Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1660661663665666915

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Our Euro-area interest rate is still only 3.5%. Its 5.5% in the US currently, and 5.25% in the UK.

    Euro area inflation is still running at 5.3% overall as of July, 10.8% for food. That 5.5% overall figure was being dragged down by cheaper oil and gas prices too which were at -6% in July, but which have gone into reverse in recent weeks. So the overall figure is going to be trending up again soon.

    Plenty of Euro countries also still have extremely high overall inflation - Slovakia (10.2%), Croatia (8.1%) Lithuania (7.1%) etc.

    I wouldn't be betting on the increases to stop yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Again not saying they won't increase it. All I am saying is they really need IR hikes to soak in the economy for it to take effect! Any rate hike won't see impacts for at least 6 months to a year after it was done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭wassie


    The 4x LTI only applies to FHB. Otherwise, its still 3.5x with exemptions for a small portion of borrowers, so the average is somewhere in between.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    You'll find that the in 16 and 18 the central bank were strongly opposed to relaxing the rules and in fact tightened the numbers that could borrow at 4 times income in 18, despite intense political pressure. This coincided with a stabilisation of prices up untill covid

    This stance only changed when the cental bank head changed. An appointment heavily critiqued by many including previous heads of the CB that were tasked with cleaning up the mess from the celtic tiger regime



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    If an economy can't cope with normalization of rates, one suspects the economy was murdered prior to the rate rises rather than a consequence of rate rises



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    What do you think 30% shared ownership plus 10% ftb grant does. Your 4x income may only be purchasing 60% of a home where as its greater than 90% in UK and US

    I'm also pretty sure you are aware that both the UK and US have significant storm clouds gathering, with affordability in the US worse than the 07/08 peak



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    I totally agree here, The EU economic growth was mediocre at best when the interest rates was 0% for close to a decade. So I can only imagine what is in front of us. But remember it is the same people that made those decision still at the helm of the ship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    The issue is all these scheme are aimed at building more houses. But at the same time the policy implies that average Joe can't buy these houses and Bob the builder can't build them at a reasonable price. Hence they need massive subsidies, which again isn't very sustainable.

    But since these subsides are aimed at new builds, which are only a small percentage of the housing market. But no doubt they will have impact on the market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 317 ✭✭SimpleDimple


    Went to view a house on Thursday, it’s listed at an ambitious €665k. Spoke to the agent a few days after, having had the third viewing they now have an offer of €630, the vendor isn’t interested in selling at that price. I was also at a different viewing where the agent acknowledged the price was too high but the seller insisted on it so as a result they weren’t getting offers.

    I’ve been to a few others like this, sellers not getting what they think the house of worth and so leaving it up there. Hopefully (as a perspective buyer) it’s an indication of some cooling off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Is the mods deleting messages from this thread or is there an ongoing issue with boards? There was a chain about interest rates yesterday, that just vanished. Only noticed as there is a notification for a comment I made, and can't read it now!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    In the headlines today :Why Ireland’s biggest private landlord is struggling - despite average rents of €1,800.

    The biggest worry about Ires is its exposure to interest rates.

    Last week it reached a deal to sell almost 200 west Dublin apartments to the Tuath Housing Agency for €72 million and is looking at offloading further assets.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Wonder could there be an opportunity for the state to buy out those long term leases should this trend continue

    360k for Dublin apartments for a housing agency seems not bad considering the market



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Do you think if they had put those 200 apartments individually on the open market in one go they would have got more per unit?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Even if they got more per unit individually the relevant question is if the additional overheads of selling each unit individually would cancel that out. It would probably need to be a significant additional % to be worthwhile.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Yeah, I get that, from IRES point of view it makes sense, it was a bit of a hypothetical question mainly curious as to what others think what the impact of 200 apartments on at say 360k a piece and what would they sell for.

    Would they get snapped up at asking immediately given they represent good value to current prices?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    I think they should have been sold individually to families.

    I am not familiar with the area but I don't think they would have been snapped up at 360k a peace. I see plenty of apartments for sale around that price in Dublin in good areas and they don't fly off the shelves or at least that is what I think.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Interesting is even so they achieve good rents, still they don't make enough.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,702 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    What is with the huge variation of rent for similar rooms. I see some double rooms asking €600 and in the same complex others asking €1200. Would it be presumed €1200 rooms are allowing couples while the €600 isn't. I am putting up a room to rent and I am confused.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I've no idea, I'm comparing to the quoted cost of construction we hear bandied about here

    To think Nama flogged apartments beside tallaght hospital at what worked out at circa 100k per unit shows the opportunities that have been missed over the last decade



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Personally I'd take the cost of construction figures bandied about with a very large pinch of salt!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    All of the apartments would have had tenants in them, the chance of any individuals wanting to buy them with tenants in-situ would be in the 1%. If they would have given notice for 200 families to vacate the premises so they could be sold, imagine there would have been another outrage!



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I wonder what the profile of the tenants was.

    Tuath are cost rental, affordable housing type of specialists. If the majority of the tenants don't qualify for these schemes, I would have thought if Tuath had 72m to invest they would be have been better off targeting their funds towards the demographic most in need of their support.

    So we have a booming market with rents and property prices driven higher because of scarcity of supply.

    Notwithstanding that, the largest profit/return for shareholders driven business in the market is offloading their properties as a forced seller.

    And the best price obtainable for these properties in this booming market is from a not for profit housing association.

    Seems legit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    You really need to understand REIT structure to kind of understand why they sold them in the first place.

    Most REIT are asset rich and cash poor. REIT's pay no corporate tax in Ireland, this is because the tax structure is setup in a way that they must return 85% of profits to their shareholders. Thus moving the tax liability from REIT's to the shareholders. This also means that most REIT's have to borrow money for new projects and have very little capital in them. As interest rates rise and property value slowly goes down from the peak of last year, they will need to abide by their required LTV (loan to value). To do this, they will need to liquidate their assets fairly quickly and this is what is happening. Selling to any individuals is a nonstarter (it is to slow of a process), hence it will be another REIT, investors or housing agency would have bought it anyway. Thankfully in this case Tuath bought them, I bet they got it at a fairly decent discount too.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Sure, i know why they are selling -, they have no choice. They're forced sellers. As you say individual sales a non starter - "hence it will be another REIT, investors or housing agency".

    Unlikely to be another REIT as they're all in the same boat, it was always most likely to be a housing agency or the state.

    Totally understand why this is happening, it just doesn't seem like the market is underpinned by solid fundamentals.

    Charitable and not for profit housing agencies and the state might well achieve their aims better by not buying these properties and waiting to see how the market gets on without their support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    I still believe Tuath buying these are the best outcome here. Remember these aren’t distressed assets, someone will buy them at the end of day. People were complaining that individual Chinese investors were snapping up houses in Dublin, imagine if the Chinese setup a REIT’s of their own so people in China could invest in them by buying up these properties. If I recall correctly the Canadians are the biggest shareholders in IRES as an example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    They technically don’t need to borrow but choose to do so as the bank loan is a cheaper than using investors capital. It also allows them to buy more properties. I would agree it’s a good outcome because you could easily have a bigger more capitalised fund snap it up as it’s still turning a 6% yield



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    All explained here




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    Love all the people in the comments of the journal saying "These should be put on the open market where normal people can buy them".

    Some problems with that.

    You wont get these vacant for years. The same people looking for them to be sold to regular buyers will then be marching when the residents get their notice.

    The tax payer who is funding the charities is like a bottomless pit of money, so much easier to just spend it and then put the hand out for more.

    At the end of the day its just a restructure for the REIT - at the tax payers expense. Not going to be any new properties added to the market and its not going to have any effect on the price of other properties.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,938 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Who funds Tuath? Is it funded by the government essentially?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden




Advertisement