Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

19569579599619621796

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ok, let's. He is not playing particularly well so far this season so far and there is no real indication Ireland is missing out on anything with him. I fail to see what him having been sprung off the bench in the last 6N would have done to change that.

    There is a time and a place for players to step into "supporting roles" and in many ways Henderson is already there. That is moreso a function of his own inconsistent play than of any deliberating shifting of a player due to age though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,756 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    You can't just introduce 3 new players to the 23 every time. New players need a good bit of time/investment in the system, training camps etc. And they need to be backed once they get in the 23, not dropped again to give some other 3 another go. It just doesn't work on any level really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,675 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    There's an Ireland A now, any player coming from that would be delighted to get one opportunity.

    Think about it, guy gets minutes and what's he going to do next. He'll bust his ass to get back in full time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    Will the Ireland A match be in place for the six nations?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,675 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    If you don't think Coombes form from November to the end of last season demonstrated he has something to offer Ireland, then I don't know what to tell ya, Podge...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,219 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    I don't think Coombes has anything to offer above our current squad.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,220 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I think Coombes has lots to offer, his issue is that other players just offer more. If we picked Coombes I'm sure he'd do a grand job, he really is an excellent player, but he's just got a bit of a backlog of better players ahead of him.

    Performances like Friday night won't help his cause, Coombes has over twice as many caps for Munster as David McCann does for Ulster yet it was McCann who dominated in that game. Coombes has played nearly 80 times for Munster now, we're long past the up-and-coming stage with him, it's time to **** or get off the pot. I am sure he'll be capped eventually, but he runs the risk of just picking up a token cap against the likes of Samoa or getting a game when there's an usual injury crisis.

    I don't put much stock in these statistics people make up either, like this "Stuff score". There are 2 things that we know about the URC:

    1. The better a player you are, the less you will have to play in the URC. The stats are skewed toward the middle-of-the-road league regulars, and young players.
    2. As far as Ireland are concerned, the majority of URC games are not worth a damn. Coombes has played the Sharks, Treviso, Dragons and Ulster. In reality, his performances in those first 3 games are of little consequence, Coombes tearing it up against the Dragons is not going to move the needle on his test prospects. We have seen this time and time again in the past with many players. What always is more important is how they fare in the big games and the interpros, when they are put head to head against the players they are competing with in the pecking order. Even the opposite is true, how many times have we seen the big players put in average performances in the URC and it has been of no real consequence.

    McCann put in excellent performances against Connacht and Munster and was the standout player in both games, this will move the needle for him significantly. He's nowhere near the Ireland 23 right now, but if he puts in more performances like that in any interpros or European games between now and January I would not be surprised to see him in the 6Nations training squad ahead of someone like Coombes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Agreed; the point was made a number of times during the RWC squad race. There will be people in an Irish 23 who are worse rugby players than guys who were sitting at home. I'd consider someone like Coombes a better player than Kilcoyne and more important to Munster, certainly.

    But we've top class back row options and someone is going to be kicking their heels. A guy like Coombes probably has something to offer Ireland. But Ireland don't need what he offers because they already have that with guys who are proven operators at the highest level.

    His issue now is that other guys like Prendergast and Timoney (both with caps more recently) are outplaying him so far this season whilst lads like Gleeson and Culhane are going to getting increasing minutes also. There will be a training camp in December more than likely and guys need to be showi



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    I wouldn't be suprised if there was an Ireland A v England A match during the 6 nations the weekend of the 8th /9th of March.

    There is no URC that weekend I believe or premiership now with less teams in the league.

    England A play Portugual on the 25th of February. So might make sense to try and play ireland a week or 2 later.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Text box froze and won't let me edit the above...Boards going from strength to strength!

    .....There will be a training camp in December more than likely and peripheral guys need to be showing form in the next few weeks at the latest if they want to be involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,846 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    If we don't have better options in the 2nd row by 2027 than 35 year olds Beirne and Henderson then it will be because we haven't begun developing them in the next year or two

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    The punishment Beirne subjects his body to, I can't see him still playing at 35. Henderson might be, but with so much talent coming through at lock country-wide, he's unlikely to be our best option if he is.

    Personally I'm very optimistic about what a shake-up might bring to the national setup. On the one hand, the current crop have grand slams in them, and on their day they can beat anyone on the planet convincingly. On the other hand, they underperformed in the RWC QF, and are largely built around a province who have likewise not shown the best version of themselves in knock-out games in the last five years.

    One major change is obviously forced, given Sexton's retirement. But I'd be surprised if there aren't a few more changes in what's considered our "best 23" by the end of the Six Nations.

    McCann, Murray, Nash, Forde, Ahern, McCarthy, Coombes and possibly Gleeson all look capable of putting pressure on the incumbents. Have a funny feeling JOB will eventually oust Lowe as the starting winger too.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,833 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    baird, mccarty and wycherley are all capped and are all under 26 years of age currently.

    threadwell is 28, james ryan is 27.


    the development of alternative options has begun ages ago.

    no one, literally no one, expects the development to suddenly stop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Beirne seems to be ageing fairly well. He was almost 25 by the time he started a game for the Scarlets. He's had an intense few years but that late start often stands to guys when they're not putting their bodies through serious punishment when still developing physically.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,220 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Given their injury records I would imagine Beirne is more likely to still be playing at 35 than Henderson is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    JOB is a quality player and very flexible. I think Nash is a possibility to nail down a wing. Lowe will hold out for a year but, he's certainly not undropable.

    Henderson has had a career disrupted with injury. I can't see him lasting for this cycle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Iirc, Farrell did seem to have have a decent amount of flux early in his tenure, and was happy to throw guys in early. Part of that was down to retirement (Best, Kearney) but even so, I think we could see the occasional surprise this early in the cycle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Big Joe and Ryan will still hopefully be around, Baird has played etc. I would hope players progress and take the slots but they shouldn't be handed to them because of age

    Less miles on clock so Henderson might be still around, Beirne sticks his head into the wrong places so wear & tear could be an issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    What happen if someone is injured after 5 mins etc? the bench is now the winning and losing of games.

    Coombes is a player who has been in the squads etc so he has been given a chance. You would need to ask Farrell why he hasn't played more. But as you mentioned him as an example, if he is not performing in training and other players are ripping it up, why would he get onto the bench instead of another player?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,357 ✭✭✭OldRio


    I thought I read recently that an Ireland development team would be playing an Italian team home and away.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,833 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    A large part of it for Coombes, Prendergast, Timoney in the back-row etc. is because the 4 incumbents were viritually never injured in the preceding 2 years.

    The opportunities just weren't there. That doesn't necessarily mean they aren't performing in training.

    The Conan injury around RWC-time was the most minutes missed by any of the 4 incumbents in ages. In the 2 seasons, and 19 Tests vs Tier 1 nations prior to the RWC, the 4 of POM, VdF, Doris and Conan missed a total of 21 mins gametime because of injury (solely, Conan vs Argentina in the AI's 2021).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,675 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Younger players need to get an early introduction to the international level. I'm not saying any particular player needs to be in the squad on a regular basis.

    Introducing them to that level earlier gives them an experience of what they need to work towards. It benefits the team in the medium term.

    We need a panel largely made up of players under 30 now, with plenty of games under their belt for 2027. Now is the time to start their introduction.

    Herring, Bealham, Kilcoyne, POM, Bundee, Murray and obviously Johnny won't be there. Maybe one might still be there.

    We won't have all, if any, of Beirne, Henderson, Conan, Josh, Henshaw, McCloskey and Lowe and Gibson-Park.

    That's 15 players from our World Cup squad. If we have three of them at the next World Cup I'll be surprised.

    So what do you want to do? Start introducing them two years in advance? Will you find the right players and give them enough experience by the time 2027 rolls around?

    I think you need to give them time now and have most of your starters set two years in advance of the next World Cup.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,220 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Timoney had opportunities. He's just not at that level.

    To labour the point I made earlier, Timoney also had chances in European / Interpro fixtures to stake a claim and never put in a performance that would have forced anyones hand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    A decision was clearly taken(to me anyway) post 2019 to move away from POM. He seemed to have moved into the backup/experience off the bench role. Potentially the captain against the tier 2 teams etc. Media talk as well but that was the way it looked.

    Yet he manage to fight his way back into been one of the most critical players for Ireland come World Cup. So players clearly had the ability to fight to get into the team

    See below in terms of transition over the period.

    This was the first Farrell squad post Joe. You had 18 players who didn't travel to World Cup in that squad I think at a quick glance. Including 5 players uncapped. Seems to me a decent number of players swapped in/out over that period.

    I think all of the 3 you mentioned played at their provinces from 2020

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    As I posted above we swapped out 18 players from the first 2020 squad so it's not impossible. I have no problem with putting players into the team if they deserve it. So far the posts I have seen on here seem to be pushing players into the team because of age, hoping they are able to swim and not sink.

    That would set a bad precedent in the squad if you are rewarding players with caps who don't deserve it over others just based on age.

    It's hard to tell who we will or won't have. Looking back at the 2020 squad the likes of Connors/Dillane/JOD/Addison would have been the guys most would have said would be big players in 2023 and POM/Earls etc would probably have retired, Sexton for sure most people expected to retire post Lions.

    Pick the best players to win the game at that time and if a young player wants to start then let them earn it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Tbh, I felt Coombes did last season, but it didn't come to pass (it was also at a time when Conan had a dip in form). His group stage performances in Europe were exceptional.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    I think Ireland should go hard to win the 6 nations and tour to South Africa in 2024.

    Then with Farrell away with the lions in 2025 there is more leeway to bed in New players and not as much pressure on winning the 6 nations. The 2024 November Internationals, 2025 6 nations and 2025 summer tour( minus the lions players) look to be a great opportunity to look at new players.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And of those 18, how many had time out due to injury at various periods or from retirement? I daresay a good number.

    With the back-row, I've spelled out that there weren't very many at all for the last 2 seasons.

    The point being, if the incumbents are fit and playing well, it's too simplistic to say "they alternatives aren't doing it in training". If, say, Conan got an injury during the 6 Nations and Prendergast got called into the 23 is he then suddenly "doing it in training"? It's too binary.



Advertisement
Advertisement