Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

19179189209229231435

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    No I'm saying the protests are pretty irrelevant to the situation in Gaza, i couldnt give a rats what they have on their placards. Protests or even the ICJ won't stop Israel doing anything only the US.

    I'm more concerned about civilians being killed, hostages being released and Hamas being removed. I'm also concerned that the civilian deaths will cause another terrorist organisation to Spring up after this operation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,671 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    It sounds as though you think an absence of a military response from Israel would have let Hamas just die out. It seems to me that that would inevitably have led to more such attacks, not just from Hamas in Gaza but also in the West Bank and from Hezbollah in Lebanon.

    I'd love to hear your thinking about what Israel should have done instead on Oct 8th and afterwards, that would have led to peace?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Not kill 20k civilians. Not continue to use methods that are resulting in such large civilian casualties. Not kill 6k kids and think that peace will be possible after.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,671 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I didn't ask what they shouldn't have done. You've already made your thinking on that clear.

    I asked what you think they should have done? For the moment, it seems your answer is "nothing". Would that be right?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Here's my suggestion: assassinate the leaders of hamas or perhaps allow civilians to leave gaza provide them safe haven in Israel before bombing the place.

    What so you support? kill 20k civilians, kill 6k kids, build support for the next terrorist group there, not allow civilians to leave?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 828 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    No it’s not a defence of Israel’s actions and literally no one said it was. Don’t make stuff up please.

    Really hopeless when posters jump in with both feet and don’t bother reading the thread first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    How long would you have given Israel to implement your displacement suggestion before they started bombing? How do you prevent Hamas from infiltrating with the Gazans moving somewhere (Israel, Egypt,...)

    Because I think if you work it through, you'd be talking months before Israel could begin the offense to get the hostages back. Should the Israeli people wait months? Why should Hamas let hostages go while the Gazans leave Gaza? They can strut and preen online showing how much tougher than Israel, and give their crazed associates like the Houthis time to organize for an eventual Israeli attack.

    As we've seen in the past weeks, it takes awhile and a great deal of planning (and luck) to blithely assassinate anyone, certainly Hamas buried in Lebanon or Qatar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,984 ✭✭✭jmreire



    I'm pretty sure that they have achieved at least some of their objectives by now. If this was Vladimir Putin, he would have finished his " Special Gaza military Operation" in weeks, never mind months. The problem with Putin's method is that all of Gaza would be in rubble. All of it, and the surrounding area as well. And the tunnels (assuming anyone was still alive in them) would be inoperable as all of Gaza would be resting on top of them. Now Hamas hides amongst the general population, and cry "Murderous Jews" when they are attacked. There was an anti-Vietnam singer / song writer who wrote songs, and one verse reminds me of the current situation in Gaza. It goes something like this:- " Every night the local gentry slips out past the sleeping sentry, they go to play at VC, in this little nightly drama, they put on their black pajamas' and come throwing mortar shells at me."

    He could well have been writing about Hamas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    We dont know how successful exactly the hostage recovery operation will be until the end of the operation but it is a fact that they successfully released about 100 at the end of November and none since. The breakdown of negotiations since that ceasefire ended has made it very unlikely that the hostages will survive this conflict.

    Do I think it would have been worthwhile to wait to bomb Gaza. Yes of course if it resulted in a much reduced civilian death total. The gazans will be looking for revenge for their casualties for years to come. Hamas destroyed with a much reduced civilian casualty rate would be a win for everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,984 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Oh, I'd say that it has worked beyond their wildest dreams, problem now for Hamas (and others too) has it worked only too well? Now Muslims killing other Muslims? They have put a match to a tinder dry forest. And in some cases, nothing to do with Palestine either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,784 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Should the Israeli people wait months for what? Revenge?

    And is that time worth civilian lives? There's no need to kill Hamas immediately. They're boxed in and surrounded by larger forces than they have been at any time. Israel could take time. they could formulate a plan. They could bide their time and go after leaders when the opportunity arises. They could start negotiating/planning with moderates what a post hamas gaza looks like. Israel has shown throughout it's history that it's willing to bide it's time and go after it's enemies. Israel didn't need to bomb start bombing the city as fast as they did. They bombed the city because they wanted to. They started immediately because they wanted to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 916 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    It's been used countless times throughout this thread to deflect with a "look over here" tactic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    "Should the Israeli people wait months for what? Revenge?"

    Israel acted to get the hostages back. Should they have waited? What would've happened to the hostages then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,447 ✭✭✭AlanG


    The ISW rerports have been so one sided and their wording so baised that it really makes me question their analysis of the Ukraine war. You can even see in the above how they talk about the palestinians being agressive and not really the IDF. All the IDF ever seem to do according to the ISW is drop aid. They also rarely report IDF casualties.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    They negotiated got a hundred back before the ceasefire broke down. Since that broke down and they have gone back to bombing gaza they have got none back so not a successful strategy (so far)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Seeing as how it looks like the IDF have killed more hostages than Hamas (the IDF have also killed more Israeli civilians than Hamas, since Oct 7) I would guess that would mean more hostages would still be alive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 828 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    Nonsense.

    I am the one that brings it up from time to time and have explained why each time. Still no one has offered any satisfactory explanation as to why no one on these marches protests Hamas. I note you haven’t opined on that either.

    Besides which it wouldn’t be very effective as a deflection tactic by me given you can post whatever you want when you want to…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭amandstu




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Israel won't allow them to leave and Egypt won't allow themselves be complicit with ethnic cleansing. There's also the very real possibility if it did happen, Israel won't allow them back into Gaza.

    Israel could have easily set up a tent city outside of Gaza (on Israeli land) to provide a safe space, to provide humanitarian and medical aid to all women and children, but choose not to. Hamas were defeated in northern Gaza, Israel could have allowed people (women and children) move back, not that there's much to go back to, but it should be a safer space than the south (provided Israel allow aid in unhindered)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Nonsense. Do you know how many hostages are in Gaza, vs. the Israeli estimate. Hamas has told you they've not killed any? Even through denial of medication (you can be sure, the Hamas leaders in Gaza get all their meds.)

    Per the account of one of the returned hostages, the main thing Hamas is doing right now, is keeping the Gazan locals from getting ahold of the hostages. She recounted her car, on the way to the release point, being pelted and attacked by Gazans. So I guess they're in slightly safer hands than if they were loose in Gaza.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Yes, and it took some bombing to get Hamas to the table. Not like they volunteered or came willingly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I'm not going by estimates, I'm going by confirmed deaths. If there's evidence of Hamas killing hostages, you're free to share it. Before you ask, I'm not looking for graphic videos.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Well, we'll have to wait then once the final tally's done, because you can be certain Hamas isn't going to willingly provide that data.

    Nice strawman though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Hamas don't have to provide the data. The IDF have cleared northern Gaza of Hamas, any hostages they found who have died, they would obviously know the cause of death. If they have a bullet hole in the head, it's probably Hamas, but given the IDF track record, they can match ballistics to NATO or a Soviet weapon. If the hostage was found under a collapsed tunnel/building that the IDF bombed, well they could surmise the cause of death from that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    You're certain Hamas are out of Northern Gaza? Because apparently they're back, like rats returning to their nests.

    And, as much as it'd delight you to get this data (lots of compassion for the poor dead innocent hostages I see), the IDF are kind of busy. Take a number, the insistence on the "IDF must confirm my suspicions now!" that you see on this thread is laughable. They're ducking bullets and making sure rockets don't get through, plus mixing it up some with the likes of Hezbollah.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    True but it makes no sense to not seek another cease fire then to negotiate to get the remaining hostages back. This doesn't seem to be the Israeli policy now for some reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    The IDF said only 2 days ago they have finished their intensive phase of their ground offensive in Northern Gaza. Certainly seems like they can be collecting evidence of war crimes (civilians and hostages executed etc...)

    I made the statement the IDF have been confirmed to have killed more Israeli hostages and civilians within Gaza and Israel than Hamas has (since Oct 7th) That was in relation to someone stating the IDF were not under imminent threat and could have easily assessed and planned for an offensive rather than jumping right in (something echoed by Biden about not being consumed by rage and making the same mistakes as the US did in the aftermath of 9/11)

    You stated Israel acted to get the hostages back. Should they have waited? What would've happened to the hostages then?

    I simple stated that those hostages Israel killed would be still alive. Even your statement goes against the general consensus (even among the hostages families) that the hostage's are not the top priority for Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    So, you're content that if Israel had waited, the hostages in Hamas's hands would have been fine?

    That's a leap; sure, some have sadly been killed in crossfire or a side-effect of the attacks. That's a tragedy entirely due to Hamas's actions on the 7th; no attack, no hostages. Couldn't be simpler.

    You seem to have a lot of faith in what Hamas' says. I think it's misguided.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,161 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Netanyahu needed a war to stay in power anyway. That's why he ignored the tip-off.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Well they probably wouldn’t have died in Israeli air strikes. Or by Israeli helicopter fire on October 7th. As has happened to many of them.



Advertisement