Harry and Meghan

And an actual iconic character... Big suze. Can't wait to hear how she's actually a bigot and the gutter press paid for peep show etc

You're really into the conspiracy theories at this stage.

Just so you know, Sophie Winkleman's husband is something like 50th in line to the throne, used be a fashion model and is now a financial analyst with JP Morgan. In other words, a minor royal who has to earn his own living and him and his wife Sophie isn't beholden to KCIII to keep afloat (unlike his father who is).

This is getting rather petty, comparing Catherine’s treatment of people working for her - or maybe I should say “with her” - with Meghan, who has form. It’s well known that Meghan was a nightmare to work for. I seem to recall some of those that did called themselves something like the “Sussexes Survivors”. One day, the investigation into Meghan’s treatment of staff will surface - even if it’s long after we’ve all shuttled off this mortal coil.

Archewell has a staff churn rate that would frighten any HR department (yes, I’m old enough that I remember it being the Personnel department, then Human Resources, now they report to the Chief People Officer. Give me strength, FFS!)

Actually, that has prompted a thought. As we know, Harry is the Chief Impact Officer for BetterUp. That makes him “CHIMPO”. Is that a clap back to that idiot Danny Baker?

Catherine has purpose, and that translate into helping others and championing initiatives Meghan also has purpose It’s self promotion, self aggrandisement, self centredness, self praise. It’s all about her

Yep- “Self” vs “Others” - it is that simple.

Kate has taken a few knocks to get to where she is- but she never appeared like she was “trying too hard”- she’s always appeared natural - and of course dutiful - it was always about the people -these days she just “owns it” - she has presence, experience, rank of course but she’s turned out very well- totally genuine.

Meaghan- a huge lack of self confidence surprisingly enough when it came to public appearances- way too self conscious and as a result, I think morphed into a controlling behaviour - it was never about the event, only about how she was portrayed- you can’t control the uncontrollable which is the British press- you’ve got to just push on - ask Princess Anne- a fcking giant of a person these days- she took dogs abuse from the press back in the day but these days she’s seen as a powerhouse of good sense and a terribly hard worker- you don’t see bad articles about princess Anne because she’s exactly how the British want their royal women to be - tough but caring, somewhat aloof but hard working - it’s not that difficult really and the rewards are a pretty damn good life it has to be said.

Meaghan was not interested in a life of duty - that’s fine, but she took Harry away from that life and I don’t think he’s surviving very well - she’s stripped all the good out of him and he’s become a woke puppet and a grumpy old man

Ok so The Spectator is an acceptable source for you. Good to know. Now you can stop decrying them when others quote them. . You slid into my DMs to debate that the Spectator was not a valid source of info over Uvlade after you got banned from this thread about a year ago, trying to continue the debate, until I had to ask you to stop messaging me. But now you are quoting them as a soure to back up your point of view, back to me. You are a hyprocrite of the higest order.

No its not Kate. You are a small minded person who uses a moniker to belittle a woman who has done nothing to you. Thanks for showing us who you are. The polite thing to do is call someone by their requested name. I bet you struggle with preferred pronouns too, out of choice. Good to know.

correct it's actually katzo.

generally i will do pronouns yes but i will not doff the cap to someone because.

Thats not how it works. You dont get to pick and chose whose names you use. It disrespectful and you know it. I am astonished you posted that. its not doffing the cap to call someone by their name. As a society we are way past using names as a derogatory go undermine people we dont like.

An end of year review from the Spectator on Harry and Meghan. Guardian readers may take a slightly different review

https://archive.is/StERX

Summary of treatment of Prince Harry & Meghan by the British Press. ''Its a huge victory for Prince Harry, and its not over yet''. Daily Mail/Sun/Express readers by take a different view!

https://x.com/DrDobberstein/status/1741099860466540757?s=20

“we embrace the moment of now to create a better tomorrow”

That’s the kind of trite, meaningless stuff I’m talking about.

lol, that video is spot on. She’s just very unimpressive to me. I’m not trying to be mean but if she has any discernible talent or charm then she’s not showing it.

It was a major struggle to listen to this to the end. She is one massive narcissist. Her ramblings made no sense whatsoever. It was all about herself. She kept saying that she did this and she did that. I still don't know what she did. Her jealousy came across very strong in the Oprah interview. I suspect that it will all in in tears for Harry.

she didn't trash harry's family, nor did harry.

they simply spoke the truth about them and the family did the rest themselves.

for her to fit the diagnosis of being a narcissist, she would need to fit a number of trates.

she does not meet a sufficient amount, if any, to be classed as a narcissist, therefore your diagnosis is bogus.

i don't know how much of the thread you have read back through, but this was discussed plenty early on and other posters have shown what i have stated to be the case.

If you listened to Martin's theories, all speakers talk about themselves to make themselves relatable to their audience. He does a similar analysis on Obama trying to relate to a woman's group (i.e., he talked about trick and treating with his daughters as an example. If he was speaking to a group of steel workers, he probably wouldn't talk about that).

If you don't know what she did after listening to her saying it, you were not listening (probably looking for her to say something that reinforced your opinion of her and were unable to find it).