Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Madeleine McCann

1149150152154155171

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,268 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Yes large green wheelie bins were in use that year .,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭reclose


    Same question to you.

    Would you leave two 2 year olds and an almost 4 year old alone in an unlocked apartment while on holidays so you could go to a restaurant with your friends?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭tibruit


    Well I wouldn`t be ruling them out, that`s for sure. Have you read the statement of Katherine Gaspar for example? It`s in the public domain and you will probably find it with a Google search. Are you aware that the menfolk of the Tapas 7 liked to bath each others kids? David Payne turned up late for dinner that night. When Gerry made his check on Madeleine it was remarked upon by the diners that he was gone for longer than he should have been. The bins were not properly searched and were allowed to be emptied and removed to landfill in the early hours of the following morning. Is it not all very convenient and imo very weird that the doors were not locked?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,062 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    They obviously wouldn't.

    As people have remarked before, you wouldn't leave valuables like jewellery out in a holiday apartment, even it was locked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭LunaLoo


    I wouldnt no. I wouldn't even leave them in the car outside my frony door if i had to run back in.

    But obviously other people did seeing as there is an actual service provided by many hotels that facilities what the mcCanns and their friends done



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,062 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I think the fact it was a ground floor flat on the corner overlooking the street heightens the risk.

    They would've gotten away with it if the flat had been on an upper level or even just further inside the resort.

    The McCanns were desperately unlucky but that doesn't resolve them of responsibility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,204 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Was it ever investigated how much alcohol was involved that night, with the Tapas 7? British tourists do remarkable things when alcohol is involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,147 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    The shame thing and the conspiracy theories are just victim blaming and helping no one.

    Her name is Madeline.

    Maddie was makey up by the tabloids. Cutie child name and Madeline would not fit in the headlines.

    And yes, it does matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    That's always been a persistently annoying aspect of the case where it's like the tabloids take ownership of the story by giving the child a little nickname that the parents didn't use. Same thing happened with James Bulger. It was not a nickname the parents appreciated.

    Regarding the blaming of the parents, people have been making the same points on this for the last 16 years as if this is a novel opinion. And the interesting thing is that if you let these people talk in this way, it too often eventually gives way to opinions like above which is not just that the parents played a role by leaving the apartment door unlocked and so on but that they may have been actively involved. That's what seems to be sitting below the surface of a lot of this. However, like many a conspiracy theory, those promoting it never let an inconvenient thing like a complete lack of credible evidence get in the way of their scurrilous accusations, do they?

    An accusation like that, if it cannot be proven, should be backed down from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    At least spell her name correctly if you are chastising others for using the wrong name.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,268 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    How is it victim blaming? Madeline is the victim.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    But sure no outcome has been proven? Are people only allowed speculate on what we you think happened or?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The classy thing to do would be to refrain from that kind of sensationalist speculation without some kind of hard evidence. At least if a person is going to pontificate about the ills of having dinner across the pool from your unlocked apartment, I hope they won't be the same kind idly spouting a conspiracy theory which the News of the World wouldn't touch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    Well I haven't spouted any conspiracy theories. We simply don't know. So calling theories you don't see as possible as conspiracy theories isn't exactly accurate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    'Conspiracy theory' may be the wrong term, in fairness. 'Tawdry speculation which would get a newspaper sued for libel, if they printed it." probably more fitting, though wordier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭Deusexmachina


    Even if you are right, what’s the point? What do you suggest? Imprison them? Not suffered enough for your liking?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭reclose


    I don’t think anyone is suggesting that.

    You can acknowledge what they did was wrong without wanting them prosecuted.

    They’ve paid the ultimate price and their daughter is dead because of their selfishness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Their daughter is gone and presumed dead because someone came and took her.

    If their daughter is dead because of their selfishness, then that's wording which implies they're directly responsible. However, there is a much larger factor at play, i.e. the abductor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,204 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Why is that conversation always started again and again, that the suffering or grieving of the McCanns would be in leu of the crime of neglect, abandonment and failure to protect?

    With this attitude you're going in circles.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 24,207 ✭✭✭✭ Harmoni Faint Skirmish


    I wish this thread would get a little back on track. Definitely the McCanns & friends made consistently bad choices in looking after their kids and I can only imagine their children in future will express criticism at how they came to lose a sibling, the way offspring can & do get annoyed with parents. However I think we’ve got the hang of this: a somewhat majority agree on this, a somewhat minority disagree, not that anyone here would wish to have happened what did happen.

    The practicalities of how the perpetrator went about his crime, the opportunities he may have had for one reason or another, is really what remains at investigation now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭reclose


    Yes the person who took her is obviously the main reason. I doubt anyone disputes that.

    However, the parents gifted the opportunity by leaving her unattended in an unlocked apartment while they went out.

    She doesn’t get abducted if they are at home with her. She might not get abducted if the apartment is locked.

    Are you saying the parents are without any responsibility in how things turned out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    No, but the parents hold a much smaller proportion of the blame than the presumed abductor does, yet they get all the focus because this person remains at large and the tabloids needed page space to fill, and that is wrong. There's only one party in the story who intended to get Madeleine stolen away and it wasn't Kate & Gerry McCann.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,630 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    It's that simple? Only one victim.

    Her parents are victims. I can guarantee you they have suffered, they lost a child.

    Her siblings are victims.

    Her grandparents are victims

    Her uncles and aunts are victims

    Her creche buddies are victims. But your misguided posts concentrate on the parents who's negligence is criminally minuscule in comparison to the perverted murderer. Your blasé posts are classic virtuous, keyboard warrior & lazy victim blaming similar to that of the Portuguese police that shifted the blame from the actual criminal to protect their skin in the holiday game.

    I'm in the "the murderer is to blame" camp.

    It's not enjoyable, it's awful, I've kids the same age as Madeleine McCann when she was murdered, I've kids that are nearly the same age as she would be now if she had lived.

    You're in the bizarre internet "the parents are to blame" camp and that's your prerogative. Not much point in arguing with you, I predict you're going to dig your heels in now and ignore the fact that someone took that girl and murdered her.

    I've remonstrated with your thank-garnering smug insensitive posts. Not you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    If that's talking in circles, then so is talking about leaving the patio door unlocked etc. as if that's not well established. But if everyone wants to drop the discussion of all that and just concentrate on developments from here on out...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭reclose


    I’m glad you don’t think they are without any responsibility for how things turned out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I'm in the "the murderer is to blame" camp.

    Murderers are usually to blame for murders, yes. You'd almost think that was a controversial thing to say.

    If a woman gets raped during a night out, you do get the odd person who says something like, "What was she doing walking down that dark alley? Wearing that dress? Why didn't she call a taxi? Shouldn't have had so much to drink..." but those people are usually called gits or worse. Most people aren't talking about the role she played in the rape. They're talking about the person who carried out that heinous crime. Rightfully so. And so it should be in any crime against a person, including that against the McCanns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,114 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    The 2020 comments by the German public prosecutor Wolters….When asked whether there was any material evidence that Madeleine , is dead, Wolters replied: “Yes.”

    not… “ it’s our belief she is dead “ not “ the likelihood from our investigation is that she is probably dead “

    Not only that, there is “ material evidence “ Madeleine is dead… I wonder were there photos that showed that…?

    the article says that Wolters refuses to elaborate…. I wonder why ? If they did find photos of her dead body… is the responsible thing not to make the family aware… if the family are aware ?

    why is the ‘ find Madeleine’ charity and website still operating, still requesting donations, still with the following explicit goals…from said site… http://www.findmadeleine.com/support/index.html

    • To secure the safe return to her family of Madeleine McCann who was abducted in Praia da Luz, Portugal on Thursday 3rd May 2007;
    • To procure that Madeleine's abduction is thoroughly investigated and that her abductors, as well as those who played or play any part in assisting them, are identified and brought to justice; and
    • To provide support, including financial assistance, to Madeleine's family.
    • If the above objects are fulfilled then the objects of the Foundation shall be to pursue such purposes in similar cases arising in the United Kingdom, Portugal or elsewhere.

    Donations can be made to the fund through the following channel…

    It’s beyond tragic, it’s beyond very very strange also… McCanns seeking £££££££ help…. Prosecutor “ material evidence she’s dead “… but we won’t tell you what evidence…. Wolters is a guy, late 40’s to early 50’s….

    whole case is as bizarre as it is tragic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭reclose


    You can’t compare that at all it’s a totally different scenario.

    The rape scenario would only work if someone else was supposed to be looking after the girl walking home but chose not to that night.



Advertisement