Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

19889899919939941796

Comments

  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    They have a lot of young players getting serious game time. A lot of those u20s will play 500+ minutes of senior rugby while our lads are knocking about in the AIL or joining a long queue for trash minutes at the arse end of the URC.

    On their current trajectory France should really dominate the game for the foreseeable future but if course it rarely works out like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    That's never going to happen as long as Ireland are in the 6N.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The same was said of NZ post 2011 and 2015. Strangely back to back WC and nobody has really made the claim about SA.

    France clubs are starting to pull back the power from the French union, so let's see how it goes over the next few years.

    In terms of Irish players, unless we get a 5th province or a better option and invest into the Emerging Ireland tours players will get minutes and progres as they currently are.

    Not sure why that is a problem? our rate at moving players from U20 to full international is impressive when you compare to Wales/England etc it was said on podcasts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,139 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    I get it is one game , but beforehand it was called the biggest game in Irish history , the facts are we lost and played poorly . Before the game I thoght Farrell was the greatest , but after the game some of his shortings cme to light , lack of use of squad players, and conservative on selection. Nothing against O'Mahoney he has been an Irish great , but he is 34 , I would like to have seen a more riskier selection process, which I cant see happening from Farrel.

    I dont think Irreland will win 6 Nations, think ther will be an emotional hit on players, that has been ecident post WC , and is understable , losing a game of that magnitude has to have an impact on any human or player - thats just my amateur thoughts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    "played poorly"?

    We didn't play to our peak but I wouldn't class it as poorly.

    Not sure how you can rate a coach as the greatest and then one game totally changes that opinion.

    FYI the teams who have won the WC have played more or less the same 23 from start to finish. That's been happening for many years.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Of those 19 in 2020 only Gros and Lucu were selected for the WC. Landed on eventually, I should have said. It kind of reinforces the point some people are making, that there aren't any guarantees in test rugby. You can rebuild the team immediately after the wc and see success in the 6N as France did in 22, but it doesn't guarantee anything in the WC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    We should just try win every game, like Farrell is doing or trying to do



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭ersatz


    That's the mandate and the model. The only weakness I perceive, and others here have challenged it, is that insisting our best team takes the field for every big game (or game against tier 1 opposition) means we never have a great amount of faith in our wider squad when it comes to the WC. For whatever reason (fewer games mainly) being in perfect condition of the 6N does not translate into perfect condition for the WC and while the 6N remains the rhythm around which the team operates we will always have a difficulty adjusting to the different challenge the WC poses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,195 ✭✭✭TRC10


    From 2020-2023, Ireland have a win % of 81%, compared to South Africa's 69%. But I know who's position I'd rather be in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Now do every other team.

    We're never nearly as bad as you constantly make out, TRC.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,356 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Very happy to see POM made captain. A like for for like replacement. We also desperately need his help re the lineout. The lineout for all provinces and Ireland have gone to crap.

    In regard to the squad. After this weekend we will see changes. Unfortunately injuries will take their toll.



  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Everleigh Freezing Oasis


    Would recommend the latest episode of the Molecast where they discuss the squad and rather going player-by-player or anything go into why Farrell might have made the decisions he has made, why he made POM captain, etc. They're fairly supportive of all the decisions made but thought it was a very interesting listen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    Maybe if Ireland had a better line out option at 6 the lineout would have more options and could function better.

    Imagine if Ireland had an alethic 6 who was 6 6 in Baird or Bierne or 6 7 or 6 8 in Ahern the thrower would have more viable options.

    Instead Ireland look to persist with a 6 and 7 who are both only 6 2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    A more viable lineout option? Than POM? Are we really suggesting POM isn't a viable lineout option now??

    The height thing is a misnomer too; it's regularly been reported that POM has the highest vertical jump stats in the squad, and he also gets into the air quicker, so any height advantage doesn't really tell us much. Bigger guys are heavier to lift.

    Whatever else people want to say about POM, he's still an elite level lineout option. On both sides of the ball.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,726 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    I liked the stat about POM

    When he started in at least 4 games Ireland won the Championship more often than not.


    '12 1 Start, 2 Bench -3rd

    2013 5 Starts - 5th

    2014 4 Starts - 1st

    2015 5 Starts - 1st

    '16 0 Starts - 3rd

    '17 1 Start, 2 Bench - 2nd

    2018 5 Starts - Grand Slam

    2019 5 Starts - 3rd

    '20 2 Starts 3 Bench - 3rd

    '21 1 Start, 2 Bench - 3rd

    '22 2 Starts, 3 Bench - 2nd

    2023 4 Starts, 1 Bench - Grand Slam



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Ireland are a better team than South Africa. We win more games.

    South Africa have the tools to navigate the attrition of a RWC. They have a monster pack and an elite place kicker.

    Completely fine if you'd rather be in the latter position. We could put Baird, Ahern, Connors etc on triple-strength clenbuterol, and have Jack Crowley practice nothing but goal kicking every day of his life.

    But do ask yourself, honestly, if you'd accept the downsides, such as losing to the likes of Scotland and/or Wales each year, and rarely winning the 6N.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,139 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    But it wasn't just an ordinary game , biggest game in Irish history, and the reality is we failed , I'm sure thats how the players saw it, if they had played well and won , they would have made a final , now its yet another WC knockout defeat , thats how many casual rugby/ sports people will see it too. and yet , I agree we played well in the groups stages and prepartaion seamed perfect, but when it came to pressure knockout rugby , its yet another knockout defeat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The manner of the defeat was very different to what we had previously seen tho.

    Prior to that game, we had won 17 consecutive Tests. That's only been bettered twice ever.

    Yes, the QF defeat was gutting. But there's no need to tear up the script and start afresh. Particularly in light of their being some evolution anyways, with Sexton's retirement, Hansen's injury etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    Pom appears to be an excellent defensive lineout operator. He bases himself at the front and can read the opposition jumpers very well.

    I agree he is probably a better line out option from 6 than other "back row" options of Conan, pender etc.

    But I'm not sure he is a better line out option than the Hybrid 4/6 like Bierne, Baird or Ahen.

    South Africa went after Ireland lineout in the world cup as they had 3 excellent lineout options. 3 big men over 6 5. And 2 more giants on the bench.

    Ireland had 2 2nd rows around 6 5 and a back row of all under 6 3. It made the lineout easier to defend for South africa winning 6 of irelands lineouts.

    Either was it looks like we won't find out now that pom is captain and will no doubt start all important games at 6 for the foreseeable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think we lost the first 4 or 5 lineouts in that game (the lineout was obviously a major issue all tournament in fairness).

    But we went on to shore it up from there in the SA game, and a large part of the solution was throwing POM (and Beirne) up at 2.

    Open to correction here, but I'm pretty sure for SA, the back-5 of the pack are all lineout options, but for us VdF is essentially not a jumping option, so that's really where the advantage at lineout time lay.

    Look, the lineout is clearly an area that'll need significant improvement in the 6 Nations, but suggesting we need more viable options than POM for that doesn't stack up to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    It was a qtr final, we have had plenty of them and never won them.

    The biggest games in Irish history would be the Grand Slam wins etc as far as I am concerned. Winning a qtr final doesn't end up with a trophy. Just another game.

    Couldn't really care about what the casual fans say.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    A) It's not a dichotomy

    B) I actually enjoy our wins for what they are. That's why I'm not as big a misanthrope as you. It's a nicer way to live.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,139 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    I and probably probably most would differ - the World cup is the big one , with the world powerhouses included , plus it only happens once every 4 years - knockout is a differnet beast to group/league rugby



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,356 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Indeed. Winning a league is much more difficult. Life's too short to worry about a competition every 4 years. Six Nations every time for me. (It also pays the bills)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I'd prefer a world cup. Imagine the novelty of wee Ireland winning a world title.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    If we got to the final it would be the big one. I don't see anyone saying a qtr final is a big game.

    Winning a 6 nations is a huge event and should be treated as such. Especially a Grand Slam.

    Irish fans are basking in the glory of the success the last few years, I look at the overall record of Ireland in rugby and the number of Grand Slams we have won means they are not to be sniffed at which some fans seem to think they are



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭Locke_Lamora


    We are in a very curious place where our players that are getting older are still very much a step above the incumbents right now but they will almost certainly be too old to play in the next world cup, or they will have diminished significantly. I didn't expect too much change tbh, consistency is important and we only have four teams in which players can gain experience in as opposed to France and England. I'm not even sure there will be too much change in the summer either.

    My brief long-term thinking about who needs replacing:

    We have no Loosehead depth. Loughman is a fine enough player but I would prefer our second choice to be better, and Healy being there is worrying. Will McCarthy or Boyle be ready? They will be young in prop years but old enough to make impacts. Will injuries catch up to Furlong? Bealham is good but is there anyone kicking down doors for a call up at tighthead? Bit worried about prop.

    Hooker is fine.

    Beirne and Henderson will likely be too old to make an impact, but are hopefully still capable of providing a veteran presence when needed. McCarthy is biting at their heels already, Ahern is going from strength to strength now that he's getting an injury free run and Baird can play there if needed. Are Murray or Edogbo international standard? Not sure.

    Couldn't guess our backrow a few years from now. POM won't make it and I have doubts about JVDF and Conan, but I'm not too worried. Baird is playing his best rugby now at 6 and finally seems to be coming into his own (and possibly overtaking Conan?). Timoney is the man in pole position and will be a good age at the next world cup. He is in form, big enough, explosive and the coaches clearly like him well enough, but can he make an impact as a first choice international? I am doubtful. Hodnett is playing incredibly - do the coaches not like something about him (eg. too small?) or is there just too much competition. Connacht fans were equally critical of Prendergast's omission but I haven't seen enough of him. Brian Gleeson will be young still by the next world cup, but no younger than Doris making his break through. McCann started off the season like a man on a mission but I'm not sure on his best position and he needs to be playing at an even higher standard for a longer period of time for me. There is much to be said about will connors finding great form after that nasty injury, I had doubted he’d make it back to this level. He will be young enough and I don’t think too many people would be overly upset about him starting for Ireland right now.

    Halfbacks - will Park still be first choice? Is Casey definitely good enough? Do we have any highly rated 9's coming through? Doak gets mentioned far to much in these conversations for me. Decent player, not sure about his international prospects though. Lots of pressure on Crowley right now. Definitely has his flaws and has a different style than we have been used to with Ireland but I think he will be steady. Lots of hype around Prendergast, probably too much for someone just starting out with three international flyhaves in front of him. Not convinced by either Byrnes but I like Ross as a veteran presence and someone to do a consistent and reliable job when called upon.

    It might be a tournament too far for Aki and I worry about Henshaw's injuries and how they'll impact him in a few years. He will be 34 so could still feature but I have doubts he will age as strongly as Aki has. McCloskey has never been particularly rated and will be 35. Who's next? Jamie Osbourne surely would have featured in the squad if not for injury, the rest are fighting amongst themselves at the minute. Hume has re-found form but I need to see it over a more sustained period of time, and Munster fans are singing Frisch's praises. Would love for a younger, unestablished centre come through in the next two years to provide better competition (Forde, Postlethwaite, insert Leinster prospect here). Ringrose should still be an excellent partner to have though.

    Lowe will probably not be the same player at 35, so a wing spot should open up but I'm not sure anyone knocking about right now has his kind of impact. Lots of decent players, but standout internationals? Not really imo. Would love for a decent backup to Keenan to emerge. Very little depth there.

    Wow, that was a ramble.

    Post edited by Locke_Lamora on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Lots of good stuff there.

    For TH, it's possible Oli Jager might emerge as a back-up option. His start at Munster has been encouraging anyways.

    For 10, on this:

    Lots of pressure on Crowley right now. Definitely has his flaws and has a different style than we have been used to with Ireland but I think he will be steady.

    I'd argue (and have done in the past) that his style is more suitable to what we've seen in attack in the last few years than RB.

    The 10 positions reminds me a bit of the Hooker position after the last RWC, where there was significant change and the guys who came in - Herring, Kelleher and Sheehan - only had a small number of caps.

    A tall order, but if the likes of Crowley and the rest can match what we've seen in that position, we'll be in a very good spot.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I think lh will be fine. Porter will be 32. Then there's Loughman who is becoming very good and Boyle, who could become a great player. Don't forget Milne either!

    Th, I doubt Bealham or Furlong survive until the next world cup. Pole position would be O'Toole, who's very good, Jager and Aungier, who is playing well.

    Hendo and Beirne will be old and have a lot of miles on the clock. I would think that Edogbo, Ryan and McCarthy will be the top 3, with one of the Murray's and Ahern.

    Backrow will be interesting! Timoney will be 32. Connors 31. I reckon Hodnett or Penny will be involved by then. McAnn and Gleeson could be involved. I really am a fan of Quinn also. Fantastic looking prospect. Doris will only be 29 and Deegan will be 31. Plenty of options.

    Scrum half is a worry. We will depend on someone breaking in. Out half will be ok, imo.

    Centers should be different by then. Aki will be past it. Henshaw likely done too. Ringrose could be there but, he's injury prone. I'm guessing, Forde and Osborne could be the center partnership. Back 3 is worrying. Hanson, Keenan are great but there's really nobody else close to them.



Advertisement
Advertisement