Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

18348358378398401442

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,698 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Well, the "evidence" given that Israel was not secular was supposedly because of symbols of the Jewish religion being part of the state. I'm saying that that isn't evidence, because other states such as the UK also have an established religion, yet still manage to allow members of other religions to have a full role in the life of the country.

    Evidence would be if non Jewish Israelis could not get certain positions like high court judges or stand for election and so on. As I said that isn't the case, because Arab Israelis like George Karra are at the top of the legal profession in Israel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Karra

    Arab Israelis are also over represented among healthcare professionals and are present in other high status positions, particularly the legal profession. They also have elected representatives in the Knesset (the United Arab List and the Arab Democratic Party etc).

    As for Gaza, I posted several links about the oppression of Christians there on this very thread not long ago.

    Not sure what you're asking for about the UK - that the Church of England has special status as the "established religion"? That's pretty basic knowledge but here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_England

    Or evidence that other religions are not discriminated again despite that? Again, pretty obvious for anyone who follows their media at all - just look at all the Irish people who do pretty well there. Hardly needs a link, surely?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,055 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Many believe Hamas figures because over the years, when WHO, or MSF, or other organizations determine deaths in Gaza, they've found the figures to be extremely close to those the Gaza Health Ministry produces.

    We've seen how reliable Israeli communications and messaging has been over the last several weeks. The fact that this is supposedly an NGO means nothing to me in the context of who to believe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,055 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I should no better than engaging with an account with only a handful of posts.

    Here you go, some reading for you. Link

    Palestinian armed groups must be held accountable for deliberate civilian killings, abductions and indiscriminate attacks 


    Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups flagrantly violated international law and displayed a chilling disregard for human life by carrying out cruel and brutal crimes including mass summary killings, hostage-taking, and launching indiscriminate rocket attacks into Israel, Amnesty International said today. With evidence still emerging of the horrors that unfolded in southern Israel, Amnesty International will continue its investigations in order to determine the full range of crimes under international law.  

    Have a good day, I'm done engaging with you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭dmcdona




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,598 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    Let’s stop the indiscriminate and ongoing murder of innocent people.

    Then let’s get prisoners exchanged.

    Then let’s get talking about the two state solution.

    Then create a platform for Palestinians to reject Hamas in free and fair elections.

    And then start aggressively criminalising terrorist activities.

    But let’s be extremely clear. Support for Israel, or any state irrespective of context, cannot be a blank cheque. Israel must obey International law, it cannot indiscriminately murder civilians, it cannot steal land it is not entitled to, etc. The murder of innocent people needs to stop now!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I think context is important.

    Last elections were 2005 (18 years ago). Half the population of Gaza were not even born then.

    Israel supported Hamas and wanted them to win the election to split the Palestinian authority.


    Do you think the Israelis are currently exhibiting adult humane behaviour?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Sorry, I think I missed the post. The source of what?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,598 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    Is that genuinely the first thing you’d say to someone you meet? Bit of a weird way to open a conversation in Ireland I’d say.

    It would be like someone opening a conversation with “I’m a proud Roman Catholic” or “I’m a proud atheist”. Maybe you’d rather start with “hello” or the events of the day? Or the weather?



  • This content has been removed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,055 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I think you meant to post this responding to someone else's comment, possibly in a different thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,329 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    There's a lot of arguments on here containing contradictions put forward as some kind of gotcha to excuse Israel (vs its neighbours and of course countries like Belarus) and imply its being held to an impossible standard.

    What-about the muslim fundamentalism and the intolerance, oppression and violence that is widespread across rest of the ME...all the deaths in Syrian civil war, Yemen...blah blah...

    In my mind either Israel is a Western democratic country all the way, even when at war, or it is not.

    When Israel commit atrocities and war crimes to achieve goals, fact that they, unlike rest of ME, have democractic internal workings and a free society (excl. "occupied territories" ofc) and are a more humane place to live than surrounding countries + more like us in that way, is rendered irrelevant to me. 

    Israel becomes yet another awful ME state, fitting into a violent region full of closed minds, religious and nationalist nutjobs and brutal rulers.

    Given this, why should we (in real Western countries) support everything Israel does?

    To try and force compliance and continued unquestioned support, they (govt., spokespeople etc.) come out with this very shrill and desparate (+ often absurd) you are with us or against us message.

    If that's all they have now well it won't work forever I predict, not even on the US.

    edit: Even before recent growth of isolationism in US, imo they have always been fickle and inconstant about allies when there is no deeper ideological or emotional link there and its just a case of "our bastard" vs "the other, maybe worse, bastard who is agin us".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,379 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes indeed - look at how Ukraine and Zelensky have responded to invasion by Russia for example. Despite major provocation, no reports of war crimes nor have they resorted to bombing civilian areas in Moscow. Zelensky is clearly a warm and empathetic man who cares about human life.

    Israel has gone full on rogue / pariah state in the last couple of months and is seemingly not even remotely bothered about the consequences or their international reputation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Palmach


    This is a lie. An utter and total fabrication.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    No it isn't.

    But I'm more than happy for you cite sources that back you up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Palmach


    They'll be stopped at the border as they cannot enter a country that is not theirs. If they attempt to breach it they'll be fired on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Palmach


    You made the assertion. Back it up. I have already referenced Israeli law where all citizens are treated equally. Have you examples to the contrary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,414 ✭✭✭✭2smiggy


    is it time to start carpet bombing isreal ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Is not real.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,842 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    For some one on a gaza/ Israel thread you seem to be only interested in talking about Ireland. Perhaps you could start a thread on how backward the Irish are.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    I thought so but what goes around, comes around. How many do you reckon the IDF would slaughter to stop them? What would be the acceptable level before even the US would turn away in absolute disgust and let Israel rot?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,079 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    That's the most hypocritical aspect of the Palestinian supporters on here. They will quite happily decry Israel but turn a blind eye to Hamas, the people who initiated this war and continue it despite the horrific damage that it has inflicted on their own people and land.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,850 ✭✭✭gameoverdude




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Actually, you made the assertion. see my reference below. I look forward to seeing your reference


    1) “The right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people.”

    This declaration doesn’t just say that Israel is the historic homeland of Jews, which is a core part of Zionist ideology and the argument for the Jewish state’s existence in what’s now Israel. Instead, this goes further to unequivocally state that Jews — and only Jews — have the exclusive right to “self-determination” within Israel. 

    In other words, only Jews have the right to determine what kind of state and society they live under. Which means that by default, non-Jews — such as Palestinian citizens of Israel, some of whom are Muslim and some of whom are Christian — don’t have that same right.


    https://www.vox.com/world/2018/7/31/17623978/israel-jewish-nation-state-law-bill-explained-apartheid-netanyahu-democracy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 920 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    What if the tables were turned and Israel launched an attack on Gaza killing 1200 people and Hamas retaliated by killing 20 thousand Israeli's and didnt stop at that.

    Would you all be defending Hamas's right to defeat Israel. Me thinks not.

    Anyway it'll probably get to 25k dead before there'll be another ceasefire. I'd say at that the international pressure might finally come to bear on Israel. Then again they dont seem to care about killing en masse, even shooting their own. I said at the start of the thread what number would be enough. I thought 10 thousand would probably be enough. How wrong I was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,396 ✭✭✭SeanW



    Assuming that I regarded China and Israel as being equally horrible (I don't, but for the sake of argument) one could start by publicly promoting a BDS movement against the so-called People's Republic of China. Personally I try to avoid Chinese made products wherever I can, but I don't expect a large scale BDS movement against China to gain traction because the Chinese are likely held to lower standards by the Left for racial reasons.

    Of course, if you really wanted to be consistent, your slogan would have to be "From the Mountains to the Seas, East Turkestan will be free" making it clear that the objective is not a multi-state solution (e.g. China, East Turkestan, Tibet and Inner Mongolia going to Mongolia) but that the Chinese people were to be driven into the sea, even from cities like Beijing, Harbin, Shenzen etc. Because it's the "From the river to the sea" chant that is genocidal, not Israel.

    Funny how much hatred and demonisation is directed at one of the worlds smallest countries, one that has been fighting mortal enemies bent on its utter annihilation since the day it was founded, and just happens to be the worlds only Jewish-majority country and the closest thing to a safe haven for Jews in the world.

    All this dog-piling on little old Israel is really ... ironic, is perhaps the kindest word I can use.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭GeminiLad


    It's not something I'd start a conversation with but speak with me a few minutes and you'd soon know I'm a proud jew.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭GeminiLad


    Interesting.. and Israel are holding them to account.

    But they hide behind their civilians causing death and destruction to their own.

    So the question is.. who's responsible?

    I think Amnesty International answered that question in the article you posted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭GeminiLad


    Ignorant post.

    Israeli's kidnapped on October 7th are not prisoners, they're hostages.

    Two state solution can never be on the table until Israel security is guaranteed. And the only way to guarantee that security is to eradicate extreme, murderous organisations like Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah. Which is what Israel is currently doing.

    I'd also add.. 'River to the Sea' chanting around the world doesn't exactly fill jews like myself with confidence that a two state solution is the priority here.

    Israel pulled out of Gaza in 2006 and left the place for free and democratic elections for Palestinians. What happened? Hamas and Fatah entered into a civil war, killing each other and creating a terror state ruled by a death cult.

    Wake up mate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭carveone


    This is the US we're talking about. Going by historical precedent, I would think "all of them and also profit from the carnage". I wouldn't say that now, but I'd think it.



Advertisement