Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dee Forbes banging the RTE TV licence drum again 60m uncollected fee *poll not working - pl ignore*

1349350352354355463

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,986 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Yes but if you went down that road a huge chunk of the population would choose not top pay, RTE's income would collapse, and they would have to take a scythe to arts programming, documentaries, etc.

    Politicians don't often say this this out loud because they would effectively be accusing a big swathe of the electorate of being uncultured oiks who only want toi watch Cornoation Street and premiership football but that's the reality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    I think a lot of the so called "cultured" people would also choose not not subscribe given that a lot of RTEs output is commercial trash. But that does not mean it should not be done.

    And remember that just because RTE would be a subscription channel does not mean that funding of cultural and artistic programming for all channels would not be possible.

    It would mean, however, that guaranteed incomes for the top presenters and brass at RTE would no longer be possible regardless of quality of output.



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The article has a quote from Senator Shane Cassells (FF) saying "why in gods name would we eliminate €200million of an income stream and saddle the taxpayer with that? That is batshit crazy."

    The Senator doesn't opt for the other options of A) providing a much smaller budget to RTE and telling them to cut their costs to measure, or B) acknowledging the billions of taxpayers money that is waste year on year, what's another €200m.

    A better question to pose back to him would be "Why in gods name is €200m of taxpayer money given to an organisation that shows such irresponsibility and disregard to financial control?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,986 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


     acknowledging the billions of taxpayers money that is waste year on year, what's another €200m.

    well this is the reality that seems to me to make direct exchequer funding of RTE an appealing option for our political classes. With the exchequer taking in over 100 billion a year in taxes, you could almost replace RTe's entire income from the licence fee and commercial sources with one day's tax take. Once the initial flurry of controversy about RTE becoming entirely tax funded had passed, who would notice or care about the source of RTe's income going forward?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭jmcc


    How do you enforce Conditional Access to ensure that only those who subscribe can watch RTE? I've seen this proposed here but nobody seems to have much of a clue about how to implement it. Knowing FFG and RTE it would probably get some clueless consultancy from morons with no record of expertise in this field and it would turn into yet another clusterfsck.

    Regards...jmcc

    Post edited by jmcc on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,090 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    So if you have all you can eat data on your mobile plan like I do as well as having broadband will I be paying twice?



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We have an orchestra funded through RTE and they don't even get wheeled out to play live music on RTE's DWTS. Instead Spotify gets chucked on. Rubbish production value there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    That's true. Poor implementation, not understanding what is required is always a danger with this crowd.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,753 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    2 mobile data plans and mobile router for house broadband, so going to pay 3times brilliant idea !

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,425 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    I remember Hungary in 2014 wanted to bring in a tax of 50cent per GB of data traffic, that would have put me in NAMA 😂...




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,972 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    So my household will go from €160 a year to €75 a month?!?!

    They can stick that where the sun doesn't shine.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,972 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    "enjoy" RTE programming? I'm right in the middle of their target demographic and they have next to nothing I'm interested in.

    A subscription model isn't going to happen, because it'd finish RTE, and even if the majority of households wanted to subscribe it'd cost an absolute fortune to implement. BBC and ITV stopped encrypting their signals on satellite because it was cheaper to pay for Republic of Ireland rights than it was to keep paying for the encryption. Every household in the country would need a new set top box and a viewing card. Who's going to pay for that?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,972 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Or why do we spend taxpayers' money to give gobshites like him a platform when they're incapable of being elected to the Dail.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭Iguarantee


    Ironically, I paid the licence and didn't use any of their services.

    I no longer have access to live television or any tv channels beyond what I can get on my Apple TV e.g. RTE iPlayer (it's not even installed) or YouTube (definitely not used for RTE content in my household).

    The last time I watched RTE was to watch the last episode of Love/Hate, whenever that was aired. I haven't watched RTE since.

    I have an electric car; I have to pay road tax of €130/yr based on vehicle emissions i.e. the emissions the vehicle itself makes. That should sum up the bonkers Irish rationale for indirect taxation. The same vehicle, in the UK, warrants no motor tax because the car doesn't actually produce exhaust emissions (I acknowledge that power generation generally has emissions but that's taxed elsewhere).

    Our TV license is based on the citizen having access to RTE products, regardless of usage. The TV licence is the only public service that you pay for directly whether you use it or not. It's like paying for a train ticket whether you use the train or not.

    RTE can go **** themselves if they think I'm ever paying the tv license again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 164 ✭✭MoonMotorway


    The new charge seems to be more ridiculous than the TV license and it seems as if they are trying to punish people now for what went on last year.


    Previously the TV licence was only one per household if you owned a TV.


    Now it's going to be on broad road and your post says it's going to hit people using mobile data too.


    I mean like this is unreal and incredible.

    You use broadband for the interet and for maybe doing online streaming of movies like Netflix as an example. There's so many reasons for broadband. This new thing tells us the government thinks we all must watch rte with our broadband.


    Then hitting mobile phones too. Every household would likely have a few different mobiles and payment packages.

    I have two mobile phones so that would mean I will need to pay this charge twice and I am not using my mobile phones for watching rte.

    Thinking to my neighbours there would be at least 5 mobiles in the house so all of them will have to pay extra for their payment plans and then they are paying many times over where as before the TV licence was only one per household.


    This is unreal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Does your home theatre monitor have a TV tuner built into it? If not, then you don't have pay a licence. You are free to watch Apple TV, Netflix, Prime whatever without paying a licence.



  • Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭ Veda Gray Toddler


    I'll just be pointing out to the local TDs I won't be voting for them if this passes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 164 ✭✭MoonMotorway


    I don't have broadband just mobile internet and it works great for me. A post above says mobile internet could be hit.


    Is this definitely for real? Is this definitely coming in or will they back down.


    With EU roaming, could I buy a SIM card from an EU phone company and use EU roaming or would that be too expensive?

    What would the best EU mobile package be?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,488 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Unless they find some way of limiting it to one €15 charge per address.

    Would mean then than 4 mobiles registered at the house wouldn't pay 60 per month.

    Personally, I think this is all a bit of kite flying. Can't see it happening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 GoingLinux


    If they can privatize bin collections and electricity, why can't they privatize RTE?

    Can't you get a NI sim card and roam with broadband?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,511 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    The 15 euro on broadband is a 20 euro increase, and we see no signs of change in RTÉ, and would result in 300m+ going to the broadcaster.

    Oliver Callahan getting 150k for his show + 250 for PK on TLLS = 400k, and we know PK is doing less shows than RT, so you now have a situation that in reality both shows presenters are getting the near the same money as RT!

    While I agree with PSB and funding it I think a % should be added to all telecom products, Pay TV and On Demand Services (Netflix, Amazon and so on).

    This would spread the 15 euro out across products rather than this blunt flat fee.

    You gomo 9.99 bill would just increase to 10.30 for example on a 3% "license fee". Added to business on a non-refundable basis.

    So e.g a household with

    Broadband at 40, On Demand services at 40, Mobile Phones at 50, Pay TV at 20 would see their bills increase across all by 3% or €4.50 or a 6% fee of €9.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,090 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    This will be a punitive tax that seeks to reward RTE. Why should we be paying for RTE's fook ups?

    If this government brings this in, they will loose a lot of seats in the next election.

    I live alone and I could be paying €30 a month because I have broadband and a mobile.

    I pity households who have multiple mobile phones and broadband too.

    Lastly I am wondering if you have a dumb phone such as a basic Doro or a pay as you go phone will you be paying as well?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    Bahah so wait, the cultured people watching Rte???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Seems like RTE is going to get what they have wanted for some time: unconditional payment from the public regardless of whether they have televisions.

    The ironic thing is that they will have achieved this through being incompetent and greedy.

    Prior to this, you had the right to not pay RTE fully legally, though it meant not owning a TV. Now this final bit of consumer power that might keep RTE accountable is being taken away.

    The correct response to the RTE scandals is to give consumers more power, not less. Don't take the tiny bit of power away from the public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭jmcc


    The Forbes fallout continues:

    And still she hasn't appeared before the Oireachtas committees.

    Regards...jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Bloody Hell! This looks really bad for the board of RTE and for Forbes.

    Regards...jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,038 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    So who exactly signed off on it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭jmcc


    The report will be published tomorrow but apparently the board was meant to sign off on it. They did not. Some of them might be encouraged to resign for the good of RTE. This is far worse for Forbes and the former board of RTE than the Tubridy paynents scandal.

    Regards...jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭jmcc




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,048 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Fantastic timing really, when the talk was about direct funding through taxation or a levy on broadband. Remind everyone what these crooks did and why giving them a blank cheque is a horrendous idea



Advertisement