Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What have you watched recently? 3D!

194959799100118

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,044 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    Watched the Covenant tonight. Very good film. Very intense. Quite like Argo. If you liked Argo, you'd love this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie




  • Administrators Posts: 55,019 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Dead Shot.

    Sky Original movie, IRA member chasing down a British Army soldier on a personal vendetta.

    A big fat meh. Like practically every movie I’ve ever seen about The Troubles it fails to hit the mark for me.

    Colin Morgan is excellent, no complaints about the acting in any of the lead roles. As a nordy myself, I was glad to see (or hear) no fake northern accents, an immediate movie killer for me.

    The story though is somewhat nonsensical and also has massive pacing issues. I felt like it lacked a middle, we went from the beginning straight to the end.

    A few events happen that are so obviously for the sake of advancing the plot, it’s not even disguised.

    The ending was just stupid, far beyond the realms of believable.

    5/10 for me, an inflated score because Colin Morgan does as good a job as he could with this script.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,965 ✭✭✭buried


    Dungeons and Dragons : Honour Among Thieves (2023)

    Thought this was godawful. Too much lame sarky dialogue shoehorned all over the place, after 20 minutes it felt like being trapped in a youtube comments section with everyone trying to be a comedian, and it got very boring, very fast. Hugh Grant was good but that was about it. 3/10

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    Haven't posted in years on this thread but used to be a frequent poster. Last Saturday I was in HMV Belfast and had the pleasure of spending a couple of hours browsing their very impressive physical media sections.....apparently the Belfast store is the largest HMV in the world now, strange! I'd forgotten how enjoyable browsing can be, and then I see today HMV are going to re-open (again) on Henry Street - I hope their movie selection mirrors Belfast's in terms of quality and selection.

    Anyway, brought a tonne of stuff that I don't need (lol), but first watch was Thief on Arrow Blu Ray. I last watched this 30+/35+ years ago and whilst I had some memories of the plot (to be fair I was but a teenager) , a lot of it was relatively fresh. It screams Michael Mann from the start, from the shot selection, the darkness combined with neon colour, the rain, etc. I have to be honest, I liked it way more than I expected to - and considering it's a Mann production I had high expectations. I absolutely loved the Tangerine Dream Soundtrack too, though I'm always partial to moody instrumental electronic music. Parts of it feel a bit dated, but that's to be expected. James Cann is by his usual standards very under-stated in this, and I had forgotten Willie Nelson was in it (and he looks so young). Dennis Farina and William Peterson have very minor roles. The restoration is great. I'd recommend it to anyone who likes Michael Mann's work. 7.5/10

    Post edited by ButtersSuki on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    I love SOTL, it usually gets a yearly viewing. I have god knows how many versions on god knows how many formats. Almost everyone takes the two lead performances for granted at this stage, but I've always felt Ted Levine's work in this is hugely under-rated. How he didn't get a Best Supporting Actor Award - let alone nomination - for this is utterly baffling.You could even argue Scott Glenn deserved a nomination! Considering how SOTL got so many nominations that year, these two seem like huge omissions. Levine's performance is the one I admire most TBH.

    1992 was a very strange year for the Best Supporting Actor Category. A win for Jack Palance in City Slickers. A nomination for Tommy Lee Jones in JFK - whilst ignoring Donald Sutherland's altogether better performance in the same film. Very strange indeed.

    Post edited by ButtersSuki on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Yeah, every performance was near flawless and as subsequently problematic as the character of Bill might be to some, the performance itself was remarkably nuanced given how easily "gimmick serial killer" tends to be played in Hollywood. As I said only Dr. Chilton came close to something like a caricature - but even that ultimately worked within the framework of the subtext and Starling's perspective.

    It's a quality movie and one of those ones people know through cultural osmosis and mimicry - but it absolutely stood up to that weight and subsequent stereotype. Even the style of the cinematography felt unique: it's one thing to push a camera wayyyyyy into the actors' faces, but to make it work and not look amateur takes talent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Ninthlife


    IMDb: : Sisu 

     https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14846026/

    Tarantino meets John Wick

    Has a spaghetti western feel and very simple story, no overly drawn out dialogue. Very good fx. Its violent, gruesome, gory and over the top. Got to suspend belief in parts but overall a very enjoyable action flick

    7.5/10



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,618 ✭✭✭✭billyhead




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Ninthlife




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,606 ✭✭✭nachouser


    I was kinda avoiding Renfield because it sounded like too much of a good thing - Nic Cage as Dracula - but it's pretty fun so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭Decuc500


    The Witch Part 1: The Subversion

    Bit of a convoluted title.

    It’s a South Korean film that’s like a mix of Brian De Palma’s The Fury, The Matrix and Stranger Things.

    A young girl escapes from a facility that seems to be home to children with telekinetic powers. She is taken in by an old couple who found her collapsed on their farm. Ten years later she gains national attention on a tv talent show and heavily armed soldiers from the facility are sent to kill her.

    There’s a quirky tone to the film. It goes from light hearted to dark and violent very quickly. Kind of typical of a lot of South Korean films I have seen.

    Five American/Korean kids with telekinetic powers are also introduced. They are also trying to kill the girl and I wasn’t sure exactly why. I just went with the flow at that stage.

    When the impressive action set pieces finally arrive they are inventively filmed. A lot of these South Korean sci-fi or action films are like grown up versions of silly Hollywood superhero movies and, without sounding snobby, are so much better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,959 ✭✭✭Sugarlumps


    Fatal Attraction – Tis an awesome film. Glenn Close is terrifying. Holds up really well.

    I could watch Michael Douglas in just about anything.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 6,923 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    In Greece at the moment, where Mubi has a Krzysztof Kieslowski retrospective. I got the opportunity to rewatch the Three Colours Trilogy. I haven't watched any of them individually or collectively in many many years and have almost forgotten how good all of them are, I viewed them with a renewed interest.

    Blue is the one that has given me the harder time in the past due to the subject matter and the slow pace. I think I enjoyed it much more this time and appreciated the small details. White is still an easy watch as the story is somewhat lighter. Not much to say about Red: my favourite Kieslowski film and I reckon it would place fairly high in my "best films of all time" list... if I ever make one.

    Special note to the direction of photography - that utilises the three colours across all 3 films. I especially liked the use of red in the first film.

    Preisner's music is fantastic - it's amazing that he was able to create these superb scores with what sounds as very uncomplicated themes.

    And superb performances all across the board.

    2025 gigs: Selofan, Alison Moyet, Wardruna, Gavin Friday, Orla Gartland, The Courettes, Nine Inch Nails, Rhiannon Giddens, New Purple Celebration, Nova Twins



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    How to Blow Up a Pipeline (2022)

    A conflicting watch, given I've lately slumped to a resignation the alt-right, conspiratorially minded and those riven by denial have, ultimately, won and our path towards climate collapse is now irrevocable. What lasting value has an indie film that might present a group of desperate people's act of "self defence" as something necessary and sacrificial - when we have past the point of no return, all the while those with the most power (and greatest ability to weather the changes) are doing the least amount to curtail our slide towards an inhospitable planet?

    Ughhh... so, movies!

    Anyway, divorcing my creeping fatalism, this turned out to be a really taut procedural of all things: one where there was an exacting, methodical tone & structure rather than an over-cranked reach for melodrama or lofty pretension towards a lecture on environmental morality; instead an approach that never robbed the tension from a balanced escalation as events began to swirl towards their conclusion. Indeed, the (very textual) morality was presented with a shrug of the shoulder and resolute mentality that what was about to happen was unavoidable - and had to happen. No equivocation, no "both sides" cake-eating ... the pipeline had to go.

    A pulsing, swirling soundtrack (one that perhaps aped Tenet's a little too closely) worked in tandem with really canny, propulsive editing; only broken by choice moments to snap away from a moment of shock & suddenness - but in a manner that teased more than it frustrated. This all creating a sense of being at once an exciting ticking-clock thriller and quasi-documentary at the same time; the conspiracy presented with a methodical energy & execution. The actors all played their roles with understated determination, it was all very naturalistic and unfussy.

    Really, the story structure operated like some inverted Ocean's Eleven: these people weren't "The Best of the Best"; some dazzling array of disparate talents all coalescing into something slick & effortless. No, instead this was a collective of messy, ordinary people fumbling towards their goal. Never presented as incompetent or idiotic however, but shown to possess that kind of determined, trial-and-error amateurism someone at our level might bring - if, ya' know, we decided that we might die waiting for the Corporate Class to save us, if we didn't take action ourselves.

    I'm not sure the whole thing was quite as incendiary as the film thought it was; but then again, that might just be the aforementioned fatalism speaking for me. It certainly had a relatively radical notion within the topic of discussion that is Climate Change: that these people were acting out of self-defence, the first shots fired by those who would willingly poison the air and water while others shrugged concerns off as "woke, lefty liberals".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,044 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    I like many of your reviews Pixelburp. Sorry but I don't understand some of the others. You're on a different intellectual scale than me.

    But I have watched about half hour of this, and put it off. Was going to get back to it again to finish it. But something has always put me off.

    Did you think it was any good. Is ti worth seeing it out. Does it get a little more like a thriller/action piece than what the first half hour suggests. so far just seems to be going through a few back-stories, and shows them pouring bomb mixtures into containers. Or overall is it more of an arty type movie.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,546 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Not really anything ‘arty’ about How To Blow Up A Pipeline. It is, in its essence, a grounded, gritty and tense movie about a group of people trying to pull off a dangerous job. It intercuts the immediate drama with flashbacks to give context (a standard heist movie would have frontloaded those sections as opposed to the in media res opening here), but is also a very tense piece of cinema that harkens back to something like The Wages of Fear - maybe not as relentlessly tense as that, but similar sense of things could go awry at any moment. It very much ratchets up the tension as it goes.

    The main thing that separates it from the mainstream is its unapologetically radical political viewpoint - the film makes no qualms about its perspective that blowing up a pipeline is a just and worthy cause in the face of overwhelming corporate power. But the filmmakers (and very much plural here - there’s a rare multi-person ‘a film by…’ credit, in what feels like an apt acknowledgement of the film’s themes) have packaged that in an immediately compelling and high-stakes thriller.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Don't think I'm on any intellectual scale different to other people but thanks, I guess? I'd have said I'm as thick as mince 😂

    As to the film, yes I'd say it's worth finishing - but I'd say that for any movie. 30 minutes isn't enough to know the full picture, where something might be going. Manys a movie doesn't doesn't make sense til the twist comes, after all.

    Here though, the tension cranks up as D Day gets closer and various small wrinkles present themselves (as they invariably do with heists and "job" movies). It's a crime caper film, and something like Ocean's 11 albeit featuring a bunch of (crazy?) amateurs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,044 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    Ok. Thanks.

    I watched new film called Influencer last night. Its quite good.

    Will throw on the rest of Pipeline tonight. Actually, I'll out it back to the beginning cause its a few weeks ago since I watched the beginning. Better to watch it all again in one go to appreciate it better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    Another purchase from my recent trip to HMV Belfast was Melancholia on Artificial Eye Blu Ray (I subsequently found that I already have this as part of a Lars Von Trier Shock and Awe Boxset, but not the first time I've done this 🙄). Not the easiest watch at time, but wow, this is simply a masterpiece. The super slow-mo opening images (and sporadically throughout the film) are breathtaking beautiful - this really is putting the art in arthouse cinema. The accompanying music to those scenes are powerful in their own right, and perfectly chosen to add to the cinematography. Its brutal depiction of depression is not an easy watch, but the reward is worth the journey. Kirsten Dunst's performance is simply incredible (prob. her best since Drop Dead Gorgeous or Marie Antoinette) and worth watching for alone. I avoided it in the cinema on release (and clearly in my own Blu Ray collection - lol) for years as I didn't really want to delve too deeply into the subject matter but I'm so glad I did.

    It's not for everyone. If you like mainstream/blockbuster movies you'll most likely be better off avoiding this.

    An easy 9/10, and I say that as someone who rarely gives anything over 7.5.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,902 ✭✭✭brokenbad


    Watched "The Football Factory" on Netflix last night - good movie with a graphic and realistic portrayal of football hooligans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,044 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    Knock at the Cabin

    What a pointless film. Nothing to it at all. No storyline. Considering the Director involved, I was expecting some a bit entertaining, something clever after sitting through 100 mins of nothing happening. But alas no. Closing credits rolled and I was left thinking - what the hell was the point of that.

    I am normally generous in my movie ratings, but I'd give this 2 out of 10.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,965 ✭✭✭buried


    Sisu (2022)

    Highly entertaining, nothing you haven't seen before really with this sort of thing but its crafted very well. Almost comic book like delivery of the narrative and the sequential editing, so like ninthlife said, you have to suspend the disbelief a fair bit. But its very well paced and the characters are also very well crafted even though there is a limited amount of dialogue. Good auld noise action fun. 7/10

    Renfield (2023)

    This was going along really nicely until that cop character showed up after 10 minutes and the creators somehow decided this wan was going to be the main feature for the rest of the film. Awful character, awful acting, totally ruined the experience because Hoult and Cage are really brilliant and the action scenes are off the wall hilarious. But the cop character totally ruined the entire thing. Whoever was in charge of this really destroyed the dinner. 4/10

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The Hidden Fortress (1958)

    A bit of an odd duck this: insofar as being a film made by a Master of Cinema that has been broadly unheralded stacked up against the rest of his CV - except for the caveat of its legacy arguably amounting to how it influenced George Lucas to fashion the bickering married-couple energy of R2D2 and C3P0. And even that genetic link required a little conscious acknowledgement as I watched Hidden Fortress - it wasn't quite as obvious as I was expecting? Maybe that's on me, bringing an incorrect estimation to the viewing. And overall, I can sort of appreciate why this has disappeared into the ether: while undoubtedly handsome with occasional flashes of genuinely arresting action, it had a knockabout and borderline frivolous vitality; some little interstitial or hangout, rather than a narrative that grabbed the viewer by the scruff of the neck.

    And part of that sense of being "between" something larger and more interesting was precisely because of that progenitor duo of characters. Matashichi and Tahei lacked any agency or the kin of comedic insertion the Star Wars droids possessed, these ostensible main characters here were instead some of the dimmest bulbs and most grasping myopic idiots I've watched in many years. At least R2-D2 sometimes saved the day. I'd be lying if I said I didn't grow a little weary of the two peasants' unbending lack of nous or self-awareness. Compounded by the frustration that a demonstrably more interesting and engaging story kept happening outside their orbit or ability to comprehend. Structurally maybe that was the point, and we still spent time with Toshirō Mifune's general and his point of view, but more often than not the two peasants inserted their "will" into events to the story's detriment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Still : A Michael J Fox Movie

    Documentary / biography of MJF tracing his life from childhood to his big break in Family Ties to his Parkinsons diagnosis, this is a beautiful, heartbreaking but ultimately uplifting story. Not once does it play the sympathy card, he is the antithesis of it. Its as painfully honest as any documentary I've ever seen, it doesn't shy away from showing him at his most vulnerable but it also shows that he is an absolute fighter that has raised billions for research into this awful affliction. Brilliant, inspiring stuff.

    10/10



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭Decuc500


    House of Gucci

    Probably the least 'Ridley Scott' film Ridley Scott has made. It looks like a passion project for somebody else that was brought to him and his heart wasn't in it. The storyline just wasn't that interesting. The performances were mainly poor. Lady Gaga was predictably dreadful. Utterly charisma free. If I never see her act again I'll be happy.

    There were some good things. Scott of course can't make a bad looking film. Al Pacino and Jeremy Irons brought a bit of class. The music cues were pretty great.

    But I'm looking forward to seeing Scott go back to familiar ground with his Napoleon movie.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,996 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    The Mummy (1999)

    Watched this last night just out of interest as it had a lot of chat around it earlier this year when Fraiser was doing the awards circuit. A lot of people claiming it was done dirty on its release and was a far better film than the audiences of 1999 would lead you to believe.

    There's loads of questionable white people behaviour, and there's only one female character after the intro, but I can generally overlook that in a film from the past if its at least entertaining. This however I just found very boring, and long, and kind of repetitive. I was also expecting some great steamy romance (based on what people have said) but Fraiser and Weisz had very little chemistry, and both characters were paper thin.

    I know it's just a 90s popcorn blockbuster, and for many people it holds a nostalgic place in their hearts, but it did nothing for me.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I think it's just that given the state of blockbusters these days, anything remotely competent from the last Ideas Driven era - the 1990s - suddenly seems retroactively amazing. I wouldn't call that 1999 film boring as such myself but definitely a smidge overrated, being a simple Indiana Jones knock off from noted Nostalgist Stephen Sommers. But again, compared with what studios churn out now it positively ranks alongside Spielberg's films in comparison.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75 ✭✭Elenor6


    Doctor Strange



Advertisement