark this with handgliders, bulldozers, kidnapping, and firing thousands of rockets is forgotten. As images of dying children take it’s place. Israel’s reaction can be painted as disproportionate. But what would have been proportionate? Wagging a finger at Hamas?

    I wonder do Hamas consider it a success as they hide among civilians using them as PR points?

    Post edited by gormdubhgorm on

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,968 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Israel was created as a state by attacking its neighbours and over the years has sometimes attacked its neighbours to initiate wars, just like Russia. Russia has been invaded a number of times so has not always been attacking its neighbours.

    I dont think Israel is like Russia but your reading of israels history is very one-sided. I hate to read what your reading of the USA's history is



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal



    Palestine is home to most Palestinians and they have been attacked constantly by Israel. What of it?

    “Jews Jews Jews” like that is some magic incantation that means Israel can do no wrong and are eternal victims.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    That and their opinion TM seemed to have even memory-holed the several Israel-Gaza ears since 2005 and before Oct 7. Or the rapes of Palestinian children. Or the murders. Or the settlements between then and there. Or the other myriad deliberate provocations - and suitcases full of money.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Say that again but for the illegal settlements on Palestinian land. Or for Israeli military facilities in residential areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,968 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Israels reaction is disproportionate. If you think that killing 10 thousand kids is proportionate i do wonder what you would consider disproportionate.

    I think you are assigning too much intelligence to Hamas. I expect they didn't think the Western World would allow Israel to kill tens of thousands of civilians in Gaza or Israel would have the stomach to do that. But here we are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    LOL

    name a neighboring country Israel has not attacked or violated the sovereignty of. Who haven’t they bombed, Cyprus? Italy?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Strange admission that there is a genocide going on and a tolerance - a “stomach” for carrying it out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I am curious to know what would have been the “proportionate” reaction for Israel? Where is this invisible line?

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,968 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    There is no invisible line. You either have a limit to how many civilians you are willing to be killed in the pursuit of hamas or you don't.

    You think they are still being proportionate so when do you think they will be disproportionate? Never?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    For instance, I probably would have used my Israeli special forces differently: rather than terrorizing hospital workers and stripping them down to their undies, and killing civilians borderline indiscriminately, it sure would be a lot cooler if they had infiltrated Qatar to assassinate the real leadership of Hamas. If you’re going to violate international law and commit war crimes anyway, aim for the head.

    But of course that would have been too efficient and wouldn’t give them the pretext to annex more territory and settle more illegal homes. So I guess that is still Plan Z



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,902 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    “That would truly be a genocide”

    As opposed to what? Actually doing it in reality like the terrorists in the Israel defense forces and their masters in the “parliament”?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,287 ✭✭✭Economics101


    This boycott was apparently justified by Ballet Ireland bacause the Israeli choreographer was in receipt of state funding from Israel. By the same token a huge number of Irish artists can be regarded as recipients of Irish state funding. Are they to be subject to boycott just because someone objects to Irish government policy?

    Two years ago there was debate about boycotting Russuan Culture and artists. One or two symphony orchestras made fools of themselves by boycotting the likes of Tchaikovsky. Thankfully this has passed, and only Russian artists who identify with the Putin regime are boycotted, such as Valery Gergiev.

    Cancel culture at its worst.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    It needs to be brought forcibly home to both citizens of Israel and Russia that they live in states widely regarded as pariahs.

    That's one of the vectors for change.



Advertisement