Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

19619629649669671818

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,418 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I've come to the conclusion that McCann is O'Mahony 2.0. The similarities are uncanny actually. So style wise I don't se why he wouldn't be a Farrell player. Ability wise? Well we won't know until if and when he makes the step up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,317 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I've come to the conclusion that McCann is O'Mahony 2.0.

    That may well be awkward for a few posters around here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    The real test will be McCann's first interview by Reggie Corrigan.

    Then we'll know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Sheehan and Porter are other nailed on starters who have youth on their side. Do either have captaincy experience/potential?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 396 ✭✭El Vino


    I think it should be Ringrose, increasingly front 5 forwards are playing 55mins or less. It is a long time with a stand in captain.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    What isn't true?

    This:

    we had multiple 'analysts' ... claiming a few months ago ... that an extended squad selection for a player ... was going to have an extremely negative impact on the sport




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    They did - you saw the tweets at the time and were heavily involved in the discussion here about them for days. I then posted some of the tweets again a few months ago when you tried to gaslight that it never happened, which it looks like you're up to your old tricks and trying to repeat now.

    I'm likely wasting my time, as you'll move the goalposts, deflect, or the selective amnesia will kick in again in a few months, but here are a few examples of the extremely negative impacts on rugby in Ireland that were claimed by 'analysts' from a certain province:

    1) That it would feed into a corrosive perception of favouritism towards one province:

    'When the perception is that you have to play twice as well for twice as long to get half the opportunities, that can be corrosive down the line.'

    2) That it was likely to cause certain fans to develop apathy for the team:

    'The more the national side becomes dominated by one province the more chance that supporters develop apathy towards the side.'

    3) That it was likely to make players from other provinces leave Ireland:

    'the Irish team continues to be Leinster dominated and the enticement of staying in Ireland to play in green becomes less of a reason to stay for those not in blue.'

    This is the absolutely toxic nonsense I was talking about, again during the most successful period in Irish rugby and all crying about an extended squad selection for a player that had a zero chance of playing, no matter who was brought into the squad.

    Now imagine what bile they'll come out with if AF stripped their cult hero of captaincy in a manner they didn't agree with, especially if Ireland were getting poor results and there was a negative mood.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Connacht have a herd of Leinster players too! Do these lads count if selected for outrage?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,231 ✭✭✭TRC10


    If O'Mahony gets the captaincy, we'll keep kicking the can down the road, get seduced by the temptation of short term results to the neglect of preparing for the World Cup. And next thing you know it we'll be going to Australia 2027 with an undroppaple 38 year old captain. And we'll go out in the quarters again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Clickbaiters will clickbait but I presume a Connacht selection wouldn't get them the same return on faux outrage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Ah, Im not sure we can compare the POM potential situation and the actual Sexton situation in that way. POM has a lot of competition for his spot and a lot more coming down the pipe. We have relied on him for his line out skills to a much greater degree that we should have, and recently that's mainly because the line out has been a coaching/execution mess. Fix that things will look very different. He is a phenomenon but I don't see us ending in a position where he remains the best in his position unquestionably in 3 years. If he does there are much greater problems that will make success at the world cup a non starter.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    MOD: Ok, address the post not the poster also means not dragging up your perceived view of their past or expectant behaviour. Just deal with what is posted.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It would be more helpful if you attributed the quotes.

    Nonetheless, I don't think any of these are anything to be taken lightly and conversations with fans would suggest it absolutely is a problem. Regardless, I doubt AF will give it much thought when it comes to deciding what to do with the captaincy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    In response to that poster a few months ago, I'd previously embedded the tweets but that doesn't seem possible anymore. For reference, those quotes were taken from a TRK thread with 62k view and Overthehill prop thread with 164k views.

    I dont understand your point of view, surely if it is a problem then AF would be foolish not to put much thought into it.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,131 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    So by analysts we mean posters? I'm not trying to be awkward, just trying to understand exactly what you're saying.

    I think it would be silly not to acknowledge that fans can feel alienated by the squad selection, and if they are posting about that and claiming annoyance I'd take them at their word. Does it matter for the squad as a whole? I think probably not, but I wouldn't completely rule it out. I don't think the captaincy falls under the same vein though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,317 ✭✭✭✭phog


    There was a full on #notmycaptain campaign a few years back, I can't recall it getting much traction here and it certainly didn't affect the then Captain nor the team

    Why then, would anyone here be bothered about something that hasn't yet happened?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Not posters, I described them earlier as 'Patreon Analysts'. The usual heads on Twitter who have thousands of followers and thrive off reactions for clicks so they can make money, though I'm sure some just enjoy the troll.

    Don't know how you're separating the captaincy from those feelings, I'd see the captaincy as being a far bigger thing than a random once off selection decision.

    Whoever is made captain is going to have all the tear jerking interviews about how it is the proudest moment of their career. If you strip that from that fan favourite a few months later, it is a recipe to annoy those same fans, especially with the Twitter arsonists I mentioned stoking the fires.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    No one is overly 'bothered', we're simply having a discussion about the pros and cons to different options - I will take this moment to point out that I am still waiting for a case to be made for POM that he couldn't do as part of the squad supporting another captain.

    Farrell on the other hand should be 'bothered' because identifying potential negative outcomes of a decision is a basic part of being an adult and vital for a national team coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    you tried to gaslight

    you're up to your old tricks

    the selective amnesia will kick in again in a few months

    I've little interest in trading ad-hominem's so am going to leave it at that Foxtrol. Suffice to say I think it entirely fair for Podge to seek clarification when in posts such as the following...

    we had multiple 'analysts' with a huge footprint within the impacted province fanbase claiming a few months ago during the most successful period in Irish rugby history that an extended squad selection for a player who was never going to get near playing was going to have an extremely negative impact on the sport - that it was creating that exact 'toxic environment'.

    ... you fail to mention / clarify:

    • who the 'analysts' are
    • who the "impacted province fanbase" is
    • and who the "player who was never going to get near playing" was

    I don't really see why you can't just name who you're referring to, and say what you mean.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I will take this moment to point out that I am still waiting for a case to be made for POM that he couldn't do as part of the squad supporting another captain.

    I've made the case:

    the one difference is with regards the ability to talk to (influence) the referee.

    Non-captains don't have as much leeway to talk to referees as the actual captain.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    deleted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    In fairness to that campaign it was designed to embarrass the IRFU and the captain in the minds of people who aren't necessarily rugby fans. It may not have affected boards or the team but it definitely helped seal the deal on Jackson as far as the IRFU was concerned. Best attending the trial while he was captain of the Irish team ended up amplifying the circus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,317 ✭✭✭✭phog


    As I said already, it had no affect on the then captain, the team and was hardly mentioned on Boards, yet we have numerous posts on what might happen if POM is appointed as a short term Captain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    2 categorically different and unrelated issues though. I'd say POMs captaincy or lack thereof is of absolutely no interest to most people in the country beyond rugby anoraks while Best showing up a the rape trial was major news beyond the sports pages, and not the kind of news rugby inc. enjoys. I think it had a big effect on Best and scared the shite out of the union.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    But captain Best remained for nearly two further calendar years.

    So I think phog's point is solid. Regardless of what anoraks and Twitter personalities might say if POM loses his captaincy before he retires—if he's even made captain in the first place—it will have little to no consequence on the functioning within the Irish setup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,595 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Sure. Most teams wouldn't blink an eye at changing the captaincy. For seem reason Irish fans make a big deal out of mundane or routine team developments. I'm just pointing out that Best going to the trial as Jackson's captain was a genuinely big deal beyond rugby while POM's coming and going as captain is largely irrelevant to all but the most engaged Rugby boffins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    You never asked any of those questions though, that would have been too constructive to a discussion. I would have been happy to clarify just like I did for Podge when he asked. Instead in your usual posting style you just gave a one line response stirring the pot, this time calling me a liar, twice.

    I've now provided the quotes that you claimed were 'untrue' and of course you're refusing to engage in your error - just like what I said you'd likely do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    That is an incredibly weak case for him. Don't see much evidence of him being much more effective in that regard than the other options, definitely not so much to negate the downsides of him being made captain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,317 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I think you've missed my point, so I'll leave it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    We can debate how much an affect it'd have, but you asked for a case for something POM couldn't do as part of the squad supporting another captain.

    I gave you one.



Advertisement
Advertisement