Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

19089099119139141120

Comments

  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭prunudo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    That's not what they said at all is it! They are pointing out that the urban wastewater is also a problem. They are probably over egging the "as much, if not more" part though. They are right though to highlight this.

    Agriculture has taken a huge hit due to water. Yet Uisce Eireann are allowed carry on for the foreseeable until they get around to it. Double standards and rightly called out



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭prunudo


    I wasnt sure how to say it, but your post gave it away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom




  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yet Uisce Eireann are allowed carry on for the foreseeable until they get around to it. Double standards and rightly called out

    You'll be happy to note the EPA are also going after Irish Water

    She said the EPA had prosecuted Uisce Éireann 28 times over polluting discharges.

    A few dozen cases against farmers might motivate some to act a bit quicker, surely you'd support that, if only to avoid double standards

    Actually, based on the rate of 5 times more sites being impacted by agri, you'd be looking at around 140 cases for it to be balanced.

    A quick look at the EPA prosecutions page shows barely any cases taken against the agri sector

    Here's a summary of the 2023 cases as an example

    2023 - 19 cases total

    • 10 - Uisce Eireann
    • 4 - Rubbish companies
    • 2 - County councils
    • 1 - Unlicensed peat operator
    • 1 - Commercial company
    • 1 - Agri sector company

    You're spot on with your double standards comment it seems, though not in the way you meant I think



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,319 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,255 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Never ceases to amaze me that the national broadcaster just runs promotional material for a lobby group. Incredible stuff and anyone hanging there hat on the grid getting to 100% wind better invest in a generator for their home and business.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,319 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭prunudo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Ah, but you are looking at prosecutions. Farmers are hit initially in their payments via the council or department. Things have to be chronic altogether for the EPA to be after them.

    My double standards point stands. Would a farmer be allowed pump raw slurry into waters, and then be given as much time as they need to rectify it in the same way UE are?

    Nitrates derogation changed due to waters not improving. Yet there's more than agri polluting waters then why is agri the only sector penalised?

    At that same Oireachtas hearing the EPA stated that P is 50/50 between agri and wastewater. Why is agri the only one with registers and permits for chemicals/organic manure and nothing on the wastewater side?



  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sewage treatment plants take around 6-8 years from conception to completion. Irish water were handed the responsibility of sorting out a century of underinvestment by the councils in a reasonable time whilst also sorting out the drinking water network. Some bright spark removed their financing model on day one.

    It would be highly counterproductive to fine Irish Water whilst in the middle of correcting all of these systemic issues. They are trearging the works on a highest priority basis which means that drinking water is sucking up the bulk of the limited capitol for the foreseeable future.

    Reality bites.

    The difference with farmers is that if they are chronically polluting by excess slurry or fertilizer this is a behavioural issue which can be addess with a change of practice and fines for recalcitrant individuals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭deholleboom




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Go on. How do you change practice? The slurry storage requirements change regularly. But the investment to keep pace is astronomical. You are saying a state utility, backed by one of the richest nations on the planet can delay pumping raw sewage into waters because of "we're working on something else" while individual farmers are expected to adhere within 12-18 months, with up to 60% state support. Double standards.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    As evidenced by the prosecution page, your point about Uisce Eireann shows this is not the case.

    All evidence from the EPA shows the Agri sector is the biggest source of pollution in our waterways.

    That does not mean other sectors are not polluting and those should also be addressed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Of course. All polluters should pay. Have you looked up the agri fines and suspension of payment for breaches yet? And do you think it's acceptable for UE to not be made sort out raw sewage into waterways ASAP in the same way business is expected to? Because it's not happening now. Double standards.

    In addition, there's massive research ongoing, changes in practice, etc in ag. No other sector has such a plan in place, and no other sector has made as many changes as ag. Yet its all dismissed



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Have you looked up the agri fines and suspension of payment for breaches yet?

    No, but feel free to provide a source of data, happy to review and learn more.

    And do you think it's acceptable for UE to not be made sort out raw sewage into waterways ASAP in the same way business is expected to?

    I believe I already addressed that in my previous post. There should be no exceptions to pollution

    In addition, there's massive research ongoing, changes in practice, etc in ag. No other sector has such a plan in place, and no other sector has made as many changes as ag. Yet its all dismissed

    With a thousand waterways polluted I think it's safe to say those efforts are showing pitiful results and further work is needed. Hopefully greater strides can be made, which I support



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    I won't do your homework. I asked did you look it up as you went to the bother of looking up EPA cases. If you don't want to look up others, fine. You can bring a horse to water....

    Of course no pollution exceptions should be permitted. You are happy to wait for UE to get around to the raw sewage, whenever they can. They have no specific plans or timelines, but you seem happy about that as they know about it. You don't extend the same leeway to other industry. Gotcha

    Polluted, but yet our waters are among the best in Europe. You'll be glad to know further work is planned, things already done but haven't shown results yet. Yet you say it's pitiful despite the fact that it's the only industry with a plan, in place and more coming. That sure is a pity



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "What is causing the problems?

    The main pressures on water quality are agriculture, physical changes such as land drainage and dredging, forestry activities and discharges from urban wastewater. These activities can lead to run-off of nutrients, sediment and pesticides and damage to the physical habitat of waterbodies.

    The number of waterbodies impacted by urban wastewater remains high, but it is reducing, and the trend is going in the right direction. The number of waterbodies impacted by agriculture has, however, increased in recent years."

    So urban sewage is a reducing problem and agricultural runnoff Is getting worse, which is not what you claim.

    Irish Water has a plan for how to deal with the the issue which it is enacting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭Coolcormack1979


    And when the magic money tree of corpo money runs out in 10 yrs time ue will still be making excuses.but hey just blame farmers for it and be dammed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    Save the rainforests. So I can charge my phone.


    IMG_0261.jpeg




  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It is not possible to resolve all urban sewage treatment plants instantly especially when you are at the beck and call of central government for your financing.

    Farming is the biggest source of water pollution and it has gotten worse as dairy intensified across the south.

    It's not unreasonable to ask the biggest pollutor to sort it's house out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,242 ✭✭✭ginger22


    But the thing is fining Irish water makes nor difference to them, you are just fining the tax payer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,770 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Burning wood is "carbon neutral" plus unloading and transporting that material to be burned are all green jobs.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Are you always this obtuse? I wasn't sure how to say your username in English, the first post I replied to, you said you were Dutch. Hence now, your username makes sense to me. Lets leave it at that, because it obviously went over your head.



  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I used to work for Irish Water on a Water treatment plant upgrade. This was a drinking water project.

    It took around 10 years of planning from first conception to breaking ground, I was also witness to the council paperwork that had to be carried out to ensure environmental compliance with legislation. The planning stage involved two councils cooperating on the extraction point since the lake source was covered by two counties. So outline design stage and environmental impact assessments needed to be carried out before it could go forward to final design stage. This was put out to tender and Irish Water chose the best of three proposals. Two contractors got the works and from final approval to completion took three years. Around 13 years for a relatively simple upgrade to an existing plant and final bill was around 3 million.

    Most of the projects for urban sewage treatment are many times larger and more complex - the environmental compliance is significantly more involved often covering multiple councils and agencies. If at any point objections come in you can add at least a year to the project. Costs will run into 10s of millions of Euros.

    How long has Irish Water been in existence ? Around a decade with around a third of that been taken up with establishing the body from a standing start. Priority for works was obviously given to Drinking water treatment and an extensive program of leak fixing because their were significant health issues at stake and cost savings were available.

    So I think, given the scale of the task, the difficulty of financing caused by the removal of water charges, Irish Water has done a fantastic job so far - and will resolve the issues of urban waste water when it is physically possible to do so.

    As has been pointed out, it would be counterproductive to fine Irish Water for legacy issues it had no control over. It would also mean there were less resources to finance the upgrade program it is undertaking.

    This crisis exists because the councils put all this on the long finger - mainly because of the funding model which operates within the state, ie they had to go cap in hand to the government for major capitol works which the government gave a low priority to.

    Rome wasn't built in a day and the issues caused by systemic underinvestment won't be solved overnight. Irish water is the solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭creedp


    If the Govt prioritised this work they would fund it properly so obviously the Govt is happy to allow untreated sewage to enter water supplies so they can used finite resources on more important matters such as availing of the photo ops afforded from building multi million euro road projects



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




Advertisement