Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1662663665667668915

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden




  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    That assumption was TimingBelt's, saying that Tuath buying these was a good thing as a fund could have easily snapped them up. I am far from convinced there was a queue of REITs beating a path to IRES's door for exactly the reasons you're mentioning.

    All we know for sure is that IRES will have sought out the highest bids, they did not offer it exclusively to Tuath.

    So, either way, the logic of Tuath buying these seems odd.

    If there were other bidders, why is a state backed housing agency spending 72m to outbid private investors buying fully tenanted blocks? Surely the 72m would be better spent somewhere that addresses or alleviates a currently unmet housing need?

    Or if there were no other bidders, why is a state backed housing agency spending 72m to buy fully tenanted blocks at a price private investors were not prepared to pay? Surely the 72m would be better spent somewhere that addresses or alleviates a currently unmet housing need?

    And if private investors were not prepared to pay 72m, the problems that Tuath and the government are trying to address, could be better addressed by ensuring the private market set the price for these apartments - be it 65m, 60m, 55m or whatever.

    Whatever way you look at, something seems off about this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭Blut2


    "If there were other bidders, why is a state backed housing agency spending 72m to outbid private investors buying fully tenanted blocks? Surely the 72m would be better spent somewhere that addresses or alleviates a currently unmet housing need?"

    The issue is the state has completely failed to build social/affordable housing (€1bn unspent in the capital budget for housing last three years etc) over the last decade and so our government is now panicking and throwing money at the problem - by buying up and leasing private sector housing instead.

    Which is obviously a terrible idea on multiple levels. It uses tax payers money to bid against them, it vastly over pays for the properties, it leaves no asset with the state long term when they're leases, and most fundamentally of all it doesn't actually help the housing crisis because it doesn't add any housing units to the market - it just adds to social housing by removing units from the private sector. Its a net gain of 0.

    That 72mn would pretty obviously have been much better spent actually building state owned apartments, and letting the IRES apartments go for sale to the private sector. But that would go against FG's ideology.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    There should be more plans like this for the city centre. A lot of ugly derelict buildings.


    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,010 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I wonder how many others live on OCS - I know there's a modern apartment above the Smiles dentists which was occupied when they were a customer of mine many years back.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Sherry Fitzgerald is acknowledging what we all know : The stock of second-hand homes available on the market has reached a historic low, according to estate agents Sherry FitzGerald.

    Quite low even comparing with previous summer months.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05



    Would have thought this would be better if it went on a smaller scale to smaller developers. They then steal a March on the large developers forcing them to act




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I was just after listening to David mcwilliams podcast and then this _ so funny

    Huge queues at ATMs in Dublin, Limerick, Dundalk and other parts of the country were reported this evening as people took advantage of the screw-up to withdraw cash from their Revolut accounts.


    The frenzied withdrawal of cash was despite warnings on social media that there is no such thing as free cash and the money will have to be repaid.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Price index seems to be following asking price data as expected. A return to month on month growth in Dublin and Ex Dublin after several months of declines.

    0.6% MoM increase countrywide.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    No surprise there, directly coincides with houses being closed out from awhile back when lending limits were upped to 4 times. We are only seeing the knock on affect in the data now.

    F$$ck me a toddler could have predicted the influence that would have - where do we get these policy makers (idiots) from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭DataDude


    That’s true, but again, politically speaking the biggest issue in Ireland is not the price of houses in isolation. It’s the supply of houses for purchase and the ability for people to secure loans to buy them.

    One way to address this is to give people more money to shift the supply curve. Prices go up, hopefully that stimulates more building, and despite the prices going up, if people are being leant more, they can still buy them (albeit with higher debt burdens).

    It’s economics 101. Rising prices is not the intention, it’s merely the by-product of them trying to stimulate supply. Can strongly debate whether the objective is correct, but I think it’s important to get away from the idea that policy makers want higher prices for the sake of higher prices.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    So this month's update:

    Nationally, house prices are at August-September 2022 levels, so the trend has definitely not continued, and the negative year on year did not materialise. Prices are currently 2.2% higher than this time last year.

    National excluding Dublin prices are up 0.8%. This is the largest increase in prices in this segment since July 2022. Prices are currently at an all-time-high in this segment.

    In Dublin, the negative trend has stopped and we have our first month of growth since September 2022. Prices are currently slightly above May 2022 levels, so Dublin while month-on-month positive, it remains year-on-year negative. The increase in June 2022 was 0.3%. This is a relatively modest increase.

    In terms of sales volumes, nationally there was 4759 properties sold. This is a drop of about 9% compared to May. Prices up, volumes down. In Dublin, there were 1414 properties sold. Again this is a drop, again of about 9%.

    These sales figures are household buyers only (same as the figures I gave last month).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Or if there were no other bidders, why is a state backed housing agency spending 72m to buy fully tenanted blocks at a price private investors were not prepared to pay? Surely the 72m would be better spent somewhere that addresses or alleviates a currently unmet housing need

    It's entirely consistent with what the state has been doing for 30 years ie

    Driving up the cost of housing and/or preventing the natural correction of prices during downturns



  • Posts: 14,769 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Working terms/conditions are extremely poor for construction workers in comparison to other professions

    Paid holidays, short term contracts, pensions, healthcare etc all below most. Very few young folk would consider it as a career option in the current environment

    Need something more secure and rewarding to attract workers. Irish wages in construction have been shown to be at or below EU averages

    Cut the white collar fat that adss little, no or negative value share it amongst those that do add value



  • Posts: 14,769 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Have you employed the services of a tradesman recently?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭Blut2


    First year apprentices as of this year are still only on €6.84 an hour, €274 a week. In second year they're on €411 a week. Both are significantly below what someone entering a minimum wage job in retail or anywhere else would get (€452 pw), mostly in much physically easier jobs.

    Its absolutely ridiculous that they're not paid at least minimum wage. Thats the rock bottom of what needs to be paid to get young people into the industry in decent numbers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭Bakharwaldog


    One watch out is that June tends to be a good month for valuation growth (as well as other summer months). So I'm reluctant to call this the bottom just yet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Have our own local pool, all reasnoble.

    The won't work for a contracted ever again as they were scalded in the crash



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    State bankrupt, so unable to intervene further, made up for it in recent years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Get em in after junior cert, like in the past. School as it is does not suit many young folk.

    This of course does not fix the terms and conditions. Many qualified apprentices are leaving for better pay and conditions in MNC



  • Posts: 14,769 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    When was the downturn in recent years should have led to property prices falling?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 310 ✭✭danfrancisco83


    When planning permission is refused, is the reason published? Looking for the reason for refusal on this - Planning Application: 221666 (Meath CoCo)



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,857 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Somewhat off topic, but yes, they always do, albeit sometimes it takes a day or two for the files to be uploaded. In this case, the Chief Executives Order shows that they didn't think the flood assessment required in FI request was submitted or sufficient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 310 ✭✭danfrancisco83


    Thanks for that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    So the government look to reduce building standards yet again, sounds great in principle - gives people the option to pay less and get less.

    But this is Ireland, so what will happen is we pay the same and get less. Bare concrete slab ceilings and unfinished block walls, and less light fittings/sockets, all for the same price as now.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Will someone send that minister to Victoria's Secret. My god does he love posing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Sandyford is such an odd spot. Lots of high density modern apartments, plenty of offices/jobs (Microsoft etc), good public transport (the Luas), and a pretty central South Dublin location. It should be a great town, but the whole place is a soulless ghost town instead.

    They really messed up not building some sort of village center there with a pub, a pharmacy, a few restaurants/cafes and some shops.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Surely if we are in chronic need of new supply, granting these apartments is a good thing, despite objections of current residents?

    yes apartment buildings are taller and more unsightly than a development of semi ds, but apartments are inarguably a better use of the space

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


Advertisement