Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

13173183203223231436

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    This mentality sounds awfully familiar, person in the UK tearing down posters of missing people kidnapped by Hamas during the recent Terrorist attack.

    No evidence of any rapes she claims

    If it was an Arab poster being removed she would be crying Islamophobia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Do you believe the Israeli Defence Figure of 1500 Hamas fighters bodies recovered by the morning of 10th October to be accurate?

    A day later the IDF “bodies of 1500 Hamas fighters” had become an estimated 1000 Palestinian gunmen.

    The force that attacked Israel on October 7th, was, according to the IDF, 2500 strong.

    Was it not a disastrously unsuccessful surprise attack on civilians if more damage has been inflicted on the attackers than on those whom they have attacked?





    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,209 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The Palestinian terrorist's attacked the least densely inhabited part of Israel. Virtually all Israeli's have done National service with the army. The Concert was an easy target a large gathering of civilians with no access to weapons. But elsewhere as the news drifted out Kibbutz's and small villages defended themselves.

    However isolated houses ended up being wiped out as they went to bomb shelters where the Palestinian terrorist's threw in fragmentation grenades.

    At a guess Hamas did not commit all there most experienced fighters they bought along the mob with them. Inexperienced 17-20 year-old hanger on. Gave them an assault rifle and they were handy fodder to be used in the first assault.

    The more veteran operatives would have abandoned them after 12-24 hours knowing what was coming.

    Akbar Allah as the saying goes it's the answer these evil terrorist's give to everything that they do

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Kenya Late Timekeeper


    And the Yanks vetoed sending in aid, the Brits abstained.

    Monstrous.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Ashkerlon has a bigger population than Galway city and Sderot has a higher population density than London. These are not the least densely inhabited parts of Israel.

    Any of the analysis I have seen certainly doesn’t point to the attackers being a mob of teenagers with assault rifles. That may have been the case 10 or 15 years ago but the Al Quassam brigades now resemble Hezbollah in training.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Kenya Late Timekeeper


    What the f*ck are you talking about?

    Even the Americans have said they believe between 100-300 were killed in the hospital.




  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Kenya Late Timekeeper


    A blast went off at a building on the premises of the St. Porphyrius Greek Orthodox Church campus in Gaza City on Thursday night while dozens of Palestinian families were sheltering there. Rescuers were pulling people out of the rubble, several of whom were injured, according to people at the site.

    It's estimated about 500 people had been seeking refuge there.

    Church is over 1,000 years old.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭✭applehunter


    Social media wasn’t around 9/12 - Iraq War.

    The inordinate influence that the Jewish lobby has over USA, UK & Germany is ridiculous

    Great to see it being shown the light of day.



  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Kenya Late Timekeeper


    Imagine having to stand up on the Senate floor to block legislation that would prevent critically needed humanitarian aid.

    In Washington, D.C., Vermont independent Senator Bernie Sanders has blocked legislation that would have effectively barred U.S. humanitarian aid from reaching Gaza. On Wednesday, Sanders objected when Florida Republican Senator Rick Scott tried to pass the so-called Stop Taxpayer Funding of Hamas Act by unanimous consent.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Video about the topic...

    1) The WH already admitted to it. They fucked up. It's bad.

    2) It's still stupid af of the internet to repost the image with the blacked out faces, but which still have loads of identifying marks on the men. 'for the sake of a hot take on operational security...'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭threeball


    100%. And you'd have to question how these attacks got such a head of steam. One of the main breeches was part of the wall being knocked by a loading shovel and hamas streaming through. In one of the most fortified and guarded sections of land on earth? With the backdrop of Netanyahus attempts to rewrite the constitution and the pushback he was receiving there's questions to be asked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭crusd


    Again, more than one thing can be true at the same time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Imagine if Israel had waited a week to react. Hypothetical, I know. Would there have been mass demonstrations condemning the slaughter of Israelis by Hamas and shouting for the end of Hamas?

    I doubt it. There might've been a few smaller protests is all.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There would have been no mass demonstrations condemning Hamas. I think there's little doubt about that.

    The massacre is considered a "justifiable defence" against Israel based on perceived grievances of the Palestinians. The reality is that Hamas acted on behalf of the Palestinians, without their consent, to conduct a massacre which was well received by some in the Western world - from San Francisco to London to Sydney (where, in the case of the latter, crowds were chanting "gas the Jews").

    At its heart, there is a sickness in the movement against Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,101 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Keep making excuses for Israel murdering innocent babies.

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,101 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Israel did bomb the hospital. Not sure on the numbers.

    Israel have murdered well over 1,000 children in the last 12 days.

    They're making Putin look like a boy scout.

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Israel did bomb the hospital.

    But they didn't. All the evidence shows that Palestinian Islamic Jihad was responsible for the attack - albeit through an errant, dodgy missile.

    It reminds me of the strategies that people use to deny what is, for them, an uncomfortable truth.

    Avoiding – The first line of defence against disruptive information is to avoid it.

    Delegitimizing – The second line of defence is to attack the messenger, by undermining the credibility of the source.

    Limiting – The final line of defence, if disruptive information cannot be avoided or delegitimized, is to rationalize and limit the impact of the disruptive ideas.

    Repeating the line that "Israel bombed the hospital" is now an empty, meaningless chant, bereft of evidence - repeated in the belief and hope that it's true, or repeated with the ambition that other people will blindly believe it without question. In other words, it's propaganda.

    Anyone who has taken the time to review the overwhelming catalogue of evidence understands perfectly well that it was Palestinian Islamic Jihad - not Israel - who was responsible for the hospital attack. Which didn't even hit a hospital, and didn't kill "500 - 1,000 people".



  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Kenya Late Timekeeper


    "We shall do all efforts to bring our hostages, to bring our hostages [back] alive…" he said, but the "first and last priority" is destroying Hamas.


    There you have it, that's what Israel thinks of hostages, it doesn't get any clearer or bolder than that.

    They don't give a f*ck about hostages, they've merely used them for propaganda so they can accelerate their ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and pillage more Palestinian land.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    No they did not...

    Your welcome to provide any evidence to support your claim



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    ...so they can accelerate their ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and pillage more Palestinian land.

    Destroying Hamas's extensive underground tunnel system has nothing to do with "ethnic cleansing of Palestinians". It's a legitimate military target.

    The IDF seem to be saying that Hamas cannot hide behind hostages to prevent the terrorist group's inevitable destruction.

    There is no perfect solution here. But Hamas must be destroyed - for the sake of the Palestinians, too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    If they destroy Hamas, they've won this war. That's their stated goal. HTH.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    NY Times has a breakdown of the aide Biden will ask for:

    $14bn - Israel

    $60bn - Ukraine

    The article doesn't mention anywhere else, but Taiwan support seems likely

    Sigh. Boards and linking to websites. Here's the text from (https://archive.ph/vit5y)

    President Biden tied together Israel and Ukraine, saying that both face threats of annihilation by tyrants and terrorists, as he made his case for providing aid to the countries in a rare Oval Office address on Thursday.


    Providing the two U.S. allies with military and economic aid is in the interest of global stability and national security, he said. Mr. Biden is expected to request $14 billion in military and security aid to Israel for its war against Hamas and $60 billion for Ukraine to fight Russia, according to people familiar with the administration’s plans.


    With the humanitarian situation growing more desperate in Gaza, the Rafah crossing between the territory and Egypt still hadn’t opened to evacuees and aid by Friday morning. Diplomats familiar with back-channel talks were pessimistic about it opening at all that day. There are still disagreements between Egypt and Israel on issues including how to institute a regular schedule of aid convoys, whether to allow in fuel and how to screen the convoys for arms.


    The territory had already been living under a 16-year blockade by Israel and Egypt when Israel responded to the Hamas attack that killed 1,400 people this month with airstrikes and a “complete siege” of the enclave. Now, nearly half of the more than two million people living in Gaza have been displaced, according to the United Nations, and essential supplies like food and fuel are running out.


    Previous agreements to provide aid have fallen through, but Mr. Biden said Israel and Egypt had agreed to let through trucks full of food, water and medicine that are stationed in Egypt.


    On Israel’s northern border with Lebanon, Israel and Hezbollah, Hamas’s Iranian-backed ally, continued to trade fire amid fears that the war could expand. A U.S. warship on Thursday shot down three cruise missiles and several drones launched from Yemen that the Pentagon said might have been headed toward Israel.


    American intelligence agencies have assessed that an explosion at a Gaza hospital on Tuesday killed 100 to 300 people, a more conservative estimate than that given by the health ministry run by Hamas, and that the hospital was lightly damaged, according to an unclassified report drafted by U.S. intelligence agencies on Wednesday.


    Other developments:


    Israel’s military said it had been in contact with the families of 203 people taken hostage, raising the number of people believed to be held in Gaza. The military also said that it had caught a Hamas gunman trying to return to Gaza, underscoring the possibility that attackers were still in Israel.


    Satellite imagery shows that hundreds of Israeli tanks and armored vehicles have gathered about four miles north of the Erez Crossing into northern Gaza, in preparation for a potential ground invasion.


    Gaza health officials said at a news conference that at least 3,785 people had been killed and more than 12,000 injured in the enclave since Oct. 7. The figures are believed to include casualties from the hospital explosion in Gaza City. Hamas and Israel blame each other for that blast, which prompted sporadic protests in Europe and in some Arab nations.


    A leader of Hamas says that not all of the Israeli hostages who were taken to Gaza are being held by the group, a claim that will most likely complicate negotiations for their release.


    Show less



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,932 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    The idea that there is only a binary option between Israel's current policy which will continue to kill thousands of civilians and "letting" Hamas butcher Israelis is one of the most pervasive fallacies of this entire debate. It is rolled out in the media as this "What else are they supposed to do?" question as if people thought this was the first ever example of a military power having to contend with an insurgency and there is nothing in history to learn from.

    I mean, nobody even seems to be capable of telling me how Israel's response even makes strategic sense, never mind proportionality. They have complete military superiority versus a penned in enemy with relatively limited resources to make outward incursions aside from one major surprise attack which caught the Israelis off guard. There is zero chance that a bunch of lads on scramblers and paragliders will break the fully mobilised Israeli military line in any meaningful way.

    And what intelligent course of action are the Israelis taking, with the comfort of their dominance? Doing the one f**king thing Hamas absolutely wanted them to do by slaughtering Palestinian civilians by the bucket load, poisoning the nature of the conflict more and more with each passing day, destabilising the region, destroying any prospect of them being seen as a conciliatory power that genuinely wants to live peacefully side by side with the people who they are killing and whose homes and communities they are flattening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,457 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    They are certainly mass murdering scum, but cowardly? No. You are confusing cowardice with brutality. It's part of the problem and one of the biggest reasons the Israeli regime have not started their ground invasion.

    Hamas fighters and in particular Hezbollah fighters would probably be the 2 most effective urban fighting groups on the planet.

    That said Israeli special forces would be up there too.

    But the problem is he will send in the reservists, the attrition rate will be high and the optics of the returning body bags will further turn the Israeli people against Bibi and his regime and not just in Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,856 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    The IDF headquarters is based in Tel Aviv, its surrounded by civilian buildings, do you agree that IDF headquarters is a legitimate target for Hamas rockets and any civilian deaths are acceptable because "legitimate military target"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    They might destroy the tunnels and ammo dumps of Hamas. They might kill all the Hamas leadership. Heck, the might even kill or capture all the Hamas foot soldiers. More power to them.

    But - as we saw in Afghanisatan - they can't destroy the idea (sick and perverted version of Islam though it is).

    People need to remember that the main reason Israel is doing this isn't military. Hamas is not an existential military threat.

    It's political. And there are two main constituencies that matter - Israeli citizens and Israel's enemies.

    The message to the first is 'we are stronger than our enemies and we will avenge our dead'. (the other message is 'I, Bibi, am the only one who can protect you. So forget all that talk about locking me up for my crimes' - pure opportunism on his behalf)

    The message to the second is 'if you ever attack us, we will respond with overwhelming force and we don't really care about any collateral damage. Hama rules apply.' This message goes out to Iran and, to a lesser extent, Syria.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,146 ✭✭✭omega man


    What are Hamas, the ruling authority in Gaza, doing to help their people? Seems everyone is to blame except Hamas.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,457 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The strategy is clear, and has actually been telegraphed by the Israeli regime.

    The border will be moved North to South, anyone north of the river will be slaughtered or interned.

    Savage amounts of pressure will be put on Egypt to set up a refugee camp on their border and allow the Palestinians through.

    Gaza will become a smaller enclave surrounded by a demilitarised zone where the people will be dehumanised further until they have no choice but to leave. The land grabbing and slaughter will continue in the West Bank probably at more pace and Bibi gets to have his legacy.

    The idea this is about destroying Hamas, a group Bibi used as an asset is as remedial as it is illogical.

    Of course none of that can happen unless Biden approves it, Joe and his administration will need to weigh up how much votes they will lose by actively financing ethnic cleansing. Also the very real possibility that other groups kick off.

    I put it at 50/50.



Advertisement