Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

13783793813833841434

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Japan slowly rowing back, one of many soon i think


    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,982 ✭✭✭jmreire



    Labelling other posters comments as stupid, to my mind says a lot more about you than it does about me, and not seeing the point I was trying to make proves it. And neither am I saying that using the atomic bomb was right or wrong, just making the point that there was two sides to the story. Perhaps, if you saw the results of a bombing, you might have a different opinion too? But one thing is for sure, the sheer destructive force of the Atomic bomb and MAD doctrine it espoused, has meant that it has never been used since. And only a madman (Putin? ) would consider using it now. Had the US not bombed Japan and ended the war, what would the death toll have been? Any comment on that? If Israel did not have the ability to defend itself, would it even exist today? To me, I don't make the difference between burnt and mutilated Men, Women and Children, be they Israeli or Palestine. They all look the same in death. They're wrong, both sides, and I've seen up close and personal what happens when a City, Town or village is Bombed. It sure as hell isn't pretty. Try holding a 7 or 8 year old kid while doctors are working on her with out anesthetics.

    As for the "yeah, maybe people should think twice about waging wars"??? Dream on.. men have been killing each other since as long as they've walking the earth. Only difference is that over time, they have improved it to the extent that they now have the capacity to completely destroy all life on the planet. Any ideas on how to change that?.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    There is a very clear difference:

    1. Russia attacked Ukraine, without any provocation
    2. Israel was brutally attacked by Hamas, with hundreds of civilians murdered in barbaric fashion. Israel is responding to that initial attack by Hamas.

    The two are very different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 569 ✭✭✭Long Sean Silver


    i agree both sides are desperate to shape the narrative, but the Israeli propaganda machine is on a different level. they are hugely resourced and highly sophisticated, but as i said previously the whole world can see what they are doing in Gaza. people aren't fools. we know what is right and what is wrong.

    i see very little difference between what Netty is doing and what Pootin is doing in Ukraine. a few months ago the Russians targeted a pizza restaurant in Kramatorsk. Later on Wednesday, the Russian defence ministry reported that the target they hit was a “temporary command post” of the Ukrainian army.

    This is EXACTLY what the IDF claims to be doing in Gaza. Ya sure they are trying to target Hamas operatives, but heck if a few dozen innocent Palestinian women & children are killed, well that's too bad.

    Almost word for word from the Russian playbook. Both disgusting.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 569 ✭✭✭Long Sean Silver


    it's a bit like slagging off Thatcher as a war-mongering biatch and being called a misogynist. 😂



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,032 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Can you point to some of such posts please. I'm not on here continuously, but have spent a number of hours at a time on the thread across various days and I can honestly say I haven't frequent examples of anti-Semitism. I'm sure there is some, but rampant implies it is very prevalent and what I've seen is a long way from that and more a case of one of posts from young accounts.

    In the same way that Palestine does not equal Hamas, disapproval of Israel's action does not equal anti-Semitism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Big discussion going on lads, you could have some bloke with a whistle like in a football match.


    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    It's hamas that did this to Palestine not Israel



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 569 ✭✭✭Long Sean Silver


    Well done Spain!



    to paraphrase Fr. Ted, "i hear you are an anti-semite now! how did you get into that sort of thing Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez?" 😮



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    "Of the two dozen journalists who have died, 20 were Palestinian, three were Israeli and one was Lebanese. At least eight other journalists have been reported injured, while three others are believed missing or detained, according to the CPJ."

    :(



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Some people are angrier at Israel for responding to the attack than they are about Hamas committing the attack to begin with.

    It's a bizarre set of circumstances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,032 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Not even Israel is claiming this.

    That's how wide of the mark you are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,804 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Just to add

    3. Russia-Ukraine war has very little to do with religion

    4. Russia did ground invasion without a care to civilian lives



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    "If Hamas were to release the hostages, Israel would find it much harder to justify the actions currently being taken."

    The problem with this is that Israel is not a normal state - it is filled with suspicion of and hatred towards their neighbours. I believe they would have absolutely no compunction in levelling a substantial part of the Gaza strip if and when they get the chance. They'd call it self defence and de militarising/ de nazifying whilst obliterating countless innocent & guilty people.

    Thankfully the US seem to have some leverage and can pull on the collar.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,893 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I don't speak for everyone else, but there is a difference between saying 'no war crimes have been committed' and denying that 'X is conclusive evidence of a war crime being committed.' If something may or may not be lawful, the general standard we tend operate under in the West is 'innocent until proven guilty', and we as Internet observers are absolutely not in a position to make that determination since we lack all relevant information in these instances.

    As for how it would work in practice, the good news is that in a modern context there probably are records kept which may be perused at some time in the long term and the advantage or lack thereof could thus be determined. It's highly unlikely, however, that such records will be made publicly available in the near future. In ye olden dayes, it would have to be proven by the prosecution. However, there haven't been any particular war crimes trials which have required such a thing since the laws of war were changed after WWII, when dropping bombs on civilians was just part of doing war, so the question right now seems to not have a demonstrated answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Tom Friedman making some great points in the NYT today. To paraphrase (my notes in brackets):

    • Netanyahu is a bad actor - what Israel needs is a PM that would declare an end to West Bank settlement expansion and to overhaul relations with the PA, such that it can credibly govern a post-Hamas Gaza. (to me, these seem very far from being realised)
    • Israel can only build proper legitimacy with its allies if it stops annexing West Bank land (unarguable)
    • Israel is fighting a fully-fledged war in Gaza against Hamas - Hamas still has residual capacity to launch rockets daily and even to launch a seaborne attack on Israel on Thursday. He notes that its terrifying to see the resources Hamas has devoted to building its military capability versus Gaza's evident human poverty. (this is something that doesn't get enough attention)
    • Netanyahu's coalition actually helps Hamas - by behaving in ways that actually help unify the various anti-Israeli fronts. This includes the restrictions they placed on Temple Mount, putting harsher conditions on Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails and planning an acceleration of settlement building (can't argue with that, Netanyahu is pandering to the right wingers in his cabinet - the quid pro quo is him staying out of jail)
    • The normalisation of relations with Arab countries was proceeding further - the Saudi deal would have been the crowing achievement of that
    • Iran is key and is the ultimate bad actor in the region. It controls 4 failed states through its proxies; Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen.

    key quote:

    To reduce this incredibly complex struggle of two peoples for the same land to a colonial war is to commit intellectual fraud. Or as the Israeli writer Yossi Klein Halevi put it in The Times of Israel on Wednesday: “To blame the occupation and its consequences wholly on Israel is to dismiss the history of Israeli peace offers and Palestinian rejection. To label Israel as one more colonialist creation is to distort the unique story of the homecoming of an uprooted people, a majority of whom were refugees from destroyed Jewish communities in the Middle East.”

    But here’s what’s also intellectually corrupt: buying into the Israeli right-wing settler narrative, now being spread far and wide inside Israel, that Hamas violence is so savage it clearly has nothing to do with anything settlers have done — so more settlements are just fine.

    (I agree - beware the simplifiers)


    My view: This is a territorial dispute between two people claiming the same land which needs to be divided as equitably as possible. Such a compromise is the cornerstone for any success against Hamas. So, if you are for a two-state solution, you are my friend and if you are against a two-state solution, you are not my friend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Nebulous complaint. Some people are angry that Israel is open to criticism



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    So here's a question: the land that Israel has annexed\stolen\grabbed (insert your own verb of choice) in the West Bank. They are mostly populated by religious Haredim settlers.

    Besides the obvious political blowback internally in Israel if they were to be handed to the PA as the price of peace, what value do they add to the State of Israel? e.g. are there any huge economic benefits that giving them up would be folly?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 569 ✭✭✭Long Sean Silver


    posters here, some through ignorance, some intentionally, are confusing criticism of Israel (as represented by their Govt.) and the IDF war crimes, as being antisemitic.

    the 2 are not the same. i have tried to explain/educate these posters without much luck. indeed may Jewish/Israeli citizens are openly critical of their Govt's actions. are they antisemitic too?

    indeed the extent to which these posters bandy around the term, antisemitic has lost much of it's potency, and is now little more than a cliche to score points and/or to stifle debate.

    For decades, the Israeli government has used the accusation of anti-Semitism as a way to shield itself from any criticism. Anyone who dares to call into question the continued military occupation of millions of Palestinians, the jailing without trial of political dissidents, the destruction of civilian homes, or any of the many other crimes that the Israeli government commits on a regular basis, is quickly labeled an anti-Semite.




  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,458 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    ...

    missed the threadban



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,836 ✭✭✭Nermal


    This post deserves a quote.

    It was followed by 15 pages of morally bankrupt false equivalence between Hamas and the IDF, between Hamas and the US in Hiroshima & Nagasaki, or between Hamas and the Allies in Dresden. 

    There is, of course, no such equivalence.

    One side exalts and triumphs in cruelty, murder, torture, rape and barbarity.

    The other does not. 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,615 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    The UK didn't bomb the hell out of I.R.A strongholds or safehouses , killing all those within the blast zone, they did their due-diligence , and tracked down those responsible of crimes, the Israeli army come across as the laziest in history, clueless bunch, whac a mole approach. Their soldiers act like spoilt brats, they know that can riddle a kid with bullets for throwing a stone, and they won't face any punishment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭scottser



    i would imagine all gay people in israel are concerned that their rights are being systematically targeted by the right-wing and theocratical elements of their government, notwithstanding israel's historical support of LGBT rights. there's been a year-on-year rise in reported incidents of homophobia since lockdown.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,504 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The IRA weren't openly firing mass numbers of rockets from heavily populated areas though where they?

    The British Army were patrolling those streets daily. The British authorities controlled the ports, controlled the borders.

    It's not remotely the same situation, so your attacks on the Israeli army just rebound on you and are self discrediting.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,471 ✭✭✭Odhinn




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭boetstark


    Would you blame them considering the constant barrage of threats to their very existence.

    Even a bloody head cleric from Palestine went to Hitler during ww2 requesting assistance in wiping out jewish population of the area. This was even before Israel was established.

    Palestinians have gotten every opportunity to create a life of peace for themselves in a Palestinian homeland and they have f##ked it up for themselves over and over again.

    And we have the drivel of society here in europe with their stupid woke rubbish.

    How much is a country and a people expected to take before deciding to take out this cancerous threat once and for all.

    I am far from an advocate of violence on any race of people but if Israel stop now. I guarantee that this whole sorry cycle of tit for tat violence is never going to end.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,830 ✭✭✭facehugger99




Advertisement