Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Madeleine McCann

1147148150152153171

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    First of all how the McCanns could ever have thought that leaving three children under four on their own in an unlocked hotel room in a foreign country was safe is unbelievable. The second thing is there’s no way what happened to Madeleine can be compared to an accidental drowning of a child. Madeleine’s parents didn’t lose sight of their daughter for one minute or even two. They willingly put their three children in great danger every night when they went out and left them alone. They did this over and over again on numerous nights even though they knew Madeleine had been crying looking for them on at least one of those nights. That to me is unbelievable and unforgivable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,204 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    The thing is with predictability in this case is that there were reports of strange characters loitering the property before the disappearance of Madeline McCann.

    Possibly it was Brueckner being in contact with one or two of these characters or it was Brueckner himself? Not impossible to think of. Brueckner must have been crazy in his mind and he knew that.

    He knew it was wrong and in conflict with the law, so I suppose that if Brueckner or somebody like Brueckner did it he must have observed and staked out the place and planned it. He probably knew the behaviour of British tourists, being out, drinking habits, lose behaviour here and there.

    They were easy prey for somebody like Brueckner and when he felt secure enough, he made his move. I am not saying that all Brits in tourist resorts behave a certain way, but somebody like Brueckner most likely figured his chance of succeeding would be far better with Brits than with fellow Germans or Austrians or Swiss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Not whataboutery to point out that parenting was looser in the 80s, with relevant examples, and conclude that, no, it very likely wouldn't have been considered socially unacceptable to have dinner across the pool from a holiday apartment where your kids where and perform regular checks on them.

    But hey, attitudes change. Who knew?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,114 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Either way…

    no body or remains found…you can be certain the ‘material collected’ that is going for analysis is just a piece of theatre on behalf of the police of giving serious attention to the smallest possible details… German prosecutor Christian Wolters said : "Of course there is a certain expectation, but it is not high. it’s important to show that the authorities are investigating the case “

    those comments are very enlightening and interesting…. The Wolters guy admitting it is for show, a token effort rather then any conclusive attempt to act on anything be it new evidence , hear say or a tip off to find the body….

    in 7 more years, what ? have a look at google maps, pick a forest, go digging….200,000 euros on plant, police overtime and logistics…..

    keeps the family pacified ? But “ it’s important to show the authorities are investigating the case ? “ looks like a German / Portuguese international pacification mission…

    Wonder if the McCanns and or local politicians in the UK were kicking up….? Firing a few shots to get things moving…. A diplomatic dig… seems like it…the McCanns certainly have the press wrapped around their fingers….

    cops can say now “we dug we didn’t find”…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,204 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    The problem is that there is no murder charge without a body. To date they have no body and I am sure the police searched long and hard. Suppose Brueckner kept pictures from Madeleine somewhere on a USB stick? Some evasive answer of having gotten them from some shady long dead character, no way to prove otherwise....

    Police need to either tie something of Madeleine's ( such as a piece of clothing ) to Brueckner to either convict him of something like abduction, or find a body to prove murder and connect the body of Madeleine to Brueckner.

    So far nothing like this has happened.

    And then, suppose they find a piece of Madeleine's clothing with Brueckner's DNA on it, and Brueckner argues in a court in his defense, yes, I've met Madeleine, - the McCanns will most likely contradict, one word against the other, 16 years ago, hard to prove what was said and done back then..

    It'll be interesting if the police ever come up with something which is strong enough to convict beyond reasonable doubt whomever did this in a court of law.

    To date Brueckner is just a suspect, but as far as we know Madeleine could have been abducted by probably anybody in the area.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,114 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Even if they find clothes I am guessing any forensic value is nil having been under water any blood, hair or indeed any DNA would be long departed with those garments having been underwater 16 years plus…in a couple of years all clothing would likely have disintegrated. 16 years, just a skeleton left…

    no body im thinking also skeletal remains so very hard to even determine a cause of death let alone who did it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,204 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Don't know. Apparently DNA can last 30 or 40 years outside. However I am no expert. Even after 16 years they should be able to identify Madeleine based on DNA, if they find a skeleton, so there would be at least certainty that it was murder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,448 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    I don't agree with what they did personally . It wasn't right . They made a choice which they are paying for forever

    But saying that all of the accidental deaths and drownings of children are parents who 'only take their eyes off them for a minute " is not true .

    Some, yes , and children get lost with sea fog with frantic parents searching. Or a toddler walks straight into a pool while parents are momentarily distracted .

    But there are also parents getting well pvssed on holiday day after day and never put sun lotion on their kids or don't even know that their kids have left the building either .

    These are all treated as tragic losses which they undoubtedly are . Little is said in tabloids whatever about privately about the parental negligence .

    But for some the fact that these were well heeled people and doctors to boot , is the main reason they are still being pilloried for this . Everywhere.

    I think most of us can agree that what they did was negligent , but the tragedy should in my view stir some compassion for these parents , just as people do express compassion for other parents who lose children tragically , regardless if the circumstances .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    The fact they were doctors means nothing to me. So what if they were doctors. Anyone absolutely anyone who did what they did night after night are 100% wrong. When you have children their welfare should come before everyone and everything else. In this case that bit of common sense was absent. I don’t feel sorry for the McCanns I feel sorry for their little daughter who they so very badly let down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭Deusexmachina


    Here we go again. This case is absolutely horrific.The McCanns have had to suffer the unbearable torture of not knowing what happened to their little girl.

    And yet, the morally superior decide the Mc Cann's deserve their plight. It sickens me.

    This has added to their suffering for many years now. It's so cruel.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,062 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Maybe it was a form of groupthink, since the other couples had the same system.

    If the McCann's were on their own, maybe they wouldn't have done it.

    It's difficult to understand their behaviour.

    Although to be fair my mother would often leave me on my own when I was of a similar age. But I bet everyone who was a kid in the 80s has similar stories.

    My fear when minding kids isn't that they'll be abducted but that they'll hurt themselves like choking on something or strangle themselves on a cord from a blind.

    If I was babysitting someone's kids, there's not a hope I'd pop out to pub or restaurant 50m away and leave them alone. I'd commit to the responsibility.

    I don't think Christian Bruckner was stalking them and waiting for his opportunity.

    I think it was a burglar who just happened to be a child abductor/paedophile.

    Ground floor flats are often broken in to.

    I've noticed people are often more complacent with their own kids that they would be with others.

    The McCanns have paid the ultimate price for complacency, which is punishment enough I feel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,048 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    It's impossible to explain to emotive people what is dangerous and what isn't. If you have children, and put them in your car to take them somewhere, the statistical danger of them dying in an RTA is likely far higher than the very small risk the McCann's took.

    There are roughly 500 million people in Europe/Uk and there's only been one single MM type incident in several decades, maybe half a century. The risk was infintesimally small. MM disappeared in 2007. In 2008, 392 children died as passengers in RTAs in Europe.

    I used to let my daughter climb a tree next to the road. This was probably several orders of magnitutde more dangerous than the McCanns actions. She could have easily fallen out of the tree and died. What's more, I used to leave her to it as she used to like spending some time up there and I had things that needed doing. She could have climbed down the tree, a van could have pulled up and someone could have got out, grabbed her and driven off, but I felt the risk was small.

    Was it Ok for me to take these risks? Absolutely. Was the risk greater than the one the Mc Canns took? Absolutely.

    Everyone thinks the McCanns took a huge risk, with the blinding benefit of hindsight and several tonnes of emotive superiority. There are many drownings of toddlers in europe every single year. So many that parents should be infinitely more worried about children and water than stranger danger situations, but it's the latter people most obsess about.

    German lifeguards have issued a warning that a growing number of child drownings this summer are linked to their parents’ obsession with mobile phones.

    More than 300 people have drowned in Germany this year, with hardly a day passing during the current heatwave when a swimmer has not died.

    ...

    “Too few parents and grandparents are heeding the advice: when your children and grandchildren are in the water, put your smartphone away,” Achim Wiese, the DLRG’s spokesman, said.

    The McCanns have been on the receiving end of probably the worst witch hunt since lindy Chamberlain was prosecuted for the murder of Azaria. At the time, i never thought she did it, but the vast majority did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    If a child dies in a road traffic accident it’s because there’s been an accident. Madeleine did not die or vanish because of an accident. She is dead or has vanished because her parents left her alone in an unlocked hotel room in a foreign country. They did this on numerous nights even when they knew Madeleine had been upset and crying on one particular night. I don’t think it was a small risk to take to do this. There’s no way those three children should have been exposed to what happened to Madeleine and we would not be having this conversation if the children had been properly looked after. Why would they ever have thought it was ok to do it in the first place is a mystery.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    @cnocbui has posed some statistics to show how small the risk actually was. You've just come back with some feelings. I think this is what the poster means when saying it's impossible to explain comparative danger to emotive people. They'll just play the 'speaking as a parent...' card, or whatever, as if that trumps everything else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    I have never said “speaking as a parent” what I have said is if the children had been looked after properly Madeleine would not be missing today. If the risk was so small Madeleine would be at home today but unfortunately she is not. When a person has children it should be their priority to protect them. This wasn’t done and we all know the result.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,656 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    Jesus could you not go and set up another thread which you can dedicate solely to deriding the McCanns as often as you wish!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    If you are addressing me I’m just answering posts addressing me. I’m as entitled to my opinion as anyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,132 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Well whoever took her from her bed must have used chloroform or some other substance or gag to stop her screaming at a stranger. The other two kids in the same room never woke up either, that has always puzzled me. And why MMcC? There were other kids in other unlocked rooms also, and her siblings. So bizarre.

    Anyway the Mcs lost their civil action against Goncalo Amaral of the Portuguese police. They said (I think) that he slandered them by saying they played a role in the child's disappearance, the courts did not agree. But that's them mad clumsy Inspector Clouseaus in Portugal right? The racism jumping out of UK media reports at the time was unreal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,268 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    It was definitely the easiest apartment to access . It had direct access from the road , straight in from the path and up a few steps and through the unlocked patio doors. It could be done in seconds .The bins were out that night so anyone could have stood behind one watching the pattern of checking . They would see a gap of 30 minutes and be in and out of that apartment in 5 minutes . Straight into a parked van turn left and within minutes out of the village and into the countryside



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,114 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Any child, being woken up to find a stranger(s) in their room in those circumstances would go batshît crazy…….

    unless …

    A… they were taken care of by violence or a substance administered rendering them sedated or unconscious or dead before they could react.

    or

    B… they encountered a person known to them, a friendly face.

    chloroform is a possibility and not so hard to acquire…it’s used in multiple industries worldwide…

    3 small children unlocked in a ground floor apartment is oddsville… it goes against each and all common sense parenting manuals…

    • strange town
    • ground floor apartment
    • quite accessible

    7 friends with them at dinner… I find it odd that one every night wouldn’t have said… hey, I’ll watch the kids…. I’ll get a take away meal, play games, put them to bed, watch tv, everyone sacrifices about 3 hours of the week….

    no forensic information alluded to a struggle, no blood. No witnesses heard screaming, thuds… or anything unusual…

    the very fact that it’s ground floor and so accessible…. Don’t get the McCanns decision, it makes zero sense for two so called educated and intelligent people…

    The focus of course is on Madeleine but to also leave two two year olds and one three year old alone…wow.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Any conclusions you want to make other than finding certain facts unusual?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,448 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    We are all different

    Different formative years families snd experiences. My parents were good but they wrren't perfect and I grew up in a more relaxed environment than even my own children.

    I have through my work seen every acvident that can befall a child almost and accidents and bad things don't just happen to bad parents or people


    As I have said before, would I have done what they did? No probably not. We brought our kids out with us or didn't go out drinking really.

    But I think the group were an influence on each other.' This is what we do '

    I don't think I am perfect but know I am a good mother. But nevertheless I have taken the odd risk now and again but have been lucky.

    Why was Madeleine taken.? .. I think because not only did her parents take a risk with an unlocked door they were also very very unlucky.

    Do I feel compassion for them? Yes, its a tragic loss and just as I feel compassion for the mother or father that loses a child to drowning or any other preventable accident, I feel for them.

    I think the blame is something they will never get away from themselves for the rest of their lives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,204 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Would a child the age of Madeleine have remembered and recognized all the friends of the McCanns? Probably not? To Madeleine this would have been just another smiling and nice talking adult, like all the visits and check ups before.

    Since there was no forensic evidence, no DNA in the room, it must have been a smooth abduction. Brueckner ( if it was him) maybe wearing gloves, maybe he chloroformed her while she was already sleeping and carried her out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭Shank Williams


    Christ, tell me you don’t understand probability and basic maths without telling me you don’t understand probability and basic maths



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭hamburgham


    There was an article in the Daily Telegraph today about it and the comments were absolutely merciless to the McCanns. Not only blaming them for leaving the kids but many suggesting there was no abduction and that the McCanns have been economical with the truth to put it mildly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,204 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Well, it was child abandonment, neglect and failure to protect their children. That's a crime under UK law. Nothing positive to say about the parenting of the McCanns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,630 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Ah hear.. less of the virtue singling "I'm a spotless parent" finger pointing stuff. My kids surf offshore, we travel around Europe in a camper, sometimes they're left alone, the older ones take part in extreme sports and we ski in the winter. We've had broken bones, sprains and strains.

    The blame stops at the pervert, the murderer, the pedophile. Don't try & confuse the situation, don't blame rape on a short skirt, don't blame the chancer perv on the drunk boy or girl, don't finger point the careless teenager on being drunk... There's good people and there's bad people, don't try and take the blame off the bad people only to accuse the parents that suffer the loss & stop trying to normalise child abduction & predation like it's to be expected if kids aren't watched 24/7.

    You need to recalibrate your posting style, adjust your moral compass and concentrate on the perpetrators. Not the victims.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,448 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Well thats it then.. case closed.

    If the Telegraph readers have them pegged it must be so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭hamburgham


    “Telegraph readers”. Lazy cliche. It’s a brilliant newspaper and not that it’s relevant, but I also read the Guardian. I find “Guardian readers” just as boring a cliche but funnily enough it’s usually smug “Guardian readers” who like to describe themselves as such.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,448 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Don't much read either or care tbh.

    English newspapers and their readers McCann bashing... Yawn



Advertisement