Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

13031333536410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,223 ✭✭✭marklazarcovic


    It's bringing a ton of attention to their league,which I'm guessing is the objective,they know a bid won't be accepted so bid eye watering amount.



  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Forget Liverpool in this discussion. The Saudi despot government having a team in the PL is a joke. Thankfully Eddie Howe is the manager, so they'll win sfa this season.



  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ah ya of course there are definitely valid points and criticisms worth talking about and pointing out but the conspiracy stuff never adds anything to the conversation.

    It's funny that the league is so worried about shirt sponsors or Newcastle owners when it was worried about tv rights and competition in that regard.

    I guess it remains to be seen how they might effect things going forward, like if Saudi clubs are overpaying massively for aging stars, clubs might actually be quite happy with the cash boost.

    Not everything done will be above board for sure but not everything done will be a conspiracy either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,741 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Its the same as their posturing for Mbappe. Just flexing their muscles knowing theres very little chance of it working.

    If there was a conspiracy to rob the EPL competition of its players to allow Newcastle an easier run then where were the bids for Haaland, Ederson, De Bruyne, Saka, Saliba, Odegaard, etc.

    Bizarre to be making it a conspiracy to aid Newcastle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 237 ✭✭DAngelo Bailey


    Because he's the most high profile and best Muslim player in the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,226 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    was the luton non handball call a bad decision if anyone was watching?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 237 ✭✭DAngelo Bailey


    Luton denied an absolute stonewall penalty at the end there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 237 ✭✭DAngelo Bailey


    20230901_220228.jpg

    Not given.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,226 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    what happened this transfer? palhinha flying back to london




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm




  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,650 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    Yeah, I think we have established that the whole handball thing is probably based on a coin flip 🤪🙃

    Bless their hearts, Luton really try, there doesn't seem to be much creativity though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,864 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    And they had a full summer to make a bid but waited until the last minute to do it.

    Why?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,724 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hammer Archer


    I will take it every day of the week but it's a penalty every day of the week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,226 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    prob moving around the funds.

    i dunno, maybe at the start of the window salah had no intention, and as they have signed higher profile players his stance softened?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,226 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    howard for all his talk needs to come out and clarify whats a handball, and whats not.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,650 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris




  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The ref missed it in the initial bit of play and enough time went by that the VAR thought it would be too awkward for his mate Tierney to be looking at screens I'd say.



  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Why single of Liverpool out of all the clubs?

    Surely if you looked at the situation a little bit logically whatever the reasoning it was to do with Salah and not Liverpool.



  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Moss better have all the managers on speed dial, a lot of apologizes to be made this season



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,108 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Think it was cause Fulham couldn't get a replacement in.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,226 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    McT rejected the move apparently. too comfy with utd sitting on the bench with his fat wage.

    ETA: there was the perfect triangle there. mcT, gravenberch and palinha.

    just utd couldnt afford gravenberch and mcT wouldn't go to fulham.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,864 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    There's been particular interest in a lot of Liverpool players from Saudi Arabia this summer. Alisson, Gomez, Konate, Hendo, Fabinho, Thiago, Diaz and now Salah have all been linked with moves to Saudi Arabia this summer. It's been very frustrating to see a new one pop every week. Of course not all link is real and some were swatted away instantly and that's all part of the summer transfer games.

    I can't really remember much links to other clubs key players this summer.


    And yes, I do get the appeal of signing Salah over nearly all other players currently in world football. One of the best players in the world, especially as a Muslim. He would be the biggest possible signing that PIF could make. So why wait until the last minute to do it? That timing is designed on purpose. Maybe it's a coincidence that the same guys own the club that want to buy him and the rivals of the club that are (proposed to) selling him. At best, they get the player they want, at worst it might unsettle the player and annoy the rival club.

    There is a reason that the first signings that Newcastle made after the PIF takeover was Chris Wood. It were designed to destabilize their rivals for PL survival at the same time while bettering themselves. Dan Burn could somewhat fall under this umbrella too and arrived in the same window. So it's not exactly something new.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 237 ✭✭DAngelo Bailey


    You need a lie down mate the Saudi league bought 2 turkeys off ye for vastly inflated sums which allowed ye to spend far more in transfer market.

    Newcastle signed wood because they were desperate for a striker and his agent told them about the release clause and as for the signing of Dan Burn to destabilise Brighton???!!! I really think you need to take off the tinfoil hat not everything is a conspiracy.



  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I mean none of that answers the question I asked why Liverpool?

    Newcastle have made a lot of transfers one was the Chris wood one, you are just finding patterns that don't exist tbh.

    The Saudi sides have been linked to everyone it's the easiest clicks journos could ever have.

    Also it's funny that when they buy Chelsea players or are linked with them they are helping them out, but Liverpool ones are to trying distabilize.

    Same kinda transfers but people are coming to two entirely different conclusions.

    As I said if you can't even come up with any half answer for why they would target Liverpool over other top 5 rivals you aren't just barking up the wrong tree you are barking up an imaginary one



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,864 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    The Brighton of today was not the Brighton of back then. Before Burn moved to Newcastle, there was an 11 point gap between the clubs and Newcastle were in the relegation zone.

    After Burn went to Newcastle, Brighton went on a run of 1 win, 1 draw & 6 losses in 8 games. In the same run of games, Newcastle hit a good run of form and after 32 games played, both Newcastle and Brighton sat level in 12th and 13th on 37 points.

    When Chris Wood joined Newcastle, Burnley were 5 points clear of Newcastle. The ended up being relegated, after being beaten by Newcastle on the last day of the season.

    He was signed for a vastly inflated fee and he was approaching the last year of his contract.

    And personally I think that Liverpool would rather have Fabinho playing for them this season rather than the unproven Endo, who nobody had heard of before 2 weeks ago. I'd also rather have Henderson than have €14m in this current transfer climate (partly caused by Newcastle) as that will barely sign you a 15 year old at this rate when guys with 10 PL sub appearances are are going for close to €50m. Those departures were unexpected and threw a spanner in the works for Liverpool's summer recruitment. Gone was the need to sign a CB and possibly a CM and instead the need to sign a DM first and the one more after that. It took 5 weeks to rectify.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,864 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Why Liverpool? Maybe they (PIF) see Liverpool as the low hanging fruit and easiest one of the top 4 aiming clubs to pick off? An older squad who have won everything there is to win at Liverpool so maybe there are hunger questions, not state backed and Klopp is nearing the end of his contract.

    Man City and Liverpool have been the stable 2 in the top 4 the last 5 or 6 years. The other clubs have been in and out and generally competing and sharing the remaining 2 top 4 spaces between themselves . Liverpool just dropped out, so go kick them while their down and keep them out.

    Take Liverpool's place and let the others compete for the rotating 4th spot. With Salah gone, it's no CL 2 years in a row and then the rebuild is a far bigger job and then Klopp is gone. Game over.

    Similar to what Man City did. Took a spot (from Arsenal basically) and made it their own for the long term. Around the same time, Man City signed a lot of players from Arsenal. Wenger left, and Arsenal were stuck in the EL cycle while paying off stadium debt. Man City used Arsenal's situation to their advantage.


    From the other current top 4 seeking clubs, there are reasons why they would not be targetted in the same way. Chelsea are on their own madness, and PIF did buy up some of their players. Man City are state backed, PIF own Newcastle so can't touch them. Arsenal have a squad of players who came close to winning trophies last year so perhaps want to stay and try to win it this year. A block on sales. Man Utd don't really have the big players to target - Bruno & Rashford maybe? Not really a big list considering it's the club captain and the club's poster boy from the academy. I think I saw Varane linked, but that's it. If a big bid came in for Casemiro in June, I think it would have been good for the club to take advantage of but it never did come in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,470 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    The EPL sold their souls many years ago, even in modern times the floating of Manchester United in the NYSE years ago opened up money to them not previously available, and continued through good old Roman's time at Chelsea, the City sportswashing project and now to PIF. Nothing new, but it is getting more brash and brazen. It's not ruining the game now though, it has indirectly ruined many of the European Leagues over the last 25 years, with even the big leagues like Serie A, LA Liga and the Bundesliga trailing financially in the wake of EPLs smallest clubs like Bournemouth, Burnley and Forest. Probably only Real, PSG, and maybe Bayern can compete with the EPL teams for any given player.

    I don't like what the Saudis are doing, but it's not much different to what the EPL teams have been doing with the rest of Europe for years, only the motivation is somewhat different.



  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So giving Liverpool extra money for highly payed players who were well past there beat is trying to bring ye down?

    With the money ye got ye have essentially bought McAllister and gravenbach, too early to say how they will work out for sure but most fans would be happy with those upgrade.

    You need to remember all ye have actually sold is two players past thee best and you got a lot of money for them, all the links in the world mean nothing.

    Tbh ye were absolutely gifted to get so much for the players you did and you are trying to turn it into a conspiracy.

    I mean Liverpool didn't have to sell anyone ye could easily have still been playing Henderson and fabinho this season and would be much worse for it, I'd say.

    If you are trying to bring down someone you don't really feed into there strengths, Liverpools record in the transfer market has been very good extra money will help them out and taking aging players is the dream scenario.

    When the time for varnae and casamerio to be moved on I hope they try distabilize us too



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,864 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    MacAllister and Szoboszlai were signed 4 weeks before Fabinho & Henderson were sold. Keita, Ox, Milner had already left and that's who they replaced. So those 2 purchases are in no way related to Saudi transfers.

    Endo & Gravenberch replaced the 2 guys who were sold. I'd take a guess that Endo will be moved on again next summer again, it's purely a stopgap. Gravenberch I have reservations about but he is young and can be coached into a higher level hopefully.

    I reckon that the plan (on July 1st) was to have Lavia come in and rotate with Fabinho as the DM. Learn from the master while not having too much pressure on the kid's shoulders with having to play every game. Have MacAllister & Jones as the LCM and then Szoboszlai & Hendo as the RCM with Thiago as a floater across all positions to deal with injuries etc. I think Fabinho could have had a decent season with legs in front of him. He had a decent finish to last season with the system change. Henderson on reduced minutes in a Milner type role is better too. They are not required to start every game on tired legs and so become better assets. Liverpool could then look to bring in a LCB as a succession planning player for VVD. Rotate this year with a view to take it on long term. 4 major signings, and the rebuild is complete for this year. Maybe an other if it suited.

    Until then Fabinho was sold and so was Hendo after a few weeks of dragged out transfers and various different blockages. They have completed their transfers on July 31st. There was now a desperation for Liverpool to buy a DM as the 2 already at the club had left. Lavia didn't / couldn't come in as the only DM so Endo, the stopgap, was signed. It took 5 weeks to sort it out and resulted in no CB being signed. 5 weeks of dithering really. It was very poorly handled by Liverpool, who have no permanent DOF and there are rumours that the CEO Billy Hogan stepped in because if how poorly the recruitment had been handled this summer (the MacAllister transfer had been pre-arranged before Julian Ward left the club and Schmake joined).

    And in hindsight, the money wasn't great, considering how the fees have gone this summer. Realistically, what is €14m gonna get you in the market for a midfielder? Nothing viable for a title challenge. I'd also rather still have Fabinho than have Endo. The club could have refused to sell alright but Klopp is a people's person, he is loyal to his players and respects how they feel. If a player asks to go because they have been tempted by whatever reason, he lets them leave. Sometimes to the detriment of the squad but it's a contributing factor to why so many players work tirelessly for him.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement