Enoch Burke turns up to school again despite sacking - read OP before posting

For his sake I hope he doesn't have a Samsung S23 Ultra

Discrimination will be his grounds of appeal.

I suspect he will try to argue that countless judges have erred in law by not allowing him to pursue the religious discrimination argument; and I also suspect that every avenue he tries will re-affirm that the judges were correct to disallow the religious discrimination red-herring.

That said - all he really wants is to be allowed to continue milking this for as long as possible - it's all just extra hardship on the path towards martyrdom in his mind, and IMO his end-goal is to make himself a martyr for the far-right religious loons around the world.

You have to work your way up to that, but with enough time inside he should be good for an S9 Ultra or even a Surface Studio 2.

I said that too. I'm convinced it will happen.

The game doesn't change.

Burke has no intention of getting his job back, this is about Martyrdom and the grift that comes with it.

I think they actually want to lose the court cases - all feeds into the oppressed martyr narrative

Given that the school, as a C of I school, is linked to one branch of the Christian community and is accepting of its pupils request to be addressed as They/Them, could there not be a case stated that EB and his Evangelist Christian family are involved in actively waging religious discrimination against the school because it agrees with the pupil's choice AND a separate case stated that EB and his Evangelist family are actively waging religious discrimination against the pupil on a similar basis: denying both the school and the pupil the freedom of religious choice allowed for by the constitution?

The EB case, as stated again and again by him and his family, is that he is being religiously discriminated against by the school. The school plainly does accept children of different religions as pupils and persons of different religious belief as teachers [as shown by it employing him] in an active process under the constitution.

It may be time to fight fire with fire by the state [the AG] stating a case in protection of both the pupil and the school rights in the constitution from the fake religious discrimination claims of EB and his family.

EB's line is that what he claims are his religious rights trump ANY rights the pupil has to make a choice and ask for validation by requesting others to use the pronouns they/them while addressing said pupil. It's not a matter of religious belief at all, it's a form of personal address. As you said, using martyrdom he's made it all about himself and is using that as a cover to be personally abusive to others - as exampled in the school meeting and in the high court, aided and abetted by his family. They are abusing the process of justice for no good purpose, following a process used by people of similar belief in another jurisdiction. Hopefully the ECHR would reject any attempt by him and his family to have it hear any case they might make on the grounds that the case has no valid standing before the court.