Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Tattoos and the Gardai

1235710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,839 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    To be just as clear -

    Just to be clear I purposely engineered the the hypothetical to suit my argument, of course I did, I am trying to highlight it.

    That’s exactly the point I was making - you engineered the strawman of the refugee who shares your views in the first place. It was completely unnecessary, and confounded then by claiming your strawman was being attacked. It was funny though 😂

    Me personally? I’d be less concerned about the tattoos on the officers arm than I would be about the weapon he’s carrying! But y’know, that’s just me, and this thread is about tattoos. I really have no idea of prostitutes opinions on tattoos or their knowledge of historical characters!

    That being said, I do appreciate artwork, not so much a fan of arse antlers or barcodes, it varies 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,352 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Ah yeh right.. No sign of that sentiment in your posts but, yes you have that line in there ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,260 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,094 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    It's like dressing in the same clothes you wore in your teens/20s into your 30s, 40s and beyond. What we thought was cool then may be cringe now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,260 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    You created a straw man in the first place, pot…meet kettle. 🤣



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Would you feel the same about haircuts/colouring??


    You raise a valid question - are there any specific rules keeping gingers out of the Gardai? And if not, why not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson


    I'm not surprised, this being Catholic ireland and all.

    It wouldn't surprise me if you needed to know th bible back to front to get into the guards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,094 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Personally, I couldn't care less about a guard having tats as long as they did a good job, but the way things are going, we'll be lucky to attract very many new recruits. Tats or no tats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson


    They should be focusing on more important things.

    Giving gardi more power to clobber scumbags if they get out of hand for one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,560 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    A sailor told me years ago that they were a way of identifying sailors lost at sea when a body was recovered. Made sense.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    Colour only fades if it's not been done right.

    I've 2 full sleeves done 10 years ago and it's still the same as the day it was done.

    And from a personal view I've interviewed 100s of people and found people with tattoos absolutely as good as people without them. As I said earlier in the thread the garda need to move in to the 21st century.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,948 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    You do realise lots of people get tattoos in their thirties and far after?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,094 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,893 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    I've noticed a nice few people who'd you consider older getting tattoos often very visible.

    Mainly women ranging from housewives to teachers/nurses.

    I think it's something that interested them with a good while.

    They were generally encouraged by a changing Ireland and family/friends.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,370 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Ah that would make you the only human to ever exist who does not have implicit bias and judge based on appearance.

    Edit: unless you are blind, apologies if you are, then I admit you are not judging people based on appearance

    Oh....yeah....sugarplum...

    Oh and one of these 🤣, am I doing it right? Lol

    Post edited by joseywhales on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,260 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Are you speaking on behalf of every human, are we?

    You’re getting a bit upset about all of this, did you see someone with tattoos this morning, and they were nice and able to do their job? That must have been traumatic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,370 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    This is a good laugh, yes I am so upset, lol. Is this to become a competition of apathy now?

    To be clear, Yes I am a speaking on behalf of all humans who can see. Bias is a fact, you could describe the life of a human as a series of judgements.

    The fashion industry exists because people make judgement based on appearance.

    What a revelation this must be for you!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,962 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Very identifiable though. You could only do it once. You'd be stuffed after that..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,347 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    The problem nowadays is what is not 'offensive' to one person can easily be offensive to another.

    Indeed you only have to look at this thread to see how people are split on this topic

    I don't mind tattoos per-se but I do think in certain professions visible tattoos shouldn't be allowed for the reason above alone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,355 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Personally I wouldn't care if a person had tats like a Maori tribal leader if they were good at the job.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,355 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    I doubt the clergy have much say in the workings of the Gardai these days and even when they did tattoos weren't a topic that came up for discussion.

    We have an ex RUC prod as commissioner now.



  • Posts: 14,769 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,352 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Thing is, josey , most people of intelligence are aware bias exists and do everything they can to mitigate against it .

    That is the whole premise of legislation for equality and anti discrimination. To prevent personal bias creeping in to everyday life .

    It is why our country has become more enlightened with education over time , as well as our own historical struggles with a class driven oppressor .

    We all have personal opinions about who and what we like .

    That doesn't mean that those personal opinions should influence how we perceive others and treat them in a fair and equal society .

    That would be most unprofessional and unacceptable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,839 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    That doesn't mean that those personal opinions should influence how we perceive others and treat them in a fair and equal society .


    Perhaps ideally speaking, it shouldn’t, but employers, AGS in this instance, also have to be conscious of the fact that people’s personal opinions, prejudices, biases and so on, DO influence their perception of Gardaí.

    That’s why for all the people arguing that in their anecdotal experience people with tattoos are no different than anyone else, etc, empirical evidence still suggests that there still exists a negative perception of tattoos - people generally still correlate tattoos with negative traits:

    The present research contributes to the public discussion on how police officers with tattoos and piercings are perceived by citizens. Using an experimental design, our studies indicate that police officers with tattoos and piercings are perceived as somewhat less trustworthy, less competent, and more threatening than the ones without tattoos and piercings, despite relatively positive explicit attitudes towards piercings for police officers. In cases of dispute, policy makers and judges decide whether a police officer is allowed to have a body modification on a visible part of the body. They need to weigh the right of each individual to express their personality against public expectations of police officers. 

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11896-021-09447-w



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,370 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I agree with you completely. Honestly, I am not really perturbed to the point of action if I were to see tattoos on a police officer, I would not expect him/her to be incompetent/competent based on that alone. I was just pointing out that one might have prejudice toward tattoos, indeed I do, if I make a tiny effort to examine myself. It's irrelevant really that I would not have a big problem, the point is the edge cases. The vulnerable, who cannot afford the level of reflection that most of us can. These people are living in a world of fear and reaction and they are the ones that police have to deal with or help. There is a lot more structure to the world than is commonly spoken about because we take it for granted but absolutely the framework of dress and appearance is a huge part of it. The leadership of AGS are no doubt aware of that, after they police by consent, it's key, whether we as individuals care or not about tattoos or language or demeanor or whatever is not really relevant iny opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,352 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    They certainly do need to weigh it up.

    And definitely if there is shortage as there currently is .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,352 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Fair enough.

    I just believe that if we can accept surgeons as trustworthy with tattoos , that it is really time to relax the rules or allow some changes to the uniform to allow gardaí a bit of lattitude with their personal choice.

    And as regards those on the edges you describe who may be vulnerable , no profession can cater for the fears or anxieties if every single person, but there are ways a person can reassure and gain trust .

    There would be many for example who would object to being treated by a person of colour or by a member of the opposite sex. It is appropriate to take this into account in some cases but there is a limit to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,370 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Well that is very relevant, I don't really know how they can expect to attract and retain any talent whatsoever given the current pay scale, conditions etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,839 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    It's irrelevant really that I would not have a big problem, the point is the edge cases. The vulnerable, who cannot afford the level of reflection that most of us can. These people are living in a world of fear and reaction and they are the ones that police have to deal with or help. 

    I know it’s not your intent, but let’s not go making excuses for bigotry based upon our own beliefs about other people.



    There is, but AGS aren’t at the point yet where they need to be considering relaxing the restrictions in their policies on tattoos in order to attract new recruits.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,656 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Tattoos are allowed provided they are covered up by the uniform. So it's basically only tattoos on the hands, neck and face that will cause problems.

    If you allow visible tattoos then you get into the thorny question of what is and isn't acceptable. Unless you're an idiot you will agree that some tats are not acceptable. So now you have a difficult and subjective process, and a waste of taxpayer money. Imagine a committee sitting around saying "skulls on the face, yea or nay?" for every possible tat they can think of. No doubt some experts would get involved, wasting more money. And then putting that list down on paper. And then having a dispute process for all the things you forgot to think of.

    It's simpler to say have whatever you want, provided it's not visible. Which is the current rule.



Advertisement