Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

18568578598618621836

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,539 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Not for one solitary second do I believe this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,539 ✭✭✭✭phog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,842 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    The thing I still don't get is that if Coombes isn't a system for, why would be be called up in the first place instead of somebody like Deegan, Paul Boyle, or Jack O'Donoghue, or somebody with that more athletic style?

    (Before I get jumped on, no, I'm not actually suggesting that Boyle or JOD get called up. I was just giving examples of that style of backrow).

    I can only presume Prendergast is starting at 8 this weekend to protect Doris since Conan is still uncertain. Whatever about him being a more versatile player than Coombes, he certainly isn't a better eight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Locke_Lamora


    Admittedly I prefer Conan to Coombes, although I am a little bemused at Coombes’ complete alienation from a match day squad. He seems like a player I would’ve wanted a close look at in in-game scenarios.

    But what specific flaws do people think makes him unsuitable for Farrell’s game plan or what do you think he lacks as a player that prevents the national coaches from rating him at all really?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think previously, tackling may have been one area. It doesn’t speak to the quality, but he’s certainly improved his output there this season. (Fwiw, I also think he’s improved his mid to long range passing this season too).

    I suspect it could be to do with rucking tho. Ruck stats are obviously notoriously difficult to come by but it wouldn’t surprise me if Prendergast was quicker to the ruck than him, and ahead of him in that area.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    I do think there's more to it than the "system" line we hear so much. Doris and Conan are more aligned with that style of play and probably more comfortable attacking soft shoulders in wider channels, getting their hand free or acting as a pivot in midfield. But Coombes isn't bad at those things. It's not his stand out feature but we've all seen him offload and show good hands.

    The one thing I've always noted against him (and he has improved) was that he's generally good for one or two missed tackles in a game. I've seen him deliver some sloppy, borderline lazy tackling efforts in URC games which is often masked by just how impactful he is when he gets the ball in his hands. I'm not sure if that would be a point of difference but perhaps. But, if we're singling out specific elements of an individual, you could level discipline at the likes of Prendergast, McCarthy or even Doris (who had a bad habit of giving away a dumb penalty or two every game for a long time).

    I listed out the 7 guys I thought that were on the outside of the squad based on selections over the past year and Coombes was definitely in that group. He's got two top class No. 8s in front of him which is unfortunate. It will certainly be a case of him being better than guys who are in the squad but they are fortunate enough to occupy different positions where we are less stacked.

    But I think there's an issue that we're not privy to here. It might be attitude. It might be specifics of his performance. It might be how be that he likes pineapple on his pizza and Farrell is disgusted with him (and he'd be right to be disgusted). We'll never know. But I don't think Coombes is ever going to be in the Irish 23 with any consistency until, at the very least, Conan fades from that level in 1-2 years. Even then, you'd think Prendergast and Baird are probably next up for the 6/20 jersey (assuming POM is gone too by then).

    Just one other point of note, Coombes is seen as an option to cover lock by some. He started a single game there this season when Munster were absolutely down to the bare bones at lock. I was looking at the team photo from the Portugal camp with interest. There's not a hope that Coombes is 6'6" which is his listed height. You can see that lads like McCarthy and Baird (both listed at 6'6") are clearly taller than him and he's not that much taller than people like Bealham and VDF (both listed at 6'2"). He might be able to cover lock in a URC game at a pinch but I'm guessing versatility was never a consideration for him in the Irish coaches eyes.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 9,571 ✭✭✭fitz


    Agree with all of this except for the patently wrong opinion about pineapple on pizzas.

    To that, I'll give a robust "Shut up, Buer"



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,289 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    im a coombes fan, i think he has physical attributes that some of our other options dont have but...

    But what specific flaws do people think makes him unsuitable for Farrell’s game plan or what do you think he lacks as a player that prevents the national coaches from rating him at all really?

    in all honesty no one here can answer that, or more specifically, only the national coaches can answer that.

    while we play what appears to be "off the cuff" rugby at times, its been said by players in the group that its actually highly organised and detailed, with right and wrong decisions to be made during the plays. Maybe its simply a case of Coombes needing more time to "get it" rather than any technically or skill based deficiency?

    in truth, we dont know. he just has better players ahead of him for his main positions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,437 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    I think the issue for Coombes is more to do with the squad makeup, @Akrasia made a similar post (https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120990084/#Comment_120990084) about this already, but this is how I see it:

    6. O'Mahony, 7. Van der Flier, 8. Doris, 20.Conan, and then Baird is a 4/6 cover as follows:

    Scenario 1. O'Mahony injured (not available for selection): 6. Doris, 7. Van der Flier, 8. Conan, 20. Baird. Here Baird covers 4/6 as injury replacement and Doris could shift to 7 or 8 to cover those positions if needed with Baird coming in at 6.

    Scenario 2. Van der Flier injured (not available for selection): 6. Doris, 7. O'Mahony, 8. Conan, 20. Baird. Here Baird covers 4/6 as injury replacement and Doris could shift to 7 or 8 to cover those positions if needed with Baird coming in at 6.

    Scenario 3. Both O'Mahony and Van der Flier injured (not available for selection): 6. Baird, 7. Doris, 8. Conan, 20. Prendergast. Here Prendergast covers 6, 7 and 8.

    (The above is a simple example but as VdF, P O'M and Doris are our three 7's, then the same applies if any two of them are injured.)

    In Scenario 3 above this is the key difference between Coombes and Prendergast, as in this scenario there would be no cover at 7 should Doris get injured during the match. Now the question is, are the coaches taking these considerations into account for selection, for the final squad cover position, and I think they probably are. The reason being, against the first two sides in the pools they will want to protect O'Mahony, Van der Flier and Doris somewhat. So having a player that can play 7 and take some minutes off the others would be welcome. As @Neil3030 already made the point, (https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120992319/#Comment_120992319) it becomes more a case of whether we need Prendergast over McCarthy, or maybe even Kilcoyne/Loughman or McCloskey or Earls for example. Whereas for Coombes the case wouldn't be made in the same way, in Coombes case I think he is in direct opposition with Conan and they have made the choice to prefer Conan in this instance. So right now Prendergast is either in the 33 or he is the first man outside the 33 that would get the call up if one of the 5 back rows get injured, and so Coombes would need 2 injuries to get the call up. That's my understanding at least, looking at it from a pure spectator point of view and no knowledge of what goes on inside the training camp or what the selectors are thinking.

    I'm inclined to think Prendergast won't make the 33 though, as if they wanted to bring a 6th back row I think they would have had another specialist 7 in the training camp all along. I think Baird is ahead of Prendergast but I could be wrong.

    Post edited by Jump_In_Jack on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,842 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Although Coombes only started one game in the row, it's worth noting he finished a number of games there this season.

    I'll have to look at some pictures myself but I'd have put Coombes at around 6'5 myself - at the lower limit of the lock height standard.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,553 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    This is exactly it in my view.

    When mapping out your "worst case scenarios" with a rigid 33 man squad , Prendergast is a better fit than Coombes given the positions he covers and the positions covered by the other players that are already certain to be part of the squad.

    Is Coombes a better 8 than Prendergast - Yes

    Is Coombes a better 6 than Prendergast - Maybe

    Is Coombes a better 7 than Prendergast - No

    Given the make up of the Irish squad , Ireland need cover at 6 and 7 not 8.

    It's not about being "good enough" or "better" per se , it's about offering the solution to a need should it arise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    Coombes has 2 caps for Ireland? one A cap? The Maori games in NZ?

    He has been knocking around some squads and plenty he hasn't.

    The coaching ticket have spent 4 years trying to build a squad they think will win the World Cup. During that time Coombes hasn't really been in the mix apart from in the odd squad.

    Sorry but it is totally over the top reaction to him getting dropped out of the squad. If he was ever going to be in the picture he would have more caps already and he would have started v Italy to give him more minutes.

    It's totally over the top. If the guy had 20-30 caps and was playing in 6 nation match's etc you could maybe say it's a shock but he wasn't.

    Blade is not far off him in terms of caps. Played v Italy and yet not really a whisper about him getting dropped. The guy has been in fantastic form all season, is a seasoned pro and has been playing great rugby for years now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It's totally over the top. If the guy had 20-30 caps and was playing in 6 nation match's etc you could maybe say it's a shock but he wasn't.

    But I don’t think anyone has said it’s a shock? You’re misrepresenting what people are actually saying here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    Look at the amount of posts since the initial squad was announced for a guy who has 1-2 caps. It's over the top. Plus what is even worse is if Ireland get knocked out Im sure all the same people will be waiting to say it would have been different if they picked "on form" and took Coombes :-)

    Blade is an excellent example of a player in a similar position and how many Ireland fans are posting about him?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,798 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Coombes is a better player playing for the league-winning team. Its not really a good comparison.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    All the same people?

    This is just as hyperbolic as the posts you’re deigning to criticise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    Both are not in the squad. Both have nearly the same amount of caps.

    Not sure why you think Coombes is a better player. How many players for Connacht won the league and still didnt get into the squad so not sure what relevance that has.

    The smiley face was the give away that it was a tongue in cheek comment. But hopefully Ireland will win and we won't have it.

    Anyway the point was the talk about Coombes is over the top. I have now added to that so I will leave you at it. Whats the odd on coming back in two weeks and you will still be discussing Coombes? 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Not sure why you think Coombes is a better player.

    Cos he’s performed more consistently at a higher level.

    And I think it’s fair to say, when Connacht won the league, it was an inferior competition. The SA teams have added to it greatly.

    Anyway the point was the talk about Coombes is over the top.

    He was dropped from the squad all of 2 days ago. Disagree by all means, but it’s hardly over the top to be discussing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    I also think there's discussion as it's a bit of a surprise dropping. No one really expected him to make the final squad but to be dropped before getting a game is unexpected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    Why? he hasn't been playing at all for Ireland. Sorry but what do you think the management would see in him playing for a few mins in a game they havne't seen in games for Munster or in training over the last 2 years?

    im sure people are trying to position this as an attack on Coombes when it is not, as I said I would expect he will get capped post World Cup.

    Im just making the relevant point the guy hasn't been playing for Ireland so I don't see why anyone thinks its a surprise he is been dropped.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    That Connacht squad was better represented, 7 Connacht players were in the 32 man 2016 summer tour to South Africa. It's likely to be 5 or 6 of the Munster squad from the 2023 URC winning team in France.

    Connacht also had a lot more non Irish qualified players; 5 of the starting 15 who won the 2016 URC final were non Irish qualified, 6 of the remaining 10 players traveled to South Africa. Of the Munster team who won the 2023 URC final only one player was non Irish qualified, most likely only 4 of the remaining 14 will travel to France.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Because why call him into the squad in the first place if you have already decided he doesn't make the grade. I expected everyone in the squad to get a run during these games.

    Coombes doesn't make a 33-man squad for Ireland. But he does make the 42-man squad. So clearly the Irish management rate him. I expected him to get a game to at least maintain his match sharpness in case he is required to go to France.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,860 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Hmmm, I'm not sure criticism of Coombes' defence stacks up. He's 15th overall in the URC for tackles made (Munster have Kleyn in 6th and Hodnett in 3rd... Conor Oliver leads the way). He's in joint 12th for turnovers won, alongside Beirne.

    He tops the stats for carries (28 ahead of 2nd). Made about as many metres as Jimmy O'Brien with ball in hand (40th). Top 4 for tries scored.

    The coaching staff must have their reasons and I trust them while not agreeing with them, but I think we're missing a trick not having more of a look at him in green, and I don't think it's that outrageous an assertion. I personally prefer him over Conan every day of the week but I suspect many on here don't.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,553 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    He is absolutely part of the wider group and if Doris or Conan were to be injured then Coombes will be right there as a potential replacement.

    Most people have been able to accurately predict 28 or 29 of the 33 Man squad for at least 6 months so there were ~15 players training with the group all summer to get on of the maybe 4 or 5 places that were realistically up for grabs across the squad.

    Those ~15 players are still part of the group and if someone gets injured and you need to call up a replacement you want them already up to speed on calls etc.

    They don't all need to get some of the limited game time to fill that back-up role.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    Nailed it here really, Coombes is TOH from 2016



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,798 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    And Jamie Heaslip had 3 caps when he was left out of the 2007 World Cup squad which was an absurd mistake, and he is no way comparable to Blade. I don't know why you're so focused on cap numbers. As to why I think Coombes is better? Cause he does his core job better and I certainly think had Coombes taken the field at 8 in the last match the drop off would have been a lot less than it was when Blade came on at 9.

    I didn't think Coombes would get into the squad - not sure anyone is particularly surprised though. I am surprised he's getting zero game time. There is talk about it because almost everything else was already guessed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    That's why he was sent back to Munster who have a number of games lined up. Players get injured so he was called in because someone might pick up an injury.

    If he is going to sit around Ireland camp with no game time why would they keep him if they can send to Munster and he can play some of their warm ups?

    That would be a better move to me than throwing him on for 20 mins in a match while they know he isn't travelling. Gve those 20 mins to a player who will travel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Im just making the relevant point the guy hasn't been playing for Ireland so I don't see why anyone thinks its a surprise he is been dropped.

    You’re painting all comments as being surprised he’s been dropped from the squad.

    But I don’t think too many are surprised to see him not make the 33.

    Posters are saying they’re surprised he’s been dropped without any gametime.

    That’s a different point to the one you’re claiming they’re making.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Munster don’t have a warm-up game til Sept 8th.

    He won’t see any more gametime with them in the meantime than he would have staying with Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    Jesus are we bringing up 2007 now. EOS had a plan in 2007 and that was about having 23 players and that was it. Nobody else. he had done ok with that plan till 2007 when it fell apart in the World Cup. Even if Heaslip travelled in 2007 he would never have played.

    Im having a discussion with others. You keep trying to drag this into me making personal comments about the player or other posters. Not sure why. It's just an opinion

    Again why play him if you are not bringing him? you are just wasting valuable minutes when you could try other combinations. They have only 3 games after all. Farrelll never seemed to be a man to throw out caps/minutes just for the sake of it which it seems to be the request now.



Advertisement
Advertisement