Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

16816826846866871429

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,469 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The condemnations that had to be dragged out of you, always with reservations and whataboutery and ifs and buts and maybes?

    Nope, you never trot this line of questioning out for claims of atrocities alleged against Israel, so the "bar of evidence" angle won't wash.

    There is sufficient evidence to conclude that Hamas burned civilians, from the footage and other evidence available. Similarly, there is sufficient evidence to conclude they celebrated such acts.

    That is the truth. Do you deny it?

    So why muddy that with "just asking questions" about the ghoulish specifics of the atrocities and exactly what horrific acts were directly witnessed? Why someone would take such issue with the claim someone actually saw it plainly speaks to a different agenda.

    And don't pretend this is done in some neutral stance, setting some bar for evidence, because it is just your posts defending Hamas in a way your posts never defend Israel.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Don't have an issue with anything he said.

    I have been saying the same thing since the start.

    Hamas actions: Clear unequivocal evidence that they have committed war crimes. There is no reasonable doubt.

    Israeli actions: Clouded by the principles of self-defence and the rules of war, mean that their actions need investigation before being adjudicated on. There is considerable doubt about whether they have committed war crimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,569 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Or maybe the real problem is what makes me throw out these stereotypes?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    International law allows for just wars, there are principles. Responding to clear war crimes such as the actions of 7/10 by Hamas are allowed. If all of the hostages are released, and any bodies returned, there is no justification for Israel to prolong the war. They could try and use the objective of bringing those responsible to justice to continue actions, but I don't think that would be sufficient to meet the test of a just war. So yes, as I said from the start of this thread, if Hamas release the hostages and hand over those responsible for 7/10 to the ICC, there is absolutely no justification for Israel to continue attacking Gaza. If Hamas only release the hostages, that is enough in my opinion, but not sure that the Israelis would see it that way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is not fanciful, releasing the hostages ends Israel's justifications. That is why the EU have called for the unconditional release of the hostages from the very start. They know that if the hostages are released, that they can make Israel stop.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Regime change in Gaza and Israel will follow the ending of this war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,031 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    It should be long evident to you that Israel has used the Oct 7th attacks by Hamas as a means to justify its genocidal intent.

    It has killed hostages held by Hamas (and also Israeli citizens during its response on Oct 7th) and has repeatedly shown little or no interest in entertaining the offers for hostage exchanges that Hamas has proposed.

    Israel has no justification for much of its actions over the last 6 weeks, full stop and if and when this does come to an end, it should face charges for its actions in the same way Hamas participants should be held accountable for theirs.

    I have close to no expectation that this will happen with respect to Israel and that is of course something they've known all along. They are a rogue state which is carrying out a genocide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,604 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    The point about Boyd- Barrett equviocating in that debate is correct. I am not someone with an axe to grind against all things left wing, but it's a bit rich of him to call Ursula out for double standards, yet he can't give a simple yes or no answer to a straight forward question.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,663 ✭✭✭Hoboo


    And there are others who throw the fog of October 7th over the decades of atrocities carried out by Israel. This didn’t start on October 7th, the most surprising thing is that anyone is surprised it happened.

    Mass murdering civilians in revenge isn’t war either, it’s a holocaust.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    (1) Israel does not have genocidal intent, however, Hamas does, and you are willing to excuse that.

    (2) There is no clear evidence that Israel have killed hostages held by Hamas, but even if there were, the onus under international law to protect the hostages and return them is on Hamas. A failure to do so would add to the lengthy list of Hamas war crimes, which you refuse to acknowledge.

    (3) The unconditional release of the hostages is something that the EU have called for from the start, it is the only way for Hamas to redeem their war crime. Calling for hostage exchange is an endorsement of Hamas war crimes.

    (4) There is a possibility that Israel have committed war crimes, that will need adjudication at the proper times, there is an absolute certainty that Hamas have committed war crimes. It appears that you are unable to comprehend the difference.

    (5) Hamas lead a rogue state that launches terrorist attacks as seen on 7/10



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I condemned Hamas, without reservation, without qualification, without equivocation, multiple times. So at least be honest.

    You speak of muddying the waters. The claim was that a poster had seen a video, that no one else has ever claimed existed or to have claimed to have seen. That’s evidence enough for you. Fine.

    The principle of what can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence only applies to posters you disagree with. Fine.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,333 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I hope you’re equally strong in your view that Hamas too need to be held to equal account - it works both ways you know



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,031 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    You won't find a single post of mine excusing Hamas' behaviour. You know this, stop pretending I have done so. I have made posts saying that it is reasonable for Israel to pursue them in various ways including using Mossad to 'neutralise' its leaders. How much more acknowedlgement do you want from me beyond what I've said about Hamas's actions being horrific, and unacceptable?

    There absolutely is clear evidence of Israel committing war crimes. But you can relax, they will not be held accountable. And Israel's PM shown a map at the UN of the 'new middle east region' with Palestine completely removed, he has since spoken of bibilical guidance to justify the killing of all Palestinians. These are facts.

    I presume when you talk about the unconditional release of hostages, you are including the thousands of Palestinians held without charge in Israeli prisons?

    I see Hamas as a terrorist organization, I have been clear about this since I first posted. You will have to construct a different strawman if you think you can challenge any support for them coming from my direction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,031 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    See previous post. I don't need you to tell me how accountability works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,044 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    If oct 7 happened here I would wish the purps to suffer greatly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,395 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    There absolutely is clear evidence of Israel committing war crimes. 

    You know.this how exactly?

    Most people would wait until the investigators have done their job



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Do Palestinians have the right to self defense under international law ?

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Pssible but that is solely up to the people of both to decide who they want, no one else. The right to self determination you see.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,031 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Link

    [p.225] Article 33 is derived from Article 50 of the Hague Regulations: "No general penalty, pecuniary or otherwise, shall be inflicted upon the population on account of the acts of individuals for which they can not be regarded as jointly and severally responsible".

    Or maybe you can tell us how telling the entire population of an area to move, or turning off power/water/internet to them, or targeting water supply lines, bakeries etc doesn't constitute this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭Rosahane


    It might have helped your comprehension if you had actually bothered to read all of the article rather than the first line which mentioned another, now redacted study!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,031 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,257 ✭✭✭crusd


    A factor not included in comparative studies of IQ tests is the actual exposure to doing the tests. Kids and adults in countries with regular standardised testing tend to score higher than those in countries that dont. One of the reasons Ireland are relatively low on the IQ tables is because we do relatively little standardised testing compared to other developed countries. In this scenario results tend lower as there is an element of learning how to take the test. There is obviously a limit to how much learning to take a test will improve the result.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    That would at least be something positive to come out of all the death and suffering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    The problem with that is the actions were those of Hamas, the elected government of Gaza.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,469 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Should be easy to find such posts then. I only recall ones couched in reservation and whataboutery or vagueness, without accepting their atrocities as a fact.

    Similarly, should be easy to find the posts where you challenged with "dismissed without evidence" for an accusation against Israel. Because when you only bring it out for claims against Hamas, you can see why is creates the impression you are here as a Hamas defender and tacit supporter.

    "At least be honest"? Those are your words not mine, so maybe take your own advice.

    There is sufficient evidence to conclude that Hamas burned civilians, from the footage and other evidence available. Similarly, there is sufficient evidence to conclude they celebrated such acts.

    Do you deny it?

    You were asked that as a simple question in previous post and no answer was given.

    So if you don't deny it - do you accept Hamas carried out such atrocities and do you condemn Hamas for it, without reservation, without ifs?

    And if you accept it happened, why would you take such issue with the possibility that somewhere online such footage was actually seen?

    And why does that seem to matter more to you than the fact of what Hamas actually did?

    Given that we know Hamas carried out atrocities against civilians, and we know from body cam footage they recorded atrocities and shared them online before being taken down, and what has been shared in mainstream media is redacted.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Look Odyssey, you are making claims. It is up to you to prove them.

    Of course we all know that Hamas committed horrific atrocities against civilians on October 7th. What we also know is that there were also claims made of atrocities, alleged by Israeli sources which did not happen, were exaggerated, unverified and subsequently retracted.

    I accept that Hamas committed atrocities including even burning civilians but what you won’t accept for some reason is that no video of Hamas burning civilians exists or is claimed to exist by anyone except the poster you are defending who has claimed it.

    Do you accept that the video doesn’t exist?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,312 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, it's widely accepted that around 800 Israeli civilians were murdered by Hamas on October 7th, mostly as a result of being shot dead. However, many of the more lurid and horrific claims of how some of them were killed which emerged in the following two or three days do not appear to have been substantiated or proven (so far).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,973 ✭✭✭jmreire


    One of the memories that I can't unsee is when ISI paraded their prisoners, handcuffed and dressed in vivid orange jumpsuits (Guantanamo style) before executing them by beheading them, except for the Jordanian Pilot who they burnt alive. For me, Hamas and ISIS are one and the same thing. There is no difference in either their methods of terror or global aims of an Islamic Caliphate. The Palestinians are just a means to an end for them, nothing more.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,838 ✭✭✭quokula


    You might think that, but you are completely and totally wrong. There is no relationship between them, Islamic State considered Hamas an enemy as Hamas' goal is a free and self governed Palestinian nation state (yes, a Muslim one, in much the same way as Israel is a Jewish one) while ISIS were opposed to nation states and instead wanted a caliphate.

    And if you're talking in terms of pure brutality, the IDF is surely the organisation most similar to ISIS in terms of the atrocities they've actually committed. They've even copied another element of the IS playbook in tearing down monuments in the West Bank to try and destroy their culture.

    It says a lot that the method of justifying warcrimes against Palestinian civilians has moved on from collective punishment of Palestinians for the actions of a few Hamas terrorists, as any concept of proportionality has long gone out the window there, so you're now trying to justify the ongoing mass murder of innocent Palestinian children as some kind of retribution for any crime committed by any muslim anywhere in the world even if those people were directly opposed to the cause of Palestinian freedom.



Advertisement