Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

"Green" policies are destroying this country

19479489509529531120

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,412 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Buses and trucks are big for a reason, they need to be the size they are to fulfill their functions.

    Buses move a lot of people.

    Trucks move a lot of cargo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,737 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Correct, but the renewables make massive inframarginal rent (on top of capacity payments and any other feed in tariff payments they may be eligible for).

    There's a reason why the wind lobby group WEI has over 40 people in employment - to keep the gravy train running. These folk never generate a single watt of electricity themselves, they're just paid by some of the industry to stay in the Ministers ear. Take a look at any photos of ER and you'll likely see their CEO nearby.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,737 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    And SUVs move people and cargo to places busses and trucks don't go.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭m2_browning


    SUVs move more people faster than a cargo bike

    whats your point again?



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I posted a load of stuff on SUV's a day or two ago here, you may find the answers you are looking for among the references studies.

    Irish road safety data is woeful though. Between the fustercluck that is the Garda data management and the secrecy of the RSA, its a serious issue trying to get comprehensive data around road collisions in Ireland, below is a recent example highlighted




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,412 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    There are very few places trucks don't go and our bus network is improving all the time.

    But you are right private vehicles will always be needed by some people.

    The question is do they need to be big vehicles where a small one would be as good.

    Of course most of what are called SUV's in this country are not SUV's at all but are crossovers.

    Should we penalise people who need more space in their cars or incentives smaller cars ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,737 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    I read your links the last time and they didn't answer questions then, they still don't now. Your last link sums the issue up and I'd rather have informed decision making.

    What I'm looking for is a big morbid database full of details related to Ireland. Linking to the USA is pointless - their saloons are often bigger than our minibuses. There's scarcely a day goes by where there isn't a road death in Ireland and there's probably multiples of accidents on top of that (many which probably aren't reported, of the 4 times I was hit cycling, only 1 went to the Gardai). None of the sources tend to track useful data like vehicle type, age, impairments, driver information, victim information (were they infringing on the rules of the road themselves). Then of course, if there's more SUVs and more cyclists/pedestrians, you'd expect more accidents with them involved.

    The least common denominator in all vehicle accidents is the human at the wheel. Perhaps we should be moving to Autonomous autos faster if it's a safety issue?

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    While I agree regarding your desire for more data, what you laid out as a dataset is unlikely to ever exist unfortunately, at least I don't foresee it ever coming together in that form based on the current treatment of this data. Maybe that will change in time, who knows.

    I disagree on the USA stats being pointless, they are an excellent indicator of where we are heading with pickups and SUV's getting larger and larger on our roads, but allow me to offer a comparable EU study instead.

    One from Belgium a few months ago, covers such things as vehicle weight, bonnet height, power, age, pickup, suv etc and is based on data from 300,000 collisions

    Conclusion

    The analysis of accidents between, on the one hand, two cars and, on the other hand, a car and a vulnerable user shows that the current development, namely increasingly heavy, tall and powerful cars, risks lead to two-speed road safety. On the one hand, passengers in these more robust vehicles are increasingly safer; on the other, vulnerable users and occupants of smaller cars (lower mass and power) are increasingly at risk of serious or fatal injuries.

    Of course, the increase in the mass of cars is partly explained by the massive presence of driving aids, but also by increased comfort, greater sound insulation and increasingly thick body pillars. This study clearly shows that it is essential to slow down this increase, to move towards a more homogeneous fleet and to better protect vulnerable users in the event of collision with cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,466 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Remember Frances EDF claim they can do it for €350million per reactor. Porkies much.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,412 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    It's not really about bikes.

    Just trying to figure out the best way to right size vehicles without disadvantaging people.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A useful bit of info released today from the North Seas Energy Cooperation (NSEC). It details most of the estimated timelines for offshore auctions and the construction periods for each auction, Ireland included (indicated in green)

    image.png image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,306 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Stop the press, are they only now realising that an increase in mass leads to more damage. Wait till they find out that the velocity is squared, making it by far the biggest factor in determining outcome for pedestrians.

    If you hit by a 1500kg car doing 30kmph (675kJ) you will come out far better than getting him by the same car at even 50kmph (1875 kJ). So over 3 times the amount of energy for a very modest increase in speed.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The ECT strikes again, with a fossil fuel company using it to block windfall taxes on its profits

    In a separate case, the publicly owned Swiss electricity company AET is suing Germany over the impact of its coal phase-out on the Trianel Lünen coal power plant, in which it has a 15% stake.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,063 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    This is the line. This is why people buy them (plus the superior driving position and more space

    On the one hand, passengers in these more robust vehicles are increasingly safer

    Has anyone ever bought a car and even considered the safety of those outside it?



  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Surely that is why the government has to consider them. People are generally selfish in their choices and government has to prioritize the greater good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,737 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Around 1/5th of their renewables is met by hydroelectric power. That implies spinning mass and therefore inertia. Their grid is also electrically coupled to a much larger system, the Spanish and indeed Central European system.

    It is absolutely not the same feat as producing electricity using asynchronous sources on an island that has only HVDC connections to the next nearest island.

    If you want to be wowed by a continental country with significant asynchronous generation, Denmark is the leader. However it's also the interconnector of Europe and benefits from all the inertia and system services carried by its neighbours.

    It's that inertia that abates system frequency excursions during events, thereby stopping significant rates of change of frequency which is measured by protection relays. This gives other sources a chance to provide reserves rather than trip themselves in sympathy.

    Disconnect Portugal from Spain and see how well they fare at that level of renewables.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,737 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Finland did it for €11 Billion for a reactor that would provide over 30% of our present requirements.

    Three of those would near enough fill our current needs. That would cost €33 Billion. Even at €10 Billion each for decommissioning the total would be €63 Billion.

    That is still €37 Billion less than Eamon Ryan`s makey uppey figure for offshore wind.

    We could even build a spare, still be €15 Billion better of than Ryan`s makey uppey figure and be like France and Sweden with countries lining up to buy our excess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,765 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    the board would be accused of not defending shareholders if it didn't. should everyone lie down to government whims.

    the consumer will pay for it anyway.

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,726 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    This is very exciting. How can an operator get a capacity payment for a 20 MW Wind farm?

    How can an operator make inframarginal rent beyond the auction strike price for a new wind farm?

    How can wind generators get these extra feed-in tariffs ‘they may be eligible for’? Does DSP pay these? Is there a web page?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,737 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Little to none of the RESS auction based wind farms have connected yet, so most of your points don't apply. Legacy wind can avail of all of the above (if they elected to), plus, those who connected before 4th July 2019 get priority dispatch ahead of everyone else.

    If you want to join them, buy a time machine, but in the meantime, approx 5GW of our generation reap the rewards of a rubbish market design where they are paid against the production cost of gas/coal/oil/DSUs despite having 0 fuel costs themselves.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,063 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    You are just moving the problem. I asked previously if studies had been done. SUVs vs VRU is just one approach and shouldn't be the only metric for determining the safety or lack of

    Is there no data showing the type of vehicle involved in tese collisions so we could see if SUVs share is growing or not? Probably is but is it in line with the growth of that vehicle class. Now in addition information needs to be sought as to the type of accident, were the pedestrians visible, what speed was the vehicle doing, was the driver impaired, etc. It wouldn't be a simple linear thing I guess (being hit at speed by a saloon or SUV is bad news). We'd also then need to look at the vehicle occupants status post accident. Were they survivors or had lesser injuries because they were in an SUV.

    It's not just a case of SUVs are more dangerous without all the ancillary bits of data needed to build a bigger more accurate picture. Plus you'd have to look at how vehicle to vehicle collisions are and if SUVs protect better than saloons.

    If we really were worried about pedestrians, then there'd be a blanket ban on pedestrians and cars mixing in any area. Targeting SUVs is just some populist shite to please those tyre deflating knobheads and their ilk.

    And prioritising ones own safety is far from selfish



  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Most people who own SUVs have no functional need for them. They congest cities and often the drivers are not even compitent enough to drive one (I have had to reverse for half a mile because some women SUV driver cannot reverse them or won't pull in even if they could). A relatively few people such as farmers have a functional need for them.



  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The boards laugh about the fact that governments agreed to these kangaroo tribunals. It's the main reason that trade agreements are falling down before final signing since the public and governments are finally wising up to the dubious nature of these binding tribunal decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,063 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    In cities, the size of them may be an issue. Then again, many of them, though taller, don't have a huge footprint on the ground and would be comparable to many saloons. Loading/unloading them is far easier than a saloon, especially if you have kids. The high driving position is much safer, as well as the aforementioned safety aspect for passengers. Driver competence is an issue not linked to SUVs, though I probably wouldn't mind a new licence class for them. If nothing else it would mean people had to do some training to manoeuver and get used to the new driving position.

    I don't believe you had to reverse for half a mile. That doesn't sound legit unless ya were down some bog lane with no where to pull in. Personally, if it was me I'd get out and offer to reverse for them and if they weren't pulling in, I'd hold my position on the road, pull in and then park up. Always let clowns like that ones moving when passing so if they hit your car it's 100% their fault as you are stationary 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,737 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    While I agree with you that some folk are out of their depth on country roads (I had a similar experience and had to reverse the Massey a good 250m with a full silage trailer behind me), I don't think it would matter if it's an SUV or a saloon. I've had the same issue when I met the milk lorry, c'est la vie - tis but an opportunity to hone my reversing skills. There's a lot of size variations within the umbrella term of "SUV", anything from the size of a Yaris to the size of a monster truck. In my experience, a lot of of them aren't particularly wide, they're just taller.

    Their needs may be different to your views of their needs. They may require increased cabin space or desire a higher driving position or simply their perception of a safer cabin. What exactly is wrong with any of those needs?

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭m2_browning


    And here we get to the core of the green nonsense ideology/religion

    The sheer arrogance and condescension towards those they consider are not holy enough

    It is not up to you and your inner dictator to tell what people to do or how to live their lives

    How is your opinion any different to social opinions let’s say of the conservatives who believe abortion is evil and gay rights are sodomous? Btw you are free to have whatever daft opinions and express them online, but trying to force your opinion’s undemocratically when greens are a minority is clearly crossing a line which pisses so many people off



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,264 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Most of the SUVs you are talking about are of no functional use to a farmer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom


    Im leaving this not so merry go round thread due to A:the many blank pages of Ignored Green posters constantly on the war path and displaying their stupidity with a veracity of an out of control beligerent child Homer Simpson and B: the insistence of contra posters willing to engage with them actually contributing to the problem. This slagging match has gotten beyond tedious..

    Good luck getting nowhere..



Advertisement