Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

16506516536556561432

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,443 ✭✭✭circadian


    "Hamas denies operating there and the BBC cannot independently verify claims by either side."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    I can't believe there are posters who think there was a first act of aggression. This has been going on, in one form or another, for well over a thousand years. All we can do is look at the actions, ethics and motives of each side during each cycle of violence. I dislike what Hamas stand for more than I dislike what the Israeli government stand for. I dislike the fanaticism and totalitarianism of Hamas more than the fanaticism and totalitarianism of the current Israeli government. That doesn't mean I like the action, motives or composition of the current Israeli government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    It was an appalling letter signed by appalling people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,380 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    So did Hamas leave the handful of rifles as a tantalising clue?

    Israel are certainly winning the War on Hospitals.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,380 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Israel's War on Hospitals includes cutting off comms. No hospitals in Northern Gaza are functioning now.

    RTE

    The Deputy Medical Co-ordinator for Médecins Sans Frontieres said the organisation is "very concerned" about staff that were in Al Shifa hospital during the Israeli army's raid.

    Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, Dr Natalie Thurtle said that MSF staff have "heroically decided to stay to protect their patients, and they shouldn't be exposed to this violence during the raid."

    Dr Thurtle, who is based in Jerusalem, said MSF "haven't been able to get in touch with our staff members who remain in Shifa Hospital today. We did have brief contact with them yesterday prior to the raid."

    She described the situation in the hospital earlier this week where, she said, due to a lack of fuel staff were reporting that six neo-natal babies who were in incubators had died and nine adults had died related to the lack of fuel for critical machines.

    In relation to other hospitals in Gaza, she said in the north, there are no hospitals that are functioning and they have not been functioning now for some days.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    UN security council passed a non binding resolution after days of negotiations on the wording. Unfortunately Israel announced they rejected the resolution 10 minutes later and will carry on doing what they are doing presumably.

    So back to square one we go.


    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,065 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There aren't any posters who think there was a first act of aggression, except in one sense - the rules of war and international law. On October 6th, there was a ceasefire, relative peace, and the Hamas raids were an act of aggression in accordance with international law (and nobody is claiming this was the first act of aggression ever, that is just a strawman response) allowing the Israelis to invoke self-defence in accordance with international law. That is all that is being claimed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Plenty of people are engaging in some reprehensible whataboutery to justify the Hamas terrorist attack. Those people start counting in 1948 and are, at best, unaware of the history of the region.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,380 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    And you continue to ignore the facts around Israel being an occupying power.

    How about this UN expert from just a few hours ago.

    Israel Hamas: Israel has no right to self-defence against Hamas: UN official (afr.com)

    UN special rapporteur to the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albanese says Israel’s right to self-defence ‘non existent’ and is committing ‘war crimes’

    A UN official has taken aim at the international community who have rallied behind Israel’s “non-existent” right to self-defence.

    “Israel cannot claim the right of self-defence against a threat that emanates from a territory it occupies, from a territory that is under belligerent occupation,” she said.

    --------

    Dodge that.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,380 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    RTE

    UN rights chief urges international probe into Israel-Hamas war violations

    The UN human rights chief decried serious allegations of violations of international law in the Israel-Hamas war, suggesting an international investigation was needed.

    "Extremely serious allegations of multiple and profound breaches of international humanitarian law, whoever commits them, demand rigorous investigation and full accountability," Volker Turk said in a briefing on the situation to UN member states, adding "international investigation is called for".

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Well that is true, their aim is to throw confusion over legitimacy by removing Israel's right to self-defence under international law in the current phase of the conflict. What has also been disturbing is the amount of bile being thrown at the UN for their 1948 decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭Sir_Name


    So to be clear… from what you’re saying, Israel never flouted international law up to oct 7th. It was Hamas that first broke it? Yes or no?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    I don't think anyone can credibly say that Israel hasn't flouted international law. The 700,000 illegal settlers in the West Bank are an obvious and glaring example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭keynes


    Whatever you say, don't mention the hospital. Propaganda has quickly shifted to IDF having hit *home of Hamas leader".

    Leave aside the fact that he wasn't even there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    And many still trot out the lie that the 1948 decision happened because of the Second World War and the Holocaust.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Why do posters just make up things? I never said that, never implied it, never touched on it.

    What I said, and I was clear on that, is that for the purposes of the rules of the war and the surrounding international law, Hamas is deemed as the aggressor on October 7th and Israel is acting in self-defence. Simple as that, no judgement on anything else, no moral judgement, just the international law aspects.

    So why do you try to obfuscate, confuse and dilute the point?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,380 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    And you know more than the UN special rapporteur to the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albanese? I noticed you avoided that post 😉

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    So would Russia have the right to self defense in the occupied territories in Ukraine? Seems a similar situation to Israel occupying Gaza.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Again, no, that is a preposterous extrapolation that has been dismissed and explained already. In international law, the Hamas actions on October 7th are closest to the Russian invasion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,380 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Wrong again.

    How about this UN expert from just a few hours ago.

    Israel Hamas: Israel has no right to self-defence against Hamas: UN official (afr.com)

    UN special rapporteur to the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albanese says Israel’s right to self-defence ‘non existent’ and is committing ‘war crimes’

    A UN official has taken aim at the international community who have rallied behind Israel’s “non-existent” right to self-defence.

    “Israel cannot claim the right of self-defence against a threat that emanates from a territory it occupies, from a territory that is under belligerent occupation,” she said.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,380 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,380 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Lebanon: Israeli Strike an Apparent War Crime | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)

    Lebanon: Israeli Strike an Apparent War Crime

    Three Children, Grandmother Killed in Their Car.

    (Beirut) – An unlawful Israeli strike on a family in a car on November 5, 2023, should be investigated as an apparent war crime, Human Rights Watch said today. The attack killed three girls and their grandmother and wounded their mother.

    The family had been traveling from south Lebanon to Beirut in the late afternoon, following heavy shelling by Israeli forces in the area earlier that day, Samir Ayoub, the girls’ uncle, said in a televised interview the night of the attack. Ayoub, a journalist, was traveling in a separate car in front of the car that was hit.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 527 ✭✭✭dickdasr1234


    Aye, 'self-defence' is akin to some of Putin's farcical comments regarding the Ukraine.

    People can put whatever slant on it the like, Israel cannot be expected to tolerate the continued presence of Hamas militants in their doorstep.

    If it transpires that their insistence that Hamas are entrenched under and among the civilian populations is the equivalent of the 'weapons of mass destruction' claim by the Yanks then...oh, wait...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭Rosahane


    Hardly unbiased is she?

    Her in response to the initial atrocity by Hamas:

    'A United Nations expert on Palestine has said she doesn't blame Hamas for the conflict in Gaza, comparing it to her children misbehaving - and said the terror attacks were a 'natural' response to Israeli rule.'

    Since Israel don't actually "rule" Gaza I think it says it all about her 🙈🙉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    I 'm no fan of Israel but calling the rapporteur the UN Special Rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territory is very politically loaded and her comments are ridiculous. Gaza was occupied by Egypt before it was occupied by Israel. The West Bank was occupied, and formally annexed, by Jordan before it was occupied by Israel. From that use of language you'd think there was a Palestinian Arab State before 1967 but there wasn't. Egypt, Jordan, Syria and their allies made sure of that in 1948.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Wow, with people like that holding positions of influence within the UN it's easy to understand why Israel regards the UN as a hostile player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    They could but the won't need to.

    On a similar note were the French resistance during WW2 terrorists or not ?

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Considering her pronouncements on the topic to date it's hard to see how she could be described as an expert.



Advertisement