Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1746747749751752943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    No tax reporting needs to be done. It is taking care for you.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭FernandoTorres


    It seems Revolut will take the tax for you but Revenue rules still dictate that you need to report the purchase of funds when you buy and when you sell. You are also subject to deemed disposal every 7 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,719 ✭✭✭amber2


    I worked with a bank thats been mentioned in relation to this Revolut savings account for well in excess of 20 years and their mantra is and always has been that very few people will go to the bother of switching and moving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭lordleitrim


    Well that didn't last long....


    House prices globally on upward march again


    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2024/02/27/house-prices-globally-on-upward-march-again/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Slowdown in wage growth. Averaging 4.5% increases for preceding 4 years (2018- 2022) but down at 2.1% for 2023.

    Bit surprising given inflation and public sector pay deals. Perhaps reflecting some of the cooling off in tech.

    Might provide some reprieve to rate of house price growth in 2024 if it continues.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Well we can rule out construction labour costs as the driver of house price growth if this report is accurate

    Average hourly rate 25euro per hour




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The fund sold its 29% stake in Manhattan’s 360 Park Avenue South for $1 to one of its partners, Boston Properties Inc., which also agreed to assume CPPIB’s share of the ‘Project’s Debt’




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭amacca


    Was about to ask...I presumed it wouldn't just be dirt you'd be paying on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    So sold it for the equivalent of 65m when you take the debt also into the equation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭Greyian


    I think it's a shortage of total housing stock, shortage of stock for sale and the fact that we have the wrong mix of housing stock (too many 3/4 bed houses, too few apartments).

    We also have a cultural aversion to apartments, which is a huge issue when they are what we need if we are to have any hope of building sufficient residential units in the areas which people want to live in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    zkf1ff9qef381.jpg


    The lack of apartments in Ireland is really quite unique in modern Europe, its a disaster of planning.

    There are so many suburban rented houses full of 20 and 30 somethings in our cities which should instead be housing families, while those 20/30somethings should be living in apartment blocks close to the city center.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I'd definitely agree with you that we have too many 3/4 bed houses and not enough apartments. This is compounded by the fact the Irish buyer only wants to buy 3 or 4 bed houses.

    I thought your figures on the comparative rises and affordability were interesting, so the reason I asked did you think it was a shortage of total housing stock, was I wondered if you'd be prepared to do some calculations of an estimate how short we are?

    I find it amazing that given the frequency with which we hear there is a current shortage of total housing stock we never hear an estimate of how big that current shortfall might be!

    I have attempted to do the calculations myself, and from those figures the conclusion is there is no shortage, but maybe I'm missing something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Fair enough but the point being that the fund most likely had significant equity vaporised in a deal struck in 2021.

    Does seem to have very poor risk management at a time when WFH wàs and remains prevalent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Yeah the took a hit on the building but it not the full value of the building it will be the capital invested which they sold for 1USD and the finance cost up to date of sale. If debt was 80% then the loss would be 20% plus finance costs. Headline is written to make people think it’s a 100% loss.

    From a risk management perspective the risk of not letting out the building always exists and deal was probably agreed a few years before Covid and it wouldn’t have been possible to exit….No different to Elon Musk and Twitter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Jmc25


    The cultural aversion to apartments is compounded by the fact that such a large proportion of current stock is of very poor quality - fire safety issues, noise issues, leaks etc. Then there’s the inevitable management company issues which arise from owners not paying their fees/voting to reduce fees by cutting services/underfunding the sinking fund.

    There’s exceptions of course, but generally the average experience of owning or living in an apartment in Ireland is inferior to a house.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I own a couple of apartments in different complexes and apart from a minority of non paying owners, have experienced none of the above. Have you any data to support your view that there are problems with a large proportion of apartments?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Jmc25


    “Having consulted widely and at length with stakeholders and interested parties, the Working Group estimates that of apartments and duplexes (or associated common areas) constructed between 1991 and 2013, the number that may be affected by one or more defects (i.e. fire safety-, structural safety- and water ingress defects) is likely to range between 50% and 80%. This equates to between 62,500 and 100,000 apartments/duplexes.”



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I must be lucky, mine were built during that period, none are affected by those issues. Your post does not account for all the apartments built since 2013, which have tighter regulations.

    Thats the problem with estimates though, they are not facts, the report you linked, though independent, appears to be more about asking OMCs/apartment owners about their problems, and how much money they want from the government to solve those problems. I have no problem with that by the way, the way regulations were practicality non existent is a scandal, and the government must accept significant responsibility for poor construction practices during that period, but that still doesn’t make the report, nor your claim factual.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Jmc25


    Ultimately, only opening up works in all apartment blocks across the country could provide more reliable information than that report.

    Re the time period involved, I don’t have any exact numbers, but it’s fair to say a very large proportion of our overall apartment stock was built during that period - certainly enough that if at least 50% per cent of them have structural issues, makes my initial post asserting that a large proportion of our current stock have fire safety issues or leaks, a valid assertion. The report doesn’t go into noise issues, which I also mentioned, as those issues aren’t seen as critical.

    I owned an apartment built during the period, built by a developer with a good reputation, and indeed in a desirable overall development relative to the area it was built in. While if you asked the managing agent or OMC or the majority of owners (most of whom never lived there) if there were issues, you would be told absolutely not, due to a leak I had reason have some very minor opening up works done in my own unit. There was no fire stopping material between mine and the adjoining upstairs unit.

    There is a huge, huge element of managing agents/OMCs and indeed owners burying their heads in the sand about these issues, and the “nothing to see here” attitude maintains the prices of these developments so that current owners pass the problems onto future owners and round and round it goes.

    I would argue that that report, rather than apartment owners/managing agents/omcs being asked “how much money would you like” was rather a chance for them to anonymously tell the truth about the situations within their developments, without it impacting on the value of their units.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Asking them if they want the Government to pay for remedial work isn’t the most scientific way of assessing problems though. I get your point, but that report does not support your claim as it only relates to apartments built during that period, and seems to be questionnaire based, then extrapolated to provide an estimate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Irish people don't have a unique inability/cultural aversion to living in apartment complexes, though. The reason our apartment % is so low compared to the rest of Europe is simply because we don't build enough apartments, not because 92% of Irish people would refuse to live in them if they existed.

    Again, as the go to example just look at the huge numbers of students, 20something, and 30something professionals living in suburban house shares in any city in Ireland. These people would all far rather be in centrally located apartments, but can't, because apartments don't exist in large enough numbers.

    In a Dublin context any development between the canals over the past 30 years, and for at least the next 30, should be apartments with a mandatory minimum height of 6 stories to help address this.

    For so many reasons (the quality of life for the renters, the families that would be able to move into suburban houses, the lower infrastructure pressure with lots of people having walkable commutes, the more vibrant city center etc etc) the inner city should be medium to high density apartment living. But our governments have made no attempt to encourage this historically, and even in 2024 this isn't showing much sign of change, either. Somewhat horrifyingly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    From my own experience of the Dublin property market such problems are certainly not rare. My first port of call prior to bidding was to get a copy of the MC accounts and I don't remember ever seeing any that were in top health.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Jmc25


    The report supports my claim. It doesn’t prove it, but it does support it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Institutional landlords charge higher rents for equivalent property than smaller landlords.

    As more small landlords selling up, the rental situation gets worse, even if all those rentals remain on market in hands of institutionals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    This has been pointed out on this forum many times but there was deniers tgatbitvwas happening. This is just proof to something we knew was happening

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Everyone who can is pricing in the prospect of an outright rent freeze. And the government still pretends surprise..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭shoegirl


    Most buyers are not buying new builds, and so get no incentives whatsoever to buy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭shoegirl


    Excellent points there - and the example of the couple in the midlands is perfect, because the comparative rent that the notional couple would be paying to rent anything like the 400k home you describe would probably be more than the mortgage. Tony Fahy actually wrote an ESRI paper around 2003-2004 suggesting that the real problem with the property sector in general was actually the private rented sector: that a whole generation who had come to normalise escalating rents were buying to fix their monthly outgoings at a time when it was both normal (& legal) to hike rents up every year for sitting tenants by whatever figure the landlord fancied levying.

    Original & 2nd Bacon report, tech bust, 9/11 tourism/aviation crash, US interest rate hikes all fed into changes including a two year period of tinkering with property market from 2000-2002 (VAT, stamp duty, interest relief, FTB grant, & levies/duty changes) that led to uncertainty.

    But looking at the core point @Greyian made - about the couple earning a combined income of 80k between them - according to tax calculators, if they are renting, paying 3% into a pension & having 2k towards health insurance from work, they'd have a net income of €5,571 per calendar month. Even if they were paying 2k a month in rent they'd still have 3500 left. If they had managed over time to save 10k between them they could even look at developments in places like Balbriggan, Drogheda etc where there are new builds for 350k. 30k help to buy and a bit more savings they would be able to borrow enough for one of those. And as you say there's other properties elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    A short article on the market today in the IT, it paints a different picture from the government press releases:

    "House prices and rents will remain on an upward curve for the foreseeable future, the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) will tell the Oireachtas Committee on Budgetary Oversight on Wednesday evening.

    In its opening statement the institute notes that investment in residential construction here slowed noticeably in 2022. “Ireland was among the countries with the lowest investment in housing in the EU in 2022, only exceeding Greece, Poland, and Bosnia and Herzegovina,” it says. “As a result the rise in house prices and rents is likely to continue, albeit at a slower pace in the case of house prices.”

    The institute warns that demand for housing would continue to exceed the supply over the medium-term."

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/2024/03/06/house-prices-and-rents-to-remain-on-upward-curve-says-esri/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    So I think we can all see now what has happened in the last decade as a result of interference in the rental market.

    Sit back now and watch then interfere with the rent a room scheme next which is working very well at the moment.

    Watch the mass evictions from rent a rooms as they tinker with an already excellent system and then watch what that then does to the homelesess figures, housing availability, rents and property prices. If the mess with the rent a room scheme its going to cause absolute carnage in the rest of the housing sector.

    Nobody wants someone living under their own roof that they cant remove straight away if they feel the need to. So they will just evict them at the mere thought of messing with the rent a room scheme. They wont be caught out like regular landlords were when rent controls came in and just got worse and worse for property owners.



Advertisement
Advertisement