Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

19879889909929931120

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    More personal comments and then you call someone childish. Should really look in the mirror.

    In regards to what you posted, it is wrong. Surprise Surprise. The 2035 is passed but as I said can be changed. Nobody has stopped it as you claim.

    What Germany and other wanted was car that run on e-fuels.

    Italy also want to change the law because of the amount of jobs that will be at risk.

    It will be at least 2 years before any of this is confirmed. Expect it to be water down, what that is I don't know yet.

    If I was you I would stop lecturing people



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,258 ✭✭✭✭JRant



    This dime bar is so detached from reality it's scary. He genuinely thinks a 75K loan over 20 years at 4% interest rate is a "game changer".

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,222 ✭✭✭prunudo


    So about €400/month extra, on top of current mortgage, pension, insurance and other outgoings. Which requires an extra €7k a year in gross income. On technology that will probably be redundant half way through the loan term.


    Follow the money lads, follow the money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,258 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I actually got the term length wrong, it's over a 10 year max. So the repayments come in at nearly 700 per month. Pure lunacy

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    The end of that article contains this gem

    “””

    Asked specifically when the Metro would be completed, he said it would be “in the early part of the next decade”.

    ”””



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,531 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I mean, I think most of us would be delighted if there was a Metro finished by early 2030s. If he gets the railway order and some shovels in the ground during his tenure, along with other improvements in public transport, I'd be delighted with his term as Minister of Transport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,258 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    It really should have been his number 1 priority the entire time he was in office. A Dublin metro would actually be one of the few projects to move the needle in getting people out of cars and on to public transport. It's been a huge missed opportunity and a serious black mark against him.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,531 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    black mark how? it's progressing and looking more likely to be built than any previous attempts at a metro.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    Progressing where exactly? Is there even a single shovelful to have broken ground



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,531 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    All of the massive amounts of red tape. Pretty sure hearings go ahead for the planning approval some time first quarter of 2024. Check out the thread on the Infrastructure forum on Metro, the transport nerds there seem pretty certain it's happening this time and keep up to date with all developments. It seems to be heading in the right direction, under the watchful eye of our hero Big Eam.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭Blut2


    There are 2 million odd households in Ireland, so at circa 50k a year households it'll only take 40 odd years to retrofit them all with this scheme. What an achievement!

    If the Greens actually wanted to drive down emissions, while helping improve the quality of life of people, they'd have brought in a very easy to qualify for no interest loan scheme. A whole house retrofit paid for upfront by the government, with say 80% of the electricity/heating savings then taken a month until the loan is paid off.

    The home owner would still benefit from lower electricity/heating bills so it would be worthwhile for them, emissions would go down, and the cost to the state long term would be minimal - particularly at a time when we've got billions of excess euros sitting around not being used. Everyone wins.

    Instead our Greens only introduce schemes like this which only already wealthy people could possibly use - the only households going to be able to add 700e a month to their monthly outgoings are those already very financially comfortable.

    And at the same time they continually ratchet up taxes on everyone, making life even harder for the poor/working classes...

    Its no wonder they're facing electoral wipe-out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,222 ✭✭✭prunudo


    There is plenty of progress. Far more than anything in the past. Metrolink will happen, but I'd be surprised if its completed as early as Eamonn alluded to above.

    I don't actually think he believes in the project himself. He never seems to get passionate about it or be singing its praises. Comes across as being indifferent to it which is strange given what it will achieve.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,706 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Where do you come up with this nonsense. Germany, Iataly or the other countries that would not sign off on this didn`t give a rats ass about e-fuels. As Carville said back in 1992, "It`s the economy stupid". But then perhaps you believe that jobs have nothing to do with economies..

    E-fuels are just another of the green pipe dreams and were only a face saving exercise by the E.U. to cover that their plan to ban the sale of ICE vehicles after 2035 are dead and buried. E-fuels are at least double the price of petrol or diesel, where yet again there is no coherent geen plan to reduce their cost, and like the E.U. farce on wood burning, they would still emit CO2 and NO2.

    Other than the E.U. presenting ever driver an EV within the next 11 years ICE vehicles using petrol will be manufactured and sold in the E.U. long after 2035, so just get over it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,770 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Oil is a really useful product, very little goes to waste and the efficiency and productivity gains through its use are the primary reason Western governments in particular can extract so much taxation from it's consumption. The price of a barrel of oil rather than the end products is at a high level dictated by the intersection of demand and supply (it must be refined), the Ukraine war is only a temporary factor due to disruption and reorganization of supply routes , plus the destruction of a substantial part of Ukraines infrastructure and industry means demand for diesel is reallocated to fighting the war. I have made my view on the Ukraine situation clear on the other thread.

    The EU (in particular France) is very much about trade protectionism (As garlic man found out) and CBAM is the latest extension of such schemes. Politicians across Europe will eventually have to answer why all the "green jobs" are created in China, where they use coal to process the materials needed for wind turbines, solar panels and batteries, that must be imported by companies throughout the EU, that are subsidized by Europeans.

    National climate policies are driving new trends of trade protectionism, with the EU at the centre of many of these fights. We expect disputes between the EU and many developing nations, in particular, to intensify over the 2020s given the inability of many emerging markets to meet the EU’s environmental policy thresholds. source

    From the horses mouth, and given the outcome of recent Dutch elections, said horse may be heading for the knackers yard.

    Here comes European protectionism (2019)

    “As an economic giant we have tremendous leverage in our trade relations,” Frans Timmermans, the Dutch Socialist tasked with making good on the plan to make the EU climate neutral by 2050, said during his confirmation hearing in the European Parliament in October.

    Tools like the carbon border tax, he said, are “instruments … to level the playing field for European products if other countries do not go as far as us or refuse to go in the right direction.


    It should be clear from recent UN COP meetings that the rest of the world (India, China & US in particular), has no intention of following the EUs dictats and in effect told the likes of Mary Robinson, John Kerry and the German delegation (led by former Greenpeace director) the diplomatic speak equivalent of "go pound sand". That's why we see Eamon Ryan coming back rabbiting on about carbon capture storage schemes. CCS is yet another way for politicians and lobbyists to waste taxpayer funds (from 2017, EU blew over €500 million)

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,773 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    I’m in my late 60’s and I seem to recall talk about the underground for Dublin back in the early 2000’s. Yes he wasn’t in power then I grant him that but Gormley was in the late 2,000’s and the greens should have pursued this then , when they were in power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    The Galway Bypass also had plenty of “progress” on paper



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,531 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    why didn't FF/FG pursue it then and make sure it happened? gormley wasn't the minister of transport at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,773 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    No he wasn’t & I acknowledged as such, but he was the leader of a coalition party, who were in power.

    Post edited by WishUWereHere on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    If they would not waste money putting concrete slabs and metal poles on the road and making lane that barely any cyclist use pretty much blocking ambulances getting through as there is nowhere to move to let them go, then maybe they could move that metro project bit more significantly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,258 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Depends on what you define progress as?

    He's had this brief for how long and we’re only getting to hearings in 2024?

    It hasn’t been on his radar at all and is more focused on window dressing than anything that can have a tangible impact.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,531 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I think you can blame An Bord Pleannala for most of that, an outfit that seems almost unfit for purpose, COVID would have slowed things down too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,531 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I've only ever seen parked cars blocking ambulances in Dublin, the Fire Brigade often tweet about being blocked by ignorant parking too. There have been some much needed segregated cycle lanes popping up which is great if you use a bike to get to work etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,726 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    This is a very puzzling exegesis. In the one hand you are against Europeans subsidizing Chinese imports. On the other hand you are disappointed anbout the prospect of adjustments for foreign goods to counteract the subsidies. Perhaps you think the CBAM is too little, too late?

    Sadly many of the points you raise are not new to me. They were articulated extensively on the neighbouring island in the second half of the last decade

    Thank you for your brilliant observation about how the intersection of demand and supply dictates the price of commodities.

    I don’t know what any of this has to do with the price of car parts. I take it you now accept that neither the CBAM nor your unspecified certification scheme will have any real influence on the price of German car parts.

    Post edited by antoinolachtnai on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    So you agree what you posted was incorrect?

    As I posted already numerous times I don't think diesel or petrol should be withdrawn. So why would I have to "just get over it"? maybe you can explain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,770 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    There are several cross currents.

    EU politics are out of step with national politics on some key issues across the entire zone. Policies that originate from Brussels are encroaching on issues of national politics, as members of the public we have no direct say on matters that impact our lives. The local establishment apparatus have long sold out, especially in the aftermath of the EU/ECB sponsored bailouts of the 2010s that saved their hides. We read rumours in the media of local politicians names associated with the jobs in the EU gravy train, previously this was used to cynically get rid of challengers to the party leader, now it seems to be a career path.

    Accommodation, immigration and environmental policies are proving to be the most contentious across the block, prior to this year anyone who as much as raises questions or expresses their concerns get jumped on by the local establishment with epithets such as far right, climate denier and hate speech. The events of 2023 have changed attitudes, every politician in the country has been contacted by many constituents opposing hate speech laws. I have no knowledge of that level of engagement happening on matters that did not involve a referendum.  Recently, a politician who showed up to shake hands with people attending a constituents funeral, was quietly spoken to (was not me) as he was about to get in his car on said topic of the day, all polite and above board. The feedback they are getting can be at odds with the mainstream narrative.

    Keeping this topic strictly to environmental issues, opposition has come about that was not there previously.  Farmers Alliance Ireland are today a fringe organisation, however, they did not exist prior to the green agenda. It takes a while to organise a cohesive group. The larger farmers lobbies tend to play the game, sniff around to see what's in it for them and protest when the government won't buy them off.

    Early commentary on the tenure of EU president Ursula von der Leyen has not been favourable, she is being tipped to fail upwards as head of NATO in 2024. Dutch politician Frans Timmermans who led the EU Green new deal has left behind a mess and not fared well in national politics. The more powerful lobby groups have come in an told EU and national politicians what is acceptable to them and I expect that soon enough "markets first" decision making might start happening, as the green jobs illusion fades away.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,706 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Remind me, which of us posted "The 2035 was always a target" ?

    It was voted on and passed by both the E.U. Commission and the E.U. Parliament and would have become law 1st. January 2036 until Germany with the backing of other countries shot it down in flames.

    If yet again your imagination wants to substitute your facts in place of reality then that is your problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    As I said it's not shot down as you claimed. It is under negotiations. So you agree you are wrong then?

    Still waiting for you to explain why I need to "just get over it"?

    Also in the last point you claimed it would never be met, so are you not confirming with what I said in first place and this was just a target :-)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,770 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    The administrative overhead from CBAM red tape alone can only mean price increases. Secondly, as part of EU plans to reduce CO2 by 40% from 1990 levels by 2030, the EU still plans to cap pollution under the Emissions Trading System (ETS) at about 12 billion tons from 2021 to 2030, tightening the total amount of emissions allowed each year. Anyone who thinks CBAM will not impact prices and availability of products is kidding themselves.

    image.png

    During the transitional phase of CBAM (October 1, 2023 – December 31, 2025), there will only be a requirement for the quarterly reporting of the greenhouse gas footprint of certain products imported to the EU (including direct and indirect emissions). Starting 2026, there will also be a requirement to purchase CBAM certificates to cover the GHG footprint, and the price of CBAM certificates would be linked to carbon prices at the EU ETS. CBAM would represent an additional cost related to export to the EU market, which would in the end of the day be shared with the exporter or producer and could influence their marketing strategy. There are expectations that other countries may also implement measures similar to CBAM. source

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,706 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    What is so difficult for you to get ?

    2035 was not a "target" date. It was the date after which new ICE vehicles as proposed by the E.U. Commission would legally cease to to be available to purchase or register. That was the proposal both the Commission and Parliament voted on and passed and made media highlights as new ICE vehicles being banned for sale or registration in the E.U after your "target" date.

    Except it`s not. Germany and others seeing the harm it would do to their economies rendered it null and void.

    It is not "under negotiation". Frans Timmerman, the Green Deal Commissioner who was pushing for this to become legally binding within the E.U. (and since departed back home in a vain attempt at steadying the leaking ship) tweeted March 25. "We have found an agreement with Germany on the fuiure use of efuel in cars". Considering that e-fuel is at least twice the price of petrol or diesel that tweet effectively means that there is no "target" date, or any other date under negotiation to ban the sale or registration of ICE vehicles and you really do need to stop wasting others time and get over it.



Advertisement