Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Dee Forbes banging the RTE TV licence drum again 60m uncollected fee *poll not working - pl ignore*

1332333335337338465

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Yes, it's that household charge which would bother me, as it would automatically lead to nasty discussions and very different opinions in society. It will certainly not make the RTE more popular and more accepted. Also there would also be an automatic comaprison to the BBC as the UK is the next door country.

    The BBC doesn't force anybody to pay who doesn't have a TV or doesn't watch TV on whatever device. BBC also, sadly to be said, offers a lot better information than the RTE does. Just look at BBC Radio 4 and Radio 5, there is nothing comparable in Ireland, plus the endless "we don't want DAB for whatever reason" attitude limits choice on the radio as well.

    There will be the "what's the one got to do with the other" attitude in society. And then there is the democratic aspect. Is a democracy and a society of free opionon there to force somebody to pay for something, nobably a journalism they've decided not to use or want?

    It's a division of opinions which is already there, even though it's not even law yet.

    Also the government and RTE will bang the "it's only fair" drum.

    Well, sadly, it's not fair. For others it will be fair.

    All very predictable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,477 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    If they broaden it out to other public service providers they could probably get away with calling it a public service broadcasting tax. Can't be many that don't consume some sort of Irish TV or Radio.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,335 ✭✭✭Damien360


    Always wondered why there is no DAB service. On a recent drive across NI, I couldn’t get over how much choice was available across DAB. Am I right in thinking it would be competition for RTE that could undermine their advertising income ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Then only "the many" should pay, but apparently they aren't that many, otherwise the RTE would have a massive inflow of license fee revenue.....

    I am also not forcing anybody to pay contribution to the catholic church, as Ireland is historically catholic. Yes, you may practice other religions, but still you'd have to pay contributions for the catholic church.

    It's partially also that democratic values are at stake here. People don't want to see that and RTE and politics will certainly make sure, that other opinions aren't that much out in the open.

    I don't think that in the UK they would be able to force a household fee for the BBC down people's throat nor is there a public discourse about it.

    And BBC radio is for free, no license required, - currently that's the same in Ireland, albeit with a lesser choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,241 ✭✭✭political analyst


    From what I've read, the original structure of RTÉ's HQ is a listed building. Therefore, the selling of Montrose might not be the solution that critics of the broadcaster think it is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    Part of their cost cutting, you know because they had no money.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    "critics of the broadcaster"? Are you not with us yet?


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    At the same time they've kept 252 LW alive for a very high cost. DAB / DAB+ is only a fraction of that, plus all of the new cars in the EU do have digital radio already.

    Also, at the same time, the RTE paid below average presenters above average salaries. This is sadly not a problem exclusively to the RTE, other public sector broadcasters have similar issues in these regards.

    But now forcing a household charge down one's throat regardless if they have a TV or not is an idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 967 ✭✭✭MICKEYG


    Maybe it should come from the general tax bucket. In the same way people with no kids pay for teacher salaries.

    It's a general good for society to have a well funded public broadcasting service in the same way it is a general good to have an educated population.

    Now, should all the money go to one entity like RTE, I dont think so. Similarly should it go into a big hole and pay for non public good shows like Dancing with the Stars then no.

    How to manage this and assign the money (and how much) to the right programming across multiple providers is a puzzle that will be hard to solve. Maybe other countries have a model we could adopt?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,241 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Will RTÉ even make it past the next general election?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I don't think its an issue if all the money goes to one. I think the issue is the public money and the private money all goes in the same pot



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 967 ✭✭✭MICKEYG


    Yep, agreed. I am a big football fan and love to see the Champions League on RTE but I cannot see how public money should be used to get it there. That should be 100% commercial.

    I am a LOI fan too and could make a much stronger case for public broadcasting money to go there .

    The thing is that is just me. Others would have a different take. It's hard to see how you could ever get the balance right.

    What is not right is what is happening currently where it just seems to be a black hole.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,285 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    The key deciders on this will be Varadkar and the two Martins.


    Mr Martin has said he wants to see the licence fee abolished and replaced with a household charge to cover all media content.


    Catherine and Leo playing their cards close to their chest so far but if either or both also comes down in favour of such a charge I'd say that's what we'll be getting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I'd only partially agree.

    A public sector broadcaster is not a retirement fund, not a public health service, a police, a military or an educational system. Any kind of solidarity doesn't exist here.

    The matter would maybe be different if the RTE would only focus on Irish culture, or Gaeltacht, general culture, educational programming and ( hopefully unbiased) news.

    Movies, other forms of entertainment shows should never be something for a public sector broadcaster if the funding is forced down somebody's throat via some kind of household charge.

    Also, remember the BBC doesn't have any advertising revenue, no commercials on TV or radio. The RTE does have commercials.

    I think the RTE should simply come to terms with the new reality and downsize a bit as well, like anybody else who's in financial difficulty.

    Instead the RTE will go begging to politics, to get a law in RTE's favour to get the household charge and continue as before. Same scandals, same overpaid presenters, same biased news.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭RoTelly



    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    BBC own BBC Studios which in turn owns UKTV (GOLD, DAVE, ALIBI, YESTERDAY, EDEN and W, and the UKTV Player) which carry advertising and selling programming. BBC has a massive commercial arm largely derived from its public service arm.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,477 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    It would just be a once off anyway to squander for another ten years.

    Structural reform as they say is required.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    Catherine wants the household charge, she'll have no issue pushing it, maybe she want's exchequer funding.

    Either way they are not abolishing the licence fee, they are clamping down on non-payments and changing the way you pay the charge/tax/fee. Or they are paying for it via the Exchequre, you still pay.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,477 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    They also get four billion odd from the license,plus all the programmes they seel around the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 269 ✭✭Cyclonius


    I really dislike the idea of another household charge, even if it replacing the TV licence. As per previous commentators, the best solution is to downsize RTÉ, and pay it a grant from the public purse. I've been looking up figures for the other TV broadcasters, and it really highlights how bloated RTÉ, with its 1,800 to 1,900 staff, really is. Teilifís na Gaeilge, which runs TG4, had 121 employees in 2022. Virgin Media Television had 250 employees in 2015, and apparently 260 staff in 2020 (this second figure would be from a less well-known website, so I'd be less sure of it), which was more than sufficient to run 4 television channels.

    If RTÉ want to keep their current number of staff, they should be trying to produce more commercially viable entertainment that could be licenced out to Netflix, etc., or radically cut the size of the organisation to something more manageable. Why wouldn't an RTÉ of between 500 and 1,000 staff, on a total budget of €150 to €200m (government funding & advertising combined) be more than sufficient to meet our public service requirements? TG4 produces plenty of cultural related programming for a fraction of the price RTÉ does, and of at least comparable quality. Even if RTÉ had to reduce their output of Irish programming, so what? Most if it has a small to very small audience anyway, with the main people losing out being the various RTÉ insiders and friends currently feeding from the trough, all subsidised by the general Irish population/taxpayers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,285 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Quite possible neither she nor Leo have a strong preference on a funding model for RTE, given neither has signalled one publicly so far AFAIK. In that scenario, it is likely the guy who appears to have such a preference (Micheal for a household charge) who will drive the decision...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    Indeed. However, RTÉ don't even come close to similar sized countries when it comes to content or services provided. And if they can compare themselves to BBC when talking about repeats we can compare them to the BBC. I have been long enough here to end defending RTÉ against people comparing them to the BBC.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,477 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    According to comments on Newstalk this morning there's always twice the number of staff in the RTE radio or TV studio compared to independent broadcasters.

    That don't strike me as an organisation comfortable with progress.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    They should have closed LW down more than 10 years ago and focused on a decent DAB+ coverage all across Ireland. LW radios are very rare these days, even buying new ones is a bit hard. RTE Radio 1 also wasn't historically ever on LW, the LW transmitter came into play because of Atlantic 252, commercially between the CLT and RTE.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    I really wonder how much RTÉ saved closing LW and DAB? Honestly the continuation of those services were the issue at RTÉ.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Hard to say as we don't have the insight. I'd say, it was probably part of the problem. However the cost of LW must have been a concern otherwise they would have continued.

    DAB is roughly only one tenth of the cost of FM, plus RTE would have had the opportunity to transmit all of the programmes, like RTE Gold, Radio 2XM etc...

    LW was probably the worst in terms of cost and listenership or return of investment. On top of that, the RTE never historically transmitted Radio 1 on LW, - it only happened after Atlantic 252 and TeamTalk stopped. So RTE Radio 1 never had to rely on LW, no ageing listeners with old radios and nostalgia as well. The Irish expats in the UK relied already on other means than LW.


    The RTE's strategy was in a very dumb way twice wrong:

    • They've spent the cost of Radio 1 transmissions on LW for nearly 20 years, which has low to very low listenership.
    • They've missed building a DAB+ network to transmit their other programmes like Gold or 2XM to attract further listeners.

    And they've lost both, their LW transmission plus a decent DAB+ network, and have another problem, their finances.

    One can hardly say the word "smart" in this case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    In the case of LW they had a well organized Lobby that effectively prevented them from close LW, when the wanted to. I won't argue that case because I don't know the costs involved.

    RTÉ made the decision to close DAB, again to argue the case for the closure I would need more information, however I would point out the BAI's and the Independent Radio's unwillingness to push for DAB.

    however...

    Over the past decade RTÉ (as the title of this thread suggest) continually called for more money and played the poor mouth.

    I wonder, if they ever once looked spending on their own opulence and said "maybe we could keep both LW and DAB", would they be in the position they are currently in? I suggest not.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,241 ✭✭✭political analyst


    I can't imagine a broadcasting charge being brought in before the general election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    It's hard to say, as we don't have that insight.

    However even if one doesn't have the insight, it's certainly very poor management.

    RTE lost the longwave transmission and also was unable to tackle that organized lobby who wanted to keep the LW alive. This resulted in increased transmission cost.

    RTE didn't establish a decent DAB+ coverage, or foster or campaign DAB+ to transmit all the other programmes. As the younger audience doesn't care about FM anymore, just 4 FM stations nationwide simply won't do it in the long run, - so they will lose market share as well.

    RTE overpaid Ryan Tubridy and also other RTE characters seem to get an excessive salary for the kind of work they are doing.

    RTE has suffered a credibility issue, not only the above mentioned issues, but also the news is biased, often a with a decent portion of left wing populism and not a neutral view, - at least not like the BBC ( which isn't perfect either, but still better)

    Now introducing a forced household charge won't mend any of that. It'll make the RTE even more unpopular and link the RTE even closer to politics, als politics would be involved in getting that household charge legally binding. During ever rising rents and a general cost of living crisis, it'll be a tough one, especially if an election is on the horizon.

    RTE would have to be re-invented, and costs would have to be cut, whether they like it or not. Either in salary, or job layoffs or the sale of one or the other TV or radio network, doesn't matter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,828 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    If RTÉ make a decision on LW or on DAB, that is their decision to make. Depending on your view point it is either a good or bad decision. I would offer that RTÉ didn't really make a decision on either, showing their lack of leadership skills.

    I do think that if RTÉ had retained LW and DAB, and they had not had the bad governance that they currently have, it would just be a normal managerial decision.

    I am not saying their decisions on DAB and LW were bad, they could easily be, and they may well be more clear signs of bad management in RTÉ over the last few years.

    For example in 2021 there were able to move the NSO to the NCH, this would have saved they €8m in 2021 but the move was postponed to 2022, even though preparation for the move had started in 2018.

    There are plenty more day-to-day issues that they were unable to grapple with.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



Advertisement