Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

1121122124126127410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    So please tell me why is there empty seats at every Man City game and there are thousands empty at some of the champions league games and when City play the smaller teams in the league? How can that be possible if the club are saying its sold out and as you have said supporters clubs are finding it hard to get tickets for matches?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,002 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Maybe the owners are buying up a bunch of tickets? A legal way to put money into the club. They might have been doing this since the start and haven't stopped. If that's the case then it's explainable. If that's the case then maybe the ground would be full if they stopped doing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,898 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    if that were to happen, I would think that it would be a bulk buy of tickets 1 minute before KO in order to give fans as much time as possible to buy them themselves.

    The CL games have been available on student sites the day of the game for cut prices, there has been a few knockout games over the years where screenshots of the deals were on social media etc.

    Constant trips to Wembley within the same season or time frame, you can say fair enough it is expensive to travel up & down etc but there is consistently large gaps in the Man City ends of those games. It's not a rare thin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,002 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Eh, ever hear of season tickets?

    And why would City fans be interested in going to miniscule cup games? They only care about the Premier league and Champions league I'd imagine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,041 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    That's mad. I've yet to see someone wearing a Haaland shirt in the wild. Or a De Bruyne one for that matter. You'd think that whoever is buying one, wouldn't necessarily be buying a 2nd with the others name on?

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭giveitholly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,165 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Again, comes back to fan numbers. If you have a big enough fan base (which is normally where the justification for higher sponsorship deals comes from) then there is always a market for cup tickets sold to those who cannot get premier league or champions league match tickets because of the massive demand. It's only when you're dealing with a very finite number of active fans that those who are interested can get their fill with Premier League and Champions league fixtures, and not need to slum it with the cups.

    An excess of unsold tickets is simply a sign of supply having exceeded demand, which can only occur if the fan interest is not large enough to cover all your games - which again, comes back to the issue of the number of active money-spending fans seemingly not being high enough to generate the largest sponsorships etc.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,472 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    While trying to skirt past the pi55ing match over the last 3 pages, I was just going to remark that I too have never seen a kid wearing a De Bruyne jersey. Even the Haaland ones are scarce.

    What this about Everton and 12 points deduction going ahead?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,156 ✭✭✭✭eh i dunno


    A fake Twitter account was reporting it today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 917 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    Initial reports indicated that they reported 700+M in profits🤣




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,002 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Again, as I've said bums on seats are not important in this day and age. Football is a worldwide business these days and City are one of the ten most popular clubs in world football.

    All these clubs had income north of €500 million in '22.

    Success increases income and City are hugely successful.

    Manchester United used to be the most popular but due to a lack of success they have fallen behind Barcelona and Real Madrid and their income has fallen behind too.

    I'd predict City's income will increase to close to a billion in the next year due to their Champions league success. If they go ahead and win that trophy again soon along with the Premier league they will get close to if not surpass United and one of the two Spanish clubs in popularity.

    Fact of the matter is they can now spend something like €300 million on transfers and be in line with fpp.

    The more they win the more popular they will become.

    Alex Ferguson was fully responsible for the huge growth in popularity of Manchester United.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,165 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    The point is not "bums on seats". The point is fan exposure. You can be fairly confident most club fandoms at that level break down into similar subcategories of spending/activity. Let's say 80+% will be passive action - social media engagement, or sports tv package subscription - while maybe only 2-5% having any intention to phsyically go to a match (these figures may be entirely inaccurate - but the point is the breakdowns will be similar). If your 2-5% (or whatever % of match-interested fans) is a significantly smaller number than other clubs, it's likely your 80% is too. For instance, Man Utd have double the number of twitter followers Man City do. So if they're not going to matches in the same numbers, and they're not engaging online in the same numbers... where are they?

    Fan exposure - eyeballs - in all its forms is the chief driving factor towards increased sponsorships. More eyes on the team (in person or online) = more eyes on your product, for which you pay more money. Well, we can see that it appears there are not more eyes on the team and sponsors products, which is why people ask about the seemingly inflated deals.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,898 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Man Utd don't and won't have a problem putting bums on seats though.

    Man City, even with their success on the pitch, are struggling to in some games. They go to big measures to try fill their stadium, such as offering half price tickets just to make it look less empty. Don't get me wrong, half price tickets are great, but I don't get the impression that they care about the fans pockets too much to be doing it for that reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,360 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    While I'd agree that bums on seats are not as important as they once were in terms of generating revenue, they are indicative of how popular a team actually is.

    Take Liverpool for example, compared to City they have had modest successes over the last 5 years yet getting tickets is very difficult.

    Likewise Arse and Spurs.

    Football tourism is huge business so surely one of the alleged top 10 teams in the world should have zero issues getting day trippers in for games yet in many games there are swathes of empty seats.

    If you look at it objectively, none of it adds up, none of it. In 15 years they went from a bottom to mid table level team to record breaking revenue generators, all supposedly by legitimate sponsorship deals.

    If anyone believes that then I've got a rather nice bag of magic beaks they will be interested in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,316 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    I really don't think they'd go to all that bother for the sake of a million.

    But if half of what the PL has charged is true, talking about a million or 2 kind of misses the point. The damage is long done at this stage.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So,.. Man Citys revenue is almost the same as Real Madrids.

    Real Madrid have an estimated global fan base of 400 million people.

    Man City have an estimated fanbase of 5 million people.


    It's all definitely above board...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,002 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    City are third amongst Premier league clubs in social media fans. United and Chelsea are ahead of them.

    United have 182 million, City have 113 million.

    Since 2021 United social media followers grew by 10 million, same with Chelsea but City saw a 20 million increase and jumped above Liverpool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    And how many of those social media fans are actual supporters of the club and not bots? You are hardly that naive are you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,002 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Where are you getting those numbers from?

    Can you provide a link?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,002 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    How many of the Real Madrid, Barcelona and United ones are bots, you are not that naive are you?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,165 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    As a rough guide does that not look a bit odd though? Down in 3rd place with nearly 70 million fewer followers than the top club, lower matchday attendance - especially on the more fringe competitions usually the bread and butter of the day-trippers that normally signify broader appeal, and rank 5th in Premier League jersey sales this year so far (behind Utd, Chelsea, Liverpool, and Arsenal)... and yet have by a distance the highest sponsorship figures?

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,002 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Obviously with super rich owners they are going to have bigger sponsorship.

    Deals can be done with companies where they pay exorbitant sponsorship and then get price reductions from Mansour in other business so they probably end up better off.

    I never said everything is above board but there are ways around breaking Premier league rules like what I've just pointed out above.

    There's just so much conspiracy theory stuff being spouted here it's ridiculous.

    And the fact is that success breaths growth in support and anybody that can't accept that is fooling themselves.

    It's highly like that over the next decade that City will become more popular than MUFC if United don't get it together and win major trophies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,165 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    I think most of this is all people are saying though... the owners money and inflated deals push them unnaturally up to a position where eventually with enough spending over time it starts to sustain itself, but that the whole thing is built backwards... the fan increase comes after the sponsorship money, rather than being the cause of the sponsorship money (as it logically should work).

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,898 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Wasn't Man City's twitter account (pre-Elon times) suspended a couple years ago, with the suspected reason being that a large number of their 'fans' were bots.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,002 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    You don't seem to understand that slmost all the talk about City is winning titles, great players etc.

    Almost all the talk about United is negative, not winning, bad managers, bad players etc

    One clubs fan base grows the bothered dwindles. Guess which is growing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,002 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I don't know, I don't engage on any of those sites.

    Even it that was the case that's a couple of years ago. City are growing all the time through winning things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    If City win every league title and champions league over the next 10 years,utd will still be a bigger club than City and will have a bigger fan base worldwide. And no distorted figures will change that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,360 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Using my 6 year old in senior infants as a barometer. There are currently approx 15 boys in his class.

    5 are United "fans".

    5 or 6 are Liverpool "fans".

    1 is a Villa fan.

    A couple are Arsenal fans.

    None of them are city fans.

    I'm also involved in underage coaching with my local gaa team. When we are coaching there are the guts of 100 kids there ranging from 4 to 8 years old on any given evening. Not once have I seen a city jersey, not once. There are United, Liverpool, Arse, Chelsea, Villa, Spurs, Madrid, Barca, PSG and others but again, not a single kid in a city jersey.

    Of course this is just anecdotal but it's the kids that drive jersey and merch sales in the main and from what I've seen, city aren't even a drop in the ocean, despite multiple trophy wins and Sky driven saturation of city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭McFly85


    The question John Henry asked after the first Etihad deal is still relevant: what was the underbid?

    There is no metric that exists that points to City being that valuable. For all of their on pitch success, there are clubs with more supporters, more engagement, more eyeballs for sponsors, which is really what it comes down to.

    I mean, if City were sold tonight, would Etihad Airways still value City so highly? Not a chance.

    City would be up shít creek if Abu Dhabi sold them because without being propped up they wouldn’t have a hope of maintaining the sums of money they’re spending now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,002 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    You see you live in Ireland where it's a tribal thing and parents tell kids who to support. This isn't the case in Asia or the USA or any other part of the world.

    It's a global sport now, what happens in Ireland and to a lesser extent England isn't really that important.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement