Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

16667697172410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,805 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Pardon me?

    What oneupmanship?

    My post was directly related to the pages and pages of tin foil hat stuff that's been posted on this forum over the last few days. I know it must be difficult to take that it's not actually a conspiracy but that's the way she goes.🤷‍♂️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,805 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Oh absolutely, it was hilariously bad but even if Liverpool hadn't made such a huge issue of it no doubt it would be looked at by PGMOL to avoid recurrence going forward.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Difficult to take? What are you talking about? Passive aggressive now. Jeez. I think you're over completely thinking it. Conspiracy it ain't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,628 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    That's the problem though - this is apparently the way all such communication takes place. The actual nature of their conversation is not an outlier or error. Only the outcome is the error. This casual over-confidence of people talking over each other, without any clear protocols for specific descriptive language to be used so everyone knows exactly what is taking place.

    Dion Fanning was talking yesterday about how every VAR conversation he's heard the recordings of sounded like a circus going on in the background, and it seems this one is no different. This is just the way they do things, and have continued doing things after each of their previous 14 apologies. I've no doubt that without being forced into public embarrassment, they'd have just carried on, same as they carried on after the rest. (and I wouldn't be at all surprised if they actually don't improve that communication process much either - it feels like this over-confident self-important machismo permeates every aspect of English officiating)



  • Administrators Posts: 55,060 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    By the time anyone realised the mistake, operator included, the game had already restarted. The operator does not appear to be aware that the decision can't be changed after the game has restarted.

    It's a mistake. It's a bad one. But it's clearly just human error and nothing more.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    These VAR lads might pay more attention from now on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    I never thought it was anything other than human error but it is interesting to see how the operate. Time to move onto the next match.

    At least they will have to document what the new protocol is; VAR to tell referee if it is a Goal or it is not a Goal:)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,949 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    is there any point when the ref relays to VAR that the on field decision was offside? cos thats where the **** up happens.

    listening again, it seems the VAR operator never told them the on field decision was offside.

    VAR operator: Wait, wait, wait, wait. The on-field decision was offside.

    why didnt he tell them this before the decision?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,247 ✭✭✭joeguevara




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭McFly85


    It’s honestly pathetic that we have the actual audio to discuss and people would still prefer to angle it as a pop at Liverpool and Liverpool fans.

    The audio did show the lack of structure around VAR calls which is the obvious area of improvement - 4 years in and that level of communication is pretty poor. If they could improve the structure of the conversation and the process once a mistake happens it’ll go a long way to resolving the issues.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,247 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    I think we need to get some perspective.


    Liverpool had a perfectly good goal disallowed because of a mistake by the officials.


    Hands up anyone who has seen their team denied a perfectly good goal because of a mistake by the officials. Yes, me too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Haha the sly digs are hilarious. As I said earlier, we’re in a false position. We’ve gotten every break going this year and don’t have the squad depth to cope with injuries in a couple of positions. I expect we’ll finish 4th to 8th and you’ll finish ahead of us.


    I’ve also said that Liverpool with 9 men were exceptional on Saturday and most teams would have struggled to break them down. The way they defended their box, the effort that they put in and the way they managed the game was very impressive. They deserved more and were very unfortunate on every level.


    We got out of jail and we know it. Absolutely no argument, much less being wound up, there. But continue with the projection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,248 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    Yes, nowhere did I say you didn't, winning and beating are 2 different things. You got shown up by nine men who beat themselves with a fluke OG.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,628 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    I genuinely don't see how that can be someone's conclusion... it's human error within a process that clearly isn't fit for purpose. The process of communication is clearly what opened up the room for that human error.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,061 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    So after all the hullabaloo its just human error, the same as every other VAR cóck up.

    What a shocking result this is!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    I think top 5 get CL which itself is a worry as that is 25% of the teams in the league, no to european super league but the CL is heading that way with the number of games involved next year.

    Spurs definitely have a chance of top 5 but Africa Nations could impact that as a few key performers will be gone.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,060 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    There are issues with the process, and of course they can (and should) make changes to prevent a similar human error happening again in future, though ultimately you'll never remove any possibility of human error from a process involving humans.

    But it was clearly just a huge mistake as opposed to some of the other theories that have been thrown about the past few days.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't know what some of you have been reading because there's been little in the way of conspiracy here. Christ you lot destroy this thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,624 ✭✭✭Augme



    When you have at least three people involved in a process mistakes due to human error really should never happen in this situation.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,060 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I will theorise that football (particularly the PL) has always had a hard-on about VAR making decisions quickly to avoid ruining the flow of the game, and this is probably at least partly a consequence of that.

    In rugby, one thing the referee will do is walk through the decision to the TMO after the TMO makes the call, so everyone is on the same page. But this adds time to the process.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,414 ✭✭✭Ottoman_1000


    To be fair, that's not really the case is it. Of course plenty of teams have had good goals disallowed, Liverpool included, do you think this is the first injustice against them on the field of play?? the uproar is about the absolute shambles of the VAR process, like how can anyway listen to the dialogue and not been concerned about the state of the whole set-up!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,061 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    "You lot"?


    There were multiple posters tryna make issue with the referees having been abroad a few days before. The same way the Saudi's only bid for Salah to unsettle Liverpool. Its the amusing bizarre conspiracies that are cooked up that do more harm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,949 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    100% its a consequence of not wanting to ruin the flow of the game and far too many in the media and here subscribe to that idea.

    which is horseshit. just get the correct decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,628 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Ok, but most reasonable people expected there was human error involved - and wanted to learn about the fundamental process behind it and if that was a contributing factor in the error. Which it very obviously was. Which is what absolutely baffles me with so many posters saying "yeah, grand, human error, nothing more than that". With a proper (and not embarrassingly amateur) process in place that human error simply never occurs.

    There are obvious and large improvements that should take place within how the communication in the VAR office works, meaning it's not "just human error" at fault.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,613 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    It's always been fascinating to me how people can spin "human error" depending on their own personal stance on a situation, be it football or politics. No less than here where, shock, the whole point of technology being introduced was to ensure incidents like these don't happen?

    If this was Luton or Sheffield Utd on the receiving end of an error like this against a team like Liverpool or Man City, people would be absolutely spitting and they know it.

    I say this as someone who has been resigned to the error being purely down to careless stupidity and nothing more. There is no conspiracy theory, just catastrophic misuse of the technology. Someone needs to go in order to send a message that it can't happen again.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,060 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yes, whatever else I think the first change that needs to be made is VAR needs to be allowed to take the time to make a decision in situations like this where the ball ends up dead anyway.

    Yes, nobody wants VAR bringing play back for a penalty for an incident that happened 2 minutes ago, but in the case of goals / offsides there is absolutely no harm in waiting 1 or 2 minutes for a call if needs be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,986 ✭✭✭eigrod


    It was a series of errors. It was incomptence by at least 2 highly trained and experienced officials. Why did both VAR officials not know what the onfield decision was? Why did the Asst VAR remain silent throughout the check? What’s his job there if he just sits there saying nothing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,247 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    Again. Mistake and ineptitude have caused countless goals to be disallowed, end of.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,949 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    its not even 2 minutes. just take 20 seconds. it was all so frantic and rushed



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement