Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1749750752754755943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    "You realise no gain from its increase in value"

    Except for getting more favourable LTV rates

    Except for using your ppt as leverage

    Except if you want to move to an area that hasn't seen the same price rises since rises do not occur uniformly at all.


    Honestly if you can't afford a house now, there's no way you'll be buying a house in a crash. The vast vast majority lost out in the last recession. Very few FTBs were snapping up properties in 2010 after being locked out during the boom. Same as last time, the people who will benefit will be cash buyers, or people who have leverage, and these people already own property.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Where is this crash coming from?

    The idea that anyone in that poll is cheering for a crash is the biggest strawman of the day.

    As I said before, price rises due to market scarcity impact almost the entire market. There is very little value to be had whereby your PPR has gone way up but the area you want to move to has not.

    "instantly"

    Nobody has claimed instantly, or a sudden fall or crash in prices. The poll claimed that 60% of people think that Dublin house prices should be cheaper, even if it means their own home falling in value. A crash/recession/instant price fall was never mentioned, only by yourself as a strawman argument.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ah, the strawman defence.

    Ask people if they want cheaper housing, to then not consider what has to happen for the prices to fall, doesn’t seem to be what a financially literate person would do.

    You said many people have no idea other than prices going up = good, I would put it to you that some don’t understand that for prices to go down to the level being discussed in that newspaper article, something has to go seriously wrong in our economy. And that could be a very bad thing for us all, including you.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭Greyian


    People with existing mortgages can also benefit from rising property prices, as they can more quickly move into lower LTV bands => lower interest rates on their mortgages. Also if someone is moving to a property of a comparable value, stable or rising prices means they can move with no risk of negative equity, which may not be the case if prices have fallen. People looking for an equity release also benefit from high (and increasing) property prices.

    It's overly simple to say falling prices only benefit people trading down or out (i.e. selling without buying) of the market.

    I know of one particular example also where a family here sold their house to pay for their child's (late 20s) cancer care at a specialist location in the US. Had property prices fallen, they would not have been able to get enough money from the sale of their property to get that specialist care. It's definitely a very niche example, but it is another example of when someone might sell a property and benefit from higher prices without treating their property as a financial asset ordinarily.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 584 ✭✭✭theboringfox




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Negative equity affects such a small proportion of homeowners as to almost be not worth mentioning. Even after 2008 crash the amount of people in negative equity was quite low as a proportion of overall homeowners.

    The rarity of people going into negative equity such that it actually affects them is significantly underestimated



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    how so? It's one reason among thousands why someone selling their house benefits from high house prices.

    The notion that increasing house prices is zero benefit to homeowners applies only if one is selling up to buy an identical house next door.

    P

    Post edited by Padre_Pio on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    Here's an example of a person objecting to new housing because as a result of the new development they argue their house has lost value and they want compensation. Depending on your point of view the actions of this 75 year old man are criminal IE bribery. It's not an isolated instance as the Irish independent reported on other instances of this a few months ago.

    Even if you accept that these people are a minority and their actions are legal their actions push up house prices. It highlights how much people will fight to protect the value of their homes. They can justify potentially criminal behaviour in extreme cases. NIMBYs have a lot of power and can cause huge delays to any major building projects. Some have legitimate concerns but a lot of driven by the fear of their houses seeing a dramatic decrease in value.

    The poll you mention doesn't change any of the above facts. Even if we accept the poll as valid 40% of voters is a group no political party serious about getting into government will ignore. Under Irelands voting system 40% of the vote more or less gets you into government. You can see this in practice. Every political party says they want more housing built but every political party also supports NIMBYs who don't want houses built in their area.

    60% of people say they support lower house prices so what? It's one poll and has limited value in isolation. It needs to viewed in context with other information like the article I've linked to and other information. I could happily link to lots of articles about NIMBYs and politicians opposing new housing developments for all sorts of reasons. All these objections ultimately increase the cost of housing and run counter to the finding in the poll you focus on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    Ok, if you believe a poll like that carries any weight then I actually feel sorry for you. Classic head in the sand stuff.

    And to say that someones home increasing in value has no advantages to them too. What are you on.

    Your need to be right in your own head is stronger than your need to be objective. So you are blind to anything else but your own single argument.

    Here are just a few things that are good about your home rising in value, besides those mentioned by others in the post above.

    • Increased Equity: A rise in home value means the homeowner builds equity, providing a financial cushion and potential borrowing power.
    • Profitable Investment: Rising home values can result in profitable returns if the homeowner decides to sell in the future, especially if they bought the property at a lower price.
    • Improved Net Worth: As the home's value increases, the homeowner's overall net worth also grows, contributing to long-term financial stability.
    • Better Loan Terms: With higher home value, homeowners may qualify for better loan terms and interest rates if they decide to refinance their mortgage.
    • Enhanced Creditworthiness: Increased home value reflects positively on the homeowner's creditworthiness, potentially opening up access to other financial opportunities.
    • Sense of Security: A rise in home value provides homeowners with a sense of security and stability, knowing that their investment is appreciating over time.
    • Potential for Upgrading: Higher home value may enable homeowners to afford upgrades or renovations, further enhancing their living space and quality of life.
    • Increased Market Appeal: Rising home value makes the property more attractive to potential buyers, increasing the likelihood of a quick and profitable sale if desired.
    • Wealth Accumulation: Appreciating home values contribute to long-term wealth accumulation, serving as a valuable asset in the homeowner's financial portfolio.
    • Potential for Generational Wealth: Higher home values can be passed down to future generations, providing a foundation for building generational wealth and financial security.

    And also a few reasons why it would be bad home owners if their property value was to fall

    • Loss of Equity: A decrease in home value results in reduced equity for homeowners, impacting their net worth and financial stability
    • Negative Equity: Falling home values can leave homeowners with mortgages worth more than the value of their homes, leading to negative equity and financial strain
    • Difficulty Selling: Decreased home value may make it challenging to sell the property, especially if the homeowner needs to relocate or downsize
    • Impact on Borrowing: Reduced home value can limit homeowners' ability to borrow against their home equity for renovations, emergencies, or other financial needs
    • Negative Wealth Effect: Declining home values can lead to a negative wealth effect, affecting consumer confidence and spending habits, which may contribute to economic slowdowns
    • Increased Foreclosure Risk: Lower home values increase the risk of foreclosure, as homeowners may struggle to make mortgage payments or refinance their loans
    • Limited Access to Home Equity Loans: Falling home values can restrict access to home equity loans or lines of credit, reducing homeowners' options for leveraging their property for financial needs
    • Diminished Retirement Savings: Homeowners relying on equity from downsizing their home as a significant portion of their retirement savings may experience diminished funds if home values decline
    • Community Decline: Decreasing home values can lead to community decline, affecting schools, local businesses, and infrastructure, potentially reducing overall quality of life

    Now do you still think a poll asking if home owners think property prices should fall would show over 60% of them saying yes and not include a big proportion of them you are just saying yes for the sake of virtue signalling.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The majority of those points are nonsense

    Almost nobody decides to sell their PPR and then rent indefinitely, so they almost always end up buying again. So any gains they have made from asset inflation are offset largely or entirely by inflation in the rest of the market.

    Net worth or built up equity is equally meaningless unless you decide to sell. You haven't actually realised a gain or a loss until you liquidate your asset. If you never intend to, you never do make any gains. If you trade up as most do (very little trading down in this country), then you achieve no benefit from market wide house price inflation.

    "Sense of security" based on potential asset worth going up. What planet are you on lol. Who derives their sense of security from "house prices have gone up".

    Higher home prices make a house less appealing to buy - you will always have more buyers at a lower price point. And your other point about lower house prices meaning harder to sell - what? Lower prices mean it's more affordable to more buyers, means a much faster sale.

    By your logic 2mil mansions are an easier sell than a 250k semiD!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    "Almost nobody decides to sell their PPR and then rent indefinitely, so they almost always end up buying again. So any gains they have made from asset inflation are offset largely or entirely by inflation in the rest of the market."


    This is not true. It would only apply if you're buying the house next door.

    In real money terms, property increases are not uniform. Take for instance someone living in a 3 bed semi in Dublin who wished to move to a comparable house in Meath. A 10% rise may mean their 500k house is now worth 550k, but the Meath house has increased from 300k to 330k. Increasing property prices has worked in that person's favour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭ingo1984


    As someone with multiple financial and economic qualifications I've never read so much horse manure. It reads like something one of those financial product salesmen in the local bank branch would be peddling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Broad house price rises are more likely in nominal terms than % rises.

    The idea that 500k goes up 50k and 300k only 30k is not reflected by the market over these past years.

    Property price inflation has been double digits outside of Dublin and typically lower priced areas, compared to in Dublin which has been single figure growth or stagnant for the past few years, depending on sub market. The gap in prices is narrowing, price inflation is higher in cheaper homes at lower end of the market.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You’ve come a long way from someone asking about books for analysing financial markets a few years ago.

    Tell us why you think a house isn’t an asset.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭The Student


    If you property increases in value it can be used as security for a loan (not just mortgages etc). To say "net worth or built up equity is equally meaningless" is inaccurate. A financial institution will offer loans based in some instances on the assets the applicant has to offer as security/collateral on the loan.

    If a property is in positive equity to a value greater than the value of a future loan or even just the remaining outstanding balance on a mortgage is all the financial institution cares about.

    While you may have more buyers at lower prices two factors need to be considered for this to happen (1) how do you lower prices? if you increase min specifications of properties eg BER etc somebody has to pay for these costs. (2) if property prices fall existing mortgage homeowners will be disproportionately affected as they may go directly into negative equity and with that you will see a stagnation of the property sector. How many people where in negative equity following the financial crisis who could not trade up (as family grew etc) because of negative equity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    So you tell us the advantages of house prices falling to home owners then you financial wizz.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Its a bit like the marketing material from the celtic tiger where the buyers were marching down the streets with bags of shopping from the high street after there home purchase. That worked out well

    A home is highly leveraged purchase, it should not be used as a vehicle for further loans. Most owners have learned that lesson from the last crash.

    Most buyers buy once

    Most homeowners purchased far below current prices

    Its in homeowners interests to have property values stable and affordable thereby eliminating/reducing the risk of a price shock thereby reducing the risk outlined by @SharkMX



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭J_1980


    Supply notched up a little bit in Dublin - but at crazy prices. And the number of sale agreeds in my lists (700k-1.1mm) is just crazy this week - all record prices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,886 ✭✭✭Roberto_gas


    Nothing coming in south..this 3 bed apartment was bought in 2018 for 383k…listed at 450k..current offer 525 k !

    Madness

    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/apartment-21-carmanhall-court-sandyford-dublin/4772165



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,854 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Kind of sums up irish housing policy at the moment.

    Its laughable.

    And some people say we have a Centre Right Govt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,854 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Very few new builds are actually for sale and I believe only about 6% of new builds are bought by private buyers.

    So prices for new builds available to joe public for purchase will inflate, because of demand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    For hundreds of thousands of homeowners with adult children in their 20s and 30s living in the family household its finally having them move out.

    For any homeowners looking to trade up a decline in overall market value benefits them more financially than they lose.

    For huge numbers of local business owners who own their own homes its actually being able to employ people on cheap wages. Its no longer possible to rent in places like Dublin on minimum wage, which is having a massive impact on getting staff in industries like hospitality and tourism.

    For employees of the large multionationals in Ireland who own their own houses its actually being able to hire foreign staff. The #1 factor in having people turn jobs in IT in Ireland now is seeing what our housing market is like, its developing into a massive issue thats putting jobs at risk.

    For homeowners in general its having gardai in your location station, nurses in your local hospital, and teachers in your local school. All of which are hugely problematic at present, because junior staff in all of these essential fields can't get housing.

    And, just on a moral level, for most homeowners its about your friends/family/Irish people in general finding it easier to get housing. I own my own house, if it dropping 20% in value tomorrow helped tens of thousands of people get secure housing in Ireland I'd be delighted.

    Thats why polls show a sizable majority of homeowners are perfectly OK with house prices dropping. Because even on a selfish level the positive, day to day, results far outweigh the vague theoretical loss of asset valuation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    How many people where in negative equity following the financial crisis who could not trade up (as family grew etc) because of negative equity

    Very few. The proportion of people in negative equity is vastly overestimated time and again



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Which figures are you saying are overestimated?

    According to the central bank over 36% of home loans, and 56% of investment properties were in negative equity when prices started to recover at the end of the recession, are you saying the CB overestimated? Of course they have probably recovered since then, but the point being made is that if there is a significant downturn which causes properties bought over the past few years to lose significant value, it traps owners and causes the housing market to stutter even more, on top of developers closing up shop if it is not worth building.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    In Dublin it is a struggle with median salary let alone minimum wage. I remember talking to some founders at SiliconDrinkabout back in 2018 and they said pretty much the same thing about employees.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭The Student


    Okay try reading my post slowly. I asked the question "how many people where in negative equity" I did not mention how many people "are" in negative equity. If however property prices drop then the number of people who could go into negative equity could increase and the market stagnates again.

    Whether you want to accept it or not part of any market focuses on "confidence" if suppliers don't have confidence in a market they stop supplying it.

    It reminds me of the banking crisis where people say the banks should have been allowed fail following the financial crisis. Assume we let this happen do you think any international investor would invest in Ireland Inc for anything? Exactly what could we do about an international investor not investing in Ireland inc?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,886 ✭✭✭Roberto_gas


    I doubt prices will fall ! The reduction in interest rates will fuel the prices further....see what happened in UK. Prices dipped due to high rates and are bouncing back slowly in UK as they will start to reduce rates too. The biggest risks taken are by people who have purchased beyond their means or have gone full in with very high mortgage or have bought a keep due to lack of supply.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    That central bank report is from when prices bottomed out after the GFC - even people in the black were not looking to sell or move.

    Those buying investment properties on 100% mortgages rightly got stung, but most homeowners never felt the effect because you do not feel the impact of negative equity unless you actually want to sell. By the time things had improved the % in negative equity dropped massively, less than 1 in 10 by 2018. And of those I'd wager most were unaffected aside from being on a higher LTV rate, as the majority of homeowners in this country only ever buy and live in 1 house.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The argument that negative equity stops people trading up is a fallacy - those people most likely to go into negative equity never had much equity to begin with, hence they ended up in negative equity from a price drop. These people are least likely to trade up because even before a price drop they never had equity.

    The people most likely to be mover-purchasers are those with significant savings or equity, usually equity. If prices fall across the board but you still have equity in your home you are just as likely to trade up as the gap between your home and that you want will in most cases have narrowed in nominal terms.



Advertisement
Advertisement