Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

1106210631065106710681538

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I am afraid one has to do better than a single map.

    That is a big reach in fairness to say that Israel wants to occupy, thus kill all the Palestinians in Israel because of a single map.

    The talks going on behind the scenes is trying to lay out how Gaza is going to be run after this war. Id rather stick to facts and logic around that, rather than conjecture and loose correlations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Regardless of your post, it doesn't address any of the points addressed in my post.

    That is, some people differ in their views of Ukrainian refugees and potential Palestinian refugees.

    The charge has been laid that if a state offers Palestinians a safe refuge, they are somehow complicit with Israel.

    Yet, we don't follow the same rationale when it comes to Ukraine and Russian complicity.

    There is a hypocrisy at play here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,538 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    preferably they should have secured their borders and there would have been no october 7th attack at all.

    however ultimately, the reaction would be special forces raids to get back hostages and the bombing of visible hamas military equipment.

    what is happening now is not a reaction to october 7th, but a genocide so as to steal and colonise gaza, like they are doing in the west bank.

    israel have lost what little credibility it had, it has failed all of its claimed objectives, it has lost the support of so many people like never before, it has made the october 7th attack irrelevant because people are focused on their genocide of the gazan people.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    That is a difference you just made up.

    The UN is clear on that, that refugees didn't have a 'choice' to flee.

    There is no tiering or hierarchy of refugees anywhere. So it doesn't apply.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    WOuldn't it be great if Israel moved back to this position and then the UN police the borders.

    Possibly, but you don't fight 3 wars, lose them all, and then claim to go back to the start. That ship has sailed.

    It's the 1967 borders that are at stake here



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's pretty straightforward really, the 'West' is actively supporting the side committing the ethnic cleansing/genocide with munitions and acting as a political shield from efforts to stop it.

    Israelis politicians have openly stated their goal is to clear Gaza of Palestinians

    If a western state assists in this removal of Palestinians they are complicit, not rocket science is it

    And before you go there, you can't destroy every hospital, university, accomodation etc and blockade the people to the point of starvation and then claim it's 'voluntary' emigration



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,081 ✭✭✭scottser




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Israelis politicians have openly stated their goal is to clear Gaza of Palestinians

    A few have, but until this is actual government policy I will hold quarter on that.

    There are discussions ongoing at the moment when the war ends.

    This is from AJ of all places.

    Once all of that has been achieved, a new phase will begin in which “Hamas will not control Gaza and will not pose a security threat to the citizens of Israel”, with other Palestinian bodies assuming the territory’s governance.

    Israel would reserve the right to operate inside the territory, which means its forces would be able to come and go as they pleased – similar to current arrangements in the occupied West Bank. However, Israel would not keep a constant civilian presence in the enclave after the aims of the war have been met, nor would there be any Israeli settlements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    There is pretty much zero chance that Israel would give up its West bank settlements (barring some extreme political recalibration in the White House). Or the Golan Heights, which people tend to forget about.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    A third of the cabinet, those who seem to be holding the whip at the mount, have publicly committed to settlements.

    Regardless, the settlement issue is actually separate to the removal of Palestinians, that can still happen regardless of whether they are replaced.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    Here's another Israeli politician being every explicit about the plan, based on a similar map to the one that Netanyahu presented.

    I had a quick search and he doesn't appear to be in the current govt, but it appears to be a widely held expectation.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,567 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    It's not a difference I made up ffs. It's the difference between a refugee and ethnic cleansing.

    You simply don't understand the difference between forced and forcible.

    Ukrainians have not been forcibly removed to the EU (they were forced to flee, that makes them a refugee)

    On the other hand, those Ukrainians that have been forcibly removed from Ukraine into Russia, that makes it ethnic cleansing.

    As soon as a Palestinian is forcibly removed from Gaza, that's ethnic cleansing. There seems to be some belief that all Gazans want to leave.

    I don't want to confuse you any more, but if Israel forcibly removes Gazans into Egypt, with Egypt allowing it, that's ethnic cleansing and Egypt could be complicit in it.

    If Gazans flee into Egypt and Egypt allows them in, that's a refugee. However in that situation, as Israel has been bombing, starving and making life unlivable for people in Gaza, Israel could still be guilty of ethnic cleansing. But Egypt wouldn't as they were not complicit in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,221 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    I’m wondering if Hamas/Palestine would be on the lookout for the IDF special forces after the first couple of raids.

    I’d imagine that the toll on Israeli forces using these tactics would be much greater than the tactic that was actually used.

    I must admit to not being a military tactician.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 790 ✭✭✭Fuascailteoir


    No difference between a fat yank headed over to join the IDF and some muslim that went off to fight for ISIS. Should receive the same treatment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,912 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    It's fùcking genocide!


    Nihal Abu Ayash was wearing his football kit and carrying his school bag when he was shot in the head and killed after Israeli forces opened fire in the West Bank town of Beit Ummar.

    The first bullet reportedly hit the 16-year-old in the leg. He collapsed, and as he tried to stand up, he was shot for a second time in the head, according to the schoolboy’s family.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭Toeuptony


    You don't say!

    (Insert the Padme & Anakin meme)

    "So they're going to re-establish funding, right?"

    "So they're going to re-establish funding, right?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I had a quick search and he doesn't appear to be in the current govt, but it appears to be a widely held expectation.

    Expected by whom, as the guy appears to be a mad crank of the highest order. I can't ever see him ever being elected to public office, so to call him a politician, is a label he put on himself.

    Ah, here it is.

    Yea, I am sure he is going to get far with 0.01% of the vote for his "Bible Bloc Party".

    4.76 million people voted in the 2022 Kinneset election. Only 411 voted for Dennis Lipkin.

    So, I'll repeat. Who is expecting him to be not only elected but also a government minister?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    But Egypt wouldn't as they were not complicit in.

    Best take that up with @Donald Trump as he explicitly stated, that any nation that grants Palestinians refuge is complicity in helping Israel.

    I would say that under no circumstance should other states facilitate Israel's genocide and ethnic cleansing




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,538 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    their genocide has caused them to lose a lot of their forces on the ground as the IDF are a badly trained army at the best of times.

    special forces teams don't always have huge numbers so chances are the losses would be a lot lower if they acted like grownups instead of committing genocide.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,579 ✭✭✭thereiver


    Look on guardian.co.uk opinion theres an article today. It says Biden could simply call the government and tell them to declare a ceasefire and allow aid supply's food water medicine to be supplied to Gaza .eg the Idf can only continue the war with the help of military and financial support from America

    Israel would run out of bombs and missiles very soon if it could not get help from America

    This has happened before if you look thru the history of middle east wars involving Israel

    Biden has the power to force a ceasefire through



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,578 ✭✭✭dmcdona




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭Eibhir


    That fella has the IQ of an amoeba. The IDF obviously have very low entrant standards.

    If the 4 houses belonged to him and his extended family how would he feel. Wow indeed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,578 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Settlers gonna settle, ICJ hearing testimony (including Ireland's AG) and democrats ask Biden to ramp up efforts.


    Dozens of settlers from the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar threw stones and tried to torch several houses in the Palestinian village of Asira al-Qibliya, according to an Israeli security official. Israeli security forces were dispatched to the village, but no arrests were made.

    At the ongoing International Court of Justice hearing on Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories, China said the occupation was illegal.

    Thirteen Jewish House Democrats urged U.S. President Biden to redouble his efforts to facilitate a temporary cease-fire, their most pronounced efforts to date.

    Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan called on the international community to take a more active role towards an urgent cease-fire in Gaza and a two-state solution during talks at the G20 summit in Brazil, a Turkish diplomatic source said.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,096 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Nope. No idea what you are referring to. Perhaps you have confused me with another poster when you said this?

    Yet you objected to me welcoming a coup against him.

    Although now it turns out it wasn't a coup - but as it's still not any clearer to me what you're talking about, I can't respond to the claim.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,578 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Heard today on the radio that data modelling predicts 85,000 Palestinians will die in the next couple of months from injuries, disease and starvation - particularly children.

    So that will be 200,000 dead and injured - 10% of the population of Gaza. On percentages, that'll be 140,000 women and children.

    Israel = Genocidal terrorist State. This will stain them forever.


    Haaretz:

    Israel is seeking Palestinians not affiliated with Hamas to manage civilian affairs in areas designated as testing grounds for a post-war administration in Gaza, according to a senior Israeli official, who added the plan would exclude anybody on the payroll of the Palestinian Authority.

    A new U.S. intelligence assessment found it is "likely" that some UNRWA employees took part in Hamas' October 7 assault on Israel, the Wall Street Journal reported, adding that "the U.S. can't verify Israeli allegations that a larger number of UN workers have links to militant groups."

    UNRWA has no "plan B" past March should donor countries continue to suspend their funds, the head of UNRWA's Lebanon office said.

    A Palestinian man being treated at a Gaza hospital for severe bruising on his face, cuts on his fingers and other injuries said Israeli soldiers beat him with chunks of masonry and chairs after bursting into his home on February 20.

    The Hamas-controlled Health Ministry in Gaza said that at least 29,410 Palestinians have been killed and 69,465 wounded since the war began.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,578 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Your quote of Trump does not equal what you attribute to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,759 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,578 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    First off, they shouldn't have invoked the Hannibal Directive and used attack helicopters to kill everyone, including their own. IDF is responsible for many of the deaths on 7th Oct.

    Second - using 2000lb dumb bombs in a densely populated area was disproportionate and a war crime.

    Cutting electricity, denying humanitarian aid and murdering surrendering civilians (including three of their own) is also a war crime.

    Murdering 260 babies who were less than 1 year old - war crime. Bulldozing graveyards - war crime.

    Stealing and looting - war crime

    Letting infants die and decompose in an ICU - war crime.

    And they are just a few examples of what the Israeli government has sanctioned and the IDF has carried out.

    Do you think the IDF was right to go into Gaza and commit war crimes to the extent that this is genocide?

    I suspect you do.



Advertisement